User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ] Older >
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 8. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Oct 9, 2012, 18:34 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
I have no idea what to think of Forza Horizon. It's not as crazy over-the-top as the Criterion NFS games. It's not as crazy realistic as Forza 4. It doesn't have the cool cockpit mode / arcadeyness / damage that Shift, GRID, and DIRT have. It pushes the "xtreme awesome festival" atmosphere really heavily. It is fun and has a bit of Forzaness to the physics (if you put steering on Simulation; if you don't, it's horrible), the environments are nice, the dirt driving isn't too shabby, and I appreciate the silly car vs. plane event and things like that, but I haven't found something to grab me.
This comment was edited on Oct 9, 2012, 18:47. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ships Ahoy - DCS: P-51D Mustang |
 |
| 6. |
Re: Ships Ahoy - DCS: P-51D Mustang |
Oct 9, 2012, 11:59 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
Aero wrote on Oct 9, 2012, 00:09: Oh, perhaps I should clarify for those that don't know. It's a simulation of the P-51D, but you fly it in modern Georgia, and all the other planes and vehicles are modern. So it's P-51's versus Su-27's or air-to-ground missions trying to evade SAMs and Shilkas. I was wondering how it would work in multiplayer with the other DCS titles. I guess I have my answer: it's always in modern times.
Still tempting though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > DICE Warns of Bans for BF3 Color Mod |
 |
| 23. |
Re: DICE Warns of Bans for BF3 Color Mod |
Oct 4, 2012, 00:10 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
xXBatmanXx wrote on Oct 3, 2012, 20:13: hahahaha "you made the game better - so we will ban you!" The anti-cheat tools pick up things that mess with DX calls, it's not like they're targeting this specifically. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Big Picture Beta Begins |
 |
| 25. |
Re: Steam Big Picture Beta Begins |
Sep 11, 2012, 16:53 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
Shok wrote on Sep 11, 2012, 08:14:
Crustacean Soup wrote on Sep 10, 2012, 21:03: This is awesome right here. Games just need to support it, like Skyrim for instance, which still needs a mouse to get through the launcher. Then get a wireless mouse. Seriously, I like Big Picture and all but I have a bad feeling about giving companies more of a reason to release crappy consolized ports. No. I want controller support. Evidently, Valve figures others do as well, since there's this whole Big Picture mode right here. I don't have any bad feelings about giving companies more of a reason to make my Xbox 360 completely obsolete.
I've gamed on the couch using a wireless mouse; it's inferior to using a controller in that situation. It's less comfortable, it's far less ergonomic. If I have to use a mouse/keyboard, I'm using them at a desk; if I'm gaming on the couch, I'm using a controller. I'm not about to replace desk PC gaming with couch PC gaming (strategy games on a couch? Multiplayer FPSs? Hah), it's more about replacing couch console gaming with couch PC gaming.
Consoles haven't killed traditional PC gaming yet, and I really doubt TV-friendly interfaces will either. I don't care in any case, I'm just going to buy the games I want to buy and play them the way I want to play them.
This comment was edited on Sep 11, 2012, 16:58. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Evening Consolidation |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Evening Consolidation |
Sep 7, 2012, 18:45 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
Emergent actually has a meaning, and it's useful when used that way as it conveys specific information. Its meaning isn't 'random encounters we scripted into the game', though.
I don't know, I think the game sounds interesting. I don't mind arcadey racers, and the random events and exploration and stuff sound neat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > UE3 on WinRT |
 |
| 27. |
Re: UE3 on WinRT |
Aug 29, 2012, 21:28 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
Hyatus wrote on Aug 29, 2012, 19:28:
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Aug 29, 2012, 18:43: Are people meant to be impressed that they support DX9, a decade old API? This is their chance to ditch legacy support and move ahead with DX11. Roughly 15% of computers on Steam are still XP. That may not seem like many, but it's still the 2nd most-used OS on there. Besides, there's no reason a game can't support both APIs. Lies. There's a good reason: a modern rendering flow using DX 11 might look drastically different to one using DX9. Drastically different means a hell of a lot of work to maintain both. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Natural Selection 2 Exosuit Reveal; Beta Access Ending |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Natural Selection 2 Exosuit Reveal; Beta Access Ending |
Aug 28, 2012, 13:43 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
I'm interested in hearing some feedback/reviews of this one too. Looks promising, but I haven't tried the beta personally.
ASeven wrote on Aug 28, 2012, 11:36: This is the first 100% true PC game to be released in a long, long time This is complete gibberish. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Metaverse |
 |
| 5. |
Re: Morning Metaverse |
Aug 20, 2012, 21:03 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
Alamar wrote on Aug 20, 2012, 13:42: I personally encrypt all my google drive backups, but that only goes so far... They have the technology... If you're encrypting it properly, that goes pretty bloody far. The only feasible attacks against AES right now involve access to the computer doing the encryption; if they have that, they can probably grab the unencrypted files anyways. That's also assuming of course that you're using a strong key. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > C&C Generals 2 Becoming F2P Command & Conquer |
 |
| 42. |
Re: C&C Generals 2 Becoming F2P Command & Conquer |
Aug 15, 2012, 19:02 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
| I'm not about to go all crazy negative yet; I have actually enjoyed some F2P games. Have yet to see an F2P strategy game that isn't crazy P2W, but it could happen. I'll just keep up the usual skepticism until I can actually try it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Precludes Class Action Lawsuits |
 |
| 56. |
Re: Steam Precludes Class Action Lawsuits |
Jul 31, 2012, 23:53 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
NKD wrote on Jul 31, 2012, 23:44: Class actions ramp up damages to an obscene amount over what are often trivial offenses that many customers aren't even aware happened. Our civil courts should not be tied up with a bunch of trivial offenses that could be dealt with in other ways. So again, we're back at
corporations should just be able to get away with shit with no punishment whatsoever, as long as they spread the damage around enough? and my more important point,
Since I can't/won't afford to waste my time taking them to trial or arbitration over such a piddling amount, what's discouraging them from stealing my $10 in the future? If they dealt with something 'in different ways', there wouldn't be any basis for a class action and it would fail. The fact that so many don't is an indication that not all corps are so benevolent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Precludes Class Action Lawsuits |
 |
| 49. |
Re: Steam Precludes Class Action Lawsuits |
Jul 31, 2012, 23:40 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
NKD wrote on Jul 31, 2012, 23:37:
Crustacean Soup wrote on Jul 31, 2012, 23:33: You're not getting my point. It's not about the $10 I might get from Valve if I sue them (vs. the $0.25 class action settlement). I couldn't care less about that. Since I can't/won't afford to waste my time taking them to trial or arbitration over such a piddling amount, what's discouraging them from stealing my $10 in the future? A couple dozen people bothering to bring them to small claims doesn't do that. A class action representing a couple dozen hundred thousand people would. That's the whole reason that the class action even exists.
If someone can't be bothered to even enter arbitration or small-claims , then they don't deserve remedies. You should have to participate in the legal system if you expect to benefit from it. This attitude of "Click here to admonish a company and get a free coupon!" is the laziest perversion of a tort system I can think of. I just said that it's not about remedies. At least two, maybe three times there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Steam Precludes Class Action Lawsuits |
 |
| 45. |
Re: Steam Precludes Class Action Lawsuits |
Jul 31, 2012, 23:33 |
Crustacean Soup |
|
|
NKD wrote on Jul 31, 2012, 23:29:
Crustacean Soup wrote on Jul 31, 2012, 23:21:
NKD wrote on Jul 31, 2012, 23:15: Regardless of what one thinks of Valve, it's hard for an educated person to not have utter contempt for class actions. They are bad for both parties, and only good for the lawyers. You're almost always better off filing an individual claim.
It isn't as convenient as signing up on a website for a free coupon, but lawsuits are serious business and they shouldn't be convenient. You should go into them willing to put in a little time and effort. If you aren't willing, then perhaps you haven't been wronged as badly as you think. No. I did think that way, but it's an oversimplification. Most people don't have the will, knowledge, time, or money to file their own lawsuits, especially if it's over what was (for them) a relatively small amount of damage. So what, the corporations should just be able to get away with shit with no punishment whatsoever, as long as they spread the damage around enough? You can opt out of class actions if you want to file suit yourself. That inconvenience factor of trying to claim small amounts is why Valve and other companies want to do arbitration or small-claims in the first place. It's better for them, lawyers don't cash in, and you get pretty much the same relief you would in a class action. You're not getting my point. It's not about the $10 I might get from Valve if I sue them (vs. the $0.25 class action settlement). I couldn't care less about that. Since I can't/won't afford to waste my time taking them to trial or arbitration over such a piddling amount, what's discouraging them from stealing my $10 in the future? A couple dozen people bothering to bring them to small claims doesn't do that. A class action representing a few hundred thousand people would. That's the whole reason that the class action even exists.
Actually, from what I've seen, you're more likely to get full relief in arbitration or small claims than you are in a class action. Especially in this case where Valve agrees to pay arbitration costs or small-claims filing fees. Again, if it's real damage you're always free to opt out of a class action and file a suit yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
334 Comments. 17 pages. Viewing page 5.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ] Older > |
|