Acleacius wrote on Nov 7, 2011, 11:18:
Pulled that content quick, also I've read people playing the leaked console game are doing live streams.

Beamer wrote on Nov 1, 2011, 08:23:

foot wrote on Nov 1, 2011, 07:58:
Looks like they haven't improved combat much. The animations are still terrible.

So what everyone here is saying is that they value graphics over gameplay?

Beamer wrote on Oct 11, 2011, 09:25:
your choice was pretty much good wizard or bad wizard.

Jerykk wrote on Oct 6, 2011, 12:24:
Daikatana wasn't just panned for bugs. It had some terrible, inconsistent level and enemy design, for one. Who thought it would be a good idea to fight small, annoying enemies like frogs and dragonflies? Your teammates' AI was atrocious as well.

Kajetan wrote on Oct 6, 2011, 11:54:

Ratty wrote on Oct 6, 2011, 11:18:
Heh, first ever comment about Daikatana I've seen that didn't rip it to complete threads.

You should have asked me the week Daikatana was released I picked it up again a few years later and to my great suprise it wasnt that bad at all.

Kajetan wrote on Oct 6, 2011, 06:45:
Daikatana had some major, game breaking bugs at release and was "only" a standard shooter with some nice ideas like RPG elements (choosing between making you stronger or your sword). Most people were upset because of this horrible and highly arrogant marketing campaign. The game itself was quite enjoyable after some patches. Nothing spectacular, but ok.

Creston wrote on Sep 30, 2011, 10:55:
Nah, I don't really care that the damage is unrealistic, it's just that throughout every Rage video, every enemy soaks up literal containers full of ammo. I don't want to empty two clips at a single frakking enemy.

It makes your weapons feel like pieces of worthless crap.

Verno wrote on Sep 28, 2011, 14:07:
Offtopic but was anyone else disappointed with Terra Nova?

Beamer wrote on Sep 27, 2011, 12:04:

Verno wrote on Sep 27, 2011, 10:50:
I always use one of the URL shortening services.

I'll rarely click on those. From you, sure, but generally on a messageboard I avoid them. If they took me to a page that showed me the URL I was being redirected to I'd be fine, but when it's just a redirect it's more a tool for spammers and malware distributors than anything else.

Beamer wrote on Sep 26, 2011, 16:56:
It really just comes down to instancing, and to wanting to have as many polygons and items as possible in some locations. Really an engine thing.

Halo wrote on Sep 26, 2011, 16:30:

Lobster wrote on Sep 26, 2011, 16:19:
Is it really that big a deal to have to look at a loading screen now and then?

When you have to wait and load a 10x10 cabin to find nothing turn around and load again. And when the developer claims immersion and making use of todays technology online to still be using dx9 and the same tech with more addons from years ago.

So in other words yes.