Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for nutshell42

Real Name nutshell42   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname None given.
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Jul 11, 2007, 21:21
Total Comments 202 (Novice)
User ID 41973
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ] Older >


News Comments > Evening Mobilization
2. Re: Evening Mobilization Mar 19, 2013, 02:37 nutshell42
 
wow, you didn't even read the fucking headline of the article you're replying to.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Tech Bits
4. Re: Evening Tech Bits Nov 17, 2012, 05:34 nutshell42
 
so it's impossible to determine whether Fedora's dead or not?  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Revised Windows Store Policy Allows PEGI-18 Games
8. Re: Revised Windows Store Policy Allows PEGI-18 Games Oct 26, 2012, 06:50 nutshell42
 
October 1942
Somewhere in the North Atlantic

"Pegi-18, Pegi-18, please respond. Pegi-18 do you copy?"



I always thought it sounded like straight out of a war movie.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Nexus 2 Kickstarter
14. Re: Nexus 2 Kickstarter Sep 28, 2012, 16:22 nutshell42
 
Stanly Manly wrote on Sep 28, 2012, 15:55:
If you do, it's because your abilities are sub par, and you obviously don't understand the genre, duh.

But he is right (now I have to shower, thanks Stan).

All your complaints about the gameplay itself instead of interface shortcomings read like the whining of a guy who doesn't like the genre.

(hey, IGN reduced the score of Ground Control due to lack of base building. Why don't you head over there? Sounds like your kind of site.)
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Consolidation
4. Re: Morning Consolidation Sep 25, 2012, 18:19 nutshell42
 
Sony's easily got the best first party titles of this generation (Last Guardian's demise notwithstanding). Can't say I'd be inconsolable (badadush) if they went multi-platform.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam EU Legal Conflict
17. Re: Steam EU Legal Conflict Sep 21, 2012, 12:59 nutshell42
 
"required declaration of failure"

A better, as in not harebrained, translation would be [b]declaration of cessation[/b] (the translation includes the stilted legalese tone).

Basically as a response to a cease and desist order you promise to cease and desist. This generally allows the ceased and desisted party to escape further legal trouble while the ceasing and desisting one can truly fuck you up good if you break said promise later on.


Valve of course won't do it because being able to rape you in the ass is part of their business model. They sell access to your asshole to publishers. Hell, this whole business started because they want to take away your right to sue them if they rape you too hard. (not that I don't have a steam library but at least I'm not in love with my pimp)
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Chris Roberts Game Countdown?
29. Re: Chris Roberts Game Countdown? Sep 10, 2012, 18:29 nutshell42
 
Muscular Beaver wrote on Sep 10, 2012, 18:21:
Freelancer sucked hard [...]
Also I dont want another Privateer 2 fail.

What the fuck is *wrong* with you?

Somebody call a doctor! He's delusional.


On a related note: Privateer 2 was by Chris Roberts brother, not him iirc, and they shouldn't have tacked on the Privateer name. But what do you expect of EA.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > The International 2012 Begins
4. Re: The International 2012 Begins Sep 1, 2012, 23:26 nutshell42
 
Imho Dota makes for a pretty terrible spectator sport.

Your girlfriend can watch a Starcraft match and get the gist of it and it generally ends with a cataclysmic battle. In Dota you're watching 20 min of farming with slowly accumulating advantages (please no counter-examples. This is a about the general situation not exceptions) and now and then there's a small skirmish that's incomprehensible without knowledge of 108 heroes and a gazillion items.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
60. Re: Morning Tech Bits Aug 24, 2012, 07:54 nutshell42
 
Dades wrote on Aug 24, 2012, 07:20:
Why can't I toggle metro if I don't want their phone interface?

There's an easy toggle: Just don't use Metro apps.


And there's no reason it should have different start menus. The current one doesn't really work like anything else in Windows either. A resizable split menu with inline scrolling.

Not to mention its bullshit inconsistency. Click "all programs" and the button turns into a back button. Search for someting then that button becomes an "open in explorer" button, while the back button is the little cross in the search bar. It's a fucking disaster.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
59. Re: Morning Tech Bits Aug 24, 2012, 07:42 nutshell42
 
Verno wrote on Aug 24, 2012, 06:49:
No one said the start menu in previous versions of Windows was more useful necessarily, that's a different argument.

