Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Brant King

Real Name Brant King   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Jivaro
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage None given.
Signed On Jul 23, 2010, 17:26
Total Comments 1780 (Pro)
User ID 55841
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ] Older >


News Comments > Morning Consolidation
5. Re: Morning Consolidation May 12, 2014, 11:52 Jivaro
 
Fibrocyte wrote on May 12, 2014, 11:23:
Can I play my PC chars when playing the game from a console? I assume Battle.net would take care of this but you never know...

Nope. Different servers, different characters. No ability to transfer at this time. Can't even use the same characters on North American servers that you use on European servers, or vice versa, let alone cross platform.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > WildStar Beta Open To All
47. Re: WildStar Beta Open To All May 9, 2014, 12:18 Jivaro
 
PropheT wrote on May 9, 2014, 02:18:
NKD wrote on May 8, 2014, 22:42:
What level did you get to?

Not high at all, but I'm not sure. It wasn't more than a handful of levels. Between the questing that seems designed for you to click through it and follow an arrow rather than actually get involved in it and struggling to do basic things with the UI I had no interest in forcing my way through in hopes that it gets better later. My problems with it aren't with lack of skills or abilities or the sorts of things that resolve as you level, it's the basic functionality and interface that I hate.

Yeah, it didn't grab me either...for many of the same reasons. There is a solid contingent of folks who do dig it though. It ain't for me but I think it will be around awhile if they stick to their design plan. If they backtrack and start trying please everyone, I see that going badly.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
6. Re: Out of the Blue May 9, 2014, 12:10 Jivaro
 
C'mon, he didn't say they should make the same. He noted the disparity.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds
74. Re: Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds May 7, 2014, 17:12 Jivaro
 
Quboid wrote on May 7, 2014, 16:23:
Early Access is not crowd funding. That's how you're looking at it and that's objectively wrong.

Of course it's not, no I am not, and yes it would be if I was.

I only casually lump them together because from a very basic customer perspective they have some of the same inherit risks. Beyond that they are, as you say, very different.

If you want to take it to court should a early access game fall apart, by all means do so.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds
72. Re: Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds May 7, 2014, 15:44 Jivaro
 
Nope, because at this point we are not only rehashing, but you are twisting what I said as if I was somehow unclear. Not only that but you appear to be taking things personally. I didn't say you were selfish, I said it sounded selfish. It has nothing to do with agreeing with me. If I felt that way it would still sound selfish.

If there is one sentence you can take from my entire post it's this: I look at this situation fundamentally different. You want a system with guarantees and low risk of failure provided by the distributor through regulation on the developer. I would agree that on paper that sounds great, but I think in practice creativity would be stifled and the indies would face the same challenges dealing with Valve that they do with any other major publisher. I like the system as is and believe it to be working as intended. I think we have both hashed over the reasons enough to be clear.

For the record, I have only done one Early Access (Grim Dawn) and 3 Kickstarters. I myself am rarely comfortable with putting down money for the overwhelming vast majority of the games I become aware of and 99% of the time take the stance of "they will get my money if they finish it". Never in a million years did I think I would be the guy defending Early Access as I find most of the games in it to be far too early in development to put my own money or time into. The thing is, I think anyone who wants to do it should be able to. As long as Valve keeps issuing refunds for the obvious scams, I think the system is fine.

This comment was edited on May 7, 2014, 15:53.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds
70. Re: Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds May 7, 2014, 14:47 Jivaro
 
So wait..the argument now is that hypothetically we would get better games if only the developers were saved from themselves by Valve? Wow. I guess we better start getting Amazon to screen all the books it sells as well to make sure those authors are being the best they can be. Here I thought that was for the consumer to decide, not the seller.

There appears to be a fundamental difference in the way I look at the gaming industry and the way some of you do. In fact, not just the gaming industry, capitalism in general. I expect things to fail occasionally. Not only that, I think they should be allowed to fail. I think people should buy stuff and find out they don't like it after all. I don't expect guarantees from people trying to make a living in a creative industry because when they fail they don't get to continue making a living. That is the life of a small business, that is life doing business with a small business. There will be people out to make a quick buck but as long as the system does not provide for the same people to do that over and over again so as to maintain a livable wage off of it....I find it completely acceptable. I am fine with it because when it all works out, it's amazing for everyone involved. The developers and the consumers. Brilliant gaming experiences come out of those successes.

Most of the arguments against this process sound so entitled and selfish. Like somehow the industry owes people to be fabulous with every release. These are people, some of them very young, who are gaining experience in not only game design but running their own business. This situation was a scam, but there will also be situations where the developers just fail. They hit a development wall, they lose a key member of the team to real life, or any number other reasons. Get over yourselves and stop trying to make it sound like a few bad apples should be allowed to restrict the rest of these people. No matter what Valve does there will be people who try to punk the system. No matter what Valve does there will be developers that just fail.

PS: Comparing this situation to Towns only proves my entire point. Towns is a perfect example of a developer getting in over their head. It happens to many a small business. This situation with Earth 2066 was a scam from the beginning. One dev played by the rules and lost, one dev tried to break the rules and lost. The rules (re: system) worked as intended. Beginning to end.

I understand the counter points as they have been presented by Quboid and others. I just don't see their validity nor do I agree that non-participants are somehow affected by any of this. I think Early Access, Kickstarter, and other systems that are helping to grow the indie side of the gaming industry need to stay unafraid to fail and I think the consumers providing the money need to understand that failure is an option. For those not okay with that, the answer is simple: don't do it. Developer or consumer.

This comment was edited on May 7, 2014, 15:00.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds
67. Re: Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds May 7, 2014, 13:12 Jivaro
 
If Valve feels the need to police this, I think they will probably just shut down the Early access program. They won't do that because incidents like this are rare. So far anyway.

I have yet to see a compelling argument for changing the system. Steam is providing a unique service in a unique way. I don't want a system that handicaps the honest folks just to prevent the occasional scammer. We already see enough of that in just about every entrepreneurial industry I can think of. The folks demanding regulation by Valve are also expressing distaste for Early Access in the first place, which makes me wonder if there really is any way this system would be applied that they would be happy with. I still don't understand why "if you don't like it, don't buy it" isn't a good enough resolution to that issue.

Had Valve refused to give refunds I would understand all this rhetoric. Had Valve refused to give refunds in any situation like this I would understand. They haven't so I don't. Again, the system worked. I fail to see why any sort of change is needed from Valve's stand point. Hopefully the people who paid into this obvious scam learned their lesson and over time the Early Access system as a whole can be looked at as one where the community and the consumers will hold the developers accountable because Valve has their back. So far, Valve has upheld their end of the bargain.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds
58. Re: Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds May 7, 2014, 02:48 Jivaro
 
The contention that Valve was not inconvenienced is also ludicrous. People and time are resources, resources that cost money. It takes both to deals with these kind of things. That isn't to say they are going to go broke over it or anything, it's simply the cost of doing business.

Stop trying to find a witch to burn here. The only one is the guy who tried to run this scam. The customers smelled a bad fish and reported it. Valve is cleaning up the mess, as they should. The system worked.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds
31. Re: Valve Offering Earth: Year 2066 Refunds May 6, 2014, 16:15 Jivaro
 
ohmagawd....a human tried to scam other humans! Quick...blame someone! Change something! Change the system! Overreact!

Or accept that no matter what Valve does, someone will try to scam it. I would prefer they keep the gates fairly open and let the community do it's thing. Every other major company in our industry brandishes control over everything to an extreme level. I really don't see the need or value in Valve being the same way.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sunday Consolidation
2. Re: Sunday Consolidation May 4, 2014, 19:00 Jivaro
 
If you can get a copy of Madden 08 for PC, there is a great community that still does updates, mods, and total conversions. I lurk on the Football Idiot forums to keep up with it, there are other places I imagine.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Legal Briefs
14. Re: Saturday Legal Briefs May 4, 2014, 09:53 Jivaro
 
Quboid wrote on May 3, 2014, 22:05:
Jivaro wrote on May 3, 2014, 21:35:
You guys aren't acknowledging that they get to keep the tech, keep selling the phones, etc etc. They are essentially paying 120million dollars to license Apple's tech. I guarantee you that if in some weird alternate reality Samsung had licensed Apple's tech, it would have cost them a bunch more than 120million over the lifetime of said tech.

File this money under R&D, not legal fees.

They can still sell the phones that use these, but can they use these in future phones? The models mentioned aren't likely to be big sellers any more.

Yes, they can use the tech in whatever they want. It is one of the reasons that some people think Apple might be as likely to appeal the decision as Samsung. The article doesn't address it because, to my knowledge, the jury didn't address it.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > EVE Online Kronos Next Month
8. Re: EVE Online Kronos Next Month May 3, 2014, 21:37 Jivaro
 
Dirwulf wrote on May 3, 2014, 15:15:
I have no idea how anyone can mine in that game. It's so utterly boring. I prefer to explore in low and null sec. Lots of ISK to be made that way. Or join The Code and gank miners. So fun.

And to the guy who said he couldn't find mining nodes, you are nuts. They are all over the frelling place in high sec. Hence The Code.

Long Live James 315!!! Death to all bot-aspirant miners! Buy a mining permit. They are cheap. Only 10,000,000 ISK. Pay up, or we will continue to gank all you miners in high sec.

minerbumping.com


Oh oh...somebody let the RP guy in....

I kid..I kid...
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Legal Briefs
8. Re: Saturday Legal Briefs May 3, 2014, 21:35 Jivaro
 
You guys aren't acknowledging that they get to keep the tech, keep selling the phones, etc etc. They are essentially paying 120million dollars to license Apple's tech. I guarantee you that if in some weird alternate reality Samsung had licensed Apple's tech, it would have cost them a bunch more than 120million over the lifetime of said tech.

File this money under R&D, not legal fees.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
4. Re: Out of the Blue May 3, 2014, 12:44 Jivaro
 
I have a long standing morning tradition of grilling burgers and serving them breadless with a fried egg and sliced grilled onions. When people come to visit, it is usually their first request.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Legal Briefs
1. Re: Saturday Legal Briefs May 3, 2014, 11:03 Jivaro
 
Seems like Samsung won.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Consolidation
1. Re: Evening Consolidation May 2, 2014, 22:31 Jivaro
 
Comcast and EA are teaming up?

Sure, that can't possibly go wrong.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > CCP's Project Legion Announced
4. Re: CCP's Project Legion Announced May 2, 2014, 22:25 Jivaro
 
They cancelled WoD to make this?  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
11. Re: Out of the Blue May 2, 2014, 22:24 Jivaro
 
So..Steam is down. At least it is down for a great many people.

www.issteamdown.com

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Transformers Universe Founders Packs On Sale
5. Re: Transformers Universe Founders Packs On Sale May 2, 2014, 13:03 Jivaro
 
The Half Elf wrote on May 2, 2014, 12:04:
And it's utter crap. Stick with Fall/War of Cybertron.

I can attest to this comment, I tried the beta last night. As betas go it is technically fairly sound. As games go, it simply isn't much fun. I was impressed with what they have accomplished within a browser from a technical stand point...it still isn't a fun game though. At least in my short time with it. I suppose I should be fair and say that I gave up on it pretty quickly.

It sure as fuck isn't worth any of the prices they want for those found packs, least of all 450 bucks. You would have to be one hell of a fanboy with a great deal of money to waste to fully dive into this one.

This comment was edited on May 2, 2014, 13:14.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Transformers Universe Founders Packs On Sale
2. Re: Transformers Universe Founders Packs On Sale May 2, 2014, 11:00 Jivaro
 
449 dollars? wow...  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
1780 Comments. 89 pages. Viewing page 11.
< Newer [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo