Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for yuastnav

Real Name yuastnav   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname None given.
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Jun 25, 2010, 15:17
Total Comments 749 (Apprentice)
User ID 55800
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ] Older >


News Comments > Nexus 2 Kickstarter
36. Re: Nexus 2 Kickstarter Sep 29, 2012, 13:16 yuastnav
 
Stormsinger wrote on Sep 28, 2012, 20:14:
[...]
Are you seriously trying to tell someone what his expectations were, in contradiction to what -he- says they were?
[...]

No I am not. Read again.

Stormsinger wrote on Sep 28, 2012, 20:14:
[...]
I guess it couldn't possibly be that he has the slightest validity to his complaints...it must just be that he's a moron who doesn't know what he wants.
[...]

Why are you insulting him?
And no, it would be strange for me to assume that you are using sarcasm since I never said anything about what you are accusing me of.
I never directly addressed his complaints.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Nexus 2 Kickstarter
18. Re: Nexus 2 Kickstarter Sep 28, 2012, 19:07 yuastnav
 
Well I really enjoyed Nexus.

The only problem was the game-breaking bug where it crashed during a sequence and didn't let me finish the game.

Apart from that it was a fantastic experience.

Stanly Manly wrote on Sep 28, 2012, 15:55:
eRe4s3r wrote on Sep 28, 2012, 15:21:
Wow the posts in this topic make me sad to be a pc gamer. Too complicated? Nexus? A game you could win with the shift key and 1 mouse button?

And to the guy saying the game felt staged.. I have only 1 thing to say to that.. DUH.
Reread the genre, TACTICAL COMBAT SIMULATION. Read up what a tactical combat challenge IS. That is the very definition of STAGED COMBAT in a game. To complain that the game felt staged is like saying that Homeworld 2 had too much space. Or that there was too much shooting in Call of Duty. Tactical challenges HAVE to be staged. Or it would be brainless skirmish.

But the sad abilities of pc gamers we have here aside, why is this kickstarter 2 days shorter than Obsidian one?

Hah, the old "you are playing it wrong" bit. Do you dislike any games, Eraser? If you do, it's because your abilities are sub par, and you obviously don't understand the genre, duh.

That is not entirely correct. As it has been said it's not a strategy game but a tactical simulator. You are not correct in saying that he he is wrong in implying that you are not playing it correctly since you, probably, just have different expectations from it.
To use an analogy: it's like expecting Baldur's Gate or Fallout to be an action adventure rpg. It's not. Gothic or the elder scrolls are action adventures with rpg elements, Baldur's gate and Fallout are rpg games. There are similar mechanics but the games are fundamentally different. It's the same for Nexus and other games of a similar genre in which you control several ships in a strategical manner in space.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Notch Knocks Win8: Minecraft Certification in Doubt
2. Re: Notch Knocks Win8: Minecraft Certification in Doubt Sep 27, 2012, 10:38 yuastnav
 
"Certify minecraft for win8"?

What does this even mean?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Sale
4. Re: On Sale Sep 27, 2012, 10:05 yuastnav
 
I just hope this copy of Nexus works properly.
I still have the DVD case lying around here somewhere but I never finished the game because a certain cutscene always crashed the game (skipping it crashed the game, too) and I didn't found any solutions on the internet that worked for me.

Oh well, got it while it was 60% off and will try it out again when I find some time. It was definitely really good when it was working.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Beneath a Steel Sky Sequel Confirmed
3. Re: Beneath a Steel Sky Sequel Confirmed Sep 24, 2012, 11:57 yuastnav
 
Wow, didn't expect that.
Sounds great, though! I hope they'll actually do it.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saints Row: The Third; Sale, Free Weekend
17. Re: Saints Row: The Third; Sale, Free Weekend Sep 21, 2012, 09:49 yuastnav
 
Definitely one of the best games I have played lately.

I just wish that they would release the fist Saints Row on PC but seeing as how financially unstable THQ is right now I guess that's not going to happen.

Oh well, at least there will be a sequel and since this game is really, really awesome it's not that likely that it's going to be cancelled since this could make them some money. Or at least I hope so.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > FTL: Faster Than Light This Week
68. Re: FTL: Faster Than Light This Week Sep 13, 2012, 10:21 yuastnav
 
space captain wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 09:44:
yuastnav wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 07:59:
It all depends on how it is presented. If you don't want it to sound like whining you have to say it in a rational manner which has not always been the case.



says the whiny little bitch

don't be too hard on yourself
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > FTL: Faster Than Light This Week
65. Re: FTL: Faster Than Light This Week Sep 13, 2012, 07:59 yuastnav
 
Prez wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 07:10:
[...]
I don't think anyone was bitching, whining, complaining, etc. It sounded more to me like people sharing why FTL wasn't appealing to them and why they weren't going to buy the game.
[...]

It all depends on how it is presented. If you don't want it to sound like whining you have to say it in a rational manner which has not always been the case.


Prez wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 07:10:
[...]
but who are we to tell anyone else what "should be sufficient" for them? Personal tastes are just that - personal.
[...]

You said it yourself: this is a forum for discussion. Anytime someone asks about what game he should play and you come up with a list of games that this person might like you automatically make an implication about what is of sufficient quality to that person and what is not.
People here expressed their opinion, in one way or the other, about how they perceive the graphics so that gives you at least some information what kind of graphics the person would like
If they don't like FTL - fine. It may have been the developer's wish to make this kind of art style or it may have been a budget problem. In any case there many other games out there that can be to someone's liking who doesn't want to play FTL.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > FTL: Faster Than Light This Week
61. Re: FTL: Faster Than Light This Week Sep 13, 2012, 05:05 yuastnav
 
PHJF wrote on Sep 12, 2012, 20:55:
Valley Without Wind is both a fucking awful game and fucking ugly. Why the fuck would you bring it up? What is wrong with you?

I rest my case.

Prez wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 00:09:
You should be congratulating these guys for coming up with an actual unique game idea and, more importantly, executing it well!

I agree with that. For my part, though I understand the complaints about the general graphic fidelity of some indie games (seriously guys it really isn't whining just because someone else cares more about a certain aspect of a game than you do), I am totally in love with the concept of FTL and can't wait to play it.

That is all well but there are games with have graphics that should be sufficient for the people who complain.
Like I said: you don't have to buy it. If someone likes the concept of the game but is put off by the graphics so much that it becomes a dealbreaker then tough luck.
But maybe that's just me. If a game is fun and has good controls then that's enough, in most cases.

This comment was edited on Sep 13, 2012, 05:13.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > FTL: Faster Than Light This Week
46. Re: FTL: Faster Than Light This Week Sep 12, 2012, 20:00 yuastnav
 
Wow, hard to believe how many people here just outright whine about graphics.

Just a few months back I played Starflight for the first time and had a blast with it. Although the control scheme could have been better.


If you don't like how it looks then don't play it, simple as that.
This just reminds me of last time when people were QQing about A Valley Without Winds.
Good god. No one forces you to play these games. What is wrong with you?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Profile; Big Picture UI Testing Tomorrow
32. Re: Valve Profile; Big Picture UI Testing Tomorrow Sep 10, 2012, 08:01 yuastnav
 
007Bistromath wrote on Sep 10, 2012, 03:51:
[...] but it isn't hard to see that TF2 is the most perfect game (in the sense of "functional completeness") in the history of the hobby, [...]

Uhm, care to elaborate?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Darksiders II Sales
45. Re: On Darksiders II Sales Sep 9, 2012, 11:48 yuastnav
 
LurkerLito wrote on Sep 9, 2012, 10:48:
Jerykk wrote on Sep 9, 2012, 01:29:
If by "fluff content," you mean "more of the same gameplay that you enjoyed in the first game," sure? Because that's what it was. Just more of the same. Same combat, same exploration, same platforming, same puzzle-solving. DS2 just had more of it and a lot of it was optional.
I am pretty sure what turned many fans of DS1 to disliked DS2 was a complete change to the game play mechanics. While combat, and puzzles were the same, the game play changed from an action game with some RPG-ish elements to a full blown aRPG with inventory management, buying and selling, and grinding for levels. In DS1 War was powerful from start to finish, the RPG-ish elements were just improving his weapons and buying skills. In DS2, you now have to deal with levels, a skill tree, grabbing dropped weapons, selling them to make room for more, buying skills, improving possessed weapons, running into creatures far stronger than Death making him feel significantly weaker than War in the beginning.

While I like both games, the first one was better put together. It was a game where the story fit the game play and the game play mechanics matched. In DS2, the story fits the game play but the game play mechanics clash. DS1 War was powerful throughout the game even after he was stripped of his powers. In DS2, Death is weak and gets stronger, and his weapons sucked and have to be constantly replaced. For a supposed horseman of the apocalypse, it clashes with the story but is done that way to fit it to the aRPG game mechanics.

In other words, they took a Action game like Ninja Gaiden/Devil May Cry and made it more like Diablo.

Which is why I am interested in Darksiders 2.
When I saw the first one I didn't pay it much attention because after seeing a few gameplay videos I've written it off as some boring action adventure, but now that they have introduced an RPG system and an open world it makes the game much more interesting and I don't think I am the only one who thinks that way.

Still, cannot afford to buy games full price since I rarely finish them anymore, due to a lack of time. And then the interest fades. Hope it will be at least 50% off during the winter sale.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Playable Female Characters in Aliens: Colonial Marines
44. Re: Playable Female Characters in Aliens: Colonial Marines Sep 4, 2012, 06:01 yuastnav
 
InBlack wrote on Sep 4, 2012, 04:24:
Remember when movies used to be NOT Politically Correct??

Remember when games used to be NOT Politically Correct??

*sigh*

Shit used to be a lot better when people were...you know actually expressing themselves instead of expressing what is 'expected' of them. Damn I miss those times....

There is no such thing as "political correctness". It is a myth.
Everything you do and say is only subject to your own set of morals which may include accepting social norms so as not to stick out. Political correctness, however, does not exist.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Natural Selection 2 Exosuit Reveal; Beta Access Ending
9. Re: Natural Selection 2 Exosuit Reveal; Beta Access Ending Aug 28, 2012, 14:46 yuastnav
 
I remember that after some time I loathed the Half Life engine and could not understand why they discarded the net code from the original Quake 2 basis, which was probably the best part. Stupid move there, Valve.
The thing is that it was too slow for Natural Selection, if you were a quick fade it would be entirely possible for you to die after you blinked around two corners already.
When they announced that they were going to use their own engine I was relieved because I thought they were going to do a good job.

Well, the netcode is basically even worse than in the original Half Life. I literally stood in front of a non-moving marine (as a Skulk) and bit him three or four times and not one single attack connected (we both had a normal ping) and have seen similar things happen to other players.
Same thing happens when you try to shoot a Skulk as a marine. The bullets do not seem to hit. :/


On the other hand Natural Selection 2 is the game that Natural Selection wanted to be. Natural Selection should have been a slightly scary, dark game where you had this asymmetric constellation of teams and while the latter part was still true it just wasn't that dark or scary (especially because people cranked up the brightness in competitive games anyway).
Unfortunately the movement is not as smooth in Natural Selection 2 as it is in Natural Selection 1. For some reason they decided not to implement bunny hopping which was really fun when you played as a Skulk (and other glitches, like wall-running as a marine etc.) so it makes this game less competitive than Natural Selection in general (at least to me).

But the atmosphere is much better. The lighting is really good, especially when you go into a dark room with your flashlights because the power node was killed and try to find those skulks. So if they actually manage to smooth this game out then it's going to be really good, it already is.


Fortunately most of the changes they made are decent and pretty fun, cannot really complain. I will miss the Fade's blink but the current ability is kind cool, too. Much more like the blink from 1.04.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Community Beta
18. Re: Steam Community Beta Aug 16, 2012, 17:12 yuastnav
 
WaltC wrote on Aug 16, 2012, 16:55:
yuastnav wrote on Aug 16, 2012, 16:21:
A PC is a Personal Computer. A Macintosh is a PC. PC doesn’t automatically mean x86, damn it. Politically Correct.

A bit off topic, but I thought I would comment on this. While it is certainly true that "personal computers" don't have to be x86 to be "personal computers," or PCs, today's Mac is 100% x86 and has been for several years. The only substantive difference between a Dell and a "Mac" is the Operating System that ships with each. The Mac will natively run either of two x86 OSes ROOB, or both: Windows and OS X. The Dell runs Windows natively, too, and the only reason you won't find OS X on a Dell is because Apple has intentionally created that situation and has made it "illegal" (both in terms of law and software) to install OS X to any non Apple-branded x86 computer system. Again, Macs are 100% x86 today, so that quote is a tad out of date. (Not to mention the fact that today's "x86" is certainly not "your father's x86", either.)

That may be true but it's really bugging me when people say things like "A Mac and a PC" or "For PC, Mac and Linux" because it's really stupid. Macs are PCs and Linux is also an operating system that is used on PCs and it's really not that difficult to say "For Win(dows), Mac and Linux" or something like that.
This may be (at least partially) attributed to the old "I'm a Mac and I'm a PC" ads but that doesn't make it right (or clever).

But again, you are right.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Community Beta
14. Re: Steam Community Beta Aug 16, 2012, 16:21 yuastnav
 
Afaik you can get a STEAM_ID by just joining a server and typing "status" into the console.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Gatherings & Competitions
104. Re: Gatherings & Competitions Aug 13, 2012, 07:42 yuastnav
 
RailWizard wrote on Aug 13, 2012, 07:02:
You all, perhaps due the severity of your buthurtedness, are missing the point entirely here.

I don't really give a shit about gays, or what they do. Only when I see stuff like this does it become a problem because I don't think they deserve any special attention or privilege.

The only ones I don't have a problem with when they do this is based on race. The reason for that should be obvious. However here in North America, there are only 2 races where this is acceptable. Blacks and Natives.

The only reason this shit blows up like this is because you fascist pricks think you own everyone.

So you can all put down the eye spreaders + drops and turn off the Ludwig Van.

I'm done here. (i think...)

Us fascists? You are the one who is talking about races!
There is only one human race on this planet that is still alive and this is the homo sapiens. You are still stuck in the 20th century with your outdated ideas and ideals and since you are mad that the world has left you behind a long time ago you start making up bs and calling everyone else a hypocrite.
The only thing that has come out of you are insults because you fail entirely to make a coherent argument.
Stop being so fething delusional.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Gatherings & Competitions
99. Re: Gatherings & Competitions Aug 13, 2012, 06:37 yuastnav
 
RailWizard wrote on Aug 13, 2012, 05:34:
yuastnav wrote on Aug 13, 2012, 05:08:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Aug 12, 2012, 22:51:
RailWizard wrote on Aug 12, 2012, 22:46:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Aug 12, 2012, 22:10:
Thanks for the armchair psychology lesson Dr. Phil. Maybe we should discuss your irrational belief that those whom you disagree with must be mentally defective?

Only those that are, Springer.


Thanks for validating my theory there. Nothing left to discuss here. I'm done.

This discussion was doomed from the very beginning. Especially because it was basically one-sided as the anti-gay side failed to bring up any coherent or logical argument, which is completely understandable because there are none.

Spoken like a true hypocrite. Golfclap

You spouted bs. People (others and I) refuted all of it.
You failed to come up with counter-arguments (though to be fair: it's impossible) and spouted more bs instead.

You lose.

Keep reaching for that rainbow.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Gatherings & Competitions
97. Re: Gatherings & Competitions Aug 13, 2012, 05:08 yuastnav
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Aug 12, 2012, 22:51:
RailWizard wrote on Aug 12, 2012, 22:46:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Aug 12, 2012, 22:10:
Thanks for the armchair psychology lesson Dr. Phil. Maybe we should discuss your irrational belief that those whom you disagree with must be mentally defective?

Only those that are, Springer.


Thanks for validating my theory there. Nothing left to discuss here. I'm done.

This discussion was doomed from the very beginning. Especially because it was basically one-sided as the anti-gay side failed to bring up any coherent or logical argument, which is completely understandable because there are none.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Gatherings & Competitions
74. Re: Gatherings & Competitions Aug 12, 2012, 06:13 yuastnav
 
RailWizard wrote on Aug 11, 2012, 22:13:
[...]
Ah yes, here is another great fallacy. "But but, the animals do it!" Many animals also eat each other. How about that cannibal minority? Where are their equal rights? So blind and stupid....

How is that a fallacy? Animals are gay, humans are also animals. Why would nature change that? It wouldn't make any sense.
Also, if you haven't heard, there are cannibalistic tribes when it comes to humans. Humans eat each other, too. Other societies have developed a set of morals that forbids that, though. There is nothing else stopping us from eating each other but there is just no need for that because we don't have to do that anymore.
You do the same mistake again, though. If we allowed cannibalism there would not be equality anymore because some people would be allowed to eat others. We'd have an inequal society.
We have the same thing here since people like you don't want other sexualities to have the same rights.


Eirikrautha wrote on Aug 11, 2012, 20:48:
[...]
Ahhhh, but why do we have morals? Perhaps morals serve to preserve societies or cultures (in the aggregate, not the individual cases)? What if some moralities have enabled certain cultures to be more successful (once again, in the aggregate)? What if cultures evolve like organisms?
[...]

So? I didn't say morals were bad. They are necessary, without them we wouldn't be where we are. But morals have downsides, too, because people can have a set of morals that leads to an inequal society, whereas a pack of animals without morals or reason would base their lives on instinct and would not make a distinction between members who are gay and those who are not.


RailWizard wrote on Aug 11, 2012, 21:58:
"Being gay is normal. & Being gay is not a choice." Wrong. I don't care what anyone says, you or the egghead community. If you insist that it is, let's see the proof. Show me the 'gay gene'. You can't because it's bullshit.

So basically you are stating that opposing opinions do not concern you and that you will believe whatever you want? Then this discussion is kinda moot.
Furthermore, why do you think there is a "gay gene"? It is more likely that homosexuality (and in argumentum e contrario heterosexuality) comes to be thorugh a specific configuration of a set of other genes.


RailWizard wrote on Aug 12, 2012, 02:21:
[...]
That must be some good kool-aid. Go ahead and keep preaching like you and your precious peers know what you're talking about. They don't know what makes some people murderers, but for this, somehow they magically know. Right.
[...]

Only because you may not understand it it doesn't mean that people who do are "drinking the kool-aid". And yes, scientists do know nigh infinitely more than you do because they are not blinded by that irrational rage that you developed for some reason, probably from upbringing or environmental influence or chance - most likely a mix of all of that. And guess what: it is the same with murderers. Maybe some people are genetically better predisposed to become murderers but that alone is not enough. There are a lot of other factors that you have to consider but that is not relevant to our discussion because one's sexuality is mostly something that is decided before birth.


RailWizard wrote on Aug 12, 2012, 02:21:
[...]
I suppose people that don't think Kim Jong Il is a living god are all rejecting reality too, right?

How is that relevant to this discussion?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
749 Comments. 38 pages. Viewing page 15.
< Newer [ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo