a7m2 wrote on Aug 26, 2012, 19:59:
Make sure to mention all these valid points in the next petition.

a7m2 wrote on Aug 26, 2012, 19:22:
Nobody's forcing you to play it. Don't you think that we're lucky to even get this port at all, from a small dev team inexperienced with a PC platform?

a7m2 wrote on Aug 26, 2012, 16:26:
From Software did a great job with this port, considering all the circumstances

Yakubs wrote on Aug 25, 2012, 23:53:
I haven't tried TL2 but I have a hard time believing the improvements are really that earth-shattering.

Mr. Tact wrote on Aug 25, 2012, 17:13:
Anyone paying close enough attention to know if Apple's patent suit is anywhere close to having merit? Or is it just normal stupid patent law that would have been thrown out before the trial started if common sense prevailed?

I'd be freakin' pissed if I worked on something for 5 years using my own hard-earned money and all that time, only for someone else (a much bigger company) to come along and blatantly rip off my design and start selling it in just a few months! I'm glad Samsung lost. This kind of copying stalls technology because it does not encourage innovation. Apple and Samsung aside, this shouldn't happen to anyone! I hope the injunction goes through! No one should be able to sell a flippin' copy of my idea!! Think about if it was your idea! You'd be pissed too.

dj LiTh wrote on Aug 25, 2012, 22:48:
Any comments on PvP? Thats what sold me on GW1 honestly, the MMORPG part of GW2 is cool, but for me not the selling point, as it honestly looks like any other MMORPG. I'm not sure if you have to level to a certain level to actually try it or like in GW1 you can roll a premade char with select skills and try it immediately?

dj LiTh wrote on Aug 25, 2012, 22:23:
Maybe i'm being pessimistic, wouldnt be the first time. But this game's Blues News reception is earily similar to SWTOR....i want to believe....i really really do

Ozmodan wrote on Aug 25, 2012, 14:57:
I installed windows 8 on a local PC that seniors use. Guess what, they all loved it. It was far easier to use than their old XP. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it. For the average user, Windows 8 is better!

There is nothing wrong with the interface!

Enahs wrote on Aug 25, 2012, 10:57:
Most of you do not seem to understand what the vast majority of people use computers for. Simple stuff. Web browsing, Word. Gaming for the masses are simple games ala Angry Birds. The vast majority of people just want their computer to work, and be easy to use.

That is what Windows 8 is. The small minority of internet nerds and journalists (relative to the major population) use the computer completely different then what the majority of the planet uses.

Prez wrote on Aug 25, 2012, 05:33:
Seriously, I can't for the life of me understand how I'm supposed to buy that Valve and Blizzard are going to be afraid about Microsoft elbowing in on their territory as the author seems to insinuate. Why in the hell would any PC gaming company be afraid of Microsoft when every last "effort" (if it can even be called that) MS has made in the PC gaming space has been a disaster or a joke?

Is it the control that Microsoft will have? Maybe, but I am reading that the author thinks that Gabe Newell is lashing out because he feels threatened by MS as a competitor, which is just laughable.

noman wrote on Aug 24, 2012, 20:04:
The second article rightly claims that Windows 8 is good for gaming. It really is, even in the release preview version. It's faster and more stable than Windows7, with lower memory footprint and better CPU/GPU resource usage.

Metro is mostly optional

Ozmodan wrote on Aug 23, 2012, 14:46:
Well the Windows 7 article forgot one big point. Windows 8 is going to be far cheaper than 7, hence I think 8 will be far more popular than he thinks.

Oh and to all of you whining about Windows 8, if you took some time to get used to it, you would realize it is far superior to 7.

No one said the start menu in previous versions of Windows was more useful necessarily, that's a different argument