User comment history
< Newer [ 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ] Older >
| News Comments > Evening Tech Bits |
 |
| 3. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 20, 2007, 08:07 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
@ Dumb Hump: You do realize that both MS and the sources could be right if the beta launches this week but lasts well into next year, right? MS said that the SP1 won't be released this year. They never said that the beta wouldn't begin this year. Comprendes?
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Orange Box Nears |
 |
| 22. |
Re: TF2 is all I want. |
Jul 15, 2007, 08:52 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
HL and HL2 [and their mods] are some of the only FPS I don't get the sliding on ice feeling with. I always felt the movement in HL games has been spot on compared to most which feel fuzzy / chunky / sliding ice... Etc. Then you move weird in real life. Are you perma-stoned or something? I fully second the person who brought up the sliding on ice feeling. It was in HL2 and also in Dark Messiah. There is a console command (called "sv_friction") to turn the sliding off or to at least tune it down. This command would obviously not exist if there were no sliding so it's pointless to even begin to argue about this issue. There is sliding. Period.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Crysis in September |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Not Going To Happen |
Jul 11, 2007, 21:11 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
There's no way Crysis is going to make September. There is supposed to be some kind of open beta before it ships, and as it stands now there's less than 6 weeks left before it would need to go to printing to make a September 14th release. It's going to be a Christmas release. So you know it better than EA when they are going to release their products? Interesting...
The September date might turn out to be wrong, of course, but as long as EA says it's 9/14/ (for the UK) and 9/11 (for the US) you gotta believe them until they revoke it. 9/11 is a Tuesday and Tuesday is when games usually come out in the US so it doesn't sound like complete bullshit. And the "open beta" could have been cancelled or it could be just a marketing stunt that will last for 2 weeks. Or they could have just changed plans in face of the strong competition this fall/winter and are trying to make it out the door before everyone else. Who really knows? As long as the date appears on EA fact sheets though it must be taken as gospel until we're officially told otherwise.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > F.E.A.R.: Perseus Mandate Announced |
 |
| 8. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 11, 2007, 13:14 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
Reading before commenting is usually best. Take some of your own advice you retarded dumbass and learn to read. F.E.A.R Files is only for the 360, not for the PC. The PC is only getting Perseus Mandate as a stand-alone expansion. The 360 is getting both, Perseus Mandate and Extraction Point bundled as F.E.A.R Files. Next time turn on your brain before jumping on other people. Oh wait. What brain? Sorry, I forgot.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > F.E.A.R. of a USB Performance Hit |
 |
| 9. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 10, 2007, 20:59 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
And Win 95 didn't even have native USB support. Only the much later released B and C versions of Win 95 that were distributed via OEMs had USB support. Don't remember if USB was causing much trouble (other than the infamous BSOD when the USB plug & play "functionality" of Win 98 was presented by Mr. Gates himself). There probably was lotsa shit goin on though since Win 95 and 98 were about as stable as Hugh Hefner's penis without Viagra.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Spielberg's PC Game |
 |
| 6. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 10, 2007, 18:24 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
Sorry Mr. Spielberg, you have chosen poorly. This could be the best game in the world, but since it's by EA, I won't touch it. Aaaw. I'm quite sure you've just broken Steven's heart. How's he ever going to find happiness in his life again if Brian from Blue's News doesn't buy his game? The poor guy... let's all hold a moment of silence for Steven Spielberg.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Evening Q&As |
 |
| 2. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 9, 2007, 20:30 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
I'll say it again..... you're full of shit, shit, shit .
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > On DirectX 10 Performance |
 |
| 33. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 5, 2007, 23:55 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
What JD said. The socket 775 might have been the same over a few generations but to give you an example, to get a Core 2 running in an "old" socket 775 board that was made for Pentium 4s you needed to have a certain type of voltage regulator on the board or it would not be compatible with Core 2. So while there was pin/socket compatibility there was very often another issue that could get in the way of upgrading with Intel. They definitely don't have an advantage over AMD in this particular area. Possibly the one, single area where Intel is not better than AMD at the moment but only about equally "bad" .
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > GRAW 2 SP Demo |
 |
| 33. |
Re: Rainer.. |
Jul 5, 2007, 22:01 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
@Assassin: That ain't no proof really. These sites all get their assets from developer/publisher press portals and a site called GamesPress so you'll find the same old stuff on literally hundreds of sites. The problem with Worthplaying is that they like to pretend as if this publicly available (public as in available to all game sites) stuff is something they got exclusive. Hell, they even rip stuff from official website updates and post it as their own instead of linking to the original source.
Anyway, back on the subject of this demo: Not buying this piece of shit game. So I get to the part where you get to use the gun at the bridge (after blowing up the artie) and die a couple times. No big deal. I reload my latest save. Then on the second or third load the game decides to crash to desktop with a weird custom error message (indicating and confirming that it was a software crash and not related to my hardware). I go back to the game, want to reload my latest checkpoint save and they [my saves] are all gone. WTF??? I'm not buying a game that destroys saves when it crashes so that you are forced to start the mission all over again. Once again some typical UbiSoft sloppy console port motherfucking asshole trash. No thanks, you faggots. You can shove this game deep and hard up your collective French asses and choke on a frog. Chiens du la putes... _!_
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** This comment was edited on Jul 5, 22:05. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > On DirectX 10 Performance |
 |
| 29. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 5, 2007, 20:35 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
I'm sorry--but many, many people, including me, do not use 1280x1024 *exclusively* while playing 3d games. My DX9 resolution of choice is 1152x864, for instance. Errr... anyone who doesn't use the native res of their display would have to be a complete frickin' retard. Now how many displays have a native res of 1280x1024 vs how many have a native res of 1152x864? Hmmm. I'm willing to bet that the ratio is pretty close to 99.9999997% to 0.0000003% in favor of 1280x1024. And that's why AT chose 1280x1024 for testing purposes. Since it is the much more widely spread resolution because nearly every 19" TFT display has a native res of 1280x1024. Playing at 1152x864 is plain retarded if your display supports a different native resolution. Finally, AT comes to the same conclusion as you do. They are saying exactly what you did which is that it is in fact too early to make further assumptions about DirectX 10 and that driver + games quality (= implementation of DX10 in games) still have a long way to go. So how did they blow this again? Are you all too fucking stupid to read?
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > On DirectX 10 Performance |
 |
| 25. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 5, 2007, 18:45 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
As for DX10, I'd love to have all these technical guys who were here about 8 months or so ago, blabbing about how great DX10 was, how much more performance it was going to get, how much lower the overhead of the API itself was going to be, how great the blowjobs from DX10 would be, etc, to come back and admit what fucking morons they were. You did read the article right? You did read how Anandtech said that it is only a matter of time until DirectX 10's advantages (which it objectively and undoubtedly does have - please read that again three times - which it objectively and undoubtedly does have - which it objectively and undoubtedly does have - which it objectively and undoubtedly does have) will fully play out? Did you? No, you didn't. You just wanted to type some retarded shit into your keyboard is what you wanted. Dumbfuck.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > On DirectX 10 Performance |
 |
| 24. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 5, 2007, 18:40 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
Maybe it won't be Vista but there will be a next Microsoft OS that everyone will be migrating to. Even tards like Icewind after he's figured out that he can't get shit to run on Linux. I just hope that MS hurries the fuck up with their Vista sequel since I'm not too fond of it either due to its performance and compatibility problems. The phoning home and DRM stuff is a claim that only a n00b of the highest order like Icewind could make. Those two issues are fixed within seconds after installing Vista but the performance and the compatibility are definitely still real issues though both are improving slowly but surely and as we can see from Anandtech's benches nVidia's DirectX 10 drivers are beginning to catch up to their DirectX 9 counterparts. It should just be a matter of a few more months and Vista will hopefully be a more than viable gaming platform then.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > GRAW 2 SP Demo |
 |
| 6. |
Re: 1.77GB???? |
Jul 5, 2007, 13:43 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
for a demo. stupidity personified. how many people will casually check this out I wonder? and no direct .exe link to make using a download manager possible. and no torrent. fucking idiots. I will agree that Ubi are generally a bunch of fucking retards but it's not really their fault if you are too retarded to use the Internet properly .
Besides, this demo will also be put on magazine DVDs. Internet is surely not the only way this huge fucker is distributed. Think, dude. Think more. Think harder. It does make sense for them to offer this demo.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > On DirectX 10 Performance |
 |
| 8. |
Re: No subject |
Jul 5, 2007, 13:12 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
it seams odd to me that they bash nVidia when it doesn't do all that fantastic, but pushes AMD even when it clearly is under performing. I think that's because everyone is feeling a bit sorry for AMD/ATI at the moment. Kinda like the clubbed down, bleeding, dying baby seal that is looking at you with its cute eyes wide open and you just can't bring yourself to smack it to death. It's certainly a bit tragic that AMD/ATI has gone from competitive or even tech leader (pre-Core 2) to complete losers on all fronts in under a year. Barcelona (Phenom) isn't looking that great either. And the next graphics card generation is far, far away as their power-draining, underperforming heat machines have just been released. It ain't looking too good for them so I think everyone's giving them a break for now. Seems like Anandtech chose to be courteous enough to not kick them in the nuts when they were already lying in the dirt.
---------------------------- *** Born to troll *** This comment was edited on Jul 5, 13:15. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1152 Comments. 58 pages. Viewing page 40.
< Newer [ 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ] Older > |
|