Muscular Beaver wrote on Mar 13, 2010, 15:14:
Gabe, you mean like having to run bloatware in the background, for example?.

nin wrote on Mar 13, 2010, 16:10:
...if his lack of action on a system he's apart of allows other publishers to harm a market that he himself would be wise to support.

Eldaron Imotholin wrote on Mar 13, 2010, 12:35:
I have not yet seen anything PhysX can that Havok or whatever can't do. Seriously, I've even watched PhysX promo trailers with showing splitscreen the game with and without PhysX. It was like playing "Find It" on hardcore.

Fuck PhysX. No one would really miss it if it would simply stop existing.

finga wrote on Mar 13, 2010, 12:21:
Seems pretty simple right now. ATI is delivering better raw performance for the money at several price points, and nVidia knows they're not going to win on that this generation, so they've been pushing their proprietary, closed features as an alternative. Hence we see nVidia trying to dominate the conversation with talk of 3DVision and PhysX.

For me, Eyefinity is just as interesting of a feature as 3DVision in-game, but 1) 3DVision can cause headaches and offers no gameplay advantage, and 2) Eyefinity setups can be used outside of games. On the physics front, I see so many games out there only using 25-50% of a quad core CPU. Why would I use the component that's most often the bottleneck in games (the GPU) for that calculation when the CPU could be used? Unfortunately, developers still haven't figured that bit out yet and are adding in things like PhysX support only for nVidia cards when that could have easily gone on the CPU.

Acleacius wrote on Mar 9, 2010, 13:35:
Wicked, no more line only vectors, the light cycles use curves!

Thanks for the linky, nin.


Great idea about facebook, Dr.Del. Hope Blue gets even more traffic.

"...The attack was caused by those customers trying to login."

I've Got The News Blues wrote on Mar 9, 2010, 01:34:

ForgedReality wrote on Mar 9, 2010, 01:05:
Please; enlighten us.

If you've always been able to play your games which require Steam and never had it fail to launch a game then you have either been very lucky, haven't used Steam for very long, or only use it infrequently.

I've Got The News Blues wrote on Mar 8, 2010, 21:14:
Steam's DRM would be horrendous to more customers if it wasn't so easily cracked or if the fanboys weren't so blinded by love that they overlook its failures.

Jerykk wrote on Mar 8, 2010, 23:57:
I can't complain this patch too much. It seems to make the game slightly harder, which is always a good thing.

siapnar wrote on Mar 8, 2010, 17:33:
I would kill for a semi-realistic FPS or TPS (see: Max Payne) with those style of graphics.

Dev wrote on Mar 8, 2010, 17:11:
Edit:
Doh, that was expressed by kimbambaman in a comment previous to me.

Creston wrote on Mar 8, 2010, 16:50:
Awesome! Buy it as soon as it comes out, so that you, too, can not play the game you paid for, because Ubi's too dumb to keep their shitty DRM servers running! Wooot! All this excitement for only 60 bucks!

Creston