User comment history
< Newer [ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ] Older >
| News Comments > StarCraft II Website |
 |
| 6. |
Re: StarCraft II Website |
Jun 22, 2010, 05:24 |
Paketep |
|
|
You wait for ten years, and then Blizzard gives you a facebook-ripoff with no LAN support in which you have to be online at all times to play it (ok, now it's authenticate once only for single player). Oh, and they divide it in three releases so you have to pay more. What do you do?.
- Don't buy it
- Don't buy it
- Don't buy it
x Don't buy it and fuck you Blizzard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > MS Recommitted to PC Gaming (Again)? |
|
| 3. |
Re: MS Recommitted to PC Gaming (Again)? |
Jun 21, 2010, 17:15 |
Paketep |
|
|
peteham wrote on Jun 21, 2010, 17:10:
Hahah... Fable? A core game? I weep for humanity.
Gotta agree there. Also, Fable 3 without Fable 2.. No, thanks.
Give us back MechWarrior and Age of Empires, Microsoft!. And kill Games for Windows Shit Live. THAT would really help PC gaming. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Kotick: Audience "Clamoring" for Subscription CoD |
|
| 17. |
Re: Kotick: Audience |
Jun 20, 2010, 14:21 |
Paketep |
|
|
Bwahahahahahaha!!!
I'd laugh more if it wasn't for the fact that this is coming, and those that paid $15 for 3 new maps and 2 recycled ones will sign up on the first day. And because of them, the rest of us will keep losing features on our games.
Pathethic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Medal of Honor Beta Client |
|
| 13. |
Re: Medal of Honor Beta Client |
Jun 18, 2010, 05:41 |
Paketep |
|
|
xXBatmanXx wrote on Jun 17, 2010, 23:42:
Thats all ya got? No "This is just a version of CoD" or something?
It's not a version of CoD, it's a mod of BC2
xXBatmanXx wrote on Jun 17, 2010, 23:42:
THink it will be worth $60.00?!!!!
I certainly don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > PS3 Portal 2 |
|
| 11. |
Re: PS3 Portal 2 |
Jun 15, 2010, 17:41 |
Paketep |
|
|
Creston wrote on Jun 15, 2010, 17:30:
What exactly does Steamworks for PS3 mean? What does it do?
It shits all over the hopes of everybody thinking that the surprise was something different. ANYTHING but this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II Replay Feature |
|
| 6. |
Re: StarCraft II Replay Feature |
Jun 14, 2010, 16:20 |
Paketep |
|
|
Oh, so they're going to limit how many replays you can have like they're doing with the maps?. And does this mean that they're also going to control your replays and what you do with them?.
Greedy, greedy Blizzard, you want everything. And you ain't getting anything from me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Rockstar: No Current PC Red Dead Redemption Plans |
|
| 39. |
Re: Rockstar: No Current PC Red Dead Redemption Plans |
Jun 11, 2010, 21:45 |
Paketep |
|
|
GTA4 for the PC was a disastrous port, lacking many PC features, really slow in big machines tens of times more powerful than a 360, and all of it worsened by the sheer amount of shit that you needed running to "play" the game: Social Club, SecuROM, Games for Windows Live, can't even remember what more.
When Red Dead Redemption for PC is released next year, I for one will not be buying it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Portal 2 Surprise Planned |
|
| 7. |
Re: Portal 2 Surprise Planned |
Jun 1, 2010, 18:01 |
Paketep |
|
|
Are they finally going to release the Day of Defeat: Source fixes?.
But, but... they've only been finished for a year and a half!!!.
Damn, where is that damned kleenex.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
|
| 61. |
Re: Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
May 31, 2010, 06:59 |
Paketep |
|
|
cliffski wrote on May 31, 2010, 06:35:
I know there are a ton of people who claim they pirate because they cant afford the games, yet the same kdis always seem to have PC's that can run Crysis at max settings, and have a mobile phone that costs more than my car.
Those are the cheap bastards I was talking about  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
|
| 57. |
Re: Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
May 31, 2010, 06:23 |
Paketep |
|
|
cliffski wrote on May 31, 2010, 05:05:
Stanly Manly wrote on May 30, 2010, 17:02:
Vote with your wallet, it is the only effective option.
this is, in effect the problem. Pirates are effectively voting with their wallet, by not opening it. Every time they pirate a game imnstead of buying it, they send a market message that says "this game sucked, no more like this".
This is why pirates complain that all modern games suck. They actively killed off the style of games they liked, by not buying them, so all they can do now is pirate games they don't like.
Simple economics.
I don't think that's it, Cliffski. That would assume that pirates used to buy games. Usually, when people who buy games stop buying them, due to DRM or whatever, they don't start pirating. At most, they buy and then get the crack.
On the other hand, people that pirate due to lack of money (as opposed to cheap bastards) and get a job, usually start buying games. So, pirates really are never taken into account when counting "non buyers" because they never were buyers in the first place.
All of this, of course, taken out of my ass and from what I see in my circle of friends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
|
| 49. |
Re: Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
May 31, 2010, 01:20 |
Paketep |
|
|
spindoctor wrote on May 31, 2010, 00:16:
It's not like pirates have no taste and will only pirate the bad stuff while buying the good...
One of the most downloaded games of last year was Modern Warfare 2. In 2008 the winner was Spore. Pirates clearly have no taste.
Ok, yeah, some of them probably did it out of spite. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
|
| 30. |
Re: Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
May 30, 2010, 18:18 |
Paketep |
|
|
[VG]Reagle wrote on May 30, 2010, 18:01:
OMG another company wanting to make us pay for a game. This nimrod has not figured out that the PC platform has only free games? We ain't paying for shit.
Perhaps you aren't. A lot of us are.
[VG]Reagle wrote on May 30, 2010, 18:01:
BTW anyone know when RDR is coming to the PC?
Usually it takes a year. Sometimes more (see Bully). Depends on how much Sony and/or Microsoft paid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
|
| 25. |
Re: Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
May 30, 2010, 17:56 |
Paketep |
|
|
kxmode wrote on May 30, 2010, 17:50:
It's clear to me Ubisoft is completely out of their minds. I don't think anything we say or do will dissuade then from CIC DRM. May I offer an compromise? Buy the game but install the pirated version. Would that be okay?
No. You're still validating their DRM. Don't buy the game and don't pirate it. That should be our answer.
Sadly, it's useless. Almost a million people (I believe) bought the PC version of MW2, despite the big cuts, IWNet and everything, and the MW2 Boycott group of Steam was full of people playing MW2 on release day, so I guess there's nothing really we can't do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
|
| 13. |
Re: Ubisoft DRM Analysis |
May 30, 2010, 16:10 |
Paketep |
|
|
Sepharo wrote on May 30, 2010, 16:04:
You don't make a better game to reduce piracy, you make a better game to increase sales.
Great point. Any developer that is thinking of piracy when making the game will probably crash and burn. Or at the very least will incense the fans (see IWNet).
It's bad enough already that the publishers can't keep their dirty DRM'd hands away from the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
745 Comments. 38 pages. Viewing page 20.
< Newer [ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ] Older > |
|
Twitter 
