User comment history
< Newer [ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ] Older >
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 Improvements |
 |
| 20. |
Re: Battlefield 3 Improvements |
Nov 4, 2011, 00:27 |
Teddy |
|
|
TangledThorns wrote on Nov 4, 2011, 00:09: No mention of the stutter fix?? If you go to the BF3 tech support forum you'll see stutter as a top complaint. I don't suggest buying the game till there is a major patch release. Fool me once, EA... fool me once... ATI has already released a new driver version that's supposed to correct stuttering with crossfire setups.
If there's some other stuttering issue, I have no idea. I've not seen it, myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Rainbow 6 Patriots Announced |
 |
| 33. |
Re: Rainbow 6 Patriots Announced |
Nov 3, 2011, 22:49 |
Teddy |
|
|
Prez wrote on Nov 3, 2011, 20:25: I was never a big fan of the planning phase. It was cool and all, but the vast majority of the mission time was spent in a 3D wireframe setting waypoints and commands - the mission itself would only take a fraction of the time. Not unrealistic, but not necessarily "fun" either... Definitions of "fun" vary. I enjoyed the strategic side of it very much and have hated every game they put out since that didn't have it. It was one of the defining features of the R6 titles, then they decided to remove it and try and make it just like every other shooter on the market. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Rainbow 6 Patriots Announced |
 |
| 10. |
Re: Rainbow 6 Patriots Announced |
Nov 3, 2011, