Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

User information for AeroMechanical

Real Name AeroMechanical   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Aero
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description Just some guy.
Homepage http://
Signed On Jun 16, 2007, 02:48
Total Comments 746 (Apprentice)
User ID 40534
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ] Older >


News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Flashback
2. Re: Ships Ahoy - Flashback Oct 1, 2013, 21:47 Aero
 
I'm not sure the graphics overhaul is really doing the original game justice. Some of the character animations in the video look pretty canny whereas the original's were eerily realistic. It's been a long time, though, so I could just be remembering it a little too fondly.

Anyways, I think I'll be picking this up at some point soon.

ed: Watching it again, it looks like they've done away with the transitions in the character movement. This probably makes the controls more responsive, but that was part of the charm of Flashback and Out of This World. It was a different playstyle that required planning your moves a lot more than it did twitch reflexes. I'll still buy it, of course.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Space Engineers Trailer; Early Access This Month
1. Re: Space Engineers Trailer; Early Access This Month Oct 1, 2013, 14:01 Aero
 
I don't know what to think about this one. I might be kind of excited about it, and I might not. Miner Wars had some impressive stuff going on with the game engine, but was very, very poor as an actual game.

So given that, the concept of this sort of indicates they know that and might be on the right track, but nevertheless, I still don't have any evidence they know how to make something fun to play with.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > iFruit Yields PC GTA5 Clues
14. Re: iFruit Yields PC GTA5 Clues Sep 18, 2013, 15:42 Aero
 
I'm not really even sure what the iFruit app is and whether or not I want it on my phone. The description is just random bullshit. What would make sense, and would be pretty cool, is if it linked to your game and performed all of the functions of your in-game smartphone on your real smartphone. I don't think it does that though.

So... gimmick, I guess. Could have been a neat little immersion enhancement.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > iFruit Yields PC GTA5 Clues
6. Re: iFruit Yields PC GTA5 Clues Sep 18, 2013, 14:31 Aero
 
I notice that the "manual" for the game (whatever version) is actually a PC program (an MSI file, which I haven't bothered installing). So, there is a PC version of the manual "program." Could mean anything.

Anyways, I think we're all pretty much in agreement there will be a PC version eventually regardless. There always has been, so I don't see any reason for there not to be this time.

Personally, I bought the PS3 version because meh. It's a console game. I'll play it on a console. It's one of the five games I've ever bought for it. Better graphics and framerates would be nice, but it holds its own mostly on production value. It is pretty good so far though actually (and I didn't like GTA4), so it'll probably be worth picking it up for PC when that comes out if that's your thing.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Family Sharing Announced; Will Allow Game Lending
54. Re: Steam Family Sharing Announced; Will Allow Game Lending Sep 11, 2013, 19:27 Aero
 
All I want is the ability to transfer a license to a game I no longer play to another Steam user. I can't play it while they're playing it, which the client could easily enforce. That should all be perfectly legal.

Very simple. When it gets there and that simple, that will be a pretty cool thing. What they're describing now is way too unclear.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > HARDWARE: Shipbreakers was F2P; Homeworld: Shipbreakers Isn't
1. Re: HARDWARE: Shipbreakers was F2P; Homeworld: Shipbreakers Isn't Sep 9, 2013, 10:09 Aero
 
I read this as very good news (you know, with the usual Gearbox+Third Party caveats).  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Space Engineers Announced
1. Re: Space Engineers Announced Sep 9, 2013, 10:08 Aero
 
Well, Miner Wars was an interesting engine used to create a poor game. This, unfortunately, looks like it's going down the same route. I hope they put a lot more thought into making something fun this time time because they do have some good technical talent.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > DayZ Video Blog
3. Re: DayZ Video Blog Sep 8, 2013, 15:05 Aero
 
I haven't played any of the DayZ stuff (I was sort of waiting for the standalone to be complete), but I really like all the ideas going into this. It probably won't be my thing in the end, but I have a lot of respect for it.

I can see how it probably will all fall apart in practice on a public server, but I like some of the concepts. I see Molyneaux (in principle at least with Godus) taking a similar approach to idiots and griefing by making that part of the gameplay. The real-life socially mal-adjusted borderline sociopaths that normally plague other games, could be perfectly in character here.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Star Citizen's $17M Haul
29. Re: On Star Citizen's $17M Haul Sep 1, 2013, 20:55 Aero
 
Parias wrote on Sep 1, 2013, 20:30:
Aero wrote on Sep 1, 2013, 19:47:
I'd be happy (enough) with connecting to a central server that manages my assets, but then puts me in my own local instance of the universe. They get to keep their microtransaction thing, I get the SP sandbox space-sim I've wanted.

If, in the end, all I really get out of is the Squadron 42 campaign, that will be worth what I put in, but the overall architecture of the game still seems as nebulous now as it did back when it was announced. I can appreciate that it's in flux, but I still see a lot of people claiming you will be able to host a private offline version of the sandbox universe, which never seemed likely. Sometimes it seems like there are thousand salesmen trying to sell me on a thousand different variations of the "dream space sim." I see the same thing with a number of other "community participation" development projects.

I don't have the time or inclination to follow every announcement and bit of news (I don't want to be spent on it before its done), but I would really like a description of what they have in mind for the game breaking it down to its fundamentals and without the spin. There is far too much of the latter. It can make people dizzy.

Then just read this:

When it comes to mods, the FAQ stresses how open to modding the game will be:

“Players will be given full control of their game! When operating private servers, players will be able and encouraged to mod the game. It doesn’t stop there, though: we hope to institute a ‘mod approval’ process that will allow the best of the best player created ships and other additions to be integrated into the central persistent world as well.”

These aren't just random claims - private servers will be supported and is one of the core bits of their design philosophy. It's been officially stated you'll get the singleplayer offline component, your own private servers, and the Persistent Universe.

Okay, but that still just implies that the private servers will be the full open universe. That could just apply to mission-based Squadron 42 style servers. I would like to see, with no uncertainty, something along the lines of "Players will be able to host a private instance of the Star Citizen universe." I don't doubt their sincerity, but why not just come out and say it directly? That's all I want. I can understand them being nebulous about these things if they can't commit, but it would be so straightforward to just confirm their intentions, and it would be nice if they would do so. For all I know, they may well have done something like this, but I haven't seen it.

Answering a FAQ question (and I know for a fact this is indeed a frequently asked question) such as "What kind of single player experience will Star Citizen provide?" would go a long ways.

Perhaps it does just go without saying, but I do see quite a bit of doubt out there that could so easily be cleared up and potentially bring more backers (I'd go a little further if I knew there was more there for me than Squadron 42).
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Star Citizen's $17M Haul
25. Re: On Star Citizen's $17M Haul Sep 1, 2013, 19:47 Aero
 
I'd be happy (enough) with connecting to a central server that manages my assets, but then puts me in my own local instance of the universe. They get to keep their microtransaction thing, I get the SP sandbox space-sim I've wanted.

If, in the end, all I really get out of is the Squadron 42 campaign, that will be worth what I put in, but the overall architecture of the game still seems as nebulous now as it did back when it was announced. I can appreciate that it's in flux, but I still see a lot of people claiming you will be able to host a private offline version of the sandbox universe, which never seemed likely. Sometimes it seems like there are thousand salesmen trying to sell me on a thousand different variations of the "dream space sim." I see the same thing with a number of other "community participation" development projects.

I don't have the time or inclination to follow every announcement and bit of news (I don't want to be spent on it before its done), but I would really like a description of what they have in mind for the game breaking it down to its fundamentals and without the spin. There is far too much of the latter. It can make people dizzy.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
15. Re: Steam Top 10 Sep 1, 2013, 16:21 Aero
 
jacobvandy wrote on Sep 1, 2013, 13:51:
The problem with keeping it all in your head is that you don't pay attention to all the money you spend, outside of bills and other necessities. So long as you have $XXX on hand at the end of the month, you think you're good. Putting it down on [virtual] paper makes you more accountable, gives you a more tangible feeling of progress (paying off debt, saving, etc.), and helps you keep track of mid- and long-term goals. You could argue that those things are still helpful even for people who are "too rich to need a budget."

For instance, it's easier to stay strong during a Steam sale if you have a total spending figure that you've budgeted for, as opposed to general knowledge of how much money (or credit) you have available. You might arrive at such a figure by putting aside a little bit of extra money you have leftover every month into a "Steam Sale" fund, so that you don't end up eating nothing but ramen noodles in July or December/January. :p

This is true, although back then I would just take out a certain amount of cash and that was my discretionary spending. That would be nearly impossible these days though. I even tried to make a point of using cash whenever I could for a few years, but eventually gave up. I probably have bills in my wallet now that have been there for nearly a year.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
1. Re: Steam Top 10 Sep 1, 2013, 11:35 Aero
 
I like the idea behind "You Need a Budget" (so far as I understand it). I probably could have used accounting software designed specifically for people living barely above hand-to-mouth when I was younger. All of my actual "accounting" could probably have been taken care of on a 10 line spreadsheet, so I just kept it in my head. It worked out in the end, but I was at any given time and at best a couple unexpected thousand dollars away from being completely screwed.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Citizen Credit Sales
6. Re: Star Citizen Credit Sales Aug 31, 2013, 15:37 Aero
 
Whether or not it's good, this is increasingly looking like not my thing, which is a shame (I have no interest in the MMO portion).

I have higher hopes for X Rebirth and Elite Dangerous.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > F1 2013 Hotlap Trailer
3. Re: F1 2013 Hotlap Trailer Aug 31, 2013, 12:53 Aero
 
I'm definitely going to need a demo for this one. I've been buying them all along, and they've been improving incrementally (with the usual backward steps as well), but I think to buy another one I'm going to need a bigger leap in handling and force feedback than we've gotten year-on-year so far.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steamships Ahoy - Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows
1. Re: Steamships Ahoy - Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows Aug 28, 2013, 22:20 Aero
 
This would have been a lot cooler as a semi-3D side scroller closer to the original arcade game.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
12. Re: Morning Tech Bits Aug 26, 2013, 18:39 Aero
 
If you install Start8 or something like that, it's decent. I run it on my laptop because I only get so many licenses for each OS through work, and I like a lot of things about it. Metro is silly for desktop apps, of course. There also isn't any seriously compelling reason to use 8 (with Start8 or whatever) over 7. So, basically, if I already had Windows 8, I would pay the $5 for Start8, and be happy with it, but I definitely don't see any reason to upgrade from 7 to 8 other than the eventual forced obsolescence, which won't be for a while yet.

I actually think Surface Pro's running 8 are really nice, but given their price, they don't really fit into many reasonable use cases.

Anyways, it seems they were just playing it safe, being a jack of all trades sort of thing (aside from the unified Metro API not working out), in case everybody suddenly stopped buying desktops through the next business upgrade cycles. They got a start on any direction they need to go, which isn't to say this was even remotely a good idea, just what I guess they were thinking.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Screenshots
7. Re: Evening Screenshots Aug 22, 2013, 07:39 Aero
 
Cutter wrote on Aug 22, 2013, 05:16:
Enh, movie tie-in game. I would not get my hopes up, fellas.

I get the feeling, when they were making Just Cause (2), they were heavily influenced by Mad Max. The vehicle fights, the wrist-mounted crossbows, the look of the character. I think they've always wanted to make a Mad Max game.

This still might suck, but I can't imagine a better combination of developer and IP. I don't think it will just be a cash-in. You may be right of course, and if it were any other developer, I would surely agree with you, but I don't think so in this case.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Blacklist; Day One Patch Released
3. Re: Ships Ahoy - Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Blacklist; Day One Patch Released Aug 20, 2013, 21:27 Aero
 
So, in the sense of a classic Splinter Cell game, it isn't very good? That's a shame. Better than Conviction is something, so I may pick it up on sale one day, but it's a shame they took that route. Probably make tons of money.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
11. Re: Steam Top 10 Aug 18, 2013, 16:29 Aero
 
I tend to be wary when I hear games/films/books/whatever described as "magical," but I might check it out anyways.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
29. Re: Out of the Blue Aug 17, 2013, 03:20 Aero
 
If they could make a real proper mechanical sequential shift (like in a racing car with auto blip and lift), now *that* would be something.

The "shiftronic" crap they sell is worse than an automatic. The paddles are more like suggesting a gear than actually changing a gear.

A Formula 1 car can blip or lift, and shit gears in a few tens of milliseconds. I would be so down for that. The only problem there, of course, is you need to rebuild the transmission every couple hundred miles. If they can make those durable, that would be great.

I enjoy a manual because it is much more engaging. It does have a few drawbacks though. For instance, I have to come to an almost complete stop at a two-way yield because I'd typically be in third at that point, which isn't enough torque to get me moving if I notice a car and hae to accelerate, but I'm going a little too fast to downshift to 2nd reliably (and that's a bit hard on the transmission).

Worst of all, though, is when you pull up to a light behind a line of cars with automatics and they all stop, and then ride the brake to snuggle up to the car in front. In a manual, I have to declutch, shift into first, ride the clutch to move slowly forward a few feet, and then engage the clutch again. Annoying, and hard on the clutch.

Don't get me wrong, all things considered, I'd rather have a manual, but there are benefits to an automatic.

I didn't know that a CVT worked by keeping the engine in its optimum power band at all time (which would be good for mileage), but the peak power is frequently a good deal more RPM than peak torque which is what I want to accelerate. I'll have to give one a try.

Of course, in Blue's Vette, he can probably accelerate faster in 5th gear than I could in first driving any of the manuals I've owned before.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
746 Comments. 38 pages. Viewing page 4.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo