User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] Older >
| News Comments > StarCraft II Patched |
 |
| 4. |
Re: StarCraft II Patched |
Aug 6, 2010, 19:05 |
Luke |
|
|
LittleMe wrote on Aug 6, 2010, 15:50:
Is this the patch that removes the part of the EULA that allows Blizzard to monitor all software installed on our PC's and report that information to whomever they like? They should pay us to install the game, not the other way around.
(correct me if I'm mistaken, please)
with faceshet in tha house it ain't gonna be better , |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > NVIDIA StarCraft II Trial |
|
| 11. |
Re: NVIDIA StarCraft II Trail Offer |
Aug 5, 2010, 13:19 |
Luke |
|
|
Marketing 101: Offer a free trial to a game everybody has already purchased.
i haven't got 1 and will never get one from faceblizz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Legal Briefs |
|
| 3. |
Re: Legal Briefs |
Jul 30, 2010, 02:16 |
Luke |
|
|
| "FBI details worst social networking cyber crime problems" interesting reading hmm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Safety Dance |
|
| 1. |
Re: Safety Dance |
Jul 29, 2010, 10:55 |
Luke |
|
|
| 100 million facebook pages leaked on torrent site , hmm well guess people don't mind that at all , Faceshet = idiots , everywere that shet appear data gets leaked , but then again = nobody care today..... sad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Saved Game Problem |
|
| 14. |
Re: StarCraft II Saved Game Problem |
Jul 28, 2010, 17:55 |
Luke |
|
|
Wait what? I said there it was odd that they mirrored each other, not that all of it was certainly caused by the pirate version. So how can it be "wrong" that its odd that they are so similar?
You are accusing blizzard of not providing AA support? LOL! Don't make me laugh. They are STILL updating and fixing issues in Diablo 2 and original starcraft! Since they never gave out CD keys for broodwar, anyone entering a key for SC1 into battle.net gets a FREE copy of broodwar, so they are giving away stuff!
So, lets go take a look at those threads you linked.
First one, known issues post from blizzard.
First issue, OMG the game allows you to install multiple times on 1 computer. OMG.
Big deal.
Second issue, OMG running the game in XP compatability from within win 7 causes issues. Well lets see, the game is compatible with win 7, so why do that in the first place? Sounds like a PEBCAK issue, not a blizzard issue.
3rd known issue, OMG it might make your computer overheat! Well then perhaps you should make sure you have adequete cooling to run your CPU at 100% load. And they provide a workaround (enabling a framerate cap) just in case. Which means those kinda debuging features were already built into the game. I think I'd rather have an uncapped framerate instead of a forced cap on everyone.
4th known issue, OMG some antivirus say the beta is a trojan! OMG. Wait, its not beta anymore.
5th known issue, black screens when using a webcam.
Ok, this is the first known issue in that list I'd consider potentially serious (could stop you from playing) and non PEBCAK. It seems related to a particular brand of webcam that was poorly programmed, so I don't blame blizzard for it. I doubt they can change the game to work in harmony with the poorly programmed Quick Cam software from another programmer, but if they can, more kudos to them.
6th known issue: Comodo firewall can cause probs with starting the game. Thats not exactly a surprise, I've had antivirus and firewall software cause problems with games before, they are DESIGNED to interfere with functions of programs, like preventing them from communcating through the internet. Comodo isn't exactly known as a user friendly software, so someone using that instead of norton n00b crap should know how to handle this kinda stuff.
In that entire list, there's only 1 issue I'd consider non PEBCAK.
Yawn.
cleary you just loveeeeeeeeeee this game gz , you don't have to defend blizz ya know , maybe you don't see any problem , but some do i see, so just because you don't think it is a problem it may be for others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > WSJ: StarCraft II Cost More Than $100M |
|
| 54. |
Re: WSJ: StarCraft II Cost More Than $100M |
Jul 17, 2010, 21:05 |
Luke |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Jul 17, 2010, 20:06:
I call bullshit. There is no way in hell it cost anywhere close to 100 million to make.
If blizz says so it is the TRUTH .... many thinks  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
|
| 105. |
Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
Jul 16, 2010, 19:21 |
Luke |
|
|
Yifes wrote on Jul 16, 2010, 19:14:
now now carm down young padawan , your belive in this is strong i see , tho don't let the dark side get you go get some air i think you need it hehe
I knew it. You're Yoda, judging from your terrible English.
and Yoda is a wise one , so ty  next one plz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Blizzard Real ID FAQ |
|
| 3. |
Re: Blizzard Real ID FAQ |
Jul 16, 2010, 19:09 |
Luke |
|
|
Yifes wrote on Jul 16, 2010, 18:17:
"We hope players will find this feature convenient, but it's completely optional. In the long term, we hope to give players who use Facebook some fun, and also optional, ways to share what they're doing in Blizzard games with their friends" "Blizzard Entertainment does not share any personal information with Facebook as part of this process."
Quoted for emphasis, because a few people around here are morons.
i am happy for you my dear  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
|
| 103. |
Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
Jul 16, 2010, 19:08 |
Luke |
|
|
Yifes wrote on Jul 16, 2010, 17:32:
so why the f do you think they made a deal with Faceshet? , not to think any kind of faceshet will be implanted is stupid opt yea right till they have sold some of the new games then it will come
CNN.com and 1/2 of the websites on the internet have optional facebook. Bluesnews uses Twitter. You think they all will eventually force you to use facebook/twitter?
Here's the latest Blizz FAQ on RealID, released today: "We hope players will find this feature convenient, but it's completely optional. In the long term, we hope to give players who use Facebook some fun, and also optional, ways to share what they're doing in Blizzard games with their friends"
http://www.bluesnews.com/s/112239/blizzard-real-id-faq
They have never secretly changed anything, so unless they announce that they plan on making facebook mandatory, you and The PC Warrior are just straight up pulling shit out of your ass.
now now carm down young padawan , your belive in this is strong i see , tho don't let the dark side get you go get some air i think you need it hehe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
|
| 98. |
Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
Jul 16, 2010, 12:50 |
Luke |
|
|
Verno wrote on Jul 16, 2010, 10:45:
While the rest of your post is gibberish at best, I have to admit that FaceBlizz amused me.
for me it wasn't but thats life ^^ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
|
| 97. |
Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
Jul 16, 2010, 12:49 |
Luke |
|
|
Verno wrote on Jul 16, 2010, 10:10:
nin wrote on Jul 16, 2010, 09:50:
Luke, are you attempting to write poems now?
You wouldn't know a paragraph if one smacked you in the face, let alone a poem.
just for the record , remember to quote the right on next time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
|
| 95. |
Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
Jul 16, 2010, 10:43 |
Luke |
|
|
nin wrote on Jul 16, 2010, 09:50:
Luke, are you attempting to write poems now?
ohh how i wish
that "MY" compani blizz
haven't took
The deal with Facebook
now i am torn
"MY" blizz is gone.
have fun with your faceblizz
i rest my case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
|
| 92. |
Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
Jul 16, 2010, 08:41 |
Luke |
|
|
What's clear here is that you believe there's a conspiracy going on between FB and Blizzard, but I'm not quite sure what that conspiracy is. For all I know, you don't even have an actual theory. So why don't you just lay it out on the table so we get an idea with what you think we are dealing with here. How do you think FB is going to benefit from this deal that would negatively affect you? You think they're in it for the money. Well, that's obvious, they ARE a business. No conspiracy there. You don't want FB to have your personal information, yet you have no problem giving that same information to Blizzard and more than likely dozens of other businesses.
Sounds like you're getting yourself all worked up without even considering the reason why.
conspiracy no but a deal with faceshet is in tha house , and what happens with faceshet in tha house is data mining/selling not even leaking personal data , its pure selling
sure they are in it for the money , selling personal data is a very healthy way to earn big money , for them , at the cost of peps
blizzard was a company (in my eyes that did games for gamers , the way they did make quality games can not be discussed)
But
Now we have the Faceshet a company earning money of peoples personal data by selling it off to other company trying to get into games all over the places ,
and now there at blizzard ,
what faceshet is standing for is a no go for me , and to see them at blizz (with there 0- some millions player base) just aint right and if ( and i am sure they will , otherwise i don't see why they are there at all)
they can get most of that player base to accept there Faceshet the hole is made
you have no problem giving that same information to Blizzard and more than likely dozens of other businesses.
no because i belived in blizz i respected them as they stod for great games ,always deliver pro games, and i have build a trust up toward them over years
i don't TRUST/belive in faceshet , once faceshet no turning back for those who have sign up
Sounds like you're getting yourself all worked up without even considering the reason why.
Worked up i would not say , (i am very carm here) just read what i wrote and you see why, i just say what i think , you do to...i think
you go do the faceblizz , i just think it is a shame great game companies goes that way , because if blizz can be turned into that shet , i guess all companies can..or not..lets hope
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
|
| 89. |
Re: StarCraft II Pre-Downloads |
Jul 16, 2010, 07:21 |
Luke |
|
|
so why the fuck do you think they will secretly make facebook mandatory? Stupid.
so why the f do you think they made a deal with Faceshet? , not to think any kind of faceshet will be implanted is stupid opt yea right till they have sold some of the new games then it will come |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
390 Comments. 20 pages. Viewing page 17.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] Older > |
|
Twitter 