But apart from it the only Metro fragment you're likely going to see with any regularity is the Wifi config (if you have a notebook and often switch wifi networks), how's that ramming Metro down our throats? =)

Correction, there's the search; I never used the start menu search for anything but apps and settings, but if you used some of the more advanced features it might be annoying. No idea.


I don't agree with your conclusion about context switching

Why? My rationale:

1. You open the start menu to start a new program
2. Hence the program you used before opening the start menu and after are different (even if you later switch back to the first)
3. Compared to switching from one program to another the question whether you use a menu or a screen is a minor difference.



I really don't like to sound like the Windows evangelist but I just don't get how the question of the size of the start menu can justify the vitriol that's heaped on Windows 8.
Hell, I'd understand if people complained that they didn't add enough stuff for desktop users since 7; but I guess ppl can't say that because it'd undermine the story of 7 being the embodiment of perfection and 8 the spawn of Satan.

Oh and my 2 favorite bullshit complaints:
1. "I searched for hours for the shutdown button" -- your PC's got a power button
2. "My grandma'll never find the start screen hot corner" -- Every keyboard has a windows key; most have 2.


There's so much legitimate stuff you could complain about. The store is Jobsian fascist wonderland, the cloud integration everywhere is annoying and the uselessness of Metro with a mouse is completely unnecessary. A more elegant integration of Metro and Desktop would go a long way. The Office 2013 beta with the collapsible window chrome shows how it could've been done.

This comment was edited on Aug 24, 2012, 07:48.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
56. Re: Morning Tech Bits Aug 24, 2012, 05:40 nutshell42
 
Verno wrote on Aug 23, 2012, 22:27:
I was addressing the comment that Metro isn't forced on the user. You can't disable it without third party functionality that can't be counted on in the corporate space. Microsoft went out of its way to accomplish that. It is a second interface that users must now deal with, to what extent will depend on their workflow and whether people even adopt Windows 8.

Unless you go out of your way to use Metro apps (additional functionality), the charms (additional functionality) or the task switcher (additional functionality and why even use it without Metro apps), your only common interaction with Metro will be

1. the start screen
2. the Wifi configuration.

Both already don't conform to the design of the rest of windows, and both are better in Windows 8 than in 7.

You can of course contest the latter but it's ridiculous to say that the start screen is a massive disruption of your work flow. You use it to start shit, that means you're already in the process of a context switch. And the cases where you need both the start menu and whatever else you've got open at the same time are really not enough to throw the kind of tantrum the Win8 haters do.

To say that Win8 is anything but a slightly better version of 7 with a new start menu and upgraded widgets, that are just as useless as the old ones, is ridiculous.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Europa Universalis IV Announced
3. Re: Europa Universalis IV Announced Aug 10, 2012, 17:34 nutshell42
 
I used to just buy these games at launch. They were shit but you could rely on Paradox to fix them over the next year and your money was simply an investment.

Nowadays they sell you those patches for money and I'm just gonna wait for the complete edition (as opposed to the Complete Edition which is not complete at all, at least in the EU3 case) a few years down the road.

Score one for greed.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Mobilization
2. Re: Acer CEO warning to MS Surface Tablet Aug 9, 2012, 03:16 nutshell42
 
Even better: Acer already produces Android stuff so by the CEO's logic it betrayed MS; but when MS does it it's Teh OUTRAAAGE.

Asus is the only innovative company anyway. Everyone else releases one shitty me-too product after the other. A bit of fire under their asses is exactly what's needed.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > MechWarrior Online Video Diary
1. Re: MechWarrior Online Video Diary Aug 8, 2012, 04:16 nutshell42
 
I like the dual reticles. One thing I've always disliked about just about any iteration of Battletech and/or Mechwarrior was that weapons in your arms were a liability (more vulnerable than torso; hardly any advantages)

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
57. Re: Morning Metaverse Aug 8, 2012, 04:10 nutshell42
 
Matshock wrote on Aug 7, 2012, 22:09:
John Kerry had it "locked up" right up until he didn't on election night.

So you're saying that Romney's in a worse position than Kerry? Interesting.


I'm still waiting for an explanation of what Obama's done to "stab Israel in the back."

In fact given the way Netanyahu has treated the administration you'd think there'd be at least some kind of retaliation. But as far as I can tell Obama just sat there and turned the other cheek.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
36. Re: Morning Metaverse Aug 7, 2012, 16:00 nutshell42
 
Verno wrote on Aug 7, 2012, 15:33:
At a personal level I think quality of care, availability and cost are the foremost in my mind

Just about all developed nations with national healthcare have better life expectancy and better results on the usual health metrics at significantly lower cost of the US.

Waiting lists can be an issue. The NHS in the UK is legendary for its delays, it's better in most other countries. Waiting times would be one non-essential area where you could have additional private insurance.

Comparisons are hard because there really is no other developed country without national healthcare of some sort.


I understand what you're saying about government regulation being required for the health care system in general but that's a separate discussion from what I'm talking about so I'm not going to address it.

The PAPs in healthcare are often so large they border on market failure. The stakes are so high (your life), the information asymmetry so great (you're not a brain surgeon) and the uncertainty so large (who can really tell how much was your doctor, how much your own body and how much that one of 40 medications) that it's hard for patients to make a rational decision.

Americans take too many pills and get too many CRTs to the detriment of their health; they do that because in the end you have to trust your doctor but it's in your doctor's best interest to sell you more shit.


I think there are many merits to a national health care but I also recognize it has its downsides as well. As an aside, I'm not sure many of the proponents for a national health care system are truly prepared to deal with the tax implications either.

That is absolutely correct.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
31. Re: Morning Metaverse Aug 7, 2012, 15:27 nutshell42
 
DukeFNukem wrote on Aug 7, 2012, 14:54:
Fast and Furious, backstabbing Israel

I'm not in the know when it comes to right wing lingo so could you enlighten me here? WTF are you talking about?


And what America needs much more than a new president is a new Congress. Take 535 chimpanzees and let them vote with left banana/right banana. At least they'd get it right 50% of the time.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
29. Re: Morning Metaverse Aug 7, 2012, 15:17 nutshell42
 
Verno wrote on Aug 7, 2012, 14:30:
Talk about how private does it better,
They can't because it doesn't.

talk about the greater number of specialists in a private health care system

Turns out they hurt more than they help because there's such a thing as too much healthcare. All those good capitalist specialists try to maximize their profit by doing shit to patients they don't need and getting kickbacks from big pharma for selling too much or the wrong pills.

Healthcare is prone to principal agent problems (look it up) to work without government intervention. There's hardly a market where the three main factors in PAPs - information asymmetry, uncertainty and risk - are more prevalent than in the patient-doctor relationship.


There's a lot to be said for a private element in health care but in areas where those three factors are limited, e.g. goodies like single rooms in hospitals, dentists and other nice to have stuff.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
17. Re: Morning Tech Bits Jul 19, 2012, 17:29 nutshell42
 
avianflu wrote on Jul 19, 2012, 15:56:
Sorry nutshell but I've been on the beta for 6 months.

Then give me a few example of all the things that are so much more terrible.


However I want the Koolaid you've been drinking!

Oh yes, "I might upgrade a PC" is sooo much shilling.
If anyone here's drunk the Kool-Aid then it's you and your fellow Win8 hate-train brigade.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
14. Re: Morning Tech Bits Jul 19, 2012, 05:41 nutshell42
 
avianflu wrote on Jul 18, 2012, 15:51:
For non-touchscreen users, windows 8 actually add more clicks to do normal things. Your only real alternative is to use keyboard shortcuts.

The writer of the editorial has no idea what he is talking about.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

The only major thing that adds clicks for normal users is when they search for settings (something Edna in accounting does 400 times a day) or files.

I'd actually dispute the file search because every normal person I know looks for files in the explorer because that's where files reside in their logic. Also the current start menu search sucks for files anyway because the 5 hits it shows are generally not enough and the additional work for the superior search in the explorer is marginal.

That said the new file search sucks just as much because of its lack of contextual actions.


If your whole hatred of windows 8 is based on the additional click required for searching the control panel (if you don't know the keyboard shortcut) and the continued suckage of a stupid way to look for files then you are just a trolling luddite.

Honestly, call it irrelevant all you want. I don't know if even at $40 the advantages are worth it -I might upgrade one PC but certainly not all- but this hatred is ridiculous.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
202 Comments. 11 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ] Older >


footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo