Quinn wrote on Dec 13, 2012, 05:24:
I spoke too soon, then. Thought 'twas a fact. No idea what my source was all those years back.

Still, not that it matters a single fuck whether you play a game on 60 or 80 or 120. Not even if you're in an FPS clan either. Been there done that. To me, at least, 60 fps is 100% smooth gameplay.

Prez wrote on Dec 8, 2012, 14:14:
Sorry Axis - you post was asinine as was your lame and presumptious defense of Nintendo. Everyone so far who has read it apparently agrees. I know - it's everyone else who is crazy.

Prez wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 23:51:

Axis wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 22:54:

Dades has been making a habit of trolling often. Apparently because when he's serious he writes ridiculous shit that anyone with half a brain can scroll back, read, comprehend and come to the conclusion he's either trolling or thinks everyone is stupid.

Seems to me that you have an unhealthy obsession with him. I don't always agree with him but the way you categorize him is just not accurate. The way you came in and basically accused everyone of not being able to read and that lame ass defense of Nintendo's indefensible DRM was more douchey than anything he said.

Seems to me that you have an unhealthy obsession with him.

The way you came in and basically accused everyone of not being able to read and that lame ass defense of Nintendo's indefensible DRM was more douchey than anything he said.

Jivaro wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 21:20:
I don't know what the fuck you two are arguing about. Who the hell is defending Nintendo? I read Dades post as sarcasm.

It was sarcasm right Dades....RIGHT?!

Dades wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 20:58:

Axis wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 18:46:
The angry troll who doesn't read has come to visit!

That's a mirror you're looking at fyi. Oh hai guys its ok, they know how shitty it is and might change it in the future so stop being so mean to little nintendo!

Every other company in the industry has this figured out already, no excuse is sufficient for that mess.

- DADES - This is a signature of my name, enjoy!

Dades wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 18:36:

Jivaro wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 16:01:
Sure they will...if you pay them. Again. I mean you already paid for the software once. Apparently in Super Bizarro World it makes complete sense that if the hardware breaks you should have to pay for the software again in some way.

That's just retarded, only some fanboy kiddie would defend that shit.

- DADES - This is a signature of my name, enjoy!

finga wrote on Dec 6, 2012, 23:55:

Axis wrote on Dec 6, 2012, 23:51:
GFWL was the real death sentence. Not exactly something you can put a finger on, but my finger sure feels it.

They went full Steamworks on a few games that had online play. Space Marine, Saints Row 2 & 3, and Homefront come to mind... still didn't really help them make anything into the super-blockbuster they needed to stay alive. Their games and marketing needed to be better, and while I hate GFWL as much as the next guy, avoiding those libraries wouldn't have saved the company.

Dades wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 23:05:

Kobalt wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 22:41:
I don't know about decline(with no subscription I doubt they care too deeply). The game sure didn't sell nearly as well as you would think with all the hype the game was getting though. People declaring it the death of the subscription mmo but it looks like ones without one aren't that much more popular.

It sold over 5 million copies already and has a pretty stable ongoing revenue stream in the shop. If that's not a success I don't know what is. Publishers always lay off post release. It's not the second coming of WOW and was never intended to be. The player base tends to rise and fall with major releases of other games, its been a busy year.

- DADES - This is a signature of my name, enjoy!