Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

User information for RollinThundr

Real Name RollinThundr   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname None given.
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description Banned
Homepage None given.
Signed On May 5, 2009, 08:31
Total Comments 2460 (Senior)
User ID 54946
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ] Older >


News Comments > Morning Metaverse
514. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 28, 2013, 09:41 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 09:18:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 08:21:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 00:46:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 23:36:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 21:16:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 21:02:
nin wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 20:40:

"I'm going to make these crazy statements, but I'm much too busy to back them up with any facts..."

durpa durpa dunder...

Derpa derpa derp. Da derp derpa derpity derp. Derp derp!
At least he's confirmed once and for all that he has nothing of substance to say and is incapable of having a rational discussion.

Where in the constitution does it grant a president to make EO's like that? Point it out for me smart guy, if anything, when you read especially the 5th amendment in regards to property alone, some of those are unconstitutional. You guys are either obtuse or really love obama's cock or some shit.

If you're not going to name the specific EOs of the 23 related to the gun issue that we've been talking about, and explain exactly how those violate the constitution, then I'll just continue to believe you're still just derping along in your decidedly non-blissful ignorance. I'm not going down another rabbit hole until you show that you can conclude a discussion about a single issue.

READ THE ENTIRE LIST regardless if its about guns. JFC you are obtuse. HELLO MC FLY? ANYONE HOME IN THERE? NO?

No. You made the specific claim that "most" of the 23 EOs Obama laid out related to the gun issue were unconstitutional. I want you to back that up with specifics about which EOs violate which parts of the Constitution. If you refuse, then there's no further point in discussing anything.

I never made one such claim, I said his EO's were on their own most likely unconstitutional, I'm not sure where you're getting the gun part in all that. In fact if you actually look at those which I still doubt you have, you'd be alarmed too, this goes beyond party, that shit is just wrong.

And for Q, Muslim patrols in East London stab US Student for drinking a beer. http://tinyurl.com/noqewa3
religion of peace!
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
511. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 28, 2013, 08:21 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 00:46:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 23:36:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 21:16:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 21:02:
nin wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 20:40:

"I'm going to make these crazy statements, but I'm much too busy to back them up with any facts..."

durpa durpa dunder...

Derpa derpa derp. Da derp derpa derpity derp. Derp derp!
At least he's confirmed once and for all that he has nothing of substance to say and is incapable of having a rational discussion.

Where in the constitution does it grant a president to make EO's like that? Point it out for me smart guy, if anything, when you read especially the 5th amendment in regards to property alone, some of those are unconstitutional. You guys are either obtuse or really love obama's cock or some shit.

If you're not going to name the specific EOs of the 23 related to the gun issue that we've been talking about, and explain exactly how those violate the constitution, then I'll just continue to believe you're still just derping along in your decidedly non-blissful ignorance. I'm not going down another rabbit hole until you show that you can conclude a discussion about a single issue.

READ THE ENTIRE LIST regardless if its about guns. JFC you are obtuse. HELLO MC FLY? ANYONE HOME IN THERE? NO?

Beamer wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 02:03:
Guys, guys, I'm sure he can post some poorly made, unsourced YouTube video that explains everything with ocersimplifications, misunderstandings, typos, comic sans a killer soundtrack.

And I'm sure you can change your situation depending on the topic, like you have a couple times already. I take anything you say with a grain of salt at this point, you've proven you're full of shit more often than not.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
508. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 23:36 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 21:16:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 21:02:
nin wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 20:40:

"I'm going to make these crazy statements, but I'm much too busy to back them up with any facts..."

durpa durpa dunder...

Derpa derpa derp. Da derp derpa derpity derp. Derp derp!
At least he's confirmed once and for all that he has nothing of substance to say and is incapable of having a rational discussion.

Where in the constitution does it grant a president to make EO's like that? Point it out for me smart guy, if anything, when you read especially the 5th amendment in regards to property alone, some of those are unconstitutional. You guys are either obtuse or really love obama's cock or some shit.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
504. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 21:02 RollinThundr
 
nin wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 20:40:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 20:34:
trollindunder wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 18:26:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 18:02:
So how long are you going to keep dodging my question? How do any of the 23 EOs violate the Constitution?


