User comment history
< Newer [ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ] Older >
| News Comments > Morning Patches |
 |
| 13. |
Re: Morning Patches |
Feb 7, 2013, 17:19 |
Dev |
|
|
nin wrote on Feb 7, 2013, 13:16:
It's fun to just chill for an hour and casually drive from Poland to France hauling some human-devouring acid for whatever evil plot the French Socialist government has come up with that time. (I find it helps to come up with background stories for the cargo. ) Role playing a truck sim - I love it!
Just need to roll some d20's. Or maybe spin them like those dice rings in that completed KS: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/critsuccess/dice-rings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs |
 |
| 12. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Feb 7, 2013, 15:15 |
Dev |
|
|
| From my experience GW has ALWAYS been nuclear and nutso about protecting their IP. This isn't even CLOSE to the first time they've pulled something like this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 31. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Feb 6, 2013, 22:10 |
Dev |
|
|
Redmask wrote on Feb 6, 2013, 17:27: I know people who would buy a lot less console games if they weren't able to trade in the duds so this would only hurt them in the long run. I doubt Gamestop would take that lying down, they would penalize any system that doesn't allow used sales by denying floor space and like them or not, they're a major presence in the videogame industry. You and I know that, but MS thinks otherwise.
Also if both sony and MS do it, gamestop won't have anyone specific to penalize. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Evening Mobilization |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Evening Mobilization |
Feb 6, 2013, 22:08 |
Dev |
|
|
| I dunno, I would have expected it to lengthen battery life, considering that it seems like every few weeks I read about some random official apple ios update that bricks phones or makes battery life tank. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 24. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Feb 6, 2013, 14:23 |
Dev |
|
|
Verno wrote on Feb 6, 2013, 13:46: That's what makes me a bit dubious about this, there isn't much of an up side for Microsoft here other than favor with publishers. MS loves having more control over every market they are in. See win 8 for only the most recent example. As well, I'm sure they have the view that having activation and tying would increase sales since it would eliminate used sales (they get crazier with every version of windows with activation).
Beamer wrote on Feb 6, 2013, 13:55: This is one of those things neither Microsoft or Sony can really do first. They either both do it or neither do it.
Odds on both doing it? If one does, they both will I'm sure. Like some time ago all the big hdd companies reducing warranties to 1 year from 3, all within a few weeks of one another. You can't tell me that was a coincidence.
This comment was edited on Feb 6, 2013, 14:48. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Metacritic Game Publisher Rankings |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Metacritic Game Publisher Rankings |
Feb 6, 2013, 14:19 |
Dev |
|
|
Creston wrote on Feb 6, 2013, 13:48:
Dev wrote on Feb 6, 2013, 12:39: EA getting it makes me wonder if its just because of their sheer size they are likely to have some good stuff, or because they have the juice to get a lot of good reviews. More probably a mix of both. If by "juice" you mean "Advertisement dollars", then yes. Well that and everything else that marketing does to boost scores. I was thinking of the more shady stuff when I said that. I'm sure it all goes into the marketing budget. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Metacritic Game Publisher Rankings |
 |
| 1. |
Re: Metacritic Game Publisher Rankings |
Feb 6, 2013, 12:39 |
Dev |
|
|
| EA getting it makes me wonder if its just because of their sheer size they are likely to have some good stuff, or because they have the juice to get a lot of good reviews. More probably a mix of both. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 17. |
Re: Errr... Beamer? |
Feb 6, 2013, 12:30 |
Dev |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Feb 6, 2013, 12:16: Your post had me so confused. Timestamp, words that weren't mine, phrases that I'd never use... I had no clue what was going on. It's from a comment on the linked website. Presumably from your response, its from a different Beamer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 15. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Feb 6, 2013, 12:28 |
Dev |
|
|
Comments are talking about always on being for ads, I find it more likely it will be primarily used for copy protection and control. Perhaps to lock games down to a specific user/console so there's no more used sales, etc.
Edit: And now that I RTFA, thats what they said too
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Take-Two Takes $400MM |
 |
| 6. |
Re: Take-Two Takes $400MM |
Feb 6, 2013, 01:52 |
Dev |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Feb 5, 2013, 22:27: And they could have made another 100 mil with a solid PC RDR port! Fucking fuckers! Quite possibly yeah. I know I would have thrown money in their direction. Instead, I finally gave up and got it for my xbox when it hit like a $10 sale. And I played it for a couple hours, every minute of it wanting to have a mouse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Notch Backtracks on Psychonauts 2 Support |
 |
| 52. |
Re: Notch Backtracks on Psychonauts 2 Support |
Feb 5, 2013, 21:39 |
Dev |
|
|
nin wrote on Feb 5, 2013, 21:32:
Smellfinger wrote on Feb 5, 2013, 21:25: If 18 million dollars is a 'reasonable' figure, this industry deserves to be crushed under its own corpulence. True, but it's also what we as gamers are spoiled to. We need to lower our standards a bit, also.
As long as the majority of gamers ONLY buy the latest thing because its a) a shooter and b) for its graphics, such as the latest CoD for $60 (usually on consoles), it won't change.
Fortunately there's a healthy minority buying things like indie games. If people didn't buy things like that, we would be stuck with recycled mega millions crap like CoD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > New 3DMark |
 |
| 9. |
Re: New 3DMark |
Feb 5, 2013, 18:42 |
Dev |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Feb 5, 2013, 08:32:
Dev wrote on Feb 4, 2013, 22:55: Yes, I'm sure they didn't make any compromises at all to get it to run on smartphones. Just like MS didn't make any compromises in dumbing down win 8 to be the same on all platforms. Oh wait...
You know better than this, Dev. It's as easy as clicking the link. You definitely know better than this. What you're doing is essentially what all those crappy game blogs do with the "OMG OVEREXAGGERATION FOR PAGE CLICKS?" headlines.
Right in Steam: Fire Strike - For high performance gaming PCs Use Fire Strike to test the performance of dedicated gaming PCs, or use the Fire Strike Extreme preset for high-end systems with multiple GPUs. Fire Strike uses a multi-threaded DirectX 11 engine to test DirectX hardware. Cloud Gate - For notebooks and home PCs Use Cloud Gate to test the performance of notebooks and typical home PCs. Cloud Gate uses a DirectX 11 engine limited to Direct3D feature level 10, making it suitable for testing DirectX 10 compatible hardware. Ice Storm - For tablets and entry-level PCs Use Ice Storm to test the performance of your Windows tablet, ultra-portable notebook or entry-level PC. Ice Storm uses a DirectX 11 engine limited to Direct3D feature level 9, making it the ideal benchmark for modern portable devices targeting that feature level. You can compare Ice Storm scores from Windows, Windows RT, Android and iOS devices at futuremark.com. Yes I saw that before I posted. But while it has different demos for each mode, it looks to me like it still uses the same engine on all 3 of them, so I'm not totally convinced.
However, after further thought there's at least one category in which it will be quite useful. Developers to be able to compare smartphones to desktops and help them with figuring out porting to/from PC, as well as figuring out how to balance the power of the largest ios/android demographics with graphical levels, so there's that at least. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > New 3DMark |
 |
| 8. |
Re: New 3DMark |
Feb 5, 2013, 18:24 |
Dev |
|
|
Arithon wrote on Feb 5, 2013, 07:01: I see little value in recent benchmarks, since most are now "on this weeks cards / hardware"
I want to see how much bang-for-buck I get for my money compared to the 2010 video card I have in my PC right now.
There are some sites that give you "HD5870 vs GTX660Ti" for example, but they are the exception.
The problem with new benchmark software is it removes the ability to compare with previous hardware. i.e. 3Dmark06 (from 2010) gives my card "23611" but 3Dmark11 (from last year) gives the 660 Ti "9027". That's no help to anyone. Both cards will run in my PC, so I want a meaningful comparison.
If 3DMark have a database of comparable test results for hardware going back some time that they share with purchasers of the software, then I'd be interested to know more, otherwise not. 3dmark does have a database of results, but its a different for each 3dmark they release. You'd have to run the older dx9 benchmark versions (I dont recall the latest 3dmark which went only to dx9) to be able to compare to the widest range of hardware/os. You could also compare those numbers to futuremarks online database. http://www.3dmark.com/search You can specify what version of 3dmark in the advanced search.
I find the most useful thing for getting a rough estimate of old or strange (like mobile) graphics cards and new ones is tom's hierarchy charts for video cards (it has tiers going back to the nvidia TNT). It also helps makes sense of ATI's horrible model naming schemes (and sometimes nvidia does similar confusing things), and see where they fall. And you can see how far down intel integrated is (although the 4000 is at least not terrible). http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-review,3107-7.html
So (in a made up example pulling numbers out of thin air) if say I have a tier 7 card, and a tier 1 graphics card costs $700, and a tier 2 graphics card costs $500, tier 3 costs $400, tier 4 costs $350, tier 5 costs $300, tier 6 costs $250, then the minimum to upgrade that tier 7 card would be $250, and to upgrade it significantly I'd have to spend $350 or more.
Also I find it useful when someone asks me what graphics card to get. I ask them to tell me what they want to spend, and show them that chart and say something like: "for $200 you can get a tier X card, and it will cost $300 or more to move up significantly. In the $200 range these are the nvidia and ATI cards that have the same tier of performance, so I suggest looking for a sale on these"
This comment was edited on Feb 5, 2013, 18:35. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Notch Backtracks on Psychonauts 2 Support |
 |
| 20. |
Re: Notch Backtracks on Psychonauts 2 Support |
Feb 5, 2013, 13:21 |
Dev |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Feb 5, 2013, 12:04: I'd dearly LOVE to see how DF breaks down this 18 mil. Probably similarly to how they break down the $3 mil for the adventure game. You can see how they break that number down in the documentaries and forums. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Notch Backtracks on Psychonauts 2 Support |
 |
| 10. |
Re: Notch Backtracks on Psychonauts 2 Support |
Feb 5, 2013, 11:53 |
Dev |
|
|
Panickd wrote on Feb 5, 2013, 10:19: Wow. Given the number and types of games being made on meager budgets from Kickstarter and other crowd-funding sites Don't fool yourself into thinking the lowball few thousand figures on kickstarter are what good games usually cost to make. Most people doing it for just a few thousand have another job, and are doing this as a hobby, already have housing lined up (perhaps living with a relative), etc. The art/sound are often gratis (in return for a portion of the proceeds) by artists just starting out. A number of kickstarters I've backed like that have run out of money in just a few months. One of them basically said he would cut back to doing it in his spare time and added a year onto the expected release. At this point I'm wondering if it will ever come out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6264 Comments. 314 pages. Viewing page 28.
< Newer [ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ] Older > |
|