User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ] Older >
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 1. |
Project Grizzly |
Feb 7, 2007, 10:50 |
Raven |
|
|
If this thing really worked, I'm sure it would sell. Heck, I'm sure someone would pay him to take a shotgun to the chest if they could use the video on TV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
|
| 17. |
Re: Ballot measure: Straight couples, procr |
Feb 6, 2007, 14:52 |
Raven |
|
|
... gah, can't remember that long, complicated planet name David Tennant (as the Doctor) had said...
Gallifrey?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Into the Black |
|
| 2. |
Re: No subject |
Jan 31, 2007, 20:24 |
Raven |
|
|
Damn, I'd expect that at least one cop in Boston watches Adult Swim.
They were there for weeks, and now they waste a colossal amount of money chasing down Mooninites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs |
|
| 3. |
Re: Privacy & Intimacy?! |
Jan 5, 2007, 18:46 |
Raven |
|
|
[Edit]
Saw a link to a rapidshare of it yesterday on Youtube... Seems to be gone now.
This comment was edited on Jan 5, 18:48. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
|
| 16. |
contact lenses |
Jan 3, 2007, 13:29 |
Raven |
|
|
Hey, I was just joking yesterday about hitting your neighbor's car again.
Maybe you should find an eye doctor that will actually remember you when you go to pick up new lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Into the Black |
|
| 6. |
Re: Copyright |
Jan 3, 2007, 00:05 |
Raven |
|
|
You think that a person who isn't wearing corrective lenses can read that line on the bottom? Poor guy probably wouldn't see a car parked on the street before he backed into it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Metaverse |
|
| 2. |
Qatar |
Jan 2, 2007, 15:02 |
Raven |
|
|
If you came here from a news headline saying that Wikipedia has banned all of Qatar, please pop right back over there and post in the comments that the story is not true. This IP number was temporarily blocked for less than 12 hours, and a block of an entire nation would go absolutely against Wikipedia policy. In the English Wikipedia, such an action would require approval of at a minimum the English Arbitration Committee and/or me personally, and would never ever be undertaken lightly, nor without extensive attempts at direct negotiation with the ISP and/or nation in question.
To any and all reporters, from Slashdot, TechCrunch, mainstream media, etc.: You may email me and ask me for my personal cellphone number, which I will answer 24 hours a day to confirm or disconfirm any such story of this type.
--Jimbo Wales, founder of Wikipedia and Chair Emeritus of the Wikimedia Foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Medieval II: Total War Patch Tomorrow, Steam Update Today |
|
| 3. |
Re: No subject |
Dec 15, 2006, 08:23 |
Raven |
|
|
Yes, right now Scotland doesn't ever try to conquer England or leave the island. The AI never puts troops on naval transports. Cavalry charges are "designed" so that if the defending unit moves after you give the order, the charge doesn't work, they raise their lances, and just run into the enemy and die.
Oh, and elite 2-handed units swing so slow that they never actually get to swing against the daggers light infantry/peasants/archers use, so they suffer huge casualties in melee.
The patch were they will look at fixing that might come in 2-3 months...
This comment was edited on Dec 15, 08:27. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs |
|
| 5. |
Re: No subject |
Dec 14, 2006, 17:33 |
Raven |
|
|
Hey, if he said that he thought that the suspect was armed, then no problem. But just because you hear gunshots doesn't mean you pop every suspect in the head. I haven't read any articles that said that, or anything about the magic tumbling bullet either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
260 Comments. 13 pages. Viewing page 4.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ] Older > |
|
Twitter 
