User comment history
< Newer [ 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ] Older >
| News Comments > Op Ed |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Op Ed |
Dec 18, 2011, 14:38 |
Bhruic |
|
|
Oh Goodness me no. No no no. No, that's always happened and always will, with any group of teenage guys and most groups of men of any age. I'm sure groups of women aren't much different either. This is in no way exclusive to gamers. That doesn't make it right.
I'm a bit conflicted about this to be honest. As much as I dislike this, it is inevitable, it certainly isn't just gamers and comic book readers. That's the main reason I find these articles annoying. They continually act as if somehow geek culture, and gaming specifically, are abberations on human behaviour. And suggesting that the cause is rooted in geek/gaming depiction of females is pretty silly. Do they honestly think that women would be treated any differently in online CoD if they had female soldiers to play instead of just men? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Op Ed |
 |
| 7. |
Re: Op Ed |
Dec 18, 2011, 14:07 |
Bhruic |
|
|
Secondly, and more importantly, it's not so much the games that are the problem so much as the gamers. The comic book shop example given is an example. I bet the level of grief (and misguided White Knighting) that female gamers on CoD is horrific. In general, I agree, but I'm not sure that it's that much worse than many other facets of the internet. Although I don't think the comic book example was useful, since dragging someone somewhere they don't want to be, and then getting them involved in an argument over the contents of that location is a pretty stupid idea.
Beyond that, however, it's disappointing how many women have to put up with idiot gamers. But can you think of an example of where you could have large numbers of teenage guys who can act anonymously, with a smaller percentage of females, and not have the guys act like complete asshats? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Sunday Tech Bits |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Sunday Tech Bits |
Dec 18, 2011, 13:56 |
Bhruic |
|
|
| I doubt anyone said a couple years back "Hey, let's release a graphics card in January". But release schedules of new hardware, especially when you're changing die sizes, aren't set in stone. The pushed hard for the holiday market, but couldn't get it out in time. That's the way it goes sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Op Ed |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Op Ed |
Dec 18, 2011, 13:54 |
Bhruic |
|
|
It's a bit insulting to not consider the history of gaming. Most early games weren't sexist, they were games. The reason that we have a mostly male dominated gaming market (not speaking of the so-called "casual" market), is because the people who first started playing those games tended to be male. And that spiraled, as developers focused more on their market, they designed their products to be more appealing to males. And the people who enjoyed the products, and then got into the industry to make them tended to be males. And the cycle continued.
My annoyance with the whole thing is - why is this a problem? When you design a facial mask product, you do so with the knowledge that the majority of people that use it will be women. Sure, maybe some men do, but you recognize that's not your primary market. So you design and advertise your product accordingly. Game companies do the same thing, they aim their products at their target market. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > On Sale |
 |
| 10. |
Re: On Sale |
Dec 18, 2011, 09:01 |
Bhruic |
|
|
I still can't believe Bioware fucked up the Dragon Age name as bad as they did with DA2. Blame EA all you want, but they allowed this shit to happen. Bioware is responsible for the wave-spawning enemies, so they take the blame for that one. Wanting to have DA2 out asap, however, is probably more EA's fault than Bioware's, so I blame EA for the lack of more map layouts.
As for Shogun 2, it's a decent game, but honestly I didn't enjoy it as much as the older ones. Although it's probably their best "modern" TW. One of the nice things about R:TW, or M:TW, was that various factions had different units, so I could play the Romans one game, with legions, etc, play the Greeks another, with massive hoplite armies, then switch it up to one of the Eastern factions, and play with Horse Archers. Gave it a great deal of replayability. Shogun 2:TW doesn't really have that, so barring map location, who you play as isn't as important. Really cut down on the replayability for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Blizzard Introduces BattleTags |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Blizzard Introduces BattleTags |
Dec 16, 2011, 11:09 |
Bhruic |
|
|
| So you can have a unified, across everything name, but it's not unique so someone else can have the same unified, across everything name. Doesn't that kind of defeat the point? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > CD Project vs. File-Sharers Follow-up |
 |
| 34. |
Re: CD Project vs. File-Sharers Follow-up |
Dec 16, 2011, 03:56 |
Bhruic |
|
|
As an idle aside, I wonder if developers/publishers would be happy if they completely eliminated piracy (speaking theoretically, of course), but doing that didn't increase sales at all. Ie, in a hypothetical world, piracy completely stops, but everyone who pirated stuff still doesn't buy it (or buys it under the same conditions they would have had they pirated it).
Would they be satisified with having no pirates, despite no more sales than they otherwise would have seen? Or would that be considered a failure, because they'd only be happy if they could get more sales? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Lord British/EA UO2 Follow-up |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Lord British/EA UO2 Follow-up |
Dec 15, 2011, 13:33 |
Bhruic |
|
|
Man, I didn't know we had senior citizens on this site. Cool! Hey, I'm not that old! The c64 version (which is what I played) didn't come out until 1983. And I was still pretty young while I was playing it.
It's funny, talking about it made me look it up, and one of the guides talks about how rolling a single character (with good stats) can take well over an hour to do. Guess my memory of play time vs rolling time was pretty accurate! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > CD Projekt Versus File-Sharers? |
 |
| 41. |
Re: CD Projekt Versus File-Sharers? |
Dec 15, 2011, 13:31 |
Bhruic |
|
|
That is ridiculous. That is like saying the people who have alcoholism and manage to quit drinking shouldn't try to encourage other alcoholics to quit drinking.
No, it's like someone who was an alcoholic but quit drinking calling alcoholics assholes.
You're not surrendering moral high ground by admitting it, in fact I'm a lot more open to considering arguments from someone who is self aware enough to understand how reality and theoretical arguments differ. I think you're misunderstanding the concept of "moral highground". There's nothing wrong with being a reformed pirate (I am one myself), but you lose the ability to make certain types of references by admitting such. You're not in a position to chastise others for their behaviour when you are guilty of the same behaviour in the past. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Lord British/EA UO2 Follow-up |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Lord British/EA UO2 Follow-up |
Dec 15, 2011, 13:08 |
Bhruic |
|
|
There is only one other game that was before Wizardry that started this view perspective, but I forgot the name (Had a small blue castle with a light gray background, Apple ][) I'm not sure if it's the one you're thinking of, but Oubliette was one of, if not the first. 1977, and Wizardry cited it as one of its inspirations. It was a fun game to play, if a bit frustrating, I think I spent more time rolling characters than I did actually playing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > On MW3 Bans |
 |
| 6. |
Re: On MW3 Bans |
Dec 15, 2011, 11:28 |
Bhruic |
|
|
Either way this is still a step in the right direction Weird, BF3 announced "thousands" of bans, and everyone laughs, MW3 bans 1600, and it's a step in the right direction? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > CD Project vs. File-Sharers Follow-up |
 |
| 5. |
Re: CD Project vs. File-Sharers Follow-up |
Dec 15, 2011, 11:12 |
Bhruic |
|
|
However, is the IP address, by itself, enough to get a warrant to search the hard drives for physical proof of stealing? In my mind, yes. In others, no. It is the very core of the debate. It's not really the core of the debate, although it should be. The problem is that they are sending out the letters without doing the hard drive searches. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > TeamSpeak and Overwolf |
 |
| 2. |
Re: TeamSpeak and Overwolf |
Dec 15, 2011, 10:22 |
Bhruic |
|
|
| The way I read it, is Overwolf added TS support to the Facebook/Twitter support it already had. TS still doesn't have any Facebook icons, afaik. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > CD Projekt Versus File-Sharers? |
 |
| 34. |
Re: CD Projekt Versus File-Sharers? |
Dec 15, 2011, 09:36 |
Bhruic |
|
|
That's a deliberate obfuscation of the reality. An IP address can be identified by the ISP that issued it, while the local IP address can ascertain which computer / device on the network accessed it. And that's spouted nonsense. The ISP has a record of who is paying for a connection, period. They don't know who's actually using the connection, they don't know what computers are behind the connection, they don't know if the connection is shared, or whether there's an open wireless connection. So if they get contacted about an ip address, they can't give them any of that information. All the company gets is the name of the person who "owns" the connection. And is not sufficient to demonstrate who actually downloaded the game from that ip. And anyone with a basic understanding of how the internet works should know that.
You're trying to introduce doubt in an attempt to let those infringing copyright off the hook. Yes, because CD Projekt is going to stop doing it just because I posted! I just have that much influence over them.
How about people just buy the fucking game or pass on it, like the rest of us do. See, when you've already admitted that you "used to" pirate games, it is much, MUCH too late for you to be taking the moral highground. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > C&C Tiberium Alliances Announced |
 |
| 26. |
Re: C&C Tiberium Alliances Announced |
Dec 15, 2011, 09:20 |
Bhruic |
|
|
I mean, EA just announced a real, brand new, graphically high-end, PC-exclusive RTS using Frostbite 2 less than a week ago.
People hated it.
Now they announce a Facebook-based free-to-play RTS.
People hate it. Funny, I've read the C&C Generals 2 thread, and I don't see any large amount of hate for it. Sure, there are probably one or two, but there are one or two people that hate everything. You just tend to gloss over them after awhile. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > CD Projekt Versus File-Sharers? |
 |
| 30. |
Re: CD Projekt Versus File-Sharers? |
Dec 15, 2011, 08:58 |
Bhruic |
|
|
I dont think that anyone is saying that what CD Projekt is doing is wrong, its simply stupid. There are people saying it's wrong, and for a very good reason. An ip address is not a form of identification. Unless you have a (relatively) foolproof way of identifying exactly who downloaded the game, sending out emails, especially threatening "settlement" emails, is wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Into the Black |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Into the Black |
Dec 14, 2011, 06:30 |
Bhruic |
|
|
| If you check out the screen, you'll note that they are watching a SC2 replay, not actually playing SC2 themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > New AMD/ATI Catalyst Drivers |
 |
| 12. |
Re: New AMD/ATI Catalyst Drivers |
Dec 14, 2011, 06:27 |
Bhruic |
|
|
The funny thing is that every time I buy AMD/ATi I think this same thing. The funnier thing is that every time I buy nVidia I think the same thing, but about nVidia, instead. In the end I've realized that it isn't one that is necessarily better than the other, but rather specific cards which are just more stable and "better" than others. Well, that, plus the fact that you really only tend to pay attention to (or perhaps pay more attention to) the problems that affect you. So it always "seems" like your card has more trouble than the other guy's, but that's because you gloss over the stories of trouble with the other cards because they don't apply to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Evening Legal Briefs |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Dec 13, 2011, 23:37 |
Bhruic |
|
|
Honestly, the "Busted" thing seems stupid. What company doesn't have a few bad apples in the bunch? The fact they could find a couple of people doing torrents doesn't make them hypocrites, unless the people doing torrents were the same people who were campaigning against them. Much more likely is that it was Doug, the assistant cameraman hooking into their network on the sly.
Doesn't make me like the corportations or their positions any more, but this kinda of "a-ha!" reporting is childish, at best. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3113 Comments. 156 pages. Viewing page 52.
< Newer [ 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ] Older > |
|