User comment history
< Newer [ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ] Older >
| News Comments > SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
 |
| 111. |
Re: SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
Mar 14, 2013, 18:02 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
deqer wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 17:56: SimCity 4 Deluxe?
Don't buy it. Pirate it!
I'm sure all of EA's bullshit has costed you $60 part of your life in some way, shape or form. Do you want a refund for that $60 of bullshit/stress/frustration/deceivingness ? Well, you can get a refund by pirating it!
Don't worry. You aren't the bad guy for pirating it. EA is. EA caused you to pirate it.
You didn't ask for all the bullshit EA has been doing lately, including forcing you on their Origin system. Yep continue justifying publishers forcing always on drm for SP games. Well done douchecanoe! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
 |
| 104. |
Re: SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
Mar 14, 2013, 16:52 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
deqer wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 16:45:
Beamer wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 16:40: Can't do that now, eh? "<EA>: Of course not. That would significantly reduce the lifetime of the game. You must start a new city and experience it, like in the real world. There is no travelling back in time. If we allowed you to do that, then you'd have your 'fill' early on." See the part where your argument fails is this isn't a pay to play game. EA already got their 60 from those who bought it. I doubt EA cares if people are still playing or not, the drm is more to combat piracy I would imagine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
 |
| 96. |
Re: SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
Mar 14, 2013, 15:57 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Dev wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 15:29:
RollinThundr wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 15:19: What bothers me about Creston's short list here is it's not even accurate or legitimate. Feel free to make a legitimate accurate complete long list. To be honest it wouldn't be all that different except that Starbreeze is NOT owned by EA, and Mythic still exists. I miss Origin Systems and Bullfrog and Westwood too, but I'm not naïve enough to think EA is the only publisher that has bought out a dev only to close them a short time afterwards. Infograms (Atari) has done it countless times, Take Two has done it. Activision has done it.
I get the reasons people hate EA, there's things they've done over the years that I haven't liked either but jesus as much as you guys call me a broken record, at what point does repeating the same shit over and over to try and legitimize hate for a particular company also get old? EA's done enough shit over the years to earn that hate sure, but saying it over and over again 30 times a thread doesn't do a damn thing.
People want EA to change? STOP BUYING THEIR GAMES! When their profits take enough of a hit, maybe they'll start to get the idea that shitty customer service is bad, and putting things like MT's into their games does nothing but fuel people's hate for them.
I honestly think people forget that EA at one point early in their existence was all about giving game developers not only credit for their works during a time in the industry where we didn't have credit screens at the end of a game and also created and funded some pretty god damn awesome games over the years. Rather than what they're doing now following in the footsteps of Blizzard and Ubisoft with game crippling DRM.
That SimCity shipped in the state it did, and is so reliant on an always on connection that it sounds like it actually breaks the game is definitely something to hold them to the flame for. But after almost a week of countless SimCity threads where the same shit is rehashed for the 100th time, at this point it'd be more useful to bitch at EA directly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
 |
| 89. |
Re: SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
Mar 14, 2013, 15:19 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Baenwort wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 15:11:
Creston wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 11:53:
Dev wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 11:39: This is not nearly the first time EA has decimated a studio they've bought out. Is origin around anymore? Bullfrog? Or any of the others? Let's see if we can make a full list of studios that have they outright killed, and studios that are currently in the slow process of dying from the EA-touch.
Outright killed:
- Origin - Westwood - Bullfrog - Mythic - Lionhead (not sure if this one should be in the next category or not.) - Pandemic
Slowly dying:
- Maxis - Starbreeze - Lionhead (just for completeness' sake. I have no idea if they're actually still around.) - Bioware. (I'm on the fence on this one. DA2 was absolutely EA-ified, but ME3 was a very good game that just suffered from one dipshit writer who is way too much in love with himself. DA3 and ME4 will be the final nail in the coffin, or a slight reprieve from their inevitable death.) - Popcap.
Any others? I'm sure I'm missing at least half a dozen other studios that EA killed.
Creston The one I'll always be pissed about is Kesmai.
Creators of: Multiplayer Battletech(Solaris, 3025, etc); AirWarrior(Amiga through 4); Islands/Legends of Kesmai; Stellar Emperor; and more.
http://web.archive.org/web/19990902072142/www.kesmaistudios.com/company/ I still look back fondly on my time in the MPBT 3025 alpha. Though the killing of that project was more to do with MS being douchebags with the license and EA knowing it was niche enough that killing Kesmai wouldn't really matter.