You've obvious never even read the contents of the Constitution, start with the first and work your way up, you'll figure it out I think.
So you can't say which one violates it, nor can you say how. So you're just full of shit and wasting my time.

"I'm going to make these crazy statements, but I'm much too busy to back them up with any facts..."

durpa durpa dunder...


I'm going to never contribute to a discussion, violate the site rules and only personally attack other members derpa derpa nin's a douchebag.

If you idiots think a president is within his power to write EO's like that, then you don't even fucking deserve your rights and freedoms. None of you have either 1. Read the damn Constitution, or 2. have a fucking brain.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
501. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 18:26 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 18:02:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 17:47:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 17:18:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 16:11:
Mad Max RW wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 15:15:
And it gets even better as liberal Californians who supported the law are discovering they have to pay up:
Some health insurance gets pricier as Obamacare rolls out - Many middle-class Californians with individual health plans are surprised they need policies that cover more and cost more.


Pam Kehaly, president of Anthem Blue Cross in California, said she received a recent letter from a young woman complaining about a 50% rate hike related to the healthcare law.

"She said, 'I was all for Obamacare until I found out I was paying for it,'" Kehaly said.

Classic.

Notice how none of the usual suspects are defending any of this.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how any (let alone most) of the EOs violate the Constitution. I don't plan to engage on any other topics until we settle at least one. You changing the subject constantly is just tedious.

So, I'll ask once again, please do explain which EOs violate the Constitution, and how.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBj7wj0Lx7c

Since when can a president sign into order the right for the government to not only seize all means of transportation, both public and private, Since when can the government take over food production and farms? Since when can the government mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision? Either you refuse to watch the same link I've posted 5 times or you're fine with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x14IF7f3tLw

So how long are you going to keep dodging my question? How do any of the 23 EOs violate the Constitution?


You've obvious never even read the contents of the Constitution, start with the first and work your way up, you'll figure it out I think.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
500. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 18:22 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 18:02:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 17:47:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 17:18:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 16:11:
Mad Max RW wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 15:15:
And it gets even better as liberal Californians who supported the law are discovering they have to pay up:
Some health insurance gets pricier as Obamacare rolls out - Many middle-class Californians with individual health plans are surprised they need policies that cover more and cost more.


Pam Kehaly, president of Anthem Blue Cross in California, said she received a recent letter from a young woman complaining about a 50% rate hike related to the healthcare law.

"She said, 'I was all for Obamacare until I found out I was paying for it,'" Kehaly said.

Classic.

Notice how none of the usual suspects are defending any of this.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how any (let alone most) of the EOs violate the Constitution. I don't plan to engage on any other topics until we settle at least one. You changing the subject constantly is just tedious.

So, I'll ask once again, please do explain which EOs violate the Constitution, and how.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBj7wj0Lx7c

Since when can a president sign into order the right for the government to not only seize all means of transportation, both public and private, Since when can the government take over food production and farms? Since when can the government mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision? Either you refuse to watch the same link I've posted 5 times or you're fine with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x14IF7f3tLw

So how long are you going to keep dodging my question? How do any of the 23 EOs violate the Constitution?

You've never read the document, that much is obvious. Do your own research.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
498. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 17:47 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 17:18:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 16:11:
Mad Max RW wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 15:15:
And it gets even better as liberal Californians who supported the law are discovering they have to pay up:
Some health insurance gets pricier as Obamacare rolls out - Many middle-class Californians with individual health plans are surprised they need policies that cover more and cost more.


Pam Kehaly, president of Anthem Blue Cross in California, said she received a recent letter from a young woman complaining about a 50% rate hike related to the healthcare law.

"She said, 'I was all for Obamacare until I found out I was paying for it,'" Kehaly said.

Classic.

Notice how none of the usual suspects are defending any of this.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how any (let alone most) of the EOs violate the Constitution. I don't plan to engage on any other topics until we settle at least one. You changing the subject constantly is just tedious.

So, I'll ask once again, please do explain which EOs violate the Constitution, and how.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBj7wj0Lx7c

Since when can a president sign into order the right for the government to not only seize all means of transportation, both public and private, Since when can the government take over food production and farms? Since when can the government mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision? Either you refuse to watch the same link I've posted 5 times or you're fine with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x14IF7f3tLw
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
495. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 16:11 RollinThundr
 
Mad Max RW wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 15:15:
And it gets even better as liberal Californians who supported the law are discovering they have to pay up:
Some health insurance gets pricier as Obamacare rolls out - Many middle-class Californians with individual health plans are surprised they need policies that cover more and cost more.


