Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Harrisburg, PA 09/18
Greenbelt, MD 11/06

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Daniel

Real Name Daniel   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname CJ_Parker
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Feb 11, 2006, 23:49
Total Comments 2271 (Senior)
User ID 24408
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ] Older >


News Comments > DCS: Bf 109 K-4 Kurfürst Released
1. Re: DCS: Bf 109 K-4 Kurfürst Released Dec 5, 2014, 21:05 CJ_Parker
 
Good luck with that as long as the WW2 theater ain't finished yet. This is like trying to sell a Murcielago to some indigenous tribe in the Amazon rain forest. Wish they'd get a clue and make the roads first before trying to sell cars *sigh*.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > LucasArts Vet Heads New 2K Studio, Hangar 13
14. Re: LucasArts Vet Heads New 2K Studio, Hangar 13 Dec 4, 2014, 18:57 CJ_Parker
 
Haden Blackman is one of the most incompetent motherfuckers who has ever worked in gaming. He carries a lot of the responsibility for the downfall of Star Wars Galaxie as he was the LucasArts producer at the time who either proactively forced and/or greenlighted many of SOE's game-breaking decisions. Many other Star Wars games like TFU stayed way below their potential thanks to that Blackman clown who was Jim Ward's personal brown-nosing and asslicking puppy dawg.
This new studio is doomed and I will make sure to boycott them completely. If by some random miracle they ever crap out anything half-decent, I'll get it for free (and I usually buy all of my games).
But that chance is like the proverbial snowball in hell so bring it on Blackman.... some generic, family and retard friendly AAA casual bullshit marketed as "exciting" and "revolutionary" even though it's last gen crap at best. You asshole.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > London-based Assassin's Creed: Victory Next Year
7. Re: London-based Assassin's Creed: Victory Next Year Dec 2, 2014, 20:48 CJ_Parker
 
Fantaz wrote on Dec 2, 2014, 20:31:
ViRGE wrote on Dec 2, 2014, 20:17:
Please stop.

this naming would be less confusing...
Assassin's Creed 2015
Splinter Cell 2015
Ghost Recon 2015
Rainbow Six 2015
Prince of Persia 2015
Rayman 2015

then repeat for 2016, and every subsequent year. fixed.

With AssCreed that won't do. Look at Rogue and Unity. There are two in 2014 so they'd have to append 2014.1 and 2014.2 etc.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
3. Re: Steam Top 10 Dec 1, 2014, 03:47 CJ_Parker
 
It's Gabe's phat paws editing the fucking charts cuz he can!  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Citizen at $65M
20. Re: Star Citizen at $65M Nov 30, 2014, 20:28 CJ_Parker
 
As usual Cutter did zero research and does not know what he is talking about. The reasons for the most recent surge are:

- Anniversary sale. Everyone knew it was coming and saved up for it. The original fundraising via the RSI site "ended" on 11/26/2012 so end of November is traditional sales time for SC. They had a massive sale with different ships added on a daily basis throughout the second half of this past week.
- The Javelin destroyer sale at $2500 per ship. There were four lots of 50 ships each to give people in different timezones a chance to get one. Each lot sold out in seconds, of course, so that was $2500 x 200 = $500K alone.
- The Javelin sale in some weird twisted logic (since we're talking unlimited digital goods in theory but whatever...) was used to subsidize 5000 Aurora (= starter ship) sales at $20/pc. - Those sold out in seconds, too. They were meant for new players but it seems more likely they were picked up by "grey market" sellers and big orgs etc.
- The Anvil Carrack was revealed and went on sale for $350/pc. - Many people want to be explorers and this is a specialized explorer vessel so it was a much anticipated sale.

Add to that the end of the year bonuses that people get at work and generally people's willingness to spend lots of money around Thanksgiving/Xmas time and you know why this sale took off as it did.
Disappointed ED players would have to be a drop in the bucket. There were several polls at the Elite forums and only about 10% - 15% of the participants voted to definitely get a refund. Even if 1000 pissed off ED players grabbed a starter pack that would only account for ~$50,000.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > The Pillars of the Earth Game Announced
2. Re: The Pillars of the Earth Game Announced Nov 27, 2014, 14:41 CJ_Parker
 
Isn't one shitty Pillars game enough for this decade?



*ducks*
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Getaway Day Interviews
10. Re: Getaway Day Interviews Nov 27, 2014, 03:45 CJ_Parker
 
RavingArmy wrote on Nov 26, 2014, 18:54:
So, just to make sure that I'm getting this right and am not having some weird pre-Thanksgiving tryptophan hallucination: Braben hates DRM, hates the inconvenience that it imposes in him, went so far as to demand its removal from the first iteration of the game, but is perfectly OK with insisting on an always-on connection for the single player game he's sold to everybody else.

Yep, well, maybe *GASP* the official reason he gave for the online requirement was actually, you know, *BIG-GASP-AGAIN* NOT EVEN A LIE?
Imagine that! He could have actually spoken the truth that it's due to technical reasons and a lack of feasibility that no offline mode could be supported.
Fuck it. Let's get really wild and nasty and suppose that maybe imposing "DRM" via an online req did not even once cross his mind when the decision was made?
Unthinkable? Um, well, maybe... for that part of the world's population where brain size <= pea size.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Getaway Day Interviews
2. Re: Getaway Day Interviews Nov 26, 2014, 13:25 CJ_Parker
 
Dude. The comedy gold laugh is on you. The part you quoted, emphasized and attributed to Braben was part of the question of PCGH and not something Braben said in response. Full quote for clarification (Braben's blurb obviously starts at "I think the coincidence..."):

PCGH: Elite: Dangerous and Star Citizen share some obvious similarities. Funding via crowd, close cooperation and maximum transparency with the community, Sci Fi setting, PC focus, space ship simulation, two well-known "veterans" making their comeback with games like in their early years. Is this just by chance?

I think the coincidence is largely because of the rise of Kickstarter, which has started to democratise the publication process by letting people support the games they want. Demand for space games is at a high - largely because there hasn't been anything for a long time. Also the PC has been a bit of a forgotten platform by big publishing - with PC versions coming out months later than their console companion versions.

There is room for both, and I look forwards to playing Star Citizen once it is released (I am an Alpha backer in the meantime), but they will be quite different experiences with different release dates.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Sale
20. Re: On Sale Nov 26, 2014, 13:01 CJ_Parker
 
MoreLuckThanSkill wrote on Nov 26, 2014, 09:45:
CJ_Parker wrote on Nov 26, 2014, 01:21:
True that. I also asked about the availability of the SP campaign back in August when they made BF4 a part of Origin Game Time and when someone confirmed that you can in fact play the campaign, I downloaded BF4, finished the campaign and uninstalled. Worked like a charm.

Each to his own I guess, but playing BF4 just for the SINGLE player? Ew, gross. :o

To be fair, I think I actually played one "full" round of multiplayer. Spawned. Was killed three seconds later by a sniper. Quit. Uninstalled.
Well, seriously, there's no point playing BF4-MP w/o all the DLC anyway so why bother. And even if basic BF4 is discounted, Premium is still expensive as hell. You're still almost paying full price for the base game plus Premium.
Nah. Fuck EA. I'm going to keep ignoring the Battlefield series until they return to a reasonable DLC pricing policy (which will probably be never).
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Sale
11. Re: On Sale Nov 26, 2014, 01:21 CJ_Parker
 
True that. I also asked about the availability of the SP campaign back in August when they made BF4 a part of Origin Game Time and when someone confirmed that you can in fact play the campaign, I downloaded BF4, finished the campaign and uninstalled. Worked like a charm.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Sale
8. Re: On Sale Nov 25, 2014, 22:53 CJ_Parker
 
jdreyer wrote on Nov 25, 2014, 22:27:
CJ_Parker wrote on Nov 25, 2014, 21:24:
jdreyer wrote on Nov 25, 2014, 20:37:
BF3 for $5. Guess I'll wait until BF4 falls to that price so I can play through the SP campaign.

Just grab the Game Time version of BF4 on Origin - for FREE. You can play BF4 (DLC-less ofc) for a week which is plenty time to finish the single player campaign (six to eight hours).
It's pretty crappy by the way. Quite a bit worse than BF3's IMHO. But nothing beats free so why the hell not just play it, right?

Really? And it comes with the SP campaign?

Dude. Yes. How else would I have been able to play it? It's real!
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Sale
5. Re: On Sale Nov 25, 2014, 21:24 CJ_Parker
 
jdreyer wrote on Nov 25, 2014, 20:37:
BF3 for $5. Guess I'll wait until BF4 falls to that price so I can play through the SP campaign.

Just grab the Game Time version of BF4 on Origin - for FREE. You can play BF4 (DLC-less ofc) for a week which is plenty time to finish the single player campaign (six to eight hours).
It's pretty crappy by the way. Quite a bit worse than BF3's IMHO. But nothing beats free so why the hell not just play it, right?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Shroud of the Avatar: Forsaken Virtues Early Access
1. Re: Shroud of the Avatar: Forsaken Virtues Early Access Nov 24, 2014, 20:22 CJ_Parker
 
Haha that is some VERY early access right there. There is hardly any game there yet.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Citizen FPS Health Detailed
33. Re: Star Citizen FPS Health Detailed Nov 23, 2014, 22:56 CJ_Parker
 
Flatline wrote on Nov 23, 2014, 21:33:
I'm even less impressed about this than before. Whoever said it was like a teenager's first video game project nailed it.

At some point the game has to be "fun" instead of "complicated". The fact that the developers aren't able to so far say "We want this to be fun so realism/complexity is taking a back seat here" suggests either really inexperienced devs, or a design crew that doesn't know how to say no.

+1

There are many proposed gameplay mechanics by now that show very clearly that Chris Roberts has A) been out of the loop for over a decade and B) has never made a (massively) multiplayer online game before and now C) has never made a FPS ever before either.
There is a reason why no one has made some of the "revolutionary" features of Star Citizen FPS gameplay before. Because they SUCK. And not just on paper...
Finally, rumor has it that CR is not very good at taking 'no's' from anyone so his designers are probably like "ok, whatever, boss" as long as they get their paycheck on time every month.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Citizen FPS Health Detailed
29. Re: Star Citizen FPS Health Detailed Nov 23, 2014, 20:27 CJ_Parker
 
Your quote just happened to be the last one containing speculation about how FD blew at least £30 million just on ED so I picked that one. Don't take it too personal.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Citizen FPS Health Detailed
27. Re: Star Citizen FPS Health Detailed Nov 23, 2014, 19:59 CJ_Parker
 
Dacron wrote on Nov 23, 2014, 19:08:
£30million is still nearly 47 million USD, plus kick starter / alpha and beta backers.

Quboid wrote on Nov 23, 2014, 17:49:
As I see it, they are different stages of the same process. People are angry at ED because the devs promised more than they could deliver. People are concerned about SC because the devs are promising a hell of a lot - which IMHO makes similar feature cuts/delays almost inevitable.

I can imagine the threads about cut SC content now....


Come on, guys. Do at least a little basic research and visit www.frontier.co.uk or read this article for starters. Then learn how they are a really big company of about 240 employees with many development teams and many games on many platforms developed in parallel at two locations in the UK and in Canada. The Canadian studio is relatively new so it shouldn't be a mystery where quite a bit of the IPO cash might have gone.
Elite Dangerous was probably their biggest and most prestigious project in the past two years or so but there is A LOT more to that company than just Elite.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Pros Banned
1. Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Pros Banned Nov 22, 2014, 14:23 CJ_Parker
 
MUUUAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAAHAHAAAAA PWNED!!!111






^ to put it in true CS 0.7 fashion
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Elite: Dangerous Refunds Reconsidered
27. Re: Elite: Dangerous Refunds Reconsidered Nov 22, 2014, 10:44 CJ_Parker
 
Sgt. Rock wrote on Nov 22, 2014, 08:39:
What's all the fuss about?
I understand that offline would have been nice for people with really bad connects, modding and when the servers go down in a couple of years(then they'll probably release the server code).

People who really can't play the game because of their connection(or lack off) will get a refund and will have to get over the fact that they can't play the game.

There is an additional layer to the fuss. Thanks to the always online requirement, it is now also inevitable that everyone will be playing in the same player-driven universe.

Even if you play single player online, the universe you experience will be the same as for everyone else, meaning that discoveries, trade routes, mining belts etc. will all be shared.
Some people were hoping to have "their own universe" to explore offline so they could explore and exploit everything by themselves.

This is no longer the case obviously. The 24/7 gamers will be the ones pushing into deep space and discovering stuff first, being the first to exploit mining opportunities and lucrative trade routes etc.
Of course the universe is more than HUGE with 400bn systems but we'll have to see whether it's fun for the more casual single player online folks to always tread in someone's footsteps or if the game mechanics will allow players to at least feel like they are still having a rather unique experience.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Free Content
1. Re: Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Free Content Nov 20, 2014, 20:28 CJ_Parker
 
FREE?! Whaddayamean F R E E ??? This gotta be some kinda Trojan horse shit or something like that!  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Elite: Dangerous Refund Policy
68. Re: Elite: Dangerous Refund Policy Nov 20, 2014, 14:38 CJ_Parker
 
Kajetan wrote on Nov 20, 2014, 14:15:
descender wrote on Nov 20, 2014, 14:10:
Stop. Using. Kickstarter.
Why? Because one prominent project goes belly up? I backed several games on Kickstarter which turned out very, VERY fine.

It's not just one. Larian Studios has failed to deliver on a whole list of promised features for Divinity Original Sin and they did the KS when the project was almost done for a final layer of polish and more content so any excuses they may have brought up smell like BS.
Or Chris Roberts.... "the dogfighting module will be released in 2013, no matter what". LOL. It came out the end of May 2014. Or the "limited ships" and LTI (lifetime insurance) that were never supposed to return after the KS campaign and that kept being sold time and again just for monetary reasons, of course.
Or Wasteland 2 backers who had to wait months for their physical copies instead of getting them at launch.
Or Obsidian who are too snobby to communicate delays directly to their backers and instead have revealed both PoE delays via 3rd parties.

The list goes on and on...

Fuck them all. Kickstarter, at least for video games, can go and DIAF.
I'm not giving ANY asshole developer my money for a fundraiser ever again. I might preorder the finished product close to release if it looks good. I might buy it at full price on release if it turns out well. But I'm no longer funding broken promises and delays.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
2271 Comments. 114 pages. Viewing page 31.
< Newer [ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo