User comment history
< Newer [ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ] Older >
| News Comments > Ubisoft Financials - Ghost Recon Online Open Beta Nears |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Ubisoft Financials - Ghost Recon Online Open Beta Nears |
Jul 19, 2012, 14:15 |
deqer |
|
|
"Ghost Recon ONLINE"
Cool, looks like all the corps are starting to make all their games ONLINE only, and using ONLINE term in their titles like it is some buzzword or something.
What next? "Super Mario Brothers Online" ? ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Fortnite To Use Online DRM? |
 |
| 1. |
Re: Fortnite To Use Online DRM? |
Jul 19, 2012, 10:06 |
deqer |
|
|
"It’s gonna be really dependent on gameplay, and it’s also dependent on platform – the method of getting updates and stuff like that."
My god, you're so full of shit. You're SO FULL OF SHIT.
Also, what does "only"--for "online only"--requirement have anything to do with how you get updates? Why does game need to be online ONLY for you to get updates? Couldn't you just connect whenever you wanted to and get the updates that way? Shit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > BF4 Beta in Fall 2013: MoH Not Required |
 |
| 24. |
Re: BF4 Beta in Fall 2013: MoH Not Required |
Jul 18, 2012, 12:58 |
deqer |
|
|
netnerd85 wrote on Jul 18, 2012, 10:29: Remeber how awesome Battlefield 1942 was? Remember how awesome Battlefield 2 was? remember how you could/can play some awesome mods for those games.
Remember how Battlefield 3 is nothing like those awesome games.
Corps "these people are making mods for our games and playing them forever and we're not making any money off that? ok, that's it. no more modding capability then. we'll do the mods; we'll provide the mods as DLC."
such selfish greedy pricks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > BF4 Beta in Fall 2013: MoH Not Required |
 |
| 1. |
Re: BF4 Beta in Fall 2013: MoH Not Required |
Jul 18, 2012, 10:06 |
deqer |
|
|
"Just as we've continued to support and maintain Bad Company 2."
And what are your comments about supporting BF2142? Why was it the game only lasted a couple years and is now suddenly dead and has been dead since? Yet, you still sell BF2142 on your website... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Diablo III Game Limits Returning |
 |
| 46. |
Re: Diablo III Game Limits Returning |
Jul 17, 2012, 16:39 |
deqer |
|
|
Muscular Beaver wrote on Jul 17, 2012, 14:47: What happened to the only reason to make this game online only? I still see cheaters that's just the fluff that corps need to feed the people.
that's not the real reason why they did online-only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > MOH Specs; Preorder BF4 Beta Access Confirmed |
 |
| 22. |
Re: MOH Specs; Preorder BF4 Beta Access Confirmed |
Jul 17, 2012, 14:29 |
deqer |
|
|
hey corps. can you stop rushing out your shit because you need to fill your pockets because you hired more people than you can handle. not our problem. so, dont make it our problem. stop rushing out your products. how about you just skip all that shit and work on it until everything is done and give us BF9. lets skip BF4, BF5, BF6, BF7, BF8. please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Diablo III Game Limits Returning |
 |
| 19. |
Re: Diablo III Game Limits Returning |
Jul 17, 2012, 12:55 |
deqer |
|
|
wonkawonka wrote on Jul 17, 2012, 11:36: I played 75 hours, much of it at level 60, quite a bit of it on inferno, and I have YET TO SEE A DROP BETTER THAN YELLOW. lol.
and this is why i scratch my head when people respond back to me with "it's a timesink, we know. if you dont like timesinks, then maybe this game isn't for you." because explain to me exactly why ANYONE would like a timesink that 1) profits off you, and 2) is actually scaled even further than what you feel is acceptable, 75+ hours for nothing.
lulz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Medal of Honor: Warfighter to Grant Battlefield 4 Beta Access? |
 |
| 29. |
Re: Medal of Honor: Warfighter to Grant Battlefield 4 Beta Access? |
Jul 14, 2012, 22:28 |
deqer |
|
|
Dmitri_M wrote on Jul 14, 2012, 16:27:
Techie714 © wrote on Jul 14, 2012, 15:54: Apparently the only guy that thought BF3 was awesome...checking in..... I liked it too. I got two months of gaming out of it then stopped satisfied. 2 months? Hey, guess what, people are still playing great games like doom and quake to this day. How many years is that?
I think maybe you TOLD yourself to be satisfied, and thus you were satisfied. But I don't think you are truly satisfied. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Call of Duty: Black Ops II Trailer |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Call of Duty: Black Ops II Trailer |
Jul 10, 2012, 23:30 |
deqer |
|
|
Alamar wrote on Jul 10, 2012, 23:11: Gotta give em props (whatever that means heh)... It means giving proper kudos. An improper kudos would be a small acknowledgement; like a golf clap or something. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > LucasArts FPS Plans? |
 |
| 28. |
Re: LucasArts FPS Plans? |
Jul 10, 2012, 16:38 |
deqer |
|
|
The more you guys rave about xwing, the more EA will feel they can get away with doing shit to the game--like, making it online only for example--and know that you'll buy it anyways.
So, keep quiet please. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > LucasArts FPS Plans? |
 |
| 21. |
Re: LucasArts FPS Plans? |
Jul 10, 2012, 14:03 |
deqer |
|
|
nin wrote on Jul 10, 2012, 14:02: I've actually enjoyed the hell out of the clone wars cartoons. It's amazing how enjoyable SW is with minimal Lucas involvement...
You like stuff with childish stuff in it? okay. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > New ZDoom and ODAMEX |
 |
| 4. |
Re: New ZDoom and ODAMEX |
Jul 8, 2012, 22:18 |
deqer |
|
|
I corrected my spelling for the PrBoom+plus port. It's not PrDoom. It's PrBoom. PrBoom+plus
I personally have not used PrBoom, but I know it's quite popular.
I'm still fine with using GZDoom for the time being though; it already has everything i could ask for with it's framework/interface and addons, etc. Perhaps PrBoom+plus uses the same framework? I don't know. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
776 Comments. 39 pages. Viewing page 24.
< Newer [ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ] Older > |
|