Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Daniel

Real Name Daniel   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname CJ_Parker
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Feb 11, 2006, 23:49
Total Comments 1515 (Pro)
User ID 24408
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ] Older >


News Comments > Star Wars: The Old Republic Cuts
22. Re: Star Wars: The Old Republic Cuts May 22, 2012, 19:29 CJ_Parker
 
sauron wrote on May 22, 2012, 19:20:
Go ahead. I dare you. If you don't, I'll assume you can't.

Also, be entertaining, not profane. The latter is not a substitute for the former.

Game on, baby. Give it your best shot. Also, try to use words of more than one syllable.

Not a chance. You know, your neurons might explode and suck up all the vacuum inside your head so it implodes and creates this black hole that will swallow us all. I know I can be a real asshole but I wouldn't want to be responsible for the end of the universe so no thanks!

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Wars: The Old Republic Cuts
19. Re: Star Wars: The Old Republic Cuts May 22, 2012, 19:18 CJ_Parker
 
Graham wrote on May 22, 2012, 19:11:
CJ, could you point us to something you've done in the world that's worth anyone paying attention to?

Sure, I could do that but why? It'd be like casting pearls before the unwashed swine that y'all are .

Is this really the best you got? Come on, at least try.

Sure, I could do that as well but why bother? It would just end up with a red *removed* text thanks to you NAZI GESTAPO forum police.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Wars: The Old Republic Cuts
13. removed May 22, 2012, 19:03 CJ_Parker
 
* REMOVED *
This comment was deleted on May 22, 2012, 19:31.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Star Wars: The Old Republic Cuts
3. Re: Star Wars: The Old Republic Cuts May 22, 2012, 17:59 CJ_Parker
 
It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside to see this game fail. Not that I have any real hope they'll do the right thing and start working on an OT MMO with space combat (you know, like SWG done right) but just to see this dumb WoW clone Old Republic fucker fail is extremely satisfactory. Seems like a slow and painful death, too, which makes it even more fun. Come on. Crumble some more, bitch...

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Diablo III
109. Re: Ships Ahoy - Diablo III May 15, 2012, 15:36 CJ_Parker
 
Wildone wrote on May 15, 2012, 15:28:
Amazed there is people able to get on. Get so many server busy erros. how could they fuck this up so bad?!?!?!?!

STFU it's not Blizz fault you're too stupid to log into their precious game!!!11!

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Diablo III
58. Re: Ships Ahoy - Diablo III May 15, 2012, 14:11 CJ_Parker
 
NKD wrote on May 15, 2012, 14:01:
The loots carrot-on-a-stick is as effective as ever on the mentally weak.

There. I fixed that fer ya. Nice of me huh?

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Risen 2 DLC Already on Disc?
18. removed May 6, 2012, 16:48 CJ_Parker
 
* REMOVED *
This comment was deleted on May 7, 2012, 08:27.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Diablo III Witch Doctor Trailer
16. Re: Diablo III Witch Doctor Trailer Apr 24, 2012, 13:04 CJ_Parker
 
I like the dude. Everyone's played a wizard or a fighter (Barb) or a monk in some game or another but the witch doc is at least somewhat semi-unique. I also liked the dude's accent, his dry sense of humor and the whole spiritual angle. Cool guy. Imma gunna play dis fuckah!

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Diablo III Beta Open to All Battle.net Accounts?
43. Re: Diablo III Beta Open to All Battle.net Accounts? Apr 18, 2012, 16:11 CJ_Parker
 
I think I'm going to have a "wallet accessibility issue" if there is no free for all beta before May 15
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > EA Denies Layoff Rumor
44. Re: EA Denies Layoff Rumor Apr 17, 2012, 01:28 CJ_Parker
 
Turglar wrote on Apr 16, 2012, 21:16:
And there is a fucking popup telling you your points were reset when you log in.

No there isn't, you n00b. Why is it always people that don't even play the game that feel an urge to reply to shit they know nothing about? *sigh*
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > EA Denies Layoff Rumor
36. Re: EA Denies Layoff Rumor Apr 16, 2012, 19:12 CJ_Parker
 
Teddy wrote on Apr 16, 2012, 18:44:
You mean like in the extensive list of patch change notes that were listed clearly in the launcher when you were downloading and installing the patch?

You clearly haven't even played the game. For the patch notes to show up you have to specifically click on a link in the launcher. They aren't just displayed while you download the patch.
And I have many better things to do than wade through patch notes. Good customer service = notify the player of really important changes (like a full respec) via an in-game pop-up or broadcast message the first time the player logs in after the change. Simple as that.
But hey, feel free to suck up the shitty treatment while paying $15/month for it. In the meantime I'll have some standards.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > EA Denies Layoff Rumor
22. Re: EA Denies Layoff Rumor Apr 16, 2012, 15:07 CJ_Parker
 
Tim Collins wrote on Apr 16, 2012, 14:37:
The new star wars patch is a complete disaster, its so bad they gave everybody a free month.

Yep. They have a strange way of patching and communicating changes. I haven't played since January and just hopped on real quick to check what 1.2 was like last week only to find all of my skill points refunded for a respec. WTF?!?
How about a little notification about why this was deemed necessary? Maybe give a quick outline of any underlying class changes in the notice so I know what this is all about.
Or am I supposed to dig up the info on their forums (that are down for "maintenance" every time a shitstorm brews on the horizon)? Fuck off. I'm not digging up anything. You fuck with my build, you explain why.

What a bunch of hacks and amateurs...

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Confirms Hardware Plans
59. Re: Valve Confirms Hardware Plans Apr 13, 2012, 18:32 CJ_Parker
 
Overon wrote on Apr 13, 2012, 17:39:
If valve does this right they can make a console like PC hardware and compete with Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony. I want more competition because it's better for me and you!

Maybe for you and everyone else who is into consoles or closed systems gaming in some form or another but it's not good for "free" traditional Windows PC gaming. More fragmentation of the gaming market as a whole would almost certainly mean an even smaller share for traditional PC gaming.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Confirms Hardware Plans
50. Re: Valve Confirms Hardware Plans Apr 13, 2012, 16:13 CJ_Parker
 
Verno wrote on Apr 13, 2012, 13:33:
No way. Research, development and design of a barebone PC would cost lots of money for very little return since selling PCs has become a very low margin business.

They might try to follow the console model and just lose money on the hardware while making it up on the software.

Make it up on the software how? Valve can't collect a $10 fee for PC games from the publishers like MS and Sony are doing it for their closed Xbox and Playstation systems. Make it up on the software how in a very competitive environment with other digital download services? Make it up on the software how if it is the publishers who dictate the prices of their games and not Valve?
Maybe by charging for some of their own software? For what? For Steam itself? OK. Bye Valve. Hello Origin, GOG, GamersGate, Direct2Drive, Green Man Gaming and so on...

Nah. Seriously. No way. There is absolutely no way they are doing a Steambox PC. Why the hell would they do that anyway? To spread Steam to more PCs worldwide? It would be much easier to invest serious money into ad campaigns or to bribe some publishers to do more Steam-exclusive stuff or to call up Dell or HP or Acer and pay them some cash to ship every PC with Steam pre-installed. There is zero reason for Valve to become a (HT)PC builder with the low margins in that area of business and the ever growing popularity of gaming capable mobile computers and tablets. It would be outright retarded of them to even try to enter the hardware (HT)PC market.

If whatever it is they are hiring for is a box/platform then it's Valve's games-as-a-service streaming solution or if it isn't then it's some gaming peripheral as others have pointed out.
But it ain't a PC or a console - never ever.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Confirms Hardware Plans
38. Re: Valve Confirms Hardware Plans Apr 13, 2012, 13:29 CJ_Parker
 
Razumen wrote on Apr 13, 2012, 12:06:
Streaming is more niche and unreliable than either consoles or PC...

Are we entirely sure about that? OnLive seems to be working fairly well and who says that OnLive is doing it all right? Maybe Valve could do it all much better and bring streaming out of its niche. Everyone was lol'ing at Steam in the early days. No one would have ever thought it would ever become what it is now.
Valve think long term, not like most people just a couple of weeks ahead, and streaming will become a major part of the media landscape. There's no doubt about it. Microsoft is really keen on the whole streaming biz and who knows maybe Valve is going to pwn them a second time (the first time being when Steam became what GFW(L) was supposed to be from the start).

... plus they'd still have to invest in a server farm to render those games and pump it them to the players. And did I mention streaming is shit?

If there is one area where Valve is right at home it's gotta be server farms. They are very experienced in running an extremely large network by now. Will it be a technical challenge? Yes. Will it be worth it if the end result is you can give Microsoft and other big media corps the finger? Fuck yeah.
And streaming doesn't have to be shit. As I said the tech is relatively new and hasn't nearly been fully explored yet. There's a good chance that Valve could find ways around the usual issues like lag by syncing input devices and the display in all new ways (see here for a vague reference that this can generally be done: Lucid MVP and HyperFormance).

No, I think it's more likely it's a standardized barebones PC that you can play Steam games on out of the box on your TV - They already have the infrastructure, a HUGE library of games, they've admitted to developing a Big-TV mode for Steam and have a decent name for themselves, I'd say it's very much possible.

No way. Research, development and design of a barebone PC would cost lots of money for very little return since selling PCs has become a very low margin business.
Then there's the even bigger -MUCH BIGGER- issue of Microsoft who will not watch idly as Valve brings PC gaming to the TV. Because that's exactly what the Xbox is all about. It's Microsoft's core Xbox philosophy actually.
Also Steam isn't an OS and Microsoft owns Windows. There are a million ways they could make life a real bitch for Valve like requiring a fee for the sale of each Windows game or slipping some "oops code" into a DirectX or Windows update that "accidentally" messes with the Valve PC. Network hacks and attacks... you name it.

All of that totally aside from the very likely legal action that Valve would face from Microsoft or that Valve might have to take against Microsoft to make that Valve PC become a reality. Or legal action from publishers who might be OK with their game on Steam in a free PC market but don't want their game on a Steambox PC. Remember that Valve does not own the games they sell.

Forget it. There's no way that Valve is doing a Steam console or a Steam barebone PC. Valve's philosophy right now is "games as a service" and a St(r)eambox as a set-top box would be just the thing they need to become a leading player in bringing that market to the mainstream before anyone else does.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Valve Confirms Hardware Plans
18. Re: Valve Confirms Hardware Plans Apr 13, 2012, 11:28 CJ_Parker
 
I don't think that the Steambox will really resemble a PC (not even a stripped down one) or a console. My money is more on a set-top box for streaming games and other content to users at home.

Entering the high end console market at this point would seem unwise. Let MS and Sony duke it out. Why take an unnecessary risk by trying desperately to break into a market that requires a multi-billion $ initial investment just for an entrance fee? Not gonna happen.
And the classic PC market? Nah. Plain unattractive. They'd have to deal with fierce competition, price wars, supply & demand issues, RMAs and all that crap... nope, not gonna happen either.

Which leaves us with choice no. 3, i.e. an OnLive kind of service. Streaming services are destined to become a major part of the media landscape a few years down the road and since all of the other big corps seem to have decided on a wait&see strategy this could just be the perfect opportunity for Valve to claim a major stake in this rather new area of business. Valve have proven to be smart long term strategists. They wouldn't do just another console or just another PC. They'll do something else, something newish. Steambox = Streambox. Mark my words.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned
144. Re: Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned Apr 10, 2012, 19:00 CJ_Parker
 
Kajetan wrote on Apr 10, 2012, 18:13:
CJ_Parker wrote on Apr 10, 2012, 17:23:
Well, why don't you set a good example and start providing facts, hard numbers and data on why piracy is NOT a problem first?
Where are your numbers and facts?

See. You can't either.

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf
http://torrentfreak.com/piracy-may-boost-sales-111102/
http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf
Pirates Are The Music Industry’s Most Valuable Customers
Game Changing Study Puts Piracy in Perspective

There are some reports and documents as a start, hinting that non-commercial content piracy is not as bad as being told by the industry for decades.

Where are yours?

WTF? It was you who made up the rule that no "articles" (because they are all full of made up numbers and LIES right?) may be posted and then all you got is a number of links to umm... well, articles and opinion pieces? Wasn't it you who demanded HARD data, facts, and numbers? And then all you got is... this^

Hmmmppfff.... bwwahahaha L to the O to the L, loser

Done with this thread. You guys keep on living in denial of the piracy problem, sure, go ahead if it makes you feel better but don't be surprised if PC gaming goes down the shitter even faster because of y'allz ignorance.
Oh, and in between posts where you defend and justify piracy don't forget to check your taskbar for the progress on that download you got going. Ya'd hate to miss getting on that latest freebie ride as soon as it's done wouldn'tcha?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned
114. Re: Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned Apr 10, 2012, 17:23 CJ_Parker
 
Kajetan wrote on Apr 10, 2012, 17:12:
CJ_Parker wrote on Apr 10, 2012, 17:06:
All evidence is pointing towards that being the case.
Show us. Show us numbers, show us facts, show us evidence. Not just quoting someone, who utters only unproven assumptions. Please. A proof. Something. Something you can use as an actual argument based on facts. Please?

Well, why don't you set a good example and start providing facts, hard numbers and data on why piracy is NOT a problem first? And as you said no lame quotes or comments but real numbers and facts.

See. You can't either.

So what do we do? Do we listen to the people with inside knowledge like a Jeff Vogel who said that sales of one his games was cut in half when the torrent became available or do we put our head and ass in the sand ignoring people like him and yell "LIES!!!111" from the top of our lungs?
Don't answer which choice you would make. It's obvious.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned
109. Re: Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned Apr 10, 2012, 17:06 CJ_Parker
 
Marvin T. Martian wrote on Apr 10, 2012, 16:47:
Another head in the sand post from one (like Capps) who doesn't have a clue.

The only people with their head in the sand are the people who continue to live in a state of denial about piracy being a huge problem. All evidence is pointing towards that being the case. It's not just EA, Epic, Ubi or other big corps but also indies like Jeff Vogel (Spiderweb) or CD Project have expressed their dissatisfaction with rampant piracy.
Now one might argue over how to best deal with the problem, like whether DRM is a viable solution or not and all that stuff but to deny that the problem exists is ignorant to the level you're buried in the sand up to your ass and not just your head.

 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > John Romero's Shooter Plans
20. Re: John Romero's Shooter Plans Apr 6, 2012, 02:39 CJ_Parker
 
"PC-first", not PC-exclusive and "MMO-ish"... see I knew there was a catch if Romero had "plans". Obviously the plan is to fuck up again. OK. Have at it, Johnnyboy. Your money, not mine .  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
1515 Comments. 76 pages. Viewing page 26.
< Newer [ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo