41 Replies. 3 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 ] Older >
 |
| 41. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 5, 2011, 01:19 |
Dev |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Jul 5, 2011, 00:05:
ViRGE wrote on Jul 3, 2011, 13:43:
AnointedSword wrote on Jul 3, 2011, 13:38: Read the law closely and let your brains catch up. Your video games will be safe. Exactly. Every time I see this bill mentioned followed by unfounded panicking, my head implodes just a bit.
It's not about going after people streaming games, it's about people streaming TV shows and movies (note the sponsors). The courts often do not recognize streaming as being downloading, so traditional laws against the downloading of copyrighted material have not been applicable to streaming. This closes that loophole.
The idea that it's going to be applied to game streaming is ridiculous. If there was a problem, companies would already be issuing DMCA takedowns against such videos on YouTube, which they aren't. That said, adding a clause to the ToS does help to resolve any ambiguity. Like many things however it's not the specific intent of the bill which is scary, but the wider ramifications that could result. Yeah. No one would have predicted that DMCA applied to printer cartridges, or apply to tape backup machines, or some of the other weird things its been stretched to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 40. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 5, 2011, 00:05 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
ViRGE wrote on Jul 3, 2011, 13:43:
AnointedSword wrote on Jul 3, 2011, 13:38: Read the law closely and let your brains catch up. Your video games will be safe. Exactly. Every time I see this bill mentioned followed by unfounded panicking, my head implodes just a bit.
It's not about going after people streaming games, it's about people streaming TV shows and movies (note the sponsors). The courts often do not recognize streaming as being downloading, so traditional laws against the downloading of copyrighted material have not been applicable to streaming. This closes that loophole.
The idea that it's going to be applied to game streaming is ridiculous. If there was a problem, companies would already be issuing DMCA takedowns against such videos on YouTube, which they aren't. That said, adding a clause to the ToS does help to resolve any ambiguity. Like many things however it's not the specific intent of the bill which is scary, but the wider ramifications that could result. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 39. |
Re: we must repeat |
Jul 4, 2011, 15:04 |
sorted |
|
|
space captain wrote on Jul 4, 2011, 11:53: the travel which has built my career has been necessarily multi-dimensional, hyper-dimensional, meta-temporal, so forth and so on
if your mind is not open and elastic, it will snap like a twig under such duress
espionage requires disguise, and hiding in plain sight is indeed the ultimate mask... a requisite to ensure the survival of life in the face of its ignorant spite for itself
once you can see suicide and genocide on the same coin, then we can talk about subspace signals... oh my captain, oh my SPACE! captain! |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| "You've heard about the pyramids? This is like the pyramids times ten." |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 38. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 4, 2011, 12:29 |
Hump |
|
|
| This will change no one's behavior. It will simply give the MPAA/RIAA another questionable revenue stream that uses courts as their collectors and rewards them for not changing their business models to come in line with the rest of the 21st century. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Both the “left” and the “right” pretend they have the answer, but they are mere flippers on the same thalidomide baby, and the truth is that neither side has a clue."
- Jim Goad |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 37. |
we must repeat |
Jul 4, 2011, 11:53 |
space captain |
|
|
the travel which has built my career has been necessarily multi-dimensional, hyper-dimensional, meta-temporal, so forth and so on
if your mind is not open and elastic, it will snap like a twig under such duress
espionage requires disguise, and hiding in plain sight is indeed the ultimate mask... a requisite to ensure the survival of life in the face of its ignorant spite for itself
once you can see suicide and genocide on the same coin, then we can talk about subspace signals... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 36. |
Re: are we not men? |
Jul 4, 2011, 10:48 |
Wolfen |
|
|
InBlack wrote on Jul 4, 2011, 10:37: I can never quite work out if Space Captain is being sarcastic or deadly serious. Or just high on LSD.
Communism cant be as bad as what we have now, can it? Actually, I think what he is implying this time is "Ignorance is bliss". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 35. |
Re: are we not men? |
Jul 4, 2011, 10:37 |
InBlack |
|
|
I can never quite work out if Space Captain is being sarcastic or deadly serious. Or just high on LSD.
Communism cant be as bad as what we have now, can it? |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| I have a nifty blue line! |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 34. |
are we not men? |
Jul 4, 2011, 10:04 |
space captain |
|
|
| you know that nobody knows anything, right? they let the govt rule their minds, and they let their minds rule their potential... shit, they get off on it! their abdication of any responsibility for their own life is like an orgasmic hypnosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 33. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 4, 2011, 09:45 |
Dev |
|
|
kookaveetsa wrote on Jul 3, 2011, 21:48: There's too many inconsistencies in this so called considered bill, it'll never pass. You know they pass these things without ever reading them, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 32. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 4, 2011, 05:11 |
InBlack |
|
|
I think they should add an ammendment to the bill that states, "for every illegal upload one of the culprit's fingers/digits shal be removed" just to make the law more "american".
This comment was edited on Jul 4, 2011, 08:14. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| I have a nifty blue line! |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 31. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 23:25 |
dubfanatic |
|
|
kookaveetsa wrote on Jul 3, 2011, 21:48: There's too many inconsistencies in this so called considered bill, it'll never pass. It sounds like you are under the impression that the US legislature considers that a priority. This is incorrect. The fact that this corporate-backed bill is getting fast tracked to the Senate floor while bills that could solve real problems languish in committee should show you where their priorities really lie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 30. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 21:48 |
kookaveetsa |
|
|
| There's too many inconsistencies in this so called considered bill, it'll never pass. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 29. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 20:30 |
MisterBenn |
|
|
I wonder whether "unsympathetic" displays of impending games will be allowed to remain on YouTube after this law. Some games get the piss taken out of them mercilessly on YogTrailers for example, I wonder whether things like this could end up being pulled...
http://www.youtube.com/user/yogscast2#p/u/25/MyrlevOwl2Y
With the investment in marketing and the information lockdown that happens before a game's release, I always thought that companies must hate that stuff being out there. Good viewing though! |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Playing: Path of Exile, Trials Gold, DOTP 2013. |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 28. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 20:24 |
space captain |
|
|
cronik wrote on Jul 3, 2011, 19:44: The peasants better get used to the fact they don't have rights, they have owners! as long as the slaves think that they are the owners, it all works out perfectly fine because they just stay snug as a bug in a rug that way |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 27. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 20:08 |
Dev |
|
|
Its not like the senate has anything better to do I guess... such as the budget, or the wars, or anything.
Umbragen wrote on Jul 3, 2011, 19:58: Wait till the turn over enforcement to the (presumed) injured parties, they'll have to invent new words to describe and justify that mess. Just don't doubt that that day is coming. MPAA/RIAA/**AA already does raids, no need to wait. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 26. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 19:58 |
Umbragen |
|
|
| Wait till the turn over enforcement to the (presumed) injured parties, they'll have to invent new words to describe and justify that mess. Just don't doubt that that day is coming. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 25. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 19:44 |
cronik |
|
|
| The peasants better get used to the fact they don't have rights, they have owners! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 24. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 19:37 |
Jackplug |
|
|
This doesn't bother me in the slightest, ok I don't live in the US, but the only thing that does bothers me is what follows this if it passes. What other laws get passed to uphold this one, to make this one stand tall, that is what scares me.
Look at us in the UK, jeez we've got a dandy of a copyright law coming out and that will piss a lot of ppl off and to think these laws is how they will kill off piracy... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 23. |
removed |
Jul 3, 2011, 19:24 |
Marvin T. Martian |
|
|
* REMOVED * This comment was deleted on Jul 4, 2011, 13:46. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 22. |
Re: On The Streaming Infringement Bill |
Jul 3, 2011, 19:23 |
tuddies |
|
|
more GAY legislation by a country too concerned with perpetual war, private profit and the public subsidy of both!
Give these morons a 365 day vacation, for America's sake! For all our sakes! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
41 Replies. 3 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 ] Older >
|
|