19 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 19. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 11:46 |
btallas |
|
|
| To each their own. In my opinion, most fun fps released this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 18. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 11:39 |
Razumen |
|
|
| Damn you Raven, stop making generic-ass futuristic/space marines and give us another Heretic or Hexen. Or at least a new IP in the same vein. Jumping on the Me-Too-Bandwagon will only get you so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 17. |
Re: Raven Would "Love" a Singularity Sequel |
Jul 8, 2010, 11:22 |
kimbambaman |
|
|
Been playing this myself and I have to say I am enjoying it. The time based powers are pretty neat and the combat is fun. There is absolutely no question that it borrows MANY elements from other games, most notably Bioshock and Half Life. I don't consider that necessarily a bad thing, however, especially if the game is fun.
On the other hand, I am enjoying Alpha Protocol and most people are shitting all over that too, so maybe its just me. *shrug* |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| "Everybody out of the universe!" - Nibbler, Futurama |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 16. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 11:14 |
nin |
|
|
Did you buy it? I did. I buy all the games I play.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 15. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 10:52 |
tony |
|
|
nin wrote on Jul 8, 2010, 09:56: Wow, I'm fighting a giant pimple monster. SHOOT HIS PIMPLES!!!!!
This game is amazingly bad.
Did you buy it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 14. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 09:56 |
nin |
|
|
Wow, I'm fighting a giant pimple monster. SHOOT HIS PIMPLES!!!!!
This game is amazingly bad.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 13. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 09:15 |
Prez |
|
|
| I'd imagine that a sequel is unlikely, given that the lack of hype coupled with the economy at the time of release practically guarantees that this game will under-perform. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 12. |
Re: Raven Would "Love" a Singularity Sequel |
Jul 8, 2010, 07:09 |
theyarecomingforyou |
|
|
| And I'd love to buy the game but the stupid cunts decided not to put in on Steam here on the UK. No sale. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Core i7 2600-K (4.6GHz) | 12GB DDR3 | GTX680 SLI (1215/1605) | OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD | Windows 8 Pro Hazro HZ30Wie 30" | Saffire PRO 40 | Razer Mamba | Coolermaster RP1000W SteamID: theyarecomingforyou |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 05:43 |
BobBob |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Jul 8, 2010, 04:23: Don't even think about buying this game for multiplayer. How unfortunate. They use the Unreal Engine 3 engine but they haven't released a dedicated server for the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 10. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 04:23 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
BobBob wrote on Jul 8, 2010, 01:51: I am reading the P2P method (MW2 style) is horrible for the MP. Truth or fiction? Don't even think about buying this game for multiplayer. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 01:51 |
BobBob |
|
|
| I am reading the P2P method (MW2 style) is horrible for the MP. Truth or fiction? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 8. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 8, 2010, 01:43 |
Nucas |
|
|
nin wrote on Jul 7, 2010, 22:18: That's an understatement. I'd go so far as to say they borrowed so much from Half Life and Bioshock that they should have called the game "Similarity". what i find most ironic about this article is that raven even has a "creative director" since they've been making the same game over and over again since soldier of fortune.
it only took ten fucking years but i'm glad the internet finally caught on and took ravensoft's collective penis out of it's mouth. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 7. |
Re: Raven Would "Love" a Singularity Sequel |
Jul 8, 2010, 01:40 |
Dr. D. Schreber |
|
|
| Agreed. It's also one of the better time-travel plotlines in recent memory. Doesn't have anything on Legacy of Kain, but the way it subverts two or three literary devices common to the premise is great. Hell, it even uses recycled voice actors as a red herring. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
NOT THE BEES! NOT THE BEES THEY'RE IN MY EYES AARRGRHGHGGAFHGHFGHFG!
(170 Hit Combo) |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 6. |
Re: Raven Would "Love" a Singularity Sequel |
Jul 8, 2010, 00:32 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
I really enjoyed it, but then I enjoy most shooters other people call mediocre like Quake 4 and Wolfenstein... oh hey wait, those are Raven games too.
Anyway... good action, nice looking, I'm happy. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 5. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 7, 2010, 22:18 |
nin |
|
|
It's by no means terribly original That's an understatement. I'd go so far as to say they borrowed so much from Half Life and Bioshock that they should have called the game "Similarity".
Very ham handed, and combined with laughable dialogue, I'm not very impressed. (And thanks for that subtitles option, Raven. It's fucking awesome when I can't understand what the voice actor with the cheap accent is saying.)
Having said that, I can't seem to stop playing it, either. It's like a really bad b-movie where you keep wondering if it can get any worse. (I'm betting it will.)
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 7, 2010, 22:12 |
Sho |
|
|
I would just like to say that as a long time fan of first person shooters, I actually had a pretty good time with this one.
It's by no means terribly original, but it's well-done and very polished across the board, and feels a lot more like a PC game than most comparable shooters have in years, including Raven's own Wolfenstein (which I disliked heavily for its stop-and-go level design and floaty controls). It may not truely measure up to the great shooters of yond, but it's as close to it as shooters have come in some time. I felt my time was well-spent on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Raven Would "Love" a Singularity Sequel |
Jul 7, 2010, 20:53 |
Fausticle |
|
|
| I would just like to say that as a long time fan of first person shooters, that this game was dull gray paint by number dog shit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Raven Would |
Jul 7, 2010, 20:34 |
Wildone |
|
|
| They should have just focused on the time glove/effect and expanded upon it, as it cant be used thru out the game |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 1. |
Re: Raven Would "Love" a Singularity Sequel |
Jul 7, 2010, 20:21 |
Dr. D. Schreber |
|
|
Be nice to see the storyline picked up from the "good" ending. Talk about all your base are belong to us.
I have a sneaking suspicion this is going to go the way of Alpha Protocol, though, considering the dearth of exposure the game got beyond a few trailers and the viral marketing that got pulled because they changed the plot. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
NOT THE BEES! NOT THE BEES THEY'RE IN MY EYES AARRGRHGHGGAFHGHFGHFG!
(170 Hit Combo) |
|
|
|
|
| |
19 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|