DangerDog wrote on Feb 9, 2012, 21:17:
This graphic tweak really helps make the games graphics not look like ass.

http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/3967848172?page=1

The difference between the default muddy/blurry graphics and the sharper effect offered with this mini mod is night and day.

Kajetan wrote on Feb 2, 2012, 11:42:
Yes, he is the one of the only one. To my knowledge, no Iron Lore dev has said anything regarding piracy being bad for TQ. As i recall this was ONLY Michael Fitch, THQ Creative Director at that time, who started this propaganda lie after the closure of Iron Lore to cover his employer. THQ killed Iron Lore. TQ sold well, the addon suffered mainly from the bad reputation TQ gathered for its rocky, bug-ridden start. In fact, an Ex-Iron Lore dev said a few months (?) ago, that TQ & addon are actually doing very well on digital plattforms like Steam or others and that they do not receive ANYTHING from these sales.

Cutter wrote on Jan 28, 2012, 23:03:
I never understood the draw of these sorts of games. The desperation of the lonely geeks drawn to virtual big titted sluts is just beyond sad.

Verno wrote on Jan 26, 2012, 13:31:
I don't get this at all, what apps and smartphone are you using? Get specific usage apps for your needs and there are many great offerings for pretty much anything you can imagine. Browsing the web is fine as long as the site has a mobile version and most of the popular ones do these days. Zooming and stuff sucks on regular sites but it's easy enough to do.

I don't worship my smartphone like some people but it is a very useful tool to do many different tasks. If you don't have a need for that then fair enough but surfing and using apps are fine on most smartphones these days. If you have no need of the functionality due to having other devices for it then you're not really the intended market for it.

Overon wrote on Jan 19, 2012, 18:03:
It always amuses me how some people can't handle criticism of their game.

Wallshadows wrote on Jan 19, 2012, 11:30:
There's a huge storm on the forums about this and it seems as though the moderators/community managers/designers are getting torn to shreds based on the feedback they have provided to the community with page after page of users saying they've cancelled their subs.

Jerykk wrote on Jan 11, 2012, 12:26:
If pirates have no intention of ever paying publishers a dime, how are publishers losing sales to them..?

Kajetan wrote on Jan 11, 2012, 09:50:
There is no proof that DRM increases sales, there is no proof that the lack of DRM decreases sales. For DECADES, since the early days of tapes and video cassettes the fear of loosing sales is based on assumptions, not actual, proven facts.

Optional nickname wrote on Jan 10, 2012, 11:46:
can someone please explain to me the FAIL by intel as if I were 5? I don't get it.

Dev wrote on Jan 8, 2012, 14:57:
A random storechain with a random date is almost never right (we've seen gamestop frequently do this in the past).

PHJF wrote on Jan 6, 2012, 21:35:
It wasn't even done properly on the PS3 in the first place. There were SERIOUS frame rate problems.

UttiniDaKilrJawa wrote on Jan 5, 2012, 20:51:
2 words.

Dorky Glasses.

Minuit wrote on Jan 5, 2012, 12:06:
Okay, it's a console game. I'm a little less excited now, but there's still hope.

eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 4, 2012, 21:04:
If only they had more locations outside the US than inside. Because if theres one nation that needs charity, its the US.. meh.

Cutter wrote on Jan 1, 2012, 21:53:
Haha! Sucks to be you, hey fanboy? It must really hurt that I'm right most of the time. You need to stay far away from any sort of career in investing or anything remotely related to the future for that matter. It's what makes your nick so ironic lol!

Cutter wrote on Jan 1, 2012, 15:01:
Yet another reason this game is doomed.