UttiniDaKilrJawa wrote on Jan 5, 2012, 20:51:
2 words.

Dorky Glasses.

Minuit wrote on Jan 5, 2012, 12:06:
Okay, it's a console game. I'm a little less excited now, but there's still hope.

eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 4, 2012, 21:04:
If only they had more locations outside the US than inside. Because if theres one nation that needs charity, its the US.. meh.

Cutter wrote on Jan 1, 2012, 21:53:
Haha! Sucks to be you, hey fanboy? It must really hurt that I'm right most of the time. You need to stay far away from any sort of career in investing or anything remotely related to the future for that matter. It's what makes your nick so ironic lol!

Cutter wrote on Jan 1, 2012, 15:01:
Yet another reason this game is doomed.

Doombringer wrote on Dec 31, 2011, 21:55:
Krahulik should have stayed out of it. He can spin it however he'd like, but it boils down to "I think I'm pretty important since I run PA and PAX, so I'm going to throw my weight into this bit of arm-flailing."

Between this ridiculousness and the Notch/Yogscast Twitter debacle a few weeks back, the "gaming community" is looking more and more like "kindergarten."

Creston wrote on Dec 31, 2011, 17:09:
Kotaku is a bunch of 'tards that continously take "edgy" positions to drive traffic to what is otherwise a really shitty website. I'm pretty sure that the "internet community", whatever that is, overwhelmingly supports Gabe for putting this fucking asshole in his place.

Creston

Uncle Bone wrote on Dec 24, 2011, 19:35:
i ask myself if blizzard is going to be next in this hacking spree.

Teddy wrote on Dec 22, 2011, 00:12:
Except that there are people who have been playing for a week and a day now, not just one day. That's a bit more frustrating to lose when you suddenly find out that all your friends joined some other server.

Bhruic wrote on Dec 21, 2011, 20:29:
That an MMO would launch today without thinking that maybe, just maybe they should have character transfers ready for launch is mind bogling.

Prez wrote on Dec 20, 2011, 19:23:
Seriously. It's like being anti-gun but going to NRA meetings and then bitching about them. If you don't like the company, leave.

Ozmodan wrote on Dec 20, 2011, 16:39:
You want facts, SWG was far more advanced than this game and that was made over 10 years ago. There is nothing innovative about this game, it is just a complete rehash of games that preceded it with a Star Wars flare.

Total-Khaos wrote on Dec 19, 2011, 16:19:
Um, no, I beg to differ. You only choose ONE provider for cable, sattelite, or cell phone service 99.9% of the time. In regards to digital distribution, you are forced into having multiple programs like Steam or Origin installed just to play games. I cannot choose just ONE provider for all my games.

nin wrote on Dec 19, 2011, 15:54:
Plugged mine in last Friday. Worked fine. Kudos to Amazon for shipping early.

Acleacius wrote on Dec 19, 2011, 11:20:
How ridiculous, they don't even have enough servers for prerelease. Now they trying to turn it into a self promoting release about how great they are, since they are concerned.

Prez wrote on Dec 18, 2011, 19:56:
No I don't. Sexualized, yes. OVER-sexualized? No. Sex is one of the strongest driving forces in human nature, which makes it natural that it is utilized in entertainment media. If women were the dominant consumer class in gaming, all of the male avatars in games would be hung like bulls, built like Mr. Universe, and sensitive to every woman's every mood instantly (Ya know, like how my wife wishes I was... ). That's just how humans are. It's true in all media, and quite frankly I'm sick of hyper-sensitive, attention-seeking idiots posing as game journalists trying to score points with other hypersensitive morons by continually writing such pointless drek as this shameful excuse for an editorial.

They may be characters, but they're also sexual objects to be consumed.

eunichron wrote on Dec 13, 2011, 15:52:
Out of curiosity, those of you that did get in today, when did you redeem your pre-order code?

Dirwulf wrote on Dec 11, 2011, 17:59:
10 hours? LOL. You obviously did none of the side quests, none of the Riddler puzzles, none of the trophies, none of the challenges. You probably played it on easy as well. You didn't even play the game, you rushed through the quest line and then pronounced your incorrect, lame judgement.

Shok wrote on Dec 10, 2011, 08:10:
Yeah but it's $60 in Kotick's and EA's pockets. I liked the beta ok but I can wait until it's free or on sale really low. FU EA.

Sempai wrote on Dec 10, 2011, 08:11:
I agree for the most part, but keep in mind after 30 days you'll be paying more money in order to keep playing.