Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for AeroMechanical

Real Name AeroMechanical   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Aero
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description Just some guy.
Homepage http://
Signed On Jun 16, 2007, 02:48
Total Comments 849 (Graduate)
User ID 40534
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ] Older >


News Comments > NVIDIA GTX 970 Lawsuit
52. Re: NVIDIA GTX 970 Lawsuit Feb 23, 2015, 18:03 Aero
 
I don't see 512MB making a big difference, now or ever. Not now because 3.5GB is still plenty on typical setups including 1440p and 21:9 (though there are probably outliers). In the future, or if you run triple screens or 4K, then you really need 6GB anyways. The 970 is the best price/performance GPU upgrade I've done in the last ten years or so. Even with these revelations, I'd buy one again at the price I paid without hesitation.

This doesn't excuse nVidia's false advertising, of course. There should be a reckoning for that.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
20. Re: Steam Top 10 Feb 22, 2015, 18:04 Aero
 
IMO, the biggest tragedy of the recent Battlefield games is that they removed the bots. Sure they were stupid, but a 64-player game populated with bots was tremendous fun. Stupid as they were, at least they played properly. If they'd put a bit of effort into the bots to make them a bit better, I'd probably play BF3 all the time. I would have bought BF4 and even that new cops and robbers modgame the day they were released.

Of course, I'd rather play with 63 real friends who'd play seriously (but not too seriously), but that's pretty hard to arrange around my gaming schedule--that is, when the whim to play a game happens to hit me.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Citizen at $73M; Rental Equipment Credits Controversy
60. Re: Star Citizen at $73M; Rental Equipment Credits Controversy Feb 22, 2015, 01:37 Aero
 
At this point, I think I'm really only looking forward to Squadron 42 for some Wing Commander style space shooter action. I definitely don't see the space sim I wanted coming out of this. That isn't to say it might not be a cool new sort of thing all its own, but the odds are pretty long on that.

If they had just taken the basic Freelancer framework and doctored it up with new technology, they would have easily had a sure thing. That could work equally well as a purely single player experience, or an instanced MMO (like a bigger, instancing incarnation of the Discovery Mod servers).

The most disappointing part is that they probably would have made a better game if they had a smaller budget*. It's still all up in the air though, so we'll see. I figure I'll get my $35 or whatever's worth from SQ42 either way.

*edit: Or better management...
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Crowdfunding Roundup
2. Re: Morning Crowdfunding Roundup Feb 20, 2015, 12:27 Aero
 
Cutter wrote on Feb 20, 2015, 12:01:
That's just ridiculous.

They're almost literally printing money.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
3. Re: Out of the Blue Feb 20, 2015, 11:03 Aero
 
Musher's Secret works pretty well.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Dying Light Mod Tool Plans
17. Re: Dying Light Mod Tool Plans Feb 7, 2015, 10:04 Aero
 
Personally, I think it's brilliant. Odds are I will never actually finish the story though, so if they want to put some QTEs in at the end, that's okay from my point of view. If it's a boss fight, that's sort of as shame though because they could use their bone-breaking system to come up with some clever ways to make that interesting (ie, the way you would aim to break the bruiser's arms in Dead Island).

I actually rather like the lock-picking. I'm glad they just ripped it off from Skyrim (another brilliant game I played the hell out of but never actually finished the story). It's a decent, simple system. It would have been better if breaking a pick was loud enough to attract nearby zombies though.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
34. Re: Steam Top 10 Feb 2, 2015, 06:02 Aero
 
So far I think Dying Light is brilliant. I'm guessing, though, that it will suffer the same pacing problems as Dead Island (which I liked for what it was, but is undoubtedly not as good as Dying Light). I do have the feeling, though, that much like Dead Island, I will grow bored of it well before completing it. That's okay though, because that's still quite a number of hours of enjoyable game play.

I'm trying to pace myself but not rushing to do the primary missions, but not blatantly grinding for XP either, and also taking a semi self-imposed iron man mentality--I don't start over or anything if I die, but I try to approach it as though death is serious and to be avoided at all costs. The actual gameplay penalty is a very minor XP reduction.

There doesn't seem to be an adjustable difficulty, and I wouldn't mind a harder setting.

It was an early purchase from me because I was in the minority that really enjoyed Dead Island (the sequel, not so much).
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
6. Re: Steam Top 10 Feb 1, 2015, 16:46 Aero
 
Yeah, I doubt it will be the case with 5, but I thought the same thing about GTA4. What could go wrong? Even though I had a higher end system at the time, it wasn't until my next upgrade two years later that it ran, well not well, but okay-ish, though it sill looked like crap.

To be fair, the GTA PC ports prior to GTA4 were technically sound for the most part.

All the same, I won't need much to convince me to buy it. Just someone I know saying 'yeah, it runs fine' will do.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evolve Unlocks in Match-3 Game
18. Re: Evolve Unlocks in Match-3 Game Feb 1, 2015, 13:20 Aero
 
If someone made a simple-ish shooter like this and sold it on Steam for $10 or $20 and it proved to be fun and popular, then they could reasonably get more money out of it with DLC and silly apps or whatever. However, starting out from the ground up using this business model that originally came from reacting to an unexpectedly succesful game based on the assumption you can just engineer the same situation is both hubris and profoundly daft cargo cult management. It's not hard to imagine them at their meetings, pretending to watch a powerpoint presentation on their cocunut projector before calling in a terrified level designer to be sacrificed to the mighty and terrible Notch, god of billion dollar buyouts.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Mobilization
3. Re: Evening Mobilization Jan 27, 2015, 20:30 Aero
 
Charging for gas (or to speed up digging, or whatever) is really quite appallingly stupid. I don't really play mobile games so I'm usually pretty blasť about the whole thing. Just let the suckers give up their money, but I don't even see how this would work in any context other than a little kid begging his parents who acquiesce just to shut him up. Microtransactions are stupid in general, but they can at least pretend to give you something for your money like a new car or something.

This is obviously a game that was not designed to have microtransactions and then somebody shoehorned them in at the last minute. It would make more sense to just charge ten cents for each game like an arcade.

edit: On second thought, I bet the article is misrepresenting it. I bet the "gas" is for the nitro turbo boost button. That wouldn't be quite as silly. Still pretty silly, though.

This comment was edited on Jan 27, 2015, 20:39.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Crowdfunding Roundup
2. Re: Evening Crowdfunding Roundup Jan 27, 2015, 19:59 Aero
 
Well, it's a better job than soldiering, and yet people love war games.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Ubisoft Deactivating Far Cry 4 Keys; Cites Fraud
36. Re: Ubisoft Deactivating Far Cry 4 Keys; Cites Fraud Jan 26, 2015, 18:01 Aero
 
Gib007 wrote on Jan 26, 2015, 16:51:
Well I bought mine from CJS CDKeys, so I hope that isn't a problem. However, ironically if they deactivated mine, it would have zero impact on my gaming because of how broken 21:9 FOV is anyway! I wouldn't be happy, of course not, since I paid about £28 for it, but hey, I'm not happy with Far Cry 4 now, hahaha.

It works pretty well in 21:9 for me. As I recall, you have to run it in borderless window mode to get it to render properly. The only problem remaining is that the gas-mask image overlay doesn't cover the entire screen. Thats annoying, but not a big deal. It's not the best 21:9 support among recent games, but very far from the worst.

As for the keys, of course they're shady and I don't see that Ubisoft has done anything wrong. It would have been a much wiser move to wait until they could somehow render them invalid to begin with, preventing you from installing rather than taking away something you've already installed. On the other hand, there are probably legitimate reasons that's not feasible without being too intrusive or getting too many false positives. Regardless, someone was going to have to come down on selling out-of-region some time and going after individual sites like G2A would just be so much whack-a-mole.

Had I paid $15 for a $60 video game key near release day, I can't say as I could feel justifiably upset if they deactivated it. I either would have known or should have known something wasn't on the level. Obviously having different prices for different markets creates problems for downloadable content, but just averaging it out would screw over a lot of people. There isn't an easy solution to that.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Ferrari Virtual Academy Closed
1. Re: Ferrari Virtual Academy Closed Jan 10, 2015, 14:47 Aero
 
Though I'm not pissed about FVA in particular because I don't play it anymore (though it was quite good), I did pay about $40 for it all told just three years ago, and it's a prime example for folks who are against always-on DRM.

Ammunition for the cause, you know.

(And it's worth pointing out, that Kunos Simulazioni isn't responsible for this, they just developed the software under license for Ferrari SpA, and it is they who are responsible).

This comment was edited on Jan 10, 2015, 15:26.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Mafia III News Soon?
12. Re: Mafia III News Soon? Jan 8, 2015, 00:46 Aero
 
They've certainly demonstrated that are a creative bunch and that they have both the technical and artistic chops to pull of something interesting. At least for me though, just more of the same would make it a $20 ($30 if it's very well done) purchase. I've replayed the first two fairly recently, and honestly, though good, I don't really think they hold up so well anymore (technical limitations aside). What struck me most about particularly the first Mafia game was how it was so tastefully presented and the the script was, by video game standards of the time, incredibly well developed. Good artistic directors and good writers are much more common in the games industry today than they were then.

Certainly, on second thought, I wouldn't really want them to try to make the series into something that it isn't. A run-of-the-mill third person shooter, no matter how good the plot is, just doesn't really cut it. So, they can't stick to the same formula, but I wouldn't want them to go way off base either (like, as I mentioned, turning it into a more advanced, urban variant of Far Cry 3/4 might be too far).

I guess I just don't know what I want. I do, however, have faith that they will have better ideas than me, and could very well surprise everybody with something amazing.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Mafia III News Soon?
5. Re: Mafia III News Soon? Jan 7, 2015, 20:40 Aero
 
Though I have nothing but fond memories of the Mafia games, they are going to have to really step it up a couple notches for another sequel. Just a big map that *looks* like a city with a small handful of more detailed interactive areas won't really cut it. And has already been mentioned, driving a car around an open world city is extremely old hat these days.

Even though the Mafia series always did well with the plot, script and characters, when it comes down to it, their competition is GTA5. Just taking the more grown-up, serious route won't cut it by itself. They're going to have to *really* step it up. It's going to need more than just that. Saints Row couldn't really compete with GTA5's production values and scale, but it (largely) made up for it by being silly and over the top. Sleeping Dogs made it work by having a fun kung fu fighting system.

Perhaps it could go with a basic strategic element (sort of Shadows of Mordor Style), and throw in a bit of LA Noire's verbal character interaction gameplay so there are some plot choices--give the player other ways to interact with the world than just shooting things.

Despite my misgivings, it's still good news though and I hope it's set in the 70's (which, I'm willing to bet it will be).
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Mad Catz Announces $300 PC/Mobile Controller
10. Re: Mad Catz Announces $300 PC/Mobile Controller Jan 7, 2015, 01:17 Aero
 
It is frankly amazing that even Mad Catz let this obviously and demonstrably terrible idea get this far.

Given its size, and especially its price, who the hell is going to buy this? I'm certainly not going to lug it around with me on the go. It would be easier to carry around a Gameboy or Vita or whatever in addition to my phone or tablet, and for less money. And at home, I may as well buy an Xbox or Playstation if I'm that serious (or hell, even an Nvidia Shield).

If it were roughly the same dimensions of a typical smartphone and had some quality low-profile integrated controls--maybe a couple thumbsticks similar to those on the Nintendo 3DS, three or four front buttons and a couple bumpers on the top, and also a physical QWERTY keyboard on the opposite side, then *that* would be something I might consider buying. Even though I think that would actually be pretty cool, I still wouldn't pay anything like $300 for it.

This thing just fits no sane use case.

edit:

Okay, I see that SirKnight would be interested at a lower price. I don't mean to imply that you aren't sane SirKnight and certainly mean no disrespect, but how and where would you see yourself using this? I can't, of course, account for situations in which other people play games on their tablets. I would also certainly agree that once it's connected, it would be a superior way to play games on a tablet to using silly onscreen widget controls. Would you carry it around with you out and about, or would you just leave it at home? I can perhaps see that (though as you say, at $30 rather than $300)... it could be a way to play games while your wife/girlfriend/kids/whatever are watching TV or something, and you're obligated to be present and therefore can't go off and play computer games.

Obviously at that price point, the handheld consoles are still better and with that thing on there, you couldn't pretend like you were using your tablet for something serious.

This comment was edited on Jan 7, 2015, 01:30.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Razer Unveils OSVR Headset
17. Re: Razer Unveils OSVR Headset Jan 6, 2015, 22:26 Aero
 
BIGtrouble77 wrote on Jan 6, 2015, 19:49:
I'm a bit uncomfortable with VR in general because I already get sick from standard FPS' on my 27" monitor. I keep thinking my body will get used to it, but I just don't play games enough to get over this hump. This tech looks amazing, but if it exacerbates my issue I'll hate it.

If it's done right, it might be possible that it could even solve your problem. Obviously I have no idea what your particular problem is, but an idealized VR setup would be very much like natural vision. In theory, it should be more natural and possibly not as sick-inducing as looking at a screen.

I don't know a sure-fire way to test this, but finding a 3D game that allows you to adjust the FOV within wide margins could help you test it. See if you can find find a FOV that is more comfortable to look at. The "realistic" FOV would be in the neighborhood of the arc of your vision taken up by your screen from where you're sitting--probably somewhere typically between 15 and 30 degrees depending... so it's like you're looking out a window rather than through a fish-eye lens which is what most 3D games are like. Though not a useful FOV for most games, if that doesn't make you feel ill, you'd probably be okay with VR.

Likewise, some people feel ill playing a game with an FOV that is too small. This is probably a more complicated situation. At a guess, I'd say they are good at zoning out their surroundings and can interpret what's on the screen as though it were their entire field of vision, projecting their sense of visual awareness entirely into the virtual picture. Therefore when the FOV is too small, it feels entirely unnatural and makes them feel ill (sort of like trying to walk around all day wearing blinders, or toilet-paper roll goggles). Again, VR would probably sort this out.

Of course, it could also be the somatosensory/inner ear disconnect with the virtual world that could be the problem too, in which case I'd guess VR would be that much worse than a screen. You can test this (to an extent) by playing games either with the lights on or the lights off and see which is worse. If it's worse with them off, it's more likely (though not guaranteed) this is the case. On the bright side, if this is the case for you, there is a good chance taking some dramamine could help alleviate the problem.

And, certainly of course, it could be a combination of these possibilities or, or course, something else entirely.

Personally, though I don't (usually) have motion sickness related to video games, I do tend toward the situation that prefers a lower field of view (though it doesn't make me physically sick, I find the higher FOVs that many peopler prefer... like 90 degrees, to be uncomfortable. Depending on what sort of game it is, I find 60-75 degrees (vertical, I believe) ideal for FPS games. In flight and racing sims, I like to go lower (I can go as low as I like (down to the "natural" FOV anyways) without discomfort, it's only the smaller FOV and therefore limited visibility becoming a hindrance that forces me to find a higher a happy medium.

I guess, after all that rambling, my point is that if and when you buy a VR headset, if you can't just try someone else's first, make sure there is a good return policy. That's what I'll be doing for sure. I learned my lesson many years before, when I bought som shutter 3D glasses, the sort that needed a CRT display. Cool as they were, the combination of the flicker and (at that time) hacked-in wonky stereo 3D implementations meant I'd be totally mentally exhausted after about a half hour of use. After a couple weeks of trying to get used to it, they ended up in a box in the basement where they still are to this day (I suppose, in the off chance I ever own a CRT monitor again).

And my final point, only somewhat related, is that *all of this* is exactly why every single game should always have and adjustable FOV. At least within reason. Everyone is different. Hell, I had a girlfriend once that literally could not perceive 3D graphics--it was all flat shapes to her. She acted as though this was a matter of pride. I wasn't foolish enough to tell her my own opinion, which was that she must have a remarkably feeble visual cortex.

edit (ignoring obvious grammar mistakes above, and for yet more ramblosity... too much coffee I guess):

This is a reason I hope the return policies are very generous (since most people won't be able to go to a friend or a showroom and try one out, and that probably wouldn't but it anyways). When I first got a TrackIR, I thought I'd never get used to it, and it was a mental strain and disorienting at first. Even after a week or two of determined practice, though the disorientation wasn't as bad, an hour long session with it would leave me mentally drained. However, soon after that, it just suddenly clicked and became perfectly natural and now I could never play a flight-sim or a space-sim without it. I can use it for hours with no strain at all (and I even find myself involuntarily making minor jerking motions with my head trying to look around when watching a video of someone play ED or DCS without a TrackIR). For me, it was the single greatest leap in virtual immersion since 3D accelerators. If I only had 10 minutes to try it or a few days or even a week to make up my mind about returning it, I may well have missed out on all that.

This comment was edited on Jan 6, 2015, 22:56.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Razer Unveils OSVR Headset
15. Re: Razer Unveils OSVR Headset Jan 6, 2015, 20:56 Aero
 
Seems the entire VR industry is dependent on what the tablet/slabphone market is doing, at least until they get enough volume to make building custom panels a thing. I suspect, given the way eyes work, a uniform density matrix of pixels probably isn't ideal for VR anyways so the only option is overkill. 2048x1536 and 2560x1600 7" panels are relatively common already, but they only do 60Hz as far as I know.

What we're going to need to do is convince people that they need a 2560x1600 120Hz tablet. Maybe Apple will push refresh rates as the next big thing once (and I think we're already at that point) we hit severe diminishing returns on resolution increases. LCD TVs are already making 240Hz refresh rates a major bullet point in their advertising (though probably the 240Hz is through some trickery and it's really more like 120Hz).

I also see quite a few 5" 2560x1440 panels. If you could manage the optics so you had one for each eye, that would be pretty good, though again, nobody cares about the refresh rate of their phone display.

Anyways, as I see it, badass VR headsets are entirely inevitable at this point. It's just that I want it now, or at least this year. And yes certainly (at least hopefully, though unfortunately), we're probably going to need some new video cards. Those resolutions and having to maintain a minimum of 85 fps going to be rough.

Either way, I am totally stoked to see what happens over the next couple years. I can't really say I have a lot of respect for Razor's hardware (and certainly not their firmware), but sooner or later, VR will explode, and I wouldn't mind being spoiled for choice.

ed: Marginally improved grammar.

edit2:

Okay, I know this is a really, really horrible thing to bring up here... but what we need is the consoles to get hip to VR. The current generation of consoles is obviously in no way up to the challenge, and they probably are expected to have a lifetime of 10 years. Maybe with some luck, and all the super badass stuff happening over in the PC arena, Sony and Microsoft will feel obligated, sooner rather than later, to release a VR based console. They'll invest a billion dollars, and build fabs to churn out bespoke VR LCD/OLED/whatever tech. With them in competition, and the resources they could bring to the table, we could maybe even see displays designed from square one to go into VR headsets. I have no idea what that would look like, but maybe they'd be curved 21:9, high refresh rate, variable pixel density displays or whatever (no idea what I'm on about, just you know, a display that would only be useful for VR).

I can only imagine it would sell. Imagine if you were a tired, not-entirely-engaged parent (ie just like about half of them are now), and all you had to do was plop a VR helmet on your kid, put him in the corner, and enjoy the game/soap opera/infidelity/whatever for hours while they were totally engrossed in VR and thus oblivious to the outside world.

This comment was edited on Jan 6, 2015, 21:21.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > $500 Sound Blaster X7 Limited Edition Announced
37. Re: $500 Sound Blaster X7 Limited Edition Announced Jan 6, 2015, 17:10 Aero
 
Certainly this thing looks silly to me for $500, but otherwise I believe the knee-jerk hate for CL may not be founded anymore. They definitely wouldn't be my first choice for high(er) end audio gear (ie. anything other than sound cards for games and day-to-day typical consumer audio consumption in the $100 or less range). While it's true that one data point doesn't make a trend, they largely cleaned up their act with the Z series and they are at least worth considering when comparison shopping. Who knows if it will last, though. I get the impression they started over with the drivers for the Z series, but that doesn't mean they won't get all bloated and buggy again in the future.

I'm still, of course, salty about what happened when they bought Cambridge Soundworks and maybe to a lesser extent E-mu. Cambridge Soundworks used to be my goto source for mid-range speakers that punched well above their weight, but now they're cheap mass-produced plastic crap (my 25 year old Ensemble II's are way, way better than the Ensemble V's (?) I happened to acquire, at relatively the same price, and they definitely lack the no-questions-asked replacement policy and warranty CS used to have.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > $500 Sound Blaster X7 Limited Edition Announced
27. Re: $500 Sound Blaster X7 Limited Edition Announced Jan 6, 2015, 15:26 Aero
 
I'll be interested to see what happens if and when software and hardware starts supporting Dolby Atmos (based on the little bit I understand of it). Then, maybe, we'll get closer to the virtual spacial sound we used to take for granted 10 years ago. In the late 90's with four speakers and an A3D sound card, things were getting impressive. Sounds could seem to come from above, below, we'd get occlusion and environmental (and cross environmental) effects. It was all looking like there were going to be great things to come, and then we just ended up with film-style surround sound. I'm sure it could all be done in software, but except for a few outfits, nobody is really trying, and it seems like nobody really cares.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
849 Comments. 43 pages. Viewing page 3.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo