Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Troy C.

Real Name Troy C.   
Search for:
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
Nickname PropheT
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Homepage http://
Signed On Jul 17, 2000, 22:20
Total Comments 2297 (Senior)
User ID 6273
User comment history
< Newer [ 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ] Older >

News Comments > Out of the Blue
14. Re: Out of the Blue May 20, 2013, 15:50 PropheT
1badmf wrote on May 20, 2013, 14:24:
wow, i feel bad for having contributed to ironman3's opening now. trek was a way better film. ironman3 was just a completely forgettable film.

Same here. I loved Iron Man 1 and 2 and actually feel bad that I paid to see the third movie. I kind of knew I was in trouble when we showed up to watch it and everyone filtering out of the previous showing looked like they'd been stuck on the top of a roller coaster for about an hour and were just happy to be leaving.

I liked the second Star Trek movie even more than the first, though. I wouldn't mind going back to see it again.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Out of the Blue
4. Re: Out of the Blue May 18, 2013, 15:00 PropheT
Root beer works great as a base, but otherwise the stuff I make is a lot like that Coke recipe. Dr. Pepper makes a really good sauce, too. Pepsi is just too sweet and there was something about using Coke that i didn't like (haha), but Root Beer and Dr. Pepper were sweet while still having some of the richness to it, for lack of a better word to describe the difference.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Out of the Blue
17. Re: Out of the Blue May 16, 2013, 19:49 PropheT
Topevoli wrote on May 16, 2013, 16:38:
I'd also challenge you on the Blackhawks and the Eastern D. They are pretty big and man can they score. Considering they made the Red Wings look stupid last night, I think they are a little better than you give them credit for.

The first and last games in that Rangers series were the only ones not decided by 1 goal, and the Rangers shut out the Caps the last two games. There's definitely defense being played in the East, although being a Penguins fan I certainly wish there was -more- defense by a certain team in Pittsburgh even if they're still winning right now...

But yeah, the Blackhawks are nuts when they're on their game. They're really, really good. It might not have looked like they were going nuts on the scoreboard against the Wild, but that's the Wild...a defensive team that got where it was despite not being able to score goals for the most part. Pittsburgh has the best offense in the league, but the Hawks were #2 AND they had the #1 defense in goals against in the regular season. I will be really, really surprised if they aren't in the finals.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Op Ed
17. Re: Op Ed May 16, 2013, 16:54 PropheT
InBlack wrote on May 16, 2013, 09:44:
What is wrong with you people????

Well, the best I can tell is that he's decrying the effects of internet outrage and public shaming by trying to incite internet outrage and public shaming. In a way that he agrees with the outcome of, of course, not in the way that happened.

It's pretty much just another episode of 'someone is wrong on the internet' that nearly everyone gets caught up in once in a while. If there's anything wrong with the people involved it's that people still argue back and forth trying to make conversations out of the shouting matches that constitute nearly everything said anywhere on the internet that anonymous people are watching.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Op Ed
24. Re: Op Ed May 15, 2013, 14:16 PropheT
Creston wrote on May 15, 2013, 11:34:
MC still has some marginal value to judge a game at a glance, though. (even though said value is getting less and less, with more and more review sites simply being paid shills these days.)

Game reviews in general are what make Metacritic useless, whether it's because people are being paid to shill like you say or just because video game reviews as a whole have little to no value. A good game that isn't hyped to death will get 70's, a great game 80's, and anything that's hyped and marketed to hell and back gets high 80's or 90's unless it's fairly bad. That's always been a problem with game reviews, really, but I don't remember it ever being as bad as it is now...especially since big review sites decided they were going to start scoring some games lower to seem more balanced.

Metacritic itself isn't the problem and it does have some value, it's just that you need to take every score you see on it with a grain of salt since the reviews that build the aggregate are often of so little value individually.

I'd ignore reviews entirely and dismiss the entire thing is worthless at this point, but when the games that are made available to us are funded and built around Metacritic scores that makes that difficult.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Safety Dance
2. Re: Evening Safety Dance May 14, 2013, 21:33 PropheT
killer_roach wrote on May 14, 2013, 19:50:
What ever happened to the good old days when it was just Sony and EA saying stuff this idiotic?

To be fair, they didn't actually say this, and even if the graphic they released did say it then they only actually be saying 13% of people don't care about privacy, not everyone.