What bothers me about Creston's short list here is it's not even accurate or legitimate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
 |
| 85. |
Re: SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
Mar 14, 2013, 14:50 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Cabezone wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 14:44:
RollinThundr wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 14:33:
Shineyguy wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 14:03:
Dev wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 11:58:
Creston wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 11:53: Any others? I'm sure I'm missing at least half a dozen other studios that EA killed.
Creston http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acquisitions_by_Electronic_Arts EA has a stake in Novalogic? NOOOOOOOO!!!! Like Novalogic was ever relevant or even a decent developer. Voxels motherfucker....voxels You win the thread, I snorted coffee through the nose on that one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs |
 |
| 6. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Mar 14, 2013, 14:03 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Mar 13, 2013, 17:02:
RollinThundr wrote on Mar 13, 2013, 15:12: Yep democrats are so concerned with citizen's rights, they keep making efforts to remove said rights and make people more reliant on them, The Government. Welfare for votes, "free" medical on the backs of everyone who works for a living. Keep living the lie that either party gives a fuck about you. The Rand filibuster was a perfect example of it. Can the President use drone strikes on US citizens on US soil, easy answer, according to the Constitution? No. Still took a 13 hour filibuster + weeks of asking the Dictator in Chief for an answer. Between the lesser of two evils they're the definite lesser. You're wrong on just about everything else, as usual though, so no great revelations there. However, yes, people do need to look for - and find - alternatives to the two party stranglehold of the elites. Jesse Ventura is a good way to go for a start. How am I wrong? The mantra of this administration for the last 5 years is blame Bush. This is a quote from 2006, funny how your buddy was against raising the debt ceiling then, but now he's all for it.
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a Sign that the US Government cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies." Reckless fiscal policies that he's continued since day 1, but hey, Bush's fault, just like the last 5 years are all also Bush's fault.
Keeping in mind that the last couple years of Bush's presidency, dems had control of the purse strings but hey, It's the GOP's fault you know. Everything that is bad in the world is solely on the shoulders of republicans.
They're not a lesser evil, they're the SAME fucking evil. This administration has done little different than tbe Bush administration yet it's different because there's a D after Barry's name on the ballot apparently. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
 |
| 57. |
Re: SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
Mar 14, 2013, 12:02 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Creston wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 11:53:
Dev wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 11:39: This is not nearly the first time EA has decimated a studio they've bought out. Is origin around anymore? Bullfrog? Or any of the others? Let's see if we can make a full list of studios that have they outright killed, and studios that are currently in the slow process of dying from the EA-touch.
Outright killed:
- Origin - Westwood - Bullfrog - Mythic - Lionhead (not sure if this one should be in the next category or not.)
Slowly dying:
- Maxis - Starbreeze - Lionhead (just for completeness' sake. I have no idea if they're actually still around.) - Bioware. (I'm on the fence on this one. DA2 was absolutely EA-ified, but ME3 was a very good game that just suffered from one dipshit writer who is way too much in love with himself. DA3 and ME4 will be the final nail in the coffin, or a slight reprieve from their inevitable death.)
Any others? I'm sure I'm missing at least half a dozen other studios that EA killed.
Creston Mythic still exists just under the Bioware brand. Starbreeze is not owned by EA. And why for the love of god does no one hold Laidlaw or Gaider at all responsible for the fuck up that was DA2? The fan base warned them over and over that it wasn't what anyone wanted and they put out shit in a box anyway.
EA's closed plenty of studios that you could prolly just pick from that list rather than lumping in studios EA doesn't even own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
 |
| 44. |
Re: SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
Mar 14, 2013, 11:32 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Optional nickname wrote on Mar 14, 2013, 11:21: The bar has been set, for our age of dumbed down AAA sequel iterations, nothing new here, moving right along,
I am however, still holding my breath, for the upcoming new online Command & Conquer, I think that will be a worthy multiplayer sequel to what was Gen Zero Hour, and frankly I couldn't care less about Single Player missions in that game, we know how EA would handle that one!
we need to stop fuming at EA, our voices are falling on deaf ears, I know very well how large corporate companies are run, with lawyers at the top that will stop at NOTHING to prevent a healthy cashflow to their owners. They will arrest their own family members, if it means preventing internal corruption to the company. I've seen all kinds of things, with these bean counters are at the top of the chain in command.
Simcity, and Diablo are dead, we need to get off our collective asses, and go program our own worthy software, get to kickstarter, and make games for gamers, once again, or rekindle the magic that we once had since the glory days of Commodore, or lets give new aspiring young players, that same feeling we once had, as EA and Activision are not going to be doing this for us anymore, not this generation.
MAKE our OWN games, STOP wasting our precious time playing THEIRS.
not even remotely interested in playing a free Simcity 2013 offline, it is broken beyond belief, and will see if they manage free overhaul to that game, in 2 months time.
/ as a simoleon: leaves work, gets in car, and drives to first residential home, and barges in, wakes up old granny in bed, and I roll over to sleep. Speak for yourself, I always liked the campy Command and Conquer single player campaigns, and not getting a full blown Generals 2 actually really pissed me off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
 |
| 3. |
Re: SimCity Hacked to Play Offline? |
Mar 14, 2013, 09:22 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
| Impossible eh EA? Here's a suggestion EA, get rid of John Riccitiello and beg Trip to come back and right the ship, Because Riccitiello's decisions being so anti consumerism spawns forums full of unbridled hate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > More on Offline SimCity |
 |
| 74. |
Re: More on Offline SimCity |
Mar 13, 2013, 15:41 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
| Ahh another day, another 30 posts from Creston and company repeating the same EA sucks dance. Simple solution don't buy EA games. Loss of massive amounts of sales will tell EA one thing, stop being assholes to your customers or go under. Betting Creston still preorders DA3 day 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Mar 13, 2013, 15:12 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Mar 13, 2013, 14:03: Hope Yelp and these other racketeers do get the shit sued out of them and they're shut down.
The amount of idiotic criminals never ceases to boggle the mind.
"You go to a Walmart with a printer to return and no receipt, with your counterfeit bills still lodged in it, and you want to dicker with the clerks to get half price back, when you have warrants out for you," Smokowicz said. "There are a few lessons here about not drawing attention to yourself." Lulz. What a tool.
OpenBand apparently convinced a lot of communities to sign exclusive franchise agreements that ran for between 25 to 75 years. While users in these developments could sign up for other TV or broadband services, they still had to pay the $150 monthly association fee to OpenBand. Are you effing kidding me? Cereal? Who would move into one of these places?
It isn't just activists that are concerned, either. In 2009, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) said the government's use of "Section 215 is unfortunately cloaked in secrecy. Some day that cloak will be lifted, and future generations will ask whether our actions today meet the test of a democratic society." In 2011, two US Senators, Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Mark Udall (D-CO), publicly voiced their concerns, too, suggesting the government had a pretty wild interpretation of what it was allowed to do under the PATRIOT Act. "When the American people find out how their government has secretly interpreted the Patriot Act, they will be stunned and they will be angry,” Wyden told The New York Times. Nice to see as always at least the Democrats are concerned with citizens rights. However they're wrong. The American public will, by and large, be as apathetic as always otherwise things like the PATRIOT Act would never occur in the first place. Yep democrats are so concerned with citizen's rights, they keep making efforts to remove said rights and make people more reliant on them, The Government. Welfare for votes, "free" medical on the backs of everyone who works for a living. Keep living the lie that either party gives a fuck about you. The Rand filibuster was a perfect example of it. Can the President use drone strikes on US citizens on US soil, easy answer, according to the Constitution? No. Still took a 13 hour filibuster + weeks of asking the Dictator in Chief for an answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Game Reviews |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Game Reviews |
Mar 13, 2013, 11:53 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Darks wrote on Mar 13, 2013, 11:28: Blizzard has lost its creativity; they are now a company that is all about long development cycles and pretty CGI. Short on story and overpriced.
When was the last time blizzard came up with a new game? A completely different IP that has nothing to do with their Three Prime Evils? That’s right, nothing!
The keep force feeding the masses with updated games that are nothing more than an over lay of new graphics over an old concept. Um just figuring this out now? It's not like Blizzard hasn't been rehasing the same ol same ol, completely devoid of innovation for a decade now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > More on Offline SimCity |
 |
| 49. |
Re: More on Offline SimCity |
Mar 13, 2013, 10:33 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
wtf_man wrote on Mar 13, 2013, 09:09:
RollinThundr wrote on Mar 13, 2013, 08:56: That's not hurt feelings, it's disgust at how whiny half the people here are. Let me put it this way...
I didn't buy Sim City, but I am outraged because I wanted to buy a new Sim City.
I didn't buy several UBI games when they had always online DRM, and was outraged, because I wanted to buy Driver San Francisco, and a couple of others. (Now I can, since they reveresed it with just one time activation with UPlay)
I didn't buy Diablo III, and actually had no interest, but I'm still outraged about the always online DRM and Pay to Win Auction House. Why? Because it sets precedence... which is why EA tried this crap with Sim City.
And yes, I'm really irritated with everyone that bought these games and supported always-online-DRM. They are the reason these publishers keep trying this shit. Eh if it isn't online DRM they'll try something else. At this point in life I have more important things to rant about than how evil EA is. Really it should be how evil their CEO is.
I think a lot of people forget back in the Trip Hawkins days, EA was a completely different company, they valued the people working on their games, it's where they got their name from.
That being said I get what you're saying WTF, and I can't say I disagree, to me it just gets tiring to see the same couple posters, essentially say the same exact thing 50 times in the same thread. Like really? You have nothing better to do than whine and complain about a company who's titles you're not buying anyway, yet feel the need to repeat yourself 30 times on the same thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > More on Offline SimCity |
 |
| 40. |
Re: More on Offline SimCity |
Mar 13, 2013, 08:56 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Kajetan wrote on Mar 13, 2013, 08:43:
RollinThundr wrote on Mar 13, 2013, 08:19: ... And EVERYTIME you chip in to blabber about your hurt feelings. That's not hurt feelings, it's disgust at how whiny half the people here are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > More on Offline SimCity |
 |
| 35. |
Re: More on Offline SimCity |
Mar 13, 2013, 08:19 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Creston wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 22:37: In other words: EA is full of shit, as usual. This is about DRM and about preventing mods so they can DLC it out the ass. This comes in addition to reports from EA's forum that the engine is just plain broken and just goes into full "what the fuck ever" mode once you reach a certain number of people. I hope the whole fucking thing burns around them and their shit-ass company.
Bye Maxis. You can join the corpses of Origin, Westwood, Bullfrog and all the other once great developers who were fucking murdered by EA. Once upon it time, it was nice playing your games. Not anymore.
Creston Instead you'll make 50 post per EA thread bitching because that's oh so more productive than swearing off EA titles. I get the outrage with SimCity, terrible design choices and crippling DRM. If I had bought the game I'd be pretty livid myself. You Creston take the cake though, I've never seen someone waste so much time and energy on something they clearly hate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ships Ahoy - StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm |
 |
| 61. |
Re: Ships Ahoy - StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm |
Mar 12, 2013, 18:20 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
edaciousx wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 18:08: You guys are pretty amazing. QQing that you get owned within 10 minutes of the game... I was ranked high in SC2 and if the game is not good at high level of play then it's even worse at lower level of play. Look at company of heroes 1, the allied forces get creamed all the time when going up against the germans. If you want to play an unbalanced game play COH. Awesome awesome game but insanely unbalanced. At high levels of play the balancing becomes an even greater issue, that's why blizzard focuses so much on the high level players. Then explain why it takes them so long to ship a product along the lines of "balance time" then generally completely change the balance of units every patch there after. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ships Ahoy - StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm |
 |
| 58. |
Re: Ships Ahoy - StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm |
Mar 12, 2013, 17:55 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Darks wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 16:33:
AngelicPenguin wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 15:15:
RollinThundr wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 15:09:
AngelicPenguin wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 15:05:
RollinThundr wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 14:31:
Fati wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 14:24:
RollinThundr wrote on Mar 12, 2013, 13:20: There's a difference between sending a scout or 2, and sending 15 starter troops all aimed directly at your resource gatherers. Sure sometimes I micro quick enough to counter it, but every game is just about the same unless playing with friends. It's the mentality of SC players apparently that every game needs to hurry up and end. At least that's been my experience with SC2. I don't think RTS is for you. You need to learn how to defend early pressure. Once you realize that the players who pressure early put themselves at a significant economic disadvantage, you'll see that all you need to do is successfully defend, counter-attack and it's gg. Right, but what if I want to enjoy the game I paid for? What if I'd like to go up the tech tree and not have the game end in 10 minutes? I can do this just fine in every other RTS that is MP. Blizzard titles? Hell you're lucky if you don't have shit in your base 2 and a half minutes in. I always thought the same thing about the NBA. I want my team to play methodical defense and push the shot clock to the limit, so I think they should ban fast breaks and teams that like to run. Who said anything about banning playstyles? holy strawman batman. How can I strawman talking about myself? Nothing fast should happen in the NBA darn it!
edit: I'm just messing with you, but it does sound like competitive RTS isn't really your thing. Most RTS games have some sort of early game rush - in fact I can't think of a single one that didn't. This is the main problem I have with this game. Blizzard purposely designed this game so matches only last 20 mins. They purposely give you limited resources and force you to expand. They also made defense practically useless. Most of the time when being rushed, your defense fall faster than units. Most defenses felt like they were made of paper. They get ripped through so fast.
This is what turned me off about SC and why I will never go back to it.
Blizzards track record recently is 0 - 2 Thanks Dark, that's pretty much my point. Even if you're half way decent at micro managing, half the time it doesn't matter because 2 mins in you have 60 zerglings tearing you a new asshole. Some people may call that fun. Me I just find it fucking tedious. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1734 Comments. 87 pages. Viewing page 16.
< Newer [ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ] Older > |
|