15 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 15. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 25, 2011, 21:53 |
venomhed |
|
|
No horse combat, clunky controls, chaotic fighting. Game is average at best.
Play the demo or you will be sorry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 14. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 25, 2011, 20:56 |
eRe4s3r |
|
|
Theres ways to disable that you know.. look for TW2 mods  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 13. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 25, 2011, 10:57 |
Pippiwolf |
|
|
Not a bad RPG but I got motion sick quickly with the totally overdosed blur filters.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 12. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 25, 2011, 09:06 |
xXBatmanXx |
|
|
Yea, which is to bad. Games almost ALWAYS look, feel, and play better on the PC. I never understood giving the same score.
Also, I know TW1 gets lots of bad rap, but it needs to be looked at like an updated Diablo clone. The game is really well done. I am still enjoying it and hope to finish it before TW2 shows up in the mail next week. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. / Few men have virtue enough to withstand the highest bidder.
Playing: RL |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 11. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 25, 2011, 09:06 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
Icewind wrote on Jan 24, 2011, 21:58:
Amazon's site says February 28th, and that's just for the "Regular" PC version.
Every other website says February 8th.
So which date is right?
(EDIT: I mean the PC version, not the consoles)
Who knows, the release date crap has been screwed from the start on this game. Delayed for months literally just to find a better release window, but then delayed again and again for short periods afterward. I think Southpeak is run by monkeys. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 10. |
Re: Not so fast... |
Jan 25, 2011, 09:05 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
xXBatmanXx wrote on Jan 25, 2011, 07:19:
Something tells me they didn't fdully play the game and it is carry over from the first one. Or they played the console version which is really bad again with frame rates and synchronization in videos, etc.
Pretty much every game of this type, made for the PC and shoehorned onto consoles, gets reviewed for the Xbox 360 and blasted for technical issues. They apply that score to the PC version too, and never even mention that stuff might be different.
Risen is a great example... Eurogamer got so much flack for it that they gave in and reviewed it for the PC later, giving it a 7 instead of the 4 the Xbox version got. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 9. |
Re: Not so fast... |
Jan 25, 2011, 07:19 |
xXBatmanXx |
|
|
JohnBirshire wrote on Jan 24, 2011, 23:33:
The first reviews to come out have been horrendous, 1 out of 5 stars, and a 43% were the first two I saw.
Something tells me they didn't fdully play the game and it is carry over from the first one. Or they played the console version which is really bad again with frame rates and synchronization in videos, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. / Few men have virtue enough to withstand the highest bidder.
Playing: RL |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 8. |
Re: Not so fast... |
Jan 25, 2011, 03:44 |
eRe4s3r |
|
|
Well i found the game (in german) hilarious and mind bending awesome. The jokes are ON, perfectly executed, the quests are sometimes absolutely unique
Theres problems of course (balance is way way off in later parts of the game) Mages particularly will have a hard time. Overall i'd give it 80% or something about, i got till chapter 3 so far (its a big game and i do most if not all quests) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
Re: Not so fast... |
Jan 25, 2011, 03:06 |
LightBender |
|
|
JohnBirshire wrote on Jan 24, 2011, 23:33:
The first reviews to come out have been horrendous, 1 out of 5 stars, and a 43% were the first two I saw.
Cite your sources please - tired of people spewing unsubstantiated crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 25, 2011, 02:08 |
Icewind |
|
|
space captain wrote on Jan 24, 2011, 22:00:
Icewind wrote on Jan 24, 2011, 21:58:
Amazon's site says February 28th, and that's just for the "Regular" PC version.
that website is a pimple on the ass of the internet!
Only a devoted Blues news member would be know this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5. |
Not so fast... |
Jan 24, 2011, 23:33 |
JohnBirshire |
|
|
| The first reviews to come out have been horrendous, 1 out of 5 stars, and a 43% were the first two I saw. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 24, 2011, 22:26 |
Paranoid Jack |
|
|
| still a bit crazy on those prices.... but at least it's not as cheesy or as over priced as The Witcher 2 CE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 24, 2011, 22:00 |
space captain |
|
|
Icewind wrote on Jan 24, 2011, 21:58:
Amazon's site says February 28th, and that's just for the "Regular" PC version.
that website is a pimple on the ass of the internet! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 24, 2011, 21:58 |
Icewind |
|
|
Amazon's site says February 28th, and that's just for the "Regular" PC version.
Every other website says February 8th.
So which date is right?
(EDIT: I mean the PC version, not the consoles) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: Two Worlds II Royal Edition |
Jan 24, 2011, 21:52 |
Cutter |
|
|
Carl: No, no no, Homer, you have the Royal, um...Sampler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Are you crazy? Is that your problem?" - Jack Burton |
|
|
|
|
| |
15 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
