Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments

PC Games Hardware has a response from NVIDIA to a recent statement by ATI that developers other than Epic use PhysX for physics "because they’re paid to do it." NVIDIA's Nadeem Mohammed, Director of Product Management, PhysX, who says: "we do not pay developers to select PhysX instead of other physics solution." He also states that PhysX is not proprietary, even though it obviously is, saying: "PhysX is a complete Physics solution which runs on all major platforms like PS3, XBOX360, Wii, PC with Intel or AMD CPU, and on the PC with GeForce cards; it even runs on iPhone. It's available for use by any developer for inclusion in games for any platform - all free of license fees. There's nothing restrictive or proprietary about that."

View
20. Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Mar 13, 2010, 01:05 Beamer
 
Never before saw a post with so much wrong in one place.

Likewise.

Larrabee is DoA

No, it isn't. It's not surprising that you think this, Intel really messed up their marketing on this. Larrabee is not DoA. It's alive. It's well. A card will be announced later this year. Intel was experiencing delays but wanted the technology out there, so they've released as an R&D platform with the consumer platform delayed until at least 2011. But it's still in development.

Fermi is big, loud and runs very hot. Nvidia is having big problems with the yields and they're hiding benchmarks from the press for a reason. Fermi will most likely launch very expensive anyways and ATI now owns the market top to bottom on price anyways

All very true. The yields are rumored to be around 2%, but that's an overexaggeration. It's hot and, despite being much more expensive, it's not blowing the 5870 away outside of tessallation. That doesn't mean that it's not going to be a very powerful technology. You need to remember it's not just a step forward but a step to the side. It's going to take an interation or two to mature. That doesn't mean it won't ultimately be the path to follow.


Listen, I'm sorry you're misinformed about Larrabee. Again, I blame Intel's PR for that, but you should at least acknowledge that you're wrong there. I'm also sorry that you're writing off Fermi before it's even launched, let alone grown. People around here keep complaining that PC technology is stagnating, yet here are two technologies that have a chance to change that, yet some of you are condeming them before they even show themselves.
More frightening, you're calling others wrong when they're telling the truth.

 
-------------
Music for the discerning:
http://www.deathwishinc.com
http://www.hydrahead.com
http://www.painkillerrecords.com
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Mar 12, 21:52 Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Creston
  3. Mar 12, 22:22  Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Ray Marden
  7. Mar 12, 22:51   Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Flatline
  4. Mar 12, 22:24  Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments ramerco
  9. Mar 12, 22:54   Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Flatline
  15. Mar 12, 23:56   Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Creston
  18. Mar 13, 00:14    Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments ramerco
  22. Mar 13, 01:31     Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments .Drifter
  5. Mar 12, 22:25  Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments TheDevilYouKnow
  6. Mar 12, 22:49   Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Overon
  26. Mar 13, 06:43    Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments BobBob
  27. Mar 13, 09:09     Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments DG
  8. Mar 12, 22:51   Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Darks
  10. Mar 12, 22:59    Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Overon
  11. Mar 12, 23:02     Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Overon
  12. Mar 12, 23:22      Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Beamer
  13. Mar 12, 23:44       Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Cutter
  16. Mar 13, 00:09        Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Jensen
  33. Mar 13, 12:21        Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments finga
  39. Mar 13, 14:54         Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Beamer
  19. Mar 13, 00:28       Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments The PC Warrior
>> 20. Mar 13, 01:05        Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Beamer
  21. Mar 13, 01:17         Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Beamer
  23. Mar 13, 01:33         Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments The PC Warrior
  24. Mar 13, 02:01          Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Beamer
  35. Mar 13, 12:37           Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Joss
  41. Mar 13, 16:25           Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments The PC Warrior
  42. Mar 13, 17:09            Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Beamer
  43. Mar 13, 17:40             Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments I've Got The News Blues
  45. Mar 13, 19:39             Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments The PC Warrior
  46. Mar 13, 20:20              Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Beamer
  14. Mar 12, 23:46      Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments ramerco
  17. Mar 13, 00:09       Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments I've Got The News Blues
  44. Mar 13, 18:00       Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments ^Drag0n^
  25. Mar 13, 06:05    Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments lvitriol
  31. Mar 13, 11:36     Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments wrlwnd
  37. Mar 13, 14:39   Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Agent.X7
  38. Mar 13, 14:52    Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Beamer
  40. Mar 13, 15:43    Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments I've Got The News Blues
  2. Mar 12, 22:21 Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments ochentay4
  28. Mar 13, 09:44 Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments MMORPGHoD
  29. Mar 13, 11:20 Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments wtf_man
  32. Mar 13, 12:10  Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Ray Marden
  49. Mar 14, 08:15  Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments ASJD
  30. Mar 13, 11:23 Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Muscular Beaver
  34. Mar 13, 12:35 Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Eldaron Imotholin
  36. Mar 13, 13:43  Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments ForgedReality
  47. Mar 13, 21:46 Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments The PC Warrior
  48. Mar 14, 01:51  Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments ^Drag0n^
  50. Mar 14, 10:25   Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments MTechnik
  51. Mar 14, 14:54    Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Ant
  52. Mar 16, 12:49 Re: NVIDIA Responds to ATI PhysX Comments Verno


footer

Blue's News logo