Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

On the DNF Revival

Kotaku has some details on how Duke Nukem Forever survived the sacking of its development team to live on as an ongoing project at Gearbox Software. It turns out that in spite of little hope they would be able to release the game due to legal complications, some of the former 3D Realms staff could not let go of the project, and continued development from home: "One of the co-creators of the well-known Duke Nukem character, Allen Blum, was among the 3D Realms developers fired in May of 2009. He was a veteran. 'He couldn't let it go,' Pitchford said. 'I wouldn't either. He decided to keep it going.' So, post 3D Realms, Duke Nukem Forever development continued in the apartments of some of the laid off staff. It became, essentially, a garage game. 'I got wind of it,' Pitchford said. 'I came around and checked things out'." Apparently it was Pitchford's history with Duke, 3D Realms, and Take Two all lead to Gearbox being able to bet on Duke. Pitchford says: "The short story of it is: Because of my history with Duke, because of my relationship with Scott and George, because of the trust and respect that Gearbox and Take Two were able to build through our work together with Borderlands, and through the capabilities that I have built with my team to be able to ship games on these platforms because of all of these things, I was in a spot that, if I took a bet and got in there and put myself in the line of fire in the middle of this thing, I knew that I could bring all these pieces together and that I could save Duke." On a related note, there are some DNF gameplay screenshots on Computer and Video Games.

View
20. Re: On the DNF Revival Sep 5, 2010, 20:38 NKD
 
Dr. D. Schreber wrote on Sep 5, 2010, 20:12:
Dreagon wrote on Sep 5, 2010, 19:42:
I'm willing to forgive and forget for the most part...but I what I read on Shacknews turns out to be true, where you can only carry two weapons at a time, then there is going to be some real hard feelings over Duke dying of consolitus.
Amazing what we're accusing of consolitis these days...

Yeah. Basically any feature that was invented since the invention of consoles is "consolitis." Fucking idiots. If anything, two weapons is more strategic, and requires more thought, whereas holding 30 weapons is the easy mode console bullshit.

That said, in this case, the easymode console bullshit is truer to the Duke Nukem name. He has no need for weapon swapping. He merely holds the weapons in his enormous ballsack.

Dreagon wrote on Sep 5, 2010, 20:37:

Another rousing defense of consolitus.


Broussard is a moron. You can have plenty of weapons in a console game. If he really felt there was no way to intuitively do it on a controller, I can see why this game never came out. Use the copious shoulder or trigger buttons to scroll left or right through weapons. Or any other two buttons. Done.
 
Avatar 43041
 
If you don't like where gaming is heading, stop giving your money to the people who are taking it in that direction.
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Sep 5, 17:06 Re: On the DNF Revival Cutter
  3. Sep 5, 17:09  Re: On the DNF Revival StingingVelvet
  4. Sep 5, 17:42   Re: On the DNF Revival Scud
  5. Sep 5, 17:54    Re: On the DNF Revival Rilcon
  13. Sep 5, 18:54    Re: On the DNF Revival Mr. Tact
  6. Sep 5, 18:02   Re: On the DNF Revival Killswitch
  22. Sep 5, 21:38  Re: On the DNF Revival budtoker
  2. Sep 5, 17:08 Re: On the DNF Revival StingingVelvet
  7. Sep 5, 18:04 Re: On the DNF Revival Creston
  8. Sep 5, 18:12  Re: On the DNF Revival Esoteric
  9. Sep 5, 18:16   Re: On the DNF Revival nin
  11. Sep 5, 18:19   Re: On the DNF Revival Creston
  10. Sep 5, 18:17  Re: On the DNF Revival StingingVelvet
  15. Sep 5, 19:00  Re: On the DNF Revival jayeffaar
  12. Sep 5, 18:30 No subject HellSlayer
  14. Sep 5, 18:58  Re: On the DNF Revival MuzixMon
  17. Sep 5, 19:42   Re: On the DNF Revival Bhruic
  16. Sep 5, 19:42 Re: On the DNF Revival Dreagon
  18. Sep 5, 20:12  Re: On the DNF Revival Dr. D. Schreber
  19. Sep 5, 20:37   Re: On the DNF Revival Dreagon
  24. Sep 5, 22:30    Re: On the DNF Revival StingingVelvet
>> 20. Sep 5, 20:38   Re: On the DNF Revival NKD
  21. Sep 5, 20:54    Re: On the DNF Revival sauron
  23. Sep 5, 22:25    Re: On the DNF Revival Bhruic
  26. Sep 5, 22:41     Re: On the DNF Revival NKD
  28. Sep 5, 23:21      Re: On the DNF Revival Nameless Again
  31. Sep 6, 01:37       Re: On the DNF Revival Ruffiana
  39. Sep 6, 11:53        Re: On the DNF Revival Nameless Again
  40. Sep 7, 11:00         Re: On the DNF Revival Beamer
  41. Sep 7, 17:08          Re: On the DNF Revival Killswitch
  32. Sep 6, 01:53       Re: On the DNF Revival NKD
  25. Sep 5, 22:34 Re: On the DNF Revival Hump
  27. Sep 5, 23:18 Re: On the DNF Revival Acleacius
  29. Sep 6, 00:31 Re: On the DNF Revival [THA] Hamst3r
  30. Sep 6, 00:44 Re: On the DNF Revival StingingVelvet
  33. Sep 6, 03:00 Re: On the DNF Revival Hump
  34. Sep 6, 03:45  Re: On the DNF Revival Jerykk
  35. Sep 6, 05:49 Re: On the DNF Revival Acleacius
  36. Sep 6, 06:00 Re: On the DNF Revival theyarecomingforyou
  37. Sep 6, 08:18  Re: On the DNF Revival Kosumo
  38. Sep 6, 08:52   Re: On the DNF Revival InBlack


footer

Blue's News logo