It's not quite as inflammatory without the user-injected conjecture and hit grab headline, though.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Evening Interviews
4. Re: Evening Interviews May 6, 2013, 21:39 PropheT
Cutter wrote on May 6, 2013, 19:25:
Oh really? I don't give a shit about virtual achievements or have any need to share my progress in a game. What a completely asinine blanket statement. And who the hell is a fluff designer like Wright to talk about what's falling short as a medium? Jesus, the ego on the guy. Rolleyes

I'd be curious as to what about it you think is wrong, or even why you don't think it's narcissistic to think that just because you don't like achievements or sharing progress that nobody else does; especially when there's so much evidence to the contrary out there now. Play an MMO for a little while, and then look at what he said and say he's even a little bit wrong. Players want control over everything, and they want everyone else to see it afterward.

He's also not wrong about falling short with the medium compared to what could be done with it. We're caught up in cycle after cycle of sequels and rehashes instead of moving forward with new ideas and innovations. Most developers are still working on perfecting the same things we saw in 2005 rather than doing something new.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Defiance Boasts a Million Accounts
9. Re: Defiance Boasts a Million Accounts May 2, 2013, 21:55 PropheT
Cutter wrote on May 2, 2013, 20:35:
Note they did not say a million sales or active, paying accounts. And from what I've heard Defiance - the show - is failing miserably.

Two things wrong with that.

First, there isn't a subscription fee so an account is an account...there are no active paying accounts.

Second is that the show is getting good ratings, so I don't know where you heard it's failing miserably. It's the most watched new series on the network in seven years and it retained the numbers it had for the pilot pretty well into the second episode. Syfy shows like Warehouse 13 also tend to come close to doubling their viewer numbers after a week once they include DVR use and so on, so if it's anything like Warehouse in that respect it's doing really well.

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Paypal vs. Skullgirls
7. Re: Paypal vs. Skullgirls Apr 23, 2013, 14:11 PropheT
Raven wrote on Apr 23, 2013, 10:51:
Lab Zero Games:
because people wanted their money back when their voted character didn't make it into the final rounds of voting

Sounds like the contributors are the ones being scummy here. Yeah, Paypal sucks, but what do you expect when your customers start doing mass chargebacks?


They're holding the money on the chance that people might do chargebacks, not because they were actually doing them.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > "Strong Possibility" Relic to Make Dawn of War 3
13. Re: Apr 23, 2013, 14:05 PropheT
Whiskers wrote on Apr 23, 2013, 10:17:
Hopefully it's more DoW 1 and less DoW 2. A mix of DoW 1 and CoH 1 would be amazing.

That's pretty much what Dawn of War 2 already is, minus the base building. Have you played it with the expansions?

The game needed more of the factions represented in the tabletop game, but the mechanics of it after the expansions were pretty much the same as CoH. The population cap was too low in general, but you can mod that.

I get the impression that people are basing DoW 2 off of the single player rather than closed multiplayer games with AI opponents that compares to the skirmish-mode single player of DoW 1.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Saints Row IV Commander in Chief Edition for Preorders
5. Re: Saints Row IV Commander in Chief Edition for Preorders Apr 23, 2013, 00:16 PropheT
I loved SR3. I think its charm was that it was batshit insane.

In retrospect, it's kind of sad that it stands out to me as being a great game because all it was trying to do was do its best to be fun. I don't know why more developers don't aim for that with their games, but they don't.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Gearbox Snags Homeworld IP
4. Re: Gearbox Snags Homeworld IP Apr 22, 2013, 16:43 PropheT
Tumbler wrote on Apr 22, 2013, 16:42:
Gearbox seems on a downward trend.

Will have to see. Aliens was terrible, but Borderlands 2 wasn't. I guess it just depends on if they can handle multiple IP's or not at this point.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Capcom Plotzes - Issues Profit Warning; Cancelling Games
24. Re: Capcom Plotzes - Issues Profit Warning; Cancelling Games Apr 18, 2013, 18:36 PropheT
Wraith wrote on Apr 18, 2013, 09:47:
Basically Capcom does not produce good games. Period. All they do is try to over-exploit their existing franchises created by people who knew what they were doing - and they do a poor job of it.

They have some of the most popular franchises around, which doesn't happen if you don't make good games (period). Resident Evil 6 was a disappointment, but SF vs. Tekken is outstanding - if marred by a shitty DLC plan. Dragon's Dogma is still my favorite game I played last year, and was a new IP, not a rehash or exploit of an existing franchise. Monster Hunter still continues to be extremely popular.

Thrashing a video game company because they make a lot of sequels is a bit silly considering how many of the games we see anymore are sequels no matter who is releasing them. Capcom has crappy DLC plans, although there's signs they've learned from the complaints about them. Other than that, they definitely do still produce good games, and usually they're games that are targeted at the hardcore game audience and generally not ridiculously dumbed down for more mass appeal when compared to other companies; although that might be their problem, because hardcore gamers are some of the whiniest bitches to make things for that I've ever seen anywhere.

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Steam Greenlights 18 More Games
17. Re: Steam Greenlights 18 More Games Apr 17, 2013, 20:02 PropheT
Parallax Abstraction wrote on Apr 17, 2013, 15:29:
It's about damn time Pinball Arcade made it through that broken Greenlight system. Have this on my Vita and very happy to buy it again on PC.

I didn't realize it was the same game; Pinball Arcade on Vita is awesome, probably my most played game on the device. I'd buy it again on PC, especially if it includes some of the extra tables like Medieval Madness.

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Dark Souls PC "Half-Assed" - PC Prioritized for Sequel
20. Re: Dark Souls PC Apr 12, 2013, 11:51 PropheT
Darks wrote on Apr 12, 2013, 11:46:
Whatís offensive to me is when some junkie kid screams about needing controller support for a pc game. Yes that is offensive. You want to play with a controller go play on your console. Itís that simple. If you donít own one, then stop trying to turn your pc into one.

Games have been using controllers on PC for pretty much as long as consoles have had them. Joysticks used to be a must-have PC peripheral for any serious gamer. Is it really worth getting mad about what someone else uses on their PC, especially when there's nothing to base the idea on that keyboard and mouse are the only way to game on the platform?

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Out of the Blue
23. Re: Out of the Blue Apr 10, 2013, 20:12 PropheT
NegaDeath wrote on Apr 10, 2013, 15:39:
As for the wonder woman image, I never even heard of the NBC pilot until today.

They never aired it, so it was pretty easy to miss, and decided not to pick up it up as a series sometime last year or the year before. I forget when, exactly.

It's a little sad that the first Wonder Woman movie isn't exactly...uh, comic-book fare. Then again, the comic isn't really written any better than a porno for the better part of the last 10 years or so.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > EA "Wins" Consumerist Poll Again
10. Re: EA Apr 9, 2013, 21:59 PropheT
Saboth wrote on Apr 9, 2013, 21:17:
Because the contest is about consumer issues, and customers getting screwed by the company they do business with. BP oil spill? Didn't affect me in the least. It was terrible, and they handled it poorly, but as a consumer, it had absolutely zero impact on me. I read Consumerist almost daily, and there has really been very few companies that seem out to screw their customers like EA. Besides the many, many anti-consumer policies they've implemented over the past few years, let's simply use the case study of Simcity. They designed the game for always-on DRM then attempted to hide it behind "features and services" that no one asked for. Strike one. They bungled the launch, preventing the paying customers from accessing the product they paid for. Strike two. When some customers attempted to get a refund or do a charge back after spending $60 and getting a broken product in return, they were banned from their Origin accounts (massively anti-consumer, and honestly, probably illegal, despite what the EULA says). Strike three. There were even reports of customers calling in to Amazon to see what kind of "relief" they could get (refund, discount, a working game), and EA banned/blocked THOSE customers from their Origin account. The website is Consumerist, and it concerns consumer issues. EA is one of the most anti-consumer gaming companies, and honestly, one of the most anti-consumer companies around. Sure, there are companies that pollute, rape the environment, or treat their employees badly, but this contest does not really concern itself with those. It's "who is showing the least regard for the consumer" (despite the rather disingenuous title of "Worst Company in America").

They also fixed it fairly quickly, gave everyone affected a free game for their trouble, and apologized. In the end, all anyone had happen to them was that they couldn't play a game for a little while.

As for your strike 2, you realize that practically any online retailer you do a chargeback to will not do business with you again, right? Valve will ban you from Steam for doing the same thing there, since doing a chargeback is stating that you didn't receive the goods that you paid for, not that you were unhappy with them...which is why it isn't illegal for them to ban people for it.

Compare that to people who get screwed by Bank of America, who is paying out almost $10 billion in mortgage buyouts or cash for screwing people who got loans for the better part of the last decade. Look at Comcast, for the articles you see posted here almost as often as EA's despite this being a gaming site (same for Time-Warner). Carnival has been leaving people stuck at sea with only a "sorry" and a voucher for another one of their cruises, and a number of other issues that you don't see reported much.

It isn't who's showing the least regard for the consumer, it's who has the loudest group of people who hate them who are tied to the internet enough to load down online polls. Maybe the BoA haters aren't taking part in the poll because they don't have a house to post from, who knows.

I'm in agreement that it makes gamers look like whiny losers.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Op Ed
58. Re: Op Ed Apr 7, 2013, 12:54 PropheT
Flatline wrote on Apr 7, 2013, 03:01:
Wait, why do we have to have "girl games" and "guy games"? How about games that don't portray women as sexual fetishes, hyperbolic stereotypes, or victims? Surely teaching boys not to treat women as only being worthy of wank fodder can't be seen as a bad thing.

And as far as the industry being "male driven", at one point that was true, but women make up around half of gamers out there. And interestingly enough, they aren't looking to play My Little Pony- really little kids and college frat boys play MLP. The idea that women *need* "girl games" is in and of itself sexist and bigoted. Separate but equal was a shameful argument when it was about race, it's shameful here too.

Here. Come read this blog:

We have girl games and guy games for the same reason that Cosmopolitan is a women's magazing and Playboy is a men's. Should Cosmo start running articles for guys, and Playboy throwing in the occasional male centerfold to cater to a female audience? There's all kinds of other examples out there of stuff that caters to both, but the problem with rants like the one in the article is that they focus on the extremes to make an example, only applying the facts that fit their argument in order to even have an argument.

As far as teaching boys anything, most of these games are made for adults. "Think of the children" is always ridiculous when you're not specifically talking about children's things.

Women make up half of the gamers out there when you consider game types like phone games, facebook games, and others. Sure, they play Gears of War and so on, but there aren't even remotely close to equal numbers of men and women playing the hardcore games that are being talked about.

Removing "Implicit tolerance" doesn't mean complete acceptance of anything that isn't milquetoast. As for the blog, all I can say is whatever... people acting like dicks to people on the internet? You don't say. Sound black or asian on XBL? You'll get the same thing. Have a southern accent? Same thing. Not native english speaking? Good luck. There's a subset of people who will take any opportunity they can get to use the differences between them and their target to belittle whoever they're in contact with. It's prevalent in the gaming community because it's prevalent in the online community because it's prevalent in society...the filters on that idiocy are just turned off on the internet.

In short, what's your argument. What's your fix? Go through Steam right now and pick out the games that are misogynist using a definition other than that a woman shows cleavage in a picture. Start comparing what you find to books, magazines, movies, or popular music and then tell me that gaming is any different.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Op Ed
42. Re: Op Ed Apr 6, 2013, 22:22 PropheT
The reason I never get behind any of this, uh, crap is because it's so all-inclusive. Game shows bare breasts? Misogynist. Game has male lead characters, no female lead? Sexist. Rinse, repeat, for absolutely anything writer can find to support that argument.

It's generalist bullshit dismissing the entire medium as anti-female because there are some prominent examples you can pick out in a primarily male-driven hobby. A lot of it is going to be made for men, because the audience is primarily men. That doesn't mean it's anti-woman, or even sexist, any more than movie theaters are anti-male because they have Sex and the City 1 and 2 and Meg Ryan movies and whatever. Some stuff is made for you, some is made for me. Why don't we see more third person shooters made with the sensibilities of girl gamers in mind? Because men playing them make up enough of the market that there's not much of a choice come funding time.

Point is, you can have your cake and eat it too. If there's enough of a demand for the kind of games that we want to classify as girl games, then they'll get made, sell well, and the market for them will increase and flourish. And if they do, fantastic...but that doesn't mean games that aren't like that need to disappear for it to happen.

Sometimes nobody listens because they aren't aware of the objections, but sometimes they just aren't listening because what you're saying is stupid.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
News Comments > Op Ed
1. Re: Op Ed Apr 5, 2013, 21:57 PropheT
But...they don't put in hide, flee, or die because while that might be more realistic it's not much fun as a game. So, because the game is being a game and not a CG film, that's exactly why you spend a lot of time fighting what often winds up being trivial combat....otherwise it'd just turn into cutscene after scene with a trivial amount of actual gameplay in between.

Players don't decide how the story plays out because every if/then variable entered into the mix requires development of a separate game path to house it. Even games that do offer choice offer a muted one, or are old enough that most of the effect on it was just a variation on a text box.

I can't help but feel he's talking about Bioshock Infinite here anyway, in which case it's sort of a moot argument. It's pretty well loved, very well received, and while the gunplay in it might be average the game as a whole isn't. I wish I'd had more effect on the story, too, but that's a gripe about gaming in general and not about shooters.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
2297 Comments. 115 pages. Viewing page 36.
< Newer [ 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ] Older >


Blue's News logo