5 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 5. |
Re: New on GameTap |
Nov 14, 2009, 18:14 |
Anonymous |
|
|
| How haven't they been supporting their customers? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: New on GameTap |
Nov 13, 2009, 21:00 |
Reactor |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Re: New on GameTap |
Nov 13, 2009, 12:41 |
Deathbishop |
|
|
| Isn't that what Metaboli is for? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: New on GameTap |
Nov 13, 2009, 00:19 |
Reactor |
|
|
| Maybe they should consider supporting the rest of the world, like they were going to do eons ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: New on GameTap |
Nov 12, 2009, 20:32 |
Anonymous |
|
|
I like Gametap. There's a bunch of interesting games to choose from and quite frankly it's like a warez site where you can actually get the games your looking at.
Also, they've begun adding support for X64-based systems. Initially you couldn't really do anything with a 64-bit computer, but now they've started working on supporting their proprietary code working with the WOW (Windows on Windows) 32-bit emulator layer.
It's still a work in progress though due to the fact that they apparently have to hand-code support for each individual title.
It's unusual for a company to do anything about X64-related problems. Usually people just refuse to address it.
And why shouldn't they? Who wants to divert team members from current tasks to see who wants to take a crack at figuring out how to troubleshoot with the WOW emulator and 64-bit code?
Who wants to waste money on a small group of power users who should have known better than to rely on a potentially unreliable operating system?
And who the hell wants to deal with an X64 compatibility problem as complex-sounding as this?
But when you respond to a tough technical question regarding your products usability when you don't HAVE to do anything shows that you DO support your customers better than most. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
5 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
