User comment history
< Newer [ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ] Older >
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 U.S. Preorder Bonuses |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Battlefield 3 U.S. Preorder Bonuses |
Aug 1, 2011, 21:16 |
Teddy |
|
|
Limiting the effectiveness of the pre-order based weapon?
If it makes you feel better, the pre-order weapons for MoH included an MP7 and an M60.
That said, since they've already confirmed that these items will be released to the public eventually, I'm personally less offended by the retailer specific content this time around. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 Novel Plans |
 |
| 16. |
Re: Battlefield 3 Novel Plans |
Aug 1, 2011, 19:11 |
Teddy |
|
|
DangerDog wrote on Aug 1, 2011, 13:52: There needs to be at least one incidence of T-bagging dead enemy soldiers to be a credible book based on Battlefield 3.
Maybe they can cover the backstory on regenerating health too.
Now that you mention it, I wonder how many times in the book the main character is going to get shot then hide behind cover for 20 seconds until the wounds go away.
Any bets? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
 |
| 236. |
Re: Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
Aug 1, 2011, 18:26 |
Teddy |
|
|
Dev wrote on Aug 1, 2011, 18:09:
Teddy wrote on Aug 1, 2011, 17:25: So, just so I'm clear on this... You have to pay blizzard to list an item on the AH (whether it sells or not), you have to pay blizzard again if that item sells (Source: Ars Tech), then you have to pay Blizzard a third time to transfer the money owed to a third party company that you have to pay to give you the remains of the money, and only if you live in the right area in the world.
With all that paying out, I'd be surprised if you get 10c on the dollar for everything you sell. Except your link mentions its a flat fee to list and sell, and that its going to be a very small fraction of the higher end stuff. I read that as well. The difference is, I don't trust Blizzard. THEY say it will be a very small fraction of the higher end stuff. Of course that's only based on their speculation of what higher end stuff might sell for, and not to mention what they consider "a very small fraction". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
 |
| 211. |
Re: Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
Aug 1, 2011, 17:25 |
Teddy |
|
|
MacLeod wrote on Aug 1, 2011, 16:30:
Dev wrote on Aug 1, 2011, 16:25: I really doubt they are going to let anyone cash out to real money, its going to be for some form of in game currency. So the gold farmers will still not be interested in it.
From the Blizzard FAQ: Can players choose to get cash from currency-based auction house sales, instead of having the proceeds deposited into their Battle.net account? Yes, as an advanced feature, players will have the option of attaching an account with an approved third-party payment service to their Battle.net account. Once this has been completed, proceeds from the sale of items in the currency-based auction house can be deposited into their third-party payment service account. “Cashing out” would then be handled through the third-party payment service. Note that this process will be subject to applicable fees charged by Blizzard and the third-party payment service. Also, any proceeds from the sale of items in the currency-based auction house that have been deposited into the Battle.net account will not be transferrable to the third-party payment service account. Not all regions will support this advanced feature at launch. Region-specific details, as well as details regarding which third-party payment services will be supported and the fee that Blizzard will charge for the cash-out process, will all be provided at a later date.
Can we buy gold from the currency-based auction house? Players will be able to buy and sell gold through the currency-based auction house at whatever the current market price is, as established by the player community. So, just so I'm clear on this... You have to pay blizzard to list an item on the AH (whether it sells or not), you have to pay blizzard again if that item sells (Source: Ars Tech), then you have to pay Blizzard a third time to transfer the money owed to a third party company that you have to pay to give you the remains of the money, and only if you live in the right area in the world.
With all that paying out, I'd be surprised if you get 10c on the dollar for everything you sell. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
 |
| 75. |
Re: Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
Aug 1, 2011, 13:38 |
Teddy |
|
|
MattyC wrote on Aug 1, 2011, 13:32: I don't think you finished reading my comment. Or if you did you are just ignoring the meat of it. I finished reading it, I just disregarded the rest since you oompletely contradict yourself, by passing it off as rage because it's Diablo 3 and not a random game, then you make up a different excuse as to why it requires constant connection.
It is NOT being made an "online game". It has a single player campaign, it's being sold as a single player and multiplayer game. That's why I didn't respond to the rest of your comment, because it's a lie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
 |
| 71. |
Re: Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
Aug 1, 2011, 13:29 |
Teddy |
|
|
MattyC wrote on Aug 1, 2011, 13:26: That said I have to wonder if they had called this Hackamaslash or whatever and released it would the rage still be there? I mean I keep reading where people call this DRM and spyware but it seems pretty silly to me. They are just making Diablo 3 an online game. You may not like that, but it doesn't make it DRM or spyware. No one said Guild Wars or a <name a MMO> had always on DRM. Just seems odd to me. No, if it was called "Hackamaslash" and not Diablo 3, the bad press from permanent connection DRM would bury it before it was even released.
The fact that it's Diablo 3 and has the pedigree of one of the most loved franchises of all time is the only reason it will get away with it and people will still buy it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
 |
| 68. |
Re: Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
Aug 1, 2011, 13:27 |
Teddy |
|
|
Wallshadows wrote on Aug 1, 2011, 13:00: Otherwise, if you intend to play this game like most did in Diablo 2 for the multiplayer That's an ENORMOUS assumption on your part, that 'most' people played Diablo 2 multiplayer. I'd bet the real statistics are quite the opposite. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
 |
| 66. |
Re: Diablo III Will Require Persistent Connection, Feature Cash Auctions, and More |
Aug 1, 2011, 13:23 |
Teddy |
|
|
Now I have to wonder about the "real-money" auction house. I'm willing to bet that Blizzard has no intention of giving us the money someone bought an item for minus a brokerage fee. Instead, they'll keep all the money and give us in-game gold, no doubt.
Think I'll just make sure I vendor everything I don't need to make sure they don't make any extra money from me on that front. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Heroes of Newerth F2P, Some Players Protest |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Heroes of Newerth F2P, Some Players Protest |
Jul 31, 2011, 01:16 |
Teddy |
|
|
I don't doubt there are plenty of normal people who play as well, and plenty of extra-nice people who do as well. The problem is simply that the assholes are so painfully vocal that it's difficult to find a single match without one constantly spamming derisive comments, or even a forum post on their site without one. Hell, they had to create a special section on their forums to funnel those posts into.
That says something in and of itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Serious Sam 3: BFE Origin Spoof |
 |
| 7. |
Re: Serious Sam 3: BFE Origin Spoof |
Jul 31, 2011, 00:21 |
Teddy |
|
|
Dades wrote on Jul 30, 2011, 23:42:
Icewind wrote on Jul 30, 2011, 18:34: Wow this is old news. They did this like 3-4 days ago.
You're just now picking up on this? Do you notice how Blue never responds to your unsubtle baiting? How does that cliche about repetition and insanity go again? I'd say Blue's response, or lack thereof is far more effective. Ignore those that aren't worth the attention and they'll seek it elsewhere. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Heroes of Newerth F2P, Some Players Protest |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Heroes of Newerth F2P, Some Players Protest |
Jul 31, 2011, 00:18 |
Teddy |
|
|
atomicfro wrote on Jul 30, 2011, 23:05: Just tried playing, and they are definitely elitist cocks. Yes, yes they are and sadly that's one of the reasons this game doesn't have a larger audience. I know the hideous attitude of the players is the primary reason I won't drop a dime on the game. Hell, I won't even play it for free if I have to deal with those people on a regular basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > New Dune Legacy |
 |
| 3. |
Re: New Dune Legacy |
Jul 29, 2011, 01:12 |
Teddy |
|
|
Shataan wrote on Jul 29, 2011, 00:49: Wtf there is STILL not a fps made in the DUNE universe is anyones guess. I blame the horrible 80's movie for diluting and confusing the lore. While it probably makes for easier transition into games with the sonic weaponry (something that shows up rarely in games today), you'd piss off loyalists who hated the change to canon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Dragon Age II DLC Released, Game Pulled from Steam |
 |
| 36. |
Re: Dragon Age II DLC Released, Game Pulled from Steam |
Jul 27, 2011, 12:54 |
Teddy |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Jul 27, 2011, 12:37: I think he means that the CoD Elite thing comes with the maps, but that's not really a sub to play them. You just get codes for them if you are a subscriber. People seem to be utterly baffled by that service and assume it is tons of things it isn't. The way he put it certainly sounded confused, but do you honestly think that Activision is going to give you all of their $15 map packs permanently if you just subscribe to their Elite service for a month?
Their only way of managing it would have to be to remove access to the maps if you cancel your subscription, or force you to pay for a full year subscription.
You could purchase the map packs seperately as an option, but I don't buy for a single second that a subscription to Elite will just gift them to you permanently without some kind of big (and expensive) catch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > EA Financials |
 |
| 9. |
Re: EA Financials |
Jul 27, 2011, 04:35 |
Teddy |
|
|
Zavy wrote on Jul 27, 2011, 04:09: So if TOR flops ala age of conan then EA will go bankrupt? Read the article again. In one single quarter, EA posted $524 million dollars worth of revenue. Taking into account that different quarters sell more or less than others, that puts them somewhere between $1 billion and $2 billion in sales per year.
Just in profit alone, they posted $221 Million. Again, that's somewhere betweeen $500-800 million over the course of a year.
A couple hundred million loss on ToR if it sold zero copies would hurt them, but bankrupt? Not a chance. If there was even a chance that it could, they wouldn't have agreed to do it in the first place. You don't fuck around and take risks that could sink a multi-billion dollar company for the potential of profit. New companies take risks, not established cash cows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Duke Nukem Forever DLC This Fall |
 |
| 12. |
Re: Duke Nukem Forever DLC This Fall |
Jul 27, 2011, 00:17 |
Teddy |
|
|
Jerykk wrote on Jul 26, 2011, 23:48: It wasn't that bad. The guy in the video complains about a lot of gameplay mechanics or design choices that were also present in HL2 and tries to justify it by saying "they're different types of games!" No, they really aren't that different. They both have:
1) Lengthy intro segments where you don't fight anything. 2) Lots of platforming. 3) Some puzzle-solving. 4) Prolonged vehicle segments.
If you enjoyed the HL games, chances are you'll find some enjoyment out of DNF too. They have similarities, sure, but Half-life did it all better 7 years ago. I liked both HL games and was bored out of my skull playing DNF. I didn't even bother to finish it after forcing myself to play through a few hours. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1059 Comments. 53 pages. Viewing page 23.
< Newer [ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ] Older > |
|