User comment history
< Newer [ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ] Older >
| News Comments > Anno 2070 Demo |
 |
| 17. |
Re: Anno 2070 Demo |
Nov 4, 2011, 16:44 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Wolfen wrote on Nov 4, 2011, 15:54:
yuastnav wrote on Nov 4, 2011, 15:23:
Haven't played any Anno games but I am kinda interested in this one because it looks futuristic and sparkly.
"We're in the future. Things are very shiny here."
Anno's definitely have a following. I never payed any attention to them until Dawn of Discovery. I think I might have to re install it actually.
I know. 
As far as I know they are especially big here in Germany which is not necessarily surprising since it is developed by a German company and, from what I understand, it is also a very decent series. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Anno 2070 Demo |
|
| 14. |
Re: Anno 2070 Demo |
Nov 4, 2011, 15:23 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Haven't played any Anno games but I am kinda interested in this one because it looks futuristic and sparkly.
"We're in the future. Things are very shiny here." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Previews |
|
| 1. |
Re: Morning Previews |
Nov 3, 2011, 14:53 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Oh how I loved the old mineshaft. Especially when the source file for it was lost and it was dropped form the list of official maps.
Some servers still had it but it was not the same anymore, mostly because people stopped playing it. 
Sadly this looks nothing like the old mineshaft. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Saints Row: The Third PC Features and Specs |
|
| 23. |
Re: Saints Row: The Third PC Features and Specs |
Nov 2, 2011, 17:00 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Yes, exactly. These freezes and the controls were horrible. Made the game much harder than it should have been whereas I had no such problems when playing Saints Row 2.
I will not say that it ran very good or even good but the performance was quite okay, cannot say that about Alpha Protocol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Saints Row: The Third PC Features and Specs |
|
| 19. |
Re: |
Nov 2, 2011, 12:33 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Jerykk wrote on Nov 2, 2011, 03:39:
In my opinion it was much better than Alpha Protocol. I tried to like Alpha Protocol but I couldn't but I loved Saints Row 2.
AP and Saints Row are completely different games. AP was definitely a better port than SR2. Whether it was a better game is completely up to your personal tastes.
I did not mean the gameplay, I mean the port.
People generally complain about the port of SR2 and, at least that is the impression that I have, seem to be of the opinion that Alpha Protocol is a better port. Which in my opinion it is not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Saints Row: The Third PC Features and Specs |
|
| 9. |
Re: |
Nov 2, 2011, 03:23 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Dades wrote on Nov 1, 2011, 23:00:
StingingVelvet wrote on Nov 1, 2011, 22:08:
Of course it's a console port, they would be idiots to do anything else. It can be a GOOD console port though.
The last Saints Row game on the PC was one of the worst ports ever made, at its most playable state it made other terrible console ports seem like pc exclusive Blizzard titles.
In my opinion it was much better than Alpha Protocol. I tried to like Alpha Protocol but I couldn't but I loved Saints Row 2.
Yes it was not a good port but either I have much lower standards (which cannot be since I am pretty much a PC elitist) or we played a different game because yes - there were bugs and other short-comings but they did not keep me from enjoying the hell out of that game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Consoles Became "Lead Platform" Late in BF3 Development |
|
| 46. |
Re: Consoles Became |
Nov 1, 2011, 13:55 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Elessar wrote on Nov 1, 2011, 13:18:
They could do themselves, and everyone else, a favor if they simply didn't name a lead platform. [...]
Yes, they could do that but they also have to tell the console kids constantly that they are very special to them and that they love them very, very much so they don't act up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
|
| 209. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 28, 2011, 12:58 |
yuastnav |
|
|
ventry wrote on Oct 28, 2011, 01:05:
Animals for Crackers wrote on Oct 28, 2011, 00:50:
"BLAH, BLAH, BLAH"
*sigh*
Homosexuality is not "normal".
Nature says so.
[...]
Nature "says" so?
Do you often "speak" with nature?
I would kindly advise you to stop using strongly mind-altering substances as it seems that they create the illusion of "nature" being a conscious entity capable of verbal communication or other forms of information transportation that go beyond usual scientific approaches.
Nature never says anything. Nature does and cannot talk. You can only observe nature and its symmetries and patterns and what not and it is possible to observe homosexuality. Homosexuality is typical in many different species, including the Homo sapiens.
btw, protip: "normal" does not actually exist. something that is abnormal suggest a deviation from the average but the actual existence of the average in humans is another fallacy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Quoteworthy |
|
| 15. |
Re: Quoteworthy |
Oct 26, 2011, 17:00 |
yuastnav |
|
|
TurdFergasun wrote on Oct 26, 2011, 15:50:
are you seriously refuting a source with source material from a paper owned by the oligarchy? ignorance begets itself.
Don't hurt yourself with those big words. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Quoteworthy |
|
| 12. |
Re: Quoteworthy |
Oct 26, 2011, 15:33 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Overon wrote on Oct 26, 2011, 14:52:
PHJF wrote on Oct 26, 2011, 14:48:
Congratulations, eight posts and you couldn't be bothered to read any of them. Congratulations, but I linked to a source as well.
...
m(
Are you seriously calling an encyclopedia a source?
Also: http://www.michigandaily.com/node/62329/talk
[...]
Even Wikipedia's founder Jimmy Wales agrees that the online encyclopedia is not a citable source. He said in a 2005 interview with Business Week that "people shouldn't be citing encyclopedias in the first place."
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
|
| 87. |
Re: Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
Oct 26, 2011, 02:12 |
yuastnav |
|
|
DarkCntry wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 20:21:
yuastnav wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 19:32:
It's pretty ballsy from EA to charge 60 bucks for a multiplayer game / interactive movie.
You mean it's ballsy to charge $60 for an entertainment medium fitting a specific genre, despite it being a median price point?
[...]
No, I did not mean that. In case you want to really know what I mean please read my post. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs |
|
| 8. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Oct 25, 2011, 08:54 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Trainwreck wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 20:54:
[...] Finally, there wouldn't even be an internet without the Pentagon.
Of course. Other things (besides the internet) that the Pentagon has invented:
Paper
Bread
Air
The moon
Propaganda
"But wait!, you might say, "How can the Pentagon have invented the Moon without being able to go there."
You have to keep in mind that the pentagon has also invented space travel and motion, exactly in that order.
This comment was edited on Oct 25, 2011, 08:59. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 PC Checklist |
|
| 12. |
Re: RE: Follow up |
Oct 25, 2011, 04:54 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Bucky wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 01:21:
Honestly, anyone not picking it up is missing out. [...]
Okay, give me a version that does not require Origin then. I dare you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Saturday Metaverse |
|
| 8. |
Re: Saturday Metaverse |
Oct 15, 2011, 19:41 |
yuastnav |
|
|
Ant wrote on Oct 15, 2011, 18:09:
Same here. And people want no Internet days for me. OVER MY DEAD BODY! I need it 24/7. Yes, I do Internet when I sleep. 
That is the great thing about computers. They can be productive while you are not! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Tribes: Ascend Beta Specs |
|
| 11. |
Re: Tribes: Ascend Beta Specs |
Oct 13, 2011, 06:16 |
yuastnav |
|
|
So, people who are paying in Euro get screwed again, eh?
19.99 GBP = 22.83 Euro = 31.43 USD
24.99 Euro = 21.87 GBP = 34.44 USD
29.99 USD = 21.78 Euro = 19.06 GBP
(exchange rates from 13.10.2011, 12:16 UTC+2)
Well, it's not much and who wants to play this game anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
604 Comments. 31 pages. Viewing page 15.
< Newer [ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ] Older > |
|
Twitter 
