Creston wrote on Jun 10, 2011, 15:09:
This should read:

Peter Molyneux—Horrendous Mistake.

Creston

entr0py wrote on Jun 9, 2011, 22:55:
Is it just me or does it seem the average reactions went from cautious optimism to bitter contempt in a matter of days? I guess the demo must have hit hard. I'm still holding out to see reviews; companies screw up brief demos all the time.

LittleMe wrote on Jun 8, 2011, 18:19:
Blue I like the way you report on the console games, as it is from a PC gameing/er perspective. I'm like how you've implemented it!"


heres a napkin for your nose.


Tis a good site tho since i've been here in 99 or 98

PropheT wrote on Jun 8, 2011, 16:15:

Prez wrote on Jun 8, 2011, 16:09:
In other news, it has been determined that people want money and sex.

I can get money and sex with my PC, lets see you do that with your Xbox filthy console peasants!

ItBurn wrote on Jun 8, 2011, 14:28:
I saw an extended 15 minute gameplay video and the interface is completely consolized. Unless they rewrite it completely for PC, it's going to be a pain in the ass to play the game. I hope you like scrolling.

LittleMe wrote on Jun 7, 2011, 17:47:
I agree with the overall sentiment here, especially Dmitri M. The fun is gone in Arma2. Even in this press release they use words like 'gameplay' and 'players' but where is the focus on the game fun and playability? The shitty net-code, the bad performance, the heinous UI and the uncooperative players on public servers all combine to make this game fail hard. It could be good. I want to like it. I just.. can't. Btw, if you want outstanding squad work, Project Reality is where it's at. I would love it if BIS outdid PRmod. I expect hell to freeze over before that happens.

Creston wrote on Jun 7, 2011, 11:57:

Bhruic wrote on Jun 6, 2011, 22:15:

The other things I really want to see fixed is the lack of activity in the world, and everyone wanting to kill you, even if you worked for their faction.

I can't remember, didn't they try to explain that away by saying that you were "secretly" working for the sides?

Either way, I agree, it's annoying. I'd rather see a Just Cause 2 system, where people ignore you unless you are doing something obviously "bad".

Yeah they did, and it was stupid. They didn't feel like making actual factions in the game, so they just had everyone shoot at YOU. Even if you played cat and mouse with a Jeep patrol to another checkpoint, the enemies still wouldn't fire at each other.

So despite all the backstory of the two factions being at war, the only one they were actually both at war with was YOU.

Oh, and the toolbag that came up with that design decision recently called LA Noire trash and kitschy. The fucking moron.

Creston

CommunistHamster wrote on Jun 6, 2011, 19:01:
Why even use the name when it has nothing to do with Far Cry 1 or 2? Why such a fear of abandoning an IP? Might as well call it Tony Hawks Pro Tropical Gunfighter Arena 2007.

DNForever wrote on Jun 6, 2011, 10:31:
What Duke 3D had was great maps, in my opinion especially the plutonium pak levels. There's not much you can do with a game if your map design isn't any good. I still haven't played the DNF demo and can't base anything off of screenshots, but these levels don't look good. Hopefully I'll be surprised when I play the game.

WyldKat wrote on Jun 5, 2011, 23:46:
It's not a run and gun shooter, which is what Duke Nukem has always been. Instead it's a Halo Warfare 4 console shooter with all the stale gameplay trappings that have diluted the appeal of the FPS genre. Graphics aren't the issue with the game, it's the gameplay. All they needed to do was bring back the gameplay that made Duke3D great and they failed miserably. It was never about the hookers, the language, or the shit and dick jokes. Those were all just garnishment on the fun gameplay.

At this point I'm just hoping Gearbox don't lose their shirts over this and have it negatively effect Borderlands 2. :\

Jerykk wrote on Jun 4, 2011, 19:17:
I hope this doesn't turn out to be Hitman: Conviction. The story sounds remarkably similar and the devs have already said the game will be more "accessible" than the previous games.

MajorD wrote on Jun 3, 2011, 22:09:
The game is not even out yet and they are announcing DLC that you'll have to pay for too? Not a very smart/good marketing strategy there boys.

I don't really get the impression that many people will be purchasing this title this time around anyway, let alone paying for DLC.

Yawn.......