User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 ] Older >
| News Comments > Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods Next Month |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods Next Month |
Apr 24, 2013, 21:55 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
I keep going back once and a while... waiting for a bunch of the DLC to go on sale again and do up another round.
One thing that I still haven't quite figured out in my on again/off again play times is how to effectively manage a decent army size. I always seem to either end up in a war where I'm massively outnumbered, or in one where it's just attrition in that I can't quite raise enough troops to capture my goals via conquest (and I'm still not ever really been able to acquire territory through scheming and marriages). I do wish there'd be a way for mercenary companies to replenish over time (unless they have done something about that?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Mark Jacobs' Camelot Unchained Kickstarter |
 |
| 20. |
Re: Mark Jacobs' Camelot Unchained Kickstarter |
Apr 2, 2013, 21:55 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
I'm torn on this one. Definitely loved DAoC. Was not a fan of Jacobs though. Would love to see an RVR MMO again, especially with a 'familiar' fantasy setting. But would need to find people to get together with again to actually make that fun. Like the player based crafting economy. But then some of these 'founders points' rewards make it sound like it's going to have some freemium pay to win options? I think if I was to actually go into this one, I'd go for broke and hit the internal testing tier (if it was still available when I make a decision)... is about the only way I think I'd really get myself invested in an MMO again. But then I don't know if I really want to do that anymore these days. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Torment: Tides of Numenera Delay |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Torment: Tides of Numenera Delay |
Apr 2, 2013, 21:53 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
For some reason this one is actually seriously tempting me to go in for one of the higher tiers to get the RPG sourcebooks and novellas around it...
Not certain why, because a) I have no nostalgia about Planescape: Torment and b) I didn't follow too closely the Numenera tabletop kickstarter (though I did consider kicking in for it).
There's just something that's drawing me to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > EA Will "Look Into" Offline SimCity; New Patch Released |
 |
| 27. |
Re: EA Will |
Mar 10, 2013, 18:13 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
I seem to recall there being lip-service to some sort of semi-offline mode when people were basically calling out this exact situation likely to happen... The interview was posted here, but I can't recall who or when it was saying it.
I passed on it the second I heard about the always-on, no saves/reloads/random city destruction. That to me is not SimCity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Skyrim Beta Patch |
 |
| 31. |
Re: Skyrim Beta Patch |
Mar 4, 2013, 19:27 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
Creston wrote on Mar 4, 2013, 18:18:
jacobvandy wrote on Mar 4, 2013, 17:51: Resetting your skill doesn't reset your damage to noob levels because you still have your uber gear... You're still powerful, just not as much as you were previously. That is, until you level up the skill again and gain some levels and end up being MORE powerful than you started. Your skills wouldn't end up more powerful, though. They'd be exactly the same as they were before you reset them. You'd have some extra health or magicka, and that'd be it.
And I think you need to have a look at your uber gear and see how much of that damages comes from skill. At skill 15, the difference between a longbow and a daedric bow is around 12 points of damage. It isn't until you get the skill up and get the 5 perks to get the damage up that it really becomes impressive.
Look, it's up to you how you use this skill reset business. You can reset a bow skill or a sneak skill on their own, and still be pretty uber, or both and have some challenge again. Or you can decide you don't want to reset anything at all, doesn't matter to me or anyone else. Oh, I don't mean to imply that it's bad they put it in or something. It's awesome they put the option in there. I just wish there'd be some kind of purpose in resetting your skills. (like, the reset and Legendary status give it a +10% bonus or something.)
Merely gaining levels (which is going to take FOREVER anyway. I think 80 to 81 already took like 400 skill increases) doesn't really seem that big of a deal.
Creston Everyone seems to be focusing on resetting your combat skills... Why wouldn't you just reset the easily trainable crafting skills -- and then you can use the perks gained from those to fill out your other trees? I don't powergame enough in Skyrim to know how the level up formula works exactly... but pretty sure you could just keep increasing in level by resetting nothing but the crafting skills? I mean at some point you eventually hit a spot where you've got nothing really to spend money on anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Obsidian Pitching New Star Wars RPG |
 |
| 14. |
Re: X WING SIM!!! |
Feb 8, 2013, 10:55 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
CutterZane wrote on Feb 8, 2013, 10:37: Agree with Wildone - we're LONG overdue for another Star Wars space sim. There's not been one since X-Wing Alliance in 1999. Instead we're getting rubbish like Star Wars Pinball I still say they should just take the exact scenarios/gameplay/design of XvT (and add in the original standalone XWing and TIE Fighter games), update the graphics and netcode -- and release.
I'd buy that in a heartbeat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Activision/Blizzard Reveals Profits, Unannounced MMOG |
 |
| 14. |
Re: Activision/Blizzard Reveals Profits, Unannounced MMOG |
Feb 8, 2013, 10:11 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
wtf_man wrote on Feb 8, 2013, 09:26: I still don't get the WoW addiction. I've played many MMOs that I thought were better (and held my attention for a year or two), and after getting to the mid levels in WoW within a couple of months... looking for the addiction that everyone else seems to find... I just couldn't stand it anymore, quit, and never looked back.
It has to be one of the dullest MMO's I've ever played, and I don't know why... because it's not that far off the typical MMO designs from games I've played that I felt were superior.
/shrug WoW is basically the ideal 'carrot on a stick' design mmo. They give enough mini achievements to keep you satisified while having enough major achievements just out of reach to keep you striving for them. It's why when people finally do quit WoW... I don't think any of them (myself included) don't have some bitterness towards the game and how much time it sucked away from you.
Meanwhile DAoC, or even EQ to an extent get remembered fondly. They didn't make it seem like they were something that they weren't.
Newer MMOs emulate more the WoW design - but people are aware of what it's doing now, so easier to get in and out of the cycle without being fully sucked in. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Obsidian Pitching New Star Wars RPG |
 |
| 8. |
Re: Obsidian Pitching New Star Wars RPG |
Feb 8, 2013, 10:05 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
Bhruic wrote on Feb 8, 2013, 09:39: It's an odd time to pick. We know what the end result is going to be - no more Jedi (barring Obi-wan and Yoda). We know there's no other Sith. So unless they are going to do non-Force users, they'd be pretty limited in what they could put in. And, frankly, I'd have no interest in a Star Wars RPG where I couldn't wield a lightsaber. Star Wars Galaxies initially actually was pretty good as a sandbox mmo with no force users. Plenty of go about your business in a star wars setting. Personally I think for any Star Wars MMO you pretty much have to go with no force users because otherwise you have a gazillion sith/jedi -- and that never existed in that time frame either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods Announced |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods Announced |
Feb 4, 2013, 15:46 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
The prepared invasions could be good... I mostly just wanted to see mercenary companies replenishing themselves throughout the game as every so often you get stuck in a war where you have way more gold than you can spend but not enough bodies to win it decisively... and I wasn't the backstabbing kind of leader either.
That or you had your little piece of country you were waiting 100 years to gain de jure on, and then all of a sudden a major nation wants it back just before... need bodies to throw at them! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > THQ Sale Results? |
 |
| 15. |
Re: THQ Sale Results? |
Jan 23, 2013, 16:43 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
Redmask wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 16:21: If the worst result of this sale is that I have to click launch twice in Steam and uPlay to get into the South Park RPG then I can live with that. The Koch Media purchase is an odd one, I think they're the parent company behind the Dead Island guys. The companies and IP are often two separate things, it would be good to know which companies are being purchased with their respective IP intact or not. You forget the probable always online requirement. Unfortunately UBI getting it is terrible in my eyes. Not sending them a single cent anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 28. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 23, 2013, 15:24 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
NegaDeath wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 12:16: Microsoft wants to be like Apple so much now I'm surprised it isn't the iXbox. Actually I'm surprised that they didn't do something like... XBox XSlate (XSurface) XOS (or they could go XWindows and take on free software again). XPhone
Xetc etc... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Gone Gold - Omerta – City of Gangsters |
 |
| 5. |
Re: Gone Gold - Omerta – City of Gangsters |
Jan 11, 2013, 12:33 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
ASeven wrote on Jan 11, 2013, 12:14: After Kalypso's terrible handling of Legend of Pegasus, I'll wait for a shitload of user reviews to come in before I consider getting this one. Yeah, unfortunately both Kalypso and Paradox are on my list of incredibly awesome sounding niche games on paper but wait for the reviews list.
Kalypso being the worse of the two.
And then Cyanide is basically don't buy unless its Blood Bowl. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Top 10 |
 |
| 104. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 21, 2012, 13:03 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
Yeah BR on the PC is a mishmash of proprietary software requirements and weird HDCP issues. I spent a bundle putting such a setup together and eventually scrapped it out of frustration. Probably easier to just switch inputs to a player or get a second monitor for movie playback hooked up directly via HDMI. You'll need to worry about sound as well. Well I'm grabbing a discrete soundcard again, because I've always been a fan of having one over the onboard. We'll see how it goes, I needed an improved DVD player anyway and Newegg twisted my arm by discounting the one I was looking at further.
Just make sure you throw the latest firmware on it after installing, Crucial has a little updater that will automate it for you So I'm assuming then that the best course of action be to put it in the computer - update the firmware. Then format and install as primary OS drive?
I did end up going for the Crucial drive, and 16GB(4x4) of Mushkin Blackline.
So just the sound and video cards left to acquire, really hoping a GTX660Ti or HD7850 go on sale soon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Top 10 |
 |
| 102. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 21, 2012, 10:24 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
I'm not sure I understand the first question but you can buy different kits, though often times it makes the most sense to buy ram with the same specs to eliminate potential sources of hassle when troubleshooting. That was sort of where I was going with it. The RAM I have now was a triple channel kit. Wondering if it's alright to buy say... two dual channel kits to hit 16GB rather than having to go for a quad channel kit (mostly because none of the quad channels have free shipping and so two dual channels come in about 10-15 cheaper).
Other part of the question was cost/benefit of doing an upgrade on RAM if I have 6GB currently.
They are both very good drives, I prefer the M4 since its relatively well tested by the community at this point but Intel drives have awesome warranties. Flip a coin. Probably the Crucial then since I can get it either in Futureshop or online for cheaper than the Intels.
Honestly unless you really want to play back BR on your PC I would skip an optical drive altogether. You can do OS installs from USB media and its significantly faster. Bluray playback on PC is a fucking mess right now due to the licensing and DRM issues. Hard drives are cheap enough again that backing up to BR media doesn't really make much sense either. I tried to do the whole HTPC with BR drive thing and ended up with an HTPC for local media and a PS3 to play back BR discs. I actually have wanted to be able to play BD on my PC, the PS3 is in an entirely separate room and there's times where it's inconvenient to use vs having playback available in the PC room. I might just go for a regular player instead. I don't even write to DVD most of the time, so really having a writer is overkill.
Thanks for the answers! Also, is Windows8 really as bad as they say it is? Might just get a fresh copy when getting the SSD, in case I have problems locating my Vista x64 disc. That or I'll have to drop 110 on Windows 7 again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Top 10 |
 |
| 100. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 21, 2012, 09:23 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
Not sure if anyone will still check in on this thread...
But one question I had about SDRAM -- can I get two separate 2x4GB kits or do I have to go with 4x4GB kit if I want to go up to 16? (currently have 3x2GB PC3 12800 in the computer now). Would I even see enough of an upgrade to spend the money (~100 with shipping) on that now? Or wait to next year's cycle when I do the CPU/Mobo? Also is there any real difference between Corsair Vengeance and XMS?
Regarding SSD: Newegg.ca has a 120GB Intel 520 on offer for less than a 180GB Intel 330. Or I could go with a Crucial M4 128GB for about 30 bucks less. Is there enough of a difference between them again to be worth spending on?
Video card I'm going to see which if any of the 7850/660Ti/7950 go on boxing day sales, and then go with the one that catches my eye for features.
Other random accessories I've been wanting forever, going with a XONAR DSX soundcard and a BD player of some sort... looking at the LG 14x Bluray writer (is it worth getting bluray writers right now, or are they in the same crazy phase that DVD had where it took forever to get writeable disks to be readable by everthing?) though again a Boxing Day sale might change my mind.
This comment was edited on Dec 21, 2012, 09:29. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Top 10 |
 |
| 88. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 18, 2012, 15:39 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
SpectralMeat wrote on Dec 18, 2012, 15:32: SATA3 drives will work fine with SATA2 mobos. For SSDs however don't worry about SATA3. If you only have SATA2 mobo that will be fine, you can not tell the difference between 2 and 3 with the SSD drives. Thanks! Sounds like I can basically upgrade everything around the mobo/cpu with my current computer and then just get a new mobo/cpu to throw everything into next year! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Top 10 |
 |
| 86. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 18, 2012, 15:24 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
SpectralMeat wrote on Dec 18, 2012, 09:14:
Ceribaen wrote on Dec 18, 2012, 09:11: Do SSD use a different controller than the standard IDE or SATA ports I have? No, SSDs are SATA Are the SATA standards backwards compatible also?
Anyway. Shopping list: 1 SSD ~ 128GB. Avoid OCZ, get Intel if in budget. 1 new video card (might do a 660 or 7850 for budget purposes vs the 660Ti and 7950). Possibly more RAM (6GB is nice, 16GB would be nicer :):)) Need to verify which slots I still have open to see if maybe I can grab a XONAR sound card as well as currently using onboard, or I see that there are SATA3 PCIe controllers if I wanted to get SATA3.
Sound about right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Top 10 |
 |
| 77. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 18, 2012, 10:19 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
Verno wrote on Dec 18, 2012, 09:39:
So I fired up the old desktop and took a look at what I actually had in it... Might be in better shape than I thought, though I think an SSD might be desireable after all the talk here and dealing with a lot of HD chugging as it was going through all the windows updates
Motherboard is a Gigabyte EX58-UD3R. So PCIe 2.0 for graphics, LGA1366 for CPU. CPU is an i7 920, so I think it's actually in reasonable shape still. Graphics is a Radeon HD 4850(pretty sure it's a 50 off memory... definitely was a relatively powerful card at time of purchase). Have 6GB RAM, though not sure if it's 1066 or 1333 though. Looks like I still can upgrade here if I'd like. HD is a 1TB drive, but pretty sure that it was a Caviar Green.
So I guess my main area to upgrade is the HD. Do SSD use a different controller than the standard IDE or SATA ports I have? I would upgrade the videocard and the hard drive to an SSD, running Windows 7 on a 5400 RPM drive must be...interesting Everything else you can probably hold over until Haswell or whatever it's called. I was going off memory, it may have been a Caviar Black... Pretty sure I would have grabbed a 7200rpm at a minimum, vaguely remember looking at 10k drives at the time I was building it.
Is actually running Vista Business 64-bit on that machine currently.
Not sure what I could get for an upgrade though on a PCIe 2.0 bus? For some reason I think that was also when AMD especially was starting to redo its card numbering convention again and there were a couple generations of HD 4xxx cards?
Freed up 200GB on the drive last night deleting a bunch of Steam games I don't play currently, going to install something more recent (BL2, Dishonored, or Skyrim) to see how it fares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Top 10 |
 |
| 73. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 18, 2012, 09:11 |
Ceribaen |
|
|
So I fired up the old desktop and took a look at what I actually had in it... Might be in better shape than I thought, though I think an SSD might be desireable after all the talk here and dealing with a lot of HD chugging as it was going through all the windows updates
Motherboard is a Gigabyte EX58-UD3R. So PCIe 2.0 for graphics, LGA1366 for CPU. CPU is an i7 920, so I think it's actually in reasonable shape still. Graphics is a Radeon HD 4850(pretty sure it's a 50 off memory... definitely was a relatively powerful card at time of purchase). Have 6GB RAM, though not sure if it's 1066 or 1333 though. Looks like I still can upgrade here if I'd like. HD is a 1TB drive, but pretty sure that it was a Caviar Green.
So I guess my main area to upgrade is the HD. Do SSD use a different controller than the standard IDE or SATA ports I have? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
60 Comments. 3 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 ] Older > |
|