siapnar wrote on Feb 9, 2013, 15:34:
Imagine a GTA game with RAGE's vehicle physics? Brutal.

Quboid wrote on Feb 9, 2013, 14:18:
Pathetic that they are taking about that as an invisible wall, or pathetic that that's in the game?

theyarecomingforyou wrote on Feb 9, 2013, 13:49:

netnerd85 wrote on Feb 9, 2013, 10:27:
I have played the game for 43 hours.

Where is one invisible wall?

I can respect differences of opinion but not outright denial of basic, well-documented facts.

theyarecomingforyou wrote on Feb 9, 2013, 08:41:
You clearly didn't play the game much.

theyarecomingforyou wrote on Feb 9, 2013, 07:42:
Then there were the gameplay issues, like a virtual useless autosave implementation, insta-death if you explored freely, terrible AI, invisible walls (they were EVERYWHERE), the terrible vehicle physics, crude inventory system, etc.

Cutter wrote on Feb 8, 2013, 23:06:
They're closing Impossible? Inconceivable!

Creston wrote on Feb 8, 2013, 21:37:
Yay, so now the 1 people still playing RAGE can take 3 years to figure out how to make a mod and then release it for himself!

Oh well, at least they actually did release it, like they promised. 18 months later.

Someone needs to explain to id how the game industry works.

Creston

Mad Max RW wrote on Feb 8, 2013, 11:48:
Well, there are full playthroughs of the game online now and it sucks. There's so many reasons big and small it adds up to a third rate DNF style rush job. You'd have to be stupid not to see how this will end. But you aren't stupid, are you?

Bradley wrote on Feb 8, 2013, 01:57:

WyldKat wrote on Feb 7, 2013, 20:43:
While it's cool they're remaking a classic, I have to say this pales in comparison to Kerbal Space Program. This makes no mention of actually designing and flying the rockets yourself, or any sort of flight simulation involved as what is a core feature of KSP. KSP will also have the management side of things too before the game is officially launched.

Still I suppose this is cool if you're really into historical management sims.

Does Kerbal Space Program actually let you do anything besides build a rocket and launch it? This game sounds like a huge sim that involves building launch facilities, building up scientists, research and tech trees, etc. KSP seems like a one-trick-pony compared to this. It's a really nice pony, granted, but it's a limited pony.

DangerDog wrote on Feb 7, 2013, 23:31:

Wallshadows wrote on Feb 7, 2013, 21:31:
I'm more worried about the voice acting and whether or not what we heard in the last trailer release is what we should expect in the game. If it happens to be the case, I'll likely mute sounds and just have Aliens play in the background even if the scenes don't match up.

I would suggest watching this IGN preview, thankfully the voice acting in those trailers isn't in the game.

IGN first level playthrough

I didn't know they had the actual actors from Aliens do the voices for the game, mostly for the multiplayer per-order bonus at gamestop. hopefully just a timed exclusive. That's pretty cool.

They've really bungled the marketing of this game.

Verno wrote on Feb 6, 2013, 11:19:

Rattlehead wrote on Feb 5, 2013, 22:52:
You must be crazy or blind, because RAGE is one of the best looking games of all time, on console or PC.

Rattlehead

It depends on what you're looking at in that game, the immediate surroundings and periphery often look like dogshit compared to other aspects. It's one of the best looking games for its framerate and an accomplishment that it runs well on console hardware but I certainly wouldn't put it up with Crysis and Far Cry 3 though.

Cutter wrote on Feb 6, 2013, 09:57:
Why does Carmack even bother staying in gaming? He clearly doesn't need the dough. And whatever passion he had for it seems to have evaporated long ago. It's more like just doing it because it's routine. He only seems to be stoked about space related stuff so why doesn't he focus on that?