space captain wrote on Sep 24, 2012, 17:25:

Darks wrote on Sep 24, 2012, 16:18:

Riker wrote on Sep 24, 2012, 15:59:

EDIT: Also, this game badly needs a multiplayer co-op mode.

This is the one thing that’s keeping me from buying it right now. I’ve got so many other games right now to play that this one will get picked up at a much later date.

But Coop is defiantly needed.

so fucking clueless

Prez wrote on Sep 24, 2012, 13:25:
This is definitely a demo I want to try out. I have high hopes for any game that has 'Xcom' in the title, but that can also lead to disappointment. If I like the demo I'll probably end up preordering to help with the bonuses.

Armengar wrote on Sep 23, 2012, 10:19:
D3 isn't poor. IMHO it is an ok game. The long awaited Duke nukem sequel was poor. sword of the stars 2 on release was poor. And so far on every d3 topic on blues there have been d3 haters jumping on d2 is better so I'm just adding a bit of variation.

I feel that d3 was supposed to have the spirit of d2 but have enough difference to stand apart. I obviously say this as my opinion and everyone has their own. Perhaps I have been luckier than others or my expectations of a good game are lower.

Not trying to start a flame war, I'm just musing.

Axis wrote on Sep 21, 2012, 09:12:
Better than D3, not even close to PoE. Bought it for my son since it's so easy but enjoying it for now myself.

Unless there's a nifty mod or two that comes out, there won't be more than about 2 weeks of interest at best from your average gamer.

AngelicPenguin wrote on Sep 19, 2012, 16:59:

deqer wrote on Sep 18, 2012, 16:03:
You D3 people... I feel sorry for you.

Have fun being controlled:
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6573698478

and never to play it offline, never to play it lan, never to mod it, all for $60 because it has Blizzard tag on it.

Grats.

You always sound upset. Would you like an internet hug? Really, people who play diablo 3 are doing fine - it's just a game my friend.

LOC wrote on Sep 19, 2012, 07:24:

1AngryGamer wrote on Sep 18, 2012, 22:59:
People are still playing this?

Why exactly does it surprise you that people still play this?

Also, why is it in nearly every other news post about a game getting an update or whatever, someone has to post "Are people still playing this?!?!" ?

Prez wrote on Sep 15, 2012, 22:18:

BobBob wrote on Sep 15, 2012, 22:16:
Is this free to play?

It just never gets old!

Prez wrote on Sep 14, 2012, 05:18:

NegaDeath wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 19:17:

...Why do I buy games I don't have time for?


Oooh shiny!

LOL! At least it's good to know I'm not alone in my sad situation.

Cutter wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 16:22:

Kajetan wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 13:50:

Cutter wrote on Sep 13, 2012, 13:23:
How guys like this ever get to be in charge of anything boggles the mind.

Having the right social contacts, having the right university diploma and being in the right fraternities, having the right "social scent", not being a filthy upstart and newcomer, originating from the right families.

To get a job as a CEO is very, very easy when you are born in the wealthy part of the city. Social transition is still very weak, classes still exist and influence our daily life.

How true. I remember when I was working corporate and our new North American VP of operations came by. The guy was all of 26 and a Wharton MBA with zero real world experience, but word around the campfire was his family were mucky mucks with our CEO.

Yakubs wrote on Sep 12, 2012, 21:02:

You don't get it do you? FTL is a low-budget strategy roguelike hybrid intended to be developed in a short amount of time. If you'd take a moment to use your brain, you'd realize what kind of audience a low-budget strategy roguelike hybrid has.

I'll give you a hint -- A TINY F*CKING AUDIENCE.

Yakubs wrote on Sep 12, 2012, 18:41:
Honestly, go back to the world of AAA sequels immediately and never return. Console releases should suit your "taste" perfectly.