Pam Kehaly, president of Anthem Blue Cross in California, said she received a recent letter from a young woman complaining about a 50% rate hike related to the healthcare law.

"She said, 'I was all for Obamacare until I found out I was paying for it,'" Kehaly said.

Classic.

Notice how none of the usual suspects are defending any of this.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Battlefield 4 Preloads
10. Re: Battlefield 4 Preloads Oct 27, 2013, 16:01 RollinThundr
 
mellis wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 15:07:
deqer wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 14:50:
Really? Sounds easier to just reject the payment on credit card, and I would feel some compensation from doing that because it will penalize EA(with the credit card company), for putting me through frustration.

Not a pretty solution. Firstly; you'd have to wait until the debit cleared onto your credit card, and secondly; you'd have to dispute it with your credit card company. While this would probably be within your legal rights, it would be logged against your credit card account and repeat offenses (I.e. repeated disputes) would probably flag you. That information will almost certainly be shared amongst all card providers, so that future disputes you make for any product/service are far more closely scrutinized.

What EA have done is pretty generous really - 24 hours *after* you launch the game or 7 days *after* you bought it (whichever comes first). I can't really fault them for this.


Or they could offer no refunds at all like every other publisher or retailer. Some of you should really stop hating for the sake of hating. It makes you look extremely petty.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
492. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 13:16 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 23:50:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 23:26:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 22:40:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 22:34:
Do a little research on all the fema camps poping up all over the US, that doesn't alarm you just a little? Did you even look at that EO link?

I used to think conspiracy types were just as loony as the next guy, but I can't help but get this sinking feeling with all the shit that's come out as of late between the NSA crap, the fact that the Boston bombing could have been a set up attack, etc.

Seriously, call me crazy, I'd understand, but there's certainly a lot of very fishy shit going on.
People have been peddling that crap for decades, and none of it has ever happened. It's bullshit. Humans are designed to see patterns in things, and we see them even when there's really nothing there. Just like the people that see Jesus in a piece of toast.

No I get that, but it just seems different with all that has come out as of late. That and I truly have zero faith in Obama as a president, and no it's not only because he's a democrat.

It's really not different at all. It has always seemed different and more real to the people coming up with these crazy conspiracies. You think they weren't utterly convinced of the stuff they were saying back in the past decades? They were. They were still wrong though, just like these guys are wrong today. It's nonsensical. There's no actual evidence. Just a bunch of crap they string together into a huge circular logic loop that makes no sense.

I get that you don't like Obama. I imagine that anyone would hate him if they bought into stuff like that video. But do yourself and the rest of us a favor and separate out the crazy shit and the hyperbole from the actual facts. Focus on real issues, not a bunch of stupid stuff. There are plenty of things to be critical of without inventing a bunch of stuff that just destroys your credibility. Hell, Sepharo made a list of perfectly good things to be pissed about back in post 430. Start there.

I dunno between all his EO's most of which I would think violate the Constitution, his stance on guns, ramming through Obamacare and lying about it. The fact that the dollar could very well collapse any day now and honestly did in 2008 and we'll be Greece before you know it.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
491. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 12:17 RollinThundr
 
Mad Max RW wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 11:27:
More good stuff for the liberals to simply wave off:

500,000 Californians Lose Health Policies

More Americans In 3 States Have Had Their Insurance Canceled Under ObamaCare Than Have Filed An Exchange Account In All 50

What happened to Obama's promise if you like your healthcare you can keep it?

Simple it was a lie but that's ok because Obama!
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
488. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 23:26 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 22:40:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 22:34:
Do a little research on all the fema camps poping up all over the US, that doesn't alarm you just a little? Did you even look at that EO link?

I used to think conspiracy types were just as loony as the next guy, but I can't help but get this sinking feeling with all the shit that's come out as of late between the NSA crap, the fact that the Boston bombing could have been a set up attack, etc.

Seriously, call me crazy, I'd understand, but there's certainly a lot of very fishy shit going on.
People have been peddling that crap for decades, and none of it has ever happened. It's bullshit. Humans are designed to see patterns in things, and we see them even when there's really nothing there. Just like the people that see Jesus in a piece of toast.

No I get that, but it just seems different with all that has come out as of late. That and I truly have zero faith in Obama as a president, and no it's not only because he's a democrat.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
486. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 22:34 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 22:24:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 22:08:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 22:06:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 21:57:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 21:01:
Which one of those 23 proposals establishes a gun registry? I don't see it. If you expect anyone to understand why you are so pissed about this, you're gonna have to articulate your argument here. You're not doing that right now. Please try again.

Since you didn't watch the link obviously. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi1c2JOSxwI
Pay special attention from about 12:30 on. Around 25:50 he calls on congress to ban assault riffles and impose a 10 round limit on mags, Again a direct attack and infringing on the 2nd amendment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBj7wj0Lx7c again a link you didn't watch, all EO's signed in by your buddy Barack "fuck the Constitution" Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxtGaZrKDvs

So basically you're full of crap. None of his proposed EOs have anything to do with a gun registry, and none of them violate the 2nd amendment. While I don't agree with him, and would oppose the legislation myself, he's not violating the Constitution by asking Congress to pass assault rifle or mag bans.

This is why nobody takes you seriously. You make claims about him violating the Constitution when it's plainly obvious that he's not. This is also why it's such a pain in the ass for people like me that support gun rights, because I get lumped in with a bunch of screaming assholes that have no idea what they're talking about and just spew a lot of WHARRGARBL!! It's fucking frustrating.



Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 20:41:

RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:43:

Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:40:
Dude, could you just answer the damn question? Which proposal do you think violates the 2nd amendment and why? I'm not seeing it.


Watch the videos and use your brain. I think you're capable of that.

I already told you I don't see what the hell you're talking about. So either tell us what exactly is violating the 2nd amendment or just shut up about the whole thing and quit wasting our time with link spam.


A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

You sir are a fucking retard.

Again, him asking Congress to pass a law doesn't violate the Constitution. If you think it does, then you're the retard. You can't name a single proposal of his that violates the 2nd, and you just keep blathering on and making no sense.

Do a little research on all the fema camps poping up all over the US, that doesn't alarm you just a little? Did you even look at that EO link?

I used to think conspiracy types were just as loony as the next guy, but I can't help but get this sinking feeling with all the shit that's come out as of late between the NSA crap, the fact that the Boston bombing could have been a set up attack, etc.

Seriously, call me crazy, I'd understand, but there's certainly a lot of very fishy shit going on.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
483. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 22:19 RollinThundr
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRK2dKUQDRw
watch this to the end please.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
482. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 22:08 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 22:06:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 21:57:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 21:01:
Which one of those 23 proposals establishes a gun registry? I don't see it. If you expect anyone to understand why you are so pissed about this, you're gonna have to articulate your argument here. You're not doing that right now. Please try again.

Since you didn't watch the link obviously. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi1c2JOSxwI
Pay special attention from about 12:30 on. Around 25:50 he calls on congress to ban assault riffles and impose a 10 round limit on mags, Again a direct attack and infringing on the 2nd amendment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBj7wj0Lx7c again a link you didn't watch, all EO's signed in by your buddy Barack "fuck the Constitution" Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxtGaZrKDvs

So basically you're full of crap. None of his proposed EOs have anything to do with a gun registry, and none of them violate the 2nd amendment. While I don't agree with him, and would oppose the legislation myself, he's not violating the Constitution by asking Congress to pass assault rifle or mag bans.

This is why nobody takes you seriously. You make claims about him violating the Constitution when it's plainly obvious that he's not. This is also why it's such a pain in the ass for people like me that support gun rights, because I get lumped in with a bunch of screaming assholes that have no idea what they're talking about and just spew a lot of WHARRGARBL!! It's fucking frustrating.



Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 20:41:

RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:43:

Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:40:
Dude, could you just answer the damn question? Which proposal do you think violates the 2nd amendment and why? I'm not seeing it.


Watch the videos and use your brain. I think you're capable of that.

I already told you I don't see what the hell you're talking about. So either tell us what exactly is violating the 2nd amendment or just shut up about the whole thing and quit wasting our time with link spam.


A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

You sir are a fucking retard.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
480. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 21:57 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 21:01:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 20:53:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 20:41:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:43:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:40:
Dude, could you just answer the damn question? Which proposal do you think violates the 2nd amendment and why? I'm not seeing it.

Watch the videos and use your brain. I think you're capable of that.
I already told you I don't see what the hell you're talking about. So either tell us what exactly is violating the 2nd amendment or just shut up about the whole thing and quit wasting our time with link spam.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Here you have Obama talking about making executive orders to not only force a gun registry database, and for what? But to strip rights that are not to be infringed.

His gun bills have all failed, so what does he do? Circumvent the process and goes right to executive orders.

Mark my words, this guy is the single most dangerous president we've ever had.

Which one of those 23 proposals establishes a gun registry? I don't see it. If you expect anyone to understand why you are so pissed about this, you're gonna have to articulate your argument here. You're not doing that right now. Please try again.

Since you didn't watch the link obviously. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi1c2JOSxwI
Pay special attention from about 12:30 on. Around 25:50 he calls on congress to ban assault riffles and impose a 10 round limit on mags, Again a direct attack and infringing on the 2nd amendment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBj7wj0Lx7c again a link you didn't watch, all EO's signed in by your buddy Barack "fuck the Constitution" Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxtGaZrKDvs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAkxdkfqn-M

He should be tried for treason imo, and I'd say the same if it were ANY president regardless of party.

Shit even Maddows is calling him out on this type of shit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwqFN1-mxJc
This comment was edited on Oct 26, 2013, 22:07.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
478. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 20:53 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 20:41:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:43:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:40:
Dude, could you just answer the damn question? Which proposal do you think violates the 2nd amendment and why? I'm not seeing it.

Watch the videos and use your brain. I think you're capable of that.
I already told you I don't see what the hell you're talking about. So either tell us what exactly is violating the 2nd amendment or just shut up about the whole thing and quit wasting our time with link spam.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Here you have Obama talking about making executive orders to not only force a gun registry database, and for what? But to strip rights that are not to be infringed.

His gun bills have all failed, so what does he do? Circumvent the process and goes right to executive orders.

Mark my words, this guy is the single most dangerous president we've ever had.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
476. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 19:20 RollinThundr
 
Sepharo wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 19:09:
Rollin for a guy who's constantly harping on about the media you sure do get a lot of your information from people ranting into a camera.

I don't like it any more than you do but seriously, wake the fuck up. This administration is fucking dangerous.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
471. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 18:43 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:40:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:30:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:11:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 17:59:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 17:33:
Maybe come up with something specific rather than just ranting. Which proposal violates the 2nd Amendment, and how?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRfn7CKih4c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1xk8LQ2iLA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi1c2JOSxwI

Wake up. Just please wake the fuck up.

Ok, you're gonna have to be more specific than that. I just watched the first one, and I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. How does anything he said there violate the 2nd amendment?

Watch the 3rd one especially. They're using Newtown to force a political agenda, it's fucking sickening.

Edit: more of the Messiah's EO's. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBj7wj0Lx7c

Edit2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMejQMpK_6Q

Dude, could you just answer the damn question? Which proposal do you think violates the 2nd amendment and why? I'm not seeing it.

Watch the videos and use your brain. I think you're capable of that.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
469. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 26, 2013, 18:30 RollinThundr
 
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 18:11:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 17:59:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 17:33:
Maybe come up with something specific rather than just ranting. Which proposal violates the 2nd Amendment, and how?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRfn7CKih4c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1xk8LQ2iLA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi1c2JOSxwI

Wake up. Just please wake the fuck up.

Ok, you're gonna have to be more specific than that. I just watched the first one, and I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. How does anything he said there violate the 2nd amendment?

Watch the 3rd one especially. They're using Newtown to force a political agenda, it's fucking sickening.

Edit: more of the Messiah's EO's. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBj7wj0Lx7c

Edit2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMejQMpK_6Q
Edit3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdQnTPdIn9I

Wake the fuck up.

Edit4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUB6zdgSzio
Do you want more evidence or is that enough to start?

This comment was edited on Oct 26, 2013, 18:42.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
2460 Comments. 123 pages. Viewing page 12.
< Newer [ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo