Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Harrisburg, PA 09/18
Greenbelt, MD 11/06

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Axis

Real Name Axis   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Axis
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description Older, smarter, better.
Homepage http://
Signed On Jun 11, 2012, 20:08
Total Comments 2054 (Senior)
User ID 57462
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ] Older >


News Comments > Turtle Rock on Evolve DLC Backlash
35. Re: Turtle Rock on Evolve DLC Backlash Jan 15, 2015, 18:39 Axis
 
I enjoyed the Evolve alpha, of course I believed there was still much to be done and forgave much. Yyou couldn't pay me to buy it right now as it is, and they got a crazy insane high price.

But it's selling decent it seems least on Steam. Too bad people don't think or research a bit before they buy...
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sunday Safety Dance
8. Re: Sunday Safety Dance Jan 13, 2015, 14:22 Axis
 
Verno wrote on Jan 13, 2015, 11:52:
Axis wrote on Jan 12, 2015, 11:21:
There are lots of ways people in power use tragedy (even if it's false, created, or perceived tragedy) for political gain - ask Obama, he's the best at it.

By that logic he would be there already then, kind of a self defeating argument.

As I already stated (you're getting as bad as beamer):

Sure there's a few on that list that may not belong there depending on who you ask, but they certainly have nothing to gain. Politically (and geographically) speaking, I'd say they have more to lose. Way louder is that American "leaders" should have showed up and they didn't.

Which renders your followup null before you even stated it. There's nothing to gain, he would have only fulfilled a justified expectation. The majority know his presence would mean virtually nothing, but his absence means quite a bit.
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sunday Safety Dance
5. Re: Sunday Safety Dance Jan 12, 2015, 11:21 Axis
 
eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 12, 2015, 02:37:
Burrito of Peace wrote on Jan 11, 2015, 12:42:
Axis wrote on Jan 11, 2015, 11:00:
Obama sits in his little hole and punches out useless executive actions while ...

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman
Israeli Economy Minister Naftali Bennett
Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy
Romanian President Klaus Iohannis
European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker
European Parliament president Martin Schulz
European Union president Donald Tusk
Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg
Polish Prime Minister Ewa Kopacz
Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt
Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras
Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny
Portuguese Prime Minister Pedro Passos Coelho
Czech Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka
Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico
Latvian Prime Minister Laimdota Straujuma
Bulgarian Prime Minister Boiko Borissov
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban
Croatian Prime Minister Zoran Milanovic
Luxembourg Prime Minister Xavier Bettel
Maltese Prime Minister Joseph Muscat
Slovenian Prime Minister Miro Cerar
Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven
Finnish Prime Minister Alexander Stubb
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko
Swiss President Simonetta Sommaruga
Kosovo President Atifete Jahjaga
Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu
Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg
Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Garibachvili
Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov
Austrian foreign minister Sebastian Kurz
King Abdallah of Jordan
Queen Rania of Jordan
German chancellor Angela Merkel
Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu
United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan
MK Eli Yishai from Israeli Knesset
Abu Mazen of Palestinian Fatah party
Malian President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita
Gabonese President Ali Bongo
Niger President Mahamadou Issoufou
Benin President Thomas Boni Yayi
Tunisian Prime Minister Mehdi Jomaa
Algerian foreign minister Ramtane Lamamra

... all stand united in Paris to show unity on the terrorist issues. Not even Biden or Kerry showed up, though to be honest there's not a single US leader I feel should be there anyway -- they are weaklings and excuse makers in an office built for better people.



You'll note that no one from the Americas was there, either.

Considering some of the names on there (turkey...) and their track record on press freedom that may have been a conscious decision. For EU leaders it was no option to stay away (especially not for UK/Germany) since France is close enough and has nearly the same problems as all the other big nations in the EU.

Anyway, I think on that list are more leaders that are against press freedom than there are for it... pretty fucking sad that they to use such a tragedy for their political gain.

Sure there's a few on that list that may not belong there depending on who you ask, but they certainly have nothing to gain. Politically (and geographically) speaking, I'd say they have more to lose. Way louder is that American "leaders" should have showed up and they didn't.

There are lots of ways people in power use tragedy (even if it's false, created, or perceived tragedy) for political gain - ask Obama, he's the best at it.

 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sunday Safety Dance
1. Re: Sunday Safety Dance Jan 11, 2015, 11:00 Axis
 
Obama sits in his little hole and punches out useless executive actions while ...

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman
Israeli Economy Minister Naftali Bennett
Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy
Romanian President Klaus Iohannis
European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker
European Parliament president Martin Schulz
European Union president Donald Tusk
Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg
Polish Prime Minister Ewa Kopacz
Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt
Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras
Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny
Portuguese Prime Minister Pedro Passos Coelho
Czech Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka
Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico
Latvian Prime Minister Laimdota Straujuma
Bulgarian Prime Minister Boiko Borissov
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban
Croatian Prime Minister Zoran Milanovic
Luxembourg Prime Minister Xavier Bettel
Maltese Prime Minister Joseph Muscat
Slovenian Prime Minister Miro Cerar
Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven
Finnish Prime Minister Alexander Stubb
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko
Swiss President Simonetta Sommaruga
Kosovo President Atifete Jahjaga
Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu
Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg
Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Garibachvili
Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov
Austrian foreign minister Sebastian Kurz
King Abdallah of Jordan
Queen Rania of Jordan
German chancellor Angela Merkel
Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu
United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan
MK Eli Yishai from Israeli Knesset
Abu Mazen of Palestinian Fatah party
Malian President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita
Gabonese President Ali Bongo
Niger President Mahamadou Issoufou
Benin President Thomas Boni Yayi
Tunisian Prime Minister Mehdi Jomaa
Algerian foreign minister Ramtane Lamamra

... all stand united in Paris to show unity on the terrorist issues. Not even Biden or Kerry showed up, though to be honest there's not a single US leader I feel should be there anyway -- they are weaklings and excuse makers in an office built for better people.


 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Elite: Dangerous Earns $21M; New Content Coming; OS X Beta Status
2. Re: Jan 10, 2015, 10:38 Axis
 
I bought it. It's fun, but I don't play it. Too difficult to start off each time online, solo is fine. I didn't pay for any initial extras and I don't plan to.  
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
21. Re: Morning Metaverse Jan 8, 2015, 14:48 Axis
 
nin wrote on Jan 8, 2015, 14:35:
Dmitri_M wrote on Jan 8, 2015, 14:14:
Yet get a little closer you realise they have an agenda of control. Of making it about Islam. Or using Islam to push their own agendas, be it making money or just generally trying to domineer.

I feel like you could say that about a lot of religions, including my own.


What kind of comparison is that crap, Nin? You sound like InBlack a few posts prior, throwing all religions in a pot of shit.

Nin can you say your religion currently has thousands of people killing thousands of innocent people indiscriminately? Raping, kidnapping villages of women and children? Defecating and descecrating holy places and items held dear to other religions? Boldly posting beheading murder videos online and daring the world to fuck with them? Actively recruiting all the useless assholes of the world to do the same?

Ya, keep giving them excuses and apologies -- The shit people say is so fucking ridiculous and ignorant way too often these days...
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
13. Re: Morning Metaverse Jan 8, 2015, 13:35 Axis
 
Beamer wrote on Jan 8, 2015, 13:28:
Axis wrote on Jan 8, 2015, 13:26:
InBlack wrote on Jan 8, 2015, 13:20:
Loving the thinly veiled hate speech. Im not saying you guys are wrong, Im just saying youre partly right. Islam is not to blame. Religion is to blame. Period. In fact, I would like to add Christianity to the list of religions that need to go. In fact I would like to add all the religions to that list. Any religion that claims it is peaceful is full of shit. Why? Because at one time or another someone has used religion as an excuse to kill. Yeah, even Buddhists. Don't believe me? Go read a history book on Sri Lanka.

Bullcompleteapoligist shit.

This is the 21st century, not some medieval town with people whose average lifespan is 30 and IQ less.

You, InBlack, are part of the problem with bullshit statements like that. Typical liberal bullshit that I can't fucking stand.

Why is everyone that disagrees with you a liberal.
I mean, you called Cutter a liberal, and that guy has spewed so much hate against so many different ethnic groups. And now you're calling InBlack liberal.

Is this the ultimate insult to you? If someone doesn't like your favorite restaurant, are they liberal? If you like Nickelback and someone else prefers Tupac, are they liberal? If you watch The Big Bang Theory and someone else thinks it's nowhere near as good as Archer, are they liberal?

Is that just the go-to you use for anyone with a different opinion than yours?

How about you fucking read for once Beamer. I ignored you yesterday with your "law" comments that you kept misquoting because you can't ever fucking take responsibility for what you say, and now I point out that his view is typical liberal bullshit and you somehow come up with I called him a liberal. Its a liberal view, get the fuck with comprehension boy.
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
11. Re: Morning Metaverse Jan 8, 2015, 13:26 Axis
 
InBlack wrote on Jan 8, 2015, 13:20:
Loving the thinly veiled hate speech. Im not saying you guys are wrong, Im just saying youre partly right. Islam is not to blame. Religion is to blame. Period. In fact, I would like to add Christianity to the list of religions that need to go. In fact I would like to add all the religions to that list. Any religion that claims it is peaceful is full of shit. Why? Because at one time or another someone has used religion as an excuse to kill. Yeah, even Buddhists. Don't believe me? Go read a history book on Sri Lanka.

Bullcompleteapoligist shit.

This is the 21st century, not some medieval town with people whose average lifespan is 30 and IQ less.

You, InBlack, are part of the problem with imbecilic statements like that. Typical liberal bullshit that I can't fucking stand.
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Into the Black
2. Re: Into the Black Jan 8, 2015, 12:19 Axis
 
Cutter wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 20:44:
Whilst that's tragic what happened in Paris today, I really wish the politicians would just shut the fuck up. I physically feel nauseous and outrage when I see and hear these sociopathic, fascist hegemonists going on about freedom and yada yada yada when they - and what they really stand for - is most of the problem in the first fucking place. It's their policies that give rise to this reactionary extremism to begin with.

You want to get serious? Then let's get serious. No more half measures. Take off the gloves. Do what the Romans would have done, level a village somewhere over there everytime they pull some shit like this here. We need to be either all in or not at all on this bullshit. Those Muslims are killing the wrong people anyway. It's their leaders selling them out for a fast buck. If you have to riot and kill because someone pokes fun at your religion, than it's actually a cult and you may want to question being part of it. If God is so great, then why the fuck doesn't he handle it personally if he's so offended? Assholes.

Ahh... so the liberal canadian guy misses the America that doesn't take shit from anyone and helps those many countries affected by assholism? Well you got Obama and a liberal world at the moment, you'd think you would be happy when Obama "acts" and it goes no further than "We are disappointed and strongly condemn "fill in the blank".

Maybe China or Russia will help...

However... what does your rant have to do with the 1.5 billion pixel photo?
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
5. Re: Morning Tech Bits Jan 8, 2015, 11:55 Axis
 
ldonyo wrote on Jan 8, 2015, 10:37:
With hardware requirements like Witcher 3's, the PC isn't going anywhere any time soon.

Never was. Just idiots who know nothing about the industry found a new fad to repeat which led to media outlets with equal lack of experience to regurgitate the same story...
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
3. Re: Morning Metaverse Jan 8, 2015, 11:48 Axis
 
Verno wrote on Jan 8, 2015, 11:15:
I'm more tired of the excuses from muslim communities. Its an extreme minority that is not representative of our culture, we wash our hands of it and the like. Do these guys have to detonate a dirty bomb before they wake up and start to acknowledge the problem? There seems to be a pretty thin line between moderate and extreme muslims, many scholars and authors have been threatened by muslims living in western & european countries.

Is there any reasoning with people who want the rest of the world to strictly adhere to one sided bronze age cultural standards? Is tolerance really working? Can these two disparate civilizations actually co-exist peacefully? I often wonder.

You got it right.
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
1. Re: Morning Metaverse Jan 8, 2015, 10:58 Axis
 
But that won't stop Muslims from trying.... too many "extremists" groups don't ya think?

So sick of their shit...
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
47. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 14:56 Axis
 
Verno wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 14:35:
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 14:22:
Glad you guys think so highly of my statements that you flounder like lost children when I don't comply to your demands.

Quite the opposite. Your complete inability to articulate even a single point of reference for your "opinion" leaves me no choice but to conclude you have no actual foundation for your opinion and are just simply parroting something you picked up from media or a third party.

You were the one posting here, no one made you come out with something so accusatory and then utterly fail to back it up with anything of substance. Here's yet another opportunity, I'll keep repeating it until you stop pretending:

Which decision there? What ideology of hers is the issue? Why is she not qualified for the job? Other posters asked for the same thing and you haven't responded to them either. Its your opinion, these things shouldn't be difficult to answer.

If I said the same thing about a person and someone asked why, I could easily explain my thoughts. I wouldn't necessarily expect everyone to agree but explaining why I believe something isn't a hardship or something. It's less time than it took you to write 12 overly defensive posts that say literally nothing at all.

Thanks for your keen interest in my opinions, I'll again decline to add my opinions and simply point you to the same link of voting fact I posted for you to read. I'd also ask you to reread my earlier statements on the matter, as they covered all your regurgitated "Prove it" remarks I keep responding to.

Unfortunately you still don't understand that qualifications and voting record is public and factual. Facts that will be ugly or beauty in the eyes of the beholder, but easily discerned to be liberal or conservative by even infantile awareness of political posturing. I could point out her stance on abortion, religious freedom, unionizing, global warming, blah blah blah, but why?

Why should I go into detail and point out that 8 out of the 11 stances she took on just that ONE link I posted is textbook liberal? I shouldn't, and I won't. And you should be ashamed you can't comprehend it for your own self. Instead demanding me to write you an essay on liberalism and conservatism and how her voting record sides almost implicitly with liberalism. You wouldn't need me to respond if you knew the difference.

You know nothing John Snow. Hoder for president...

This comment was edited on Jan 7, 2015, 15:01.
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > The Witcher 3 Specs; Requires 6GB
17. Re: The Witcher 3 Specs; Requires 6GB Jan 7, 2015, 14:37 Axis
 
I should be excited for Witcher 3, but I can't shake the feeling it's going to suck, I hope Im wrong.

The PC I just built for my son would eat up it's "requirements" like a small snack...

 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
44. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 14:22 Axis
 
Glad you guys think so highly of my statements that you flounder like lost children when I don't comply to your demands.

Roberts has proven to be fairly neutral, much to the disappointment of the hard right.

Let me guess what one of you peas in the pod will say next... you'd like me to give you specific examples in regards to Robert's neutrality? See Ag, there are mind readers here on Blues...

 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
39. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 12:00 Axis
 
Agrajag wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 11:50:
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 11:42:
I won't waste time with those who are known to have no interest in debate or facts. I'm including you on the list.

Seriously, I don't even post enough regularly around here for you to be likely to recognize me, nor have the faintest clue what my politics are nor my debating skills nor interest in facts...

I know that when someone starts a "debate" with insults like "Meh Meh Is English not your native language or something?? Meh Meh", they aren't to be taken seriously.

And when that same someone follows up with a "Meh Meh fuck you very much as well", I know I was correct in my thinking.

Just to be clear, I added the "Meh Meh" as I think that's how you sounded. Called creative license. Might have been "*grumble* Hrmph*, I was torn between the two, ended up going with the Meh path...

 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
37. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 11:42 Axis
 
Agrajag wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 11:16:
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 10:42:
I stated TWICE already Verno that I humored you and linked your "proof" of her voting record. Your problem is you cannot comprehend or don't bother to read.

Is English not your native language or something?

No one asked for proof of her voting record... Everyone already knows how she ruled on every case, or can very easily find out themselves...

What was asked for is which decisions, specifically, do you have a problem with and feel reflect a liberal bias? You can't expect anyone else to possibly find those, since it would require them knowing what you think constitutes liberal bias... I know Blue's has some cool people, but I don't think any of them are qualified mind-readers...

I won't waste time with those who are known to have no interest in debate or facts. I'm including you on the list.

Anyone paying even a mote of attention to politics could look through her voting record/s and figure out which topics are hawt stuff for liberals, you don't need me to point them all out. And if you do, then I can only assume you know nothing John Snow.

 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
33. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 11:00 Axis
 
Verno wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 10:51:
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 10:42:
I stated TWICE already Verno that I humored you and linked your "proof" of her voting record. Your problem is you cannot comprehend or don't bother to read.

You've tried this nonsense with other posters in other topics, I am not buying it. I've read both your link and many others on the subject, I comprehend them just fine. The problem is not other people, its that you can't seem to point to anything to support your assertion. You came to the opinion so this stuff should not be difficult to answer. The transparent crap about "not worth the time" isn't fooling anyone, you're here wasting time writing responses as it is so might as well just post it already.

So again, what ideology of hers so offends you and how has it influenced a few of her decisions? What lead you to believe this? Something she said, something she wrote, etc?



No you never read that link, which is why you said in two different posts:

Verno wrote:
People weren't asking for anything comprehensive here, you failed to provide even a single fact to support your statement.


Verno wrote:
You can't seem to post a single relevant fact to support what you said, not one.

So in conclusion, I posted a single fact -- a single relevant fact, well before you stated I had not.

That is all, I move on. Feel free to continue attempting to sway the folks who read only the last post that you were right. That is something I never feel compelled to do.
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
31. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 10:42 Axis
 
Verno wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 10:40:
That's childish nonsense. It's not "prove it", its "you said this, so what made you think this?". You can't seem to post a single relevant fact, you can't point to what specific political ideology is the issue and so the failure is all yours.

Your assumption that others haven't read up on it is flawed as well, people are just trying to see how you reached that conclusion but its becoming apparent that its just your own bias coming to the forefront.

I stated TWICE already Verno that I humored you and linked your "proof" of her voting record. Your problem is you cannot comprehend or don't bother to read.
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
28. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 10:36 Axis
 
Verno wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 10:18:
Yeah no, you don't get to play the "use google do research" card when you made the assertion and have failed to backup your opinion. You made the claim, you get to back it up, its not on anyone else to support your opinion for you. That's an obvious attempt to dodge the issue.

People weren't asking for anything comprehensive here, you failed to provide even a single fact to support your statement. If you don't want to then whatever, fair enough but don't act indignant or surprised if people assume you're full of shit. All I'm getting from this so far is "I dont like liberals" which is ironically as close minded and politically motivated as the criticism against her. There are plenty of liberals I don't like but that doesn't make them bad at their jobs.

So I ask again:

Kagan has been the wrong person for the job -- she is hardcore in her liberal ideology which takes precedence to her interpretation of the law. She is by far the least qualified ever to be appointed, and appears to me to be outright dumb in many areas.

What decisions have rankled you here? A sampling is fine. How have her specific political beliefs (which ones) affected those decisions? Why is she "least qualified", which metrics are you referring to?

I genuinely have an open mind in this area and I've read several of decisions already and I'm not seeing anything big here so feel free to point it out.

That is the only response deserved since you and a few others you like to play the "Prove it" card Ad nauseam.

Voting record is fact, not opinion. Her past experiences are fact, not opinion. I backed it up with the voting record link, I'm not going to spend my time sending you links upon links - do that on your own time.

If you don't understand what you are reading (which you didn't bother to read at all), that's on you.
 
Avatar 57462
 
Yours truly,

Axis
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
2054 Comments. 103 pages. Viewing page 24.
< Newer [ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo