 |
| 30. |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Aug 1, 2011, 05:08 |
zincthallinide |
|
|
After having Win7 installed for a few months with a decent amount of apps my base Windows folder gets up to 30 gigs total, a large portion of it being WinSxS. I've gone back to having XP installed on my 60 gig SSD just to have an OS that only(!) takes up 5 gigs or so. I will have Win7 on another non-SSD drive shortly for the DX10+ support..
Windows 7 has more eye candy compared to XP and a few nice UI enhancements (that I'm amazed MS overlooked even going back to 95..) but it really is an amazingly bloated OS. And somehow, XP works at least as well as 7 as far as app compatibility, and it doesn't have an SxS folder.
I've recently switched primarily to Macintosh because it's just implemented so much better overall than Windows. There's no bizarre keyboard lag like there is in 7 (although this doesn't exist in XP). Things tend to 'just work' rather than mysteriously starting to blue screen/crash after I install a particular program or driver or plug things in in a way that some hardware doesn't quite like somehow. The UI is generally better than 7 or XP's. The OS actually has more features than 7 while generally making them easy to understand and use regardless. Apps can easily go completely full screen, eliminating all the taskbar-type OS UI (without DirectX-type switching). OS X is based on Unix, which I've always preferred, but Ubuntu just doesn't do it for me.
I'm keeping my Windows box for now because it has better GPUs and a quad core and more games, but as far as general use Windows is dead for me.. putting Boot Camp on a Mac just seems wrong.. oh and at this point I've accepted that MS software will simply always have 'remote code vulnerabilities' forever and ever and ever and ever.
Windows has only ever really been targeted at businesses, and the types of businesses that don't want their employees 'distracted' by things like actual colors and fun UIs and terminal windows. The Mac OSs before OS X were technically inferior to Windows for a few years, but not anymore, and now that Apple is using Intel CPUs, they're capable of being just as fast (and expandable) as the fastest IBM compatible. Macintoshes are generally more expensive than IBM compatibles but try one out and see if you don't think there's a good reason..
Really, Windows 7 is what made me switch.. I ran XP for years, but the Win7 UI does have some nice elements, which I realize now they largely lifted from Apple. At the same time, 7 is obviously more bloated than XP, being both slower and taking more RAM/HDD, and yet I have to run 7 if I want the latest DirectX effects under Windows. If I had been able to stay on XP, I probably wouldn't have thought a more visually appealing UI was meaningful, and I'd still have the quickness of XP. I don't know if Microsoft added more DRM or what to 7, but it is definitely simply a slower OS than XP, even when doing the most basic of tasks (like entering text). |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Jul 31, 12:50 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
nin |
| |
3. |
Jul 31, 13:07 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Rockn-Roll |
| |
38. |
Aug 1, 14:14 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Creston |
| |
40. |
Aug 1, 16:10 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
nin |
| |
41. |
Aug 1, 16:14 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
zincthallinide |
| |
42. |
Aug 1, 16:18 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
nin |
| |
43. |
Aug 1, 17:13 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
^Drag0n^ |
| |
44. |
Aug 1, 18:22 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Sepharo |
| |
46. |
Aug 1, 22:46 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Beamer |
| |
47. |
Aug 1, 23:07 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Sepharo |
| |
48. |
Aug 3, 17:24 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Overon |
| |
12. |
Jul 31, 16:02 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Byte |
| |
2. |
Jul 31, 12:54 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Rockn-Roll |
| |
4. |
Jul 31, 13:11 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
bhcompy |
| |
6. |
Jul 31, 13:35 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Dirwulf |
| |
17. |
Jul 31, 17:24 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Krovven |
| |
19. |
Jul 31, 18:43 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Cutter |
| |
5. |
Jul 31, 13:20 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
jimnms |
| |
7. |
Jul 31, 14:07 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Bludd |
| |
10. |
Jul 31, 15:52 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Paketep |
| |
13. |
Jul 31, 16:27 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Rockn-Roll |
| |
16. |
Jul 31, 17:23 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Sepharo |
| |
18. |
Jul 31, 18:37 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
eRe4s3r |
| |
8. |
Jul 31, 15:27 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Acleacius |
| |
9. |
Jul 31, 15:51 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
killer_roach |
| |
11. |
Jul 31, 15:55 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
ViRGE |
| |
31. |
Aug 1, 07:14 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Zanthar |
| |
14. |
Jul 31, 16:43 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Hyatus |
| |
15. |
Jul 31, 16:49 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
jacobvandy |
| |
20. |
Jul 31, 18:55 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
21. |
Jul 31, 18:58 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Dev |
| |
22. |
Jul 31, 19:05 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Sepharo |
| |
23. |
Jul 31, 19:19 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Dev |
| |
24. |
Jul 31, 19:29 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Mashiki Amiketo |
| |
25. |
Jul 31, 19:47 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Dev |
| |
45. |
Aug 1, 22:01 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
eRe4s3r |
| |
27. |
Jul 31, 22:26 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
elefunk |
| |
28. |
Jul 31, 22:32 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
elefunk |
| |
29. |
Aug 1, 00:36 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Dev |
| >> |
30. |
Aug 1, 05:08 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
zincthallinide |
| |
32. |
Aug 1, 08:07 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Beamer |
| |
33. |
Aug 1, 08:59 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Dev |
| |
34. |
Aug 1, 09:25 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Beamer |
| |
35. |
Aug 1, 10:06 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
kanniballl |
| |
36. |
Aug 1, 13:36 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
zincthallinide |
| |
26. |
Jul 31, 21:10 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
headkase |
| |
37. |
Aug 1, 14:10 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Creston |
| |
39. |
Aug 1, 16:06 |
Re: On Steam and Direct3D |
Dev |
|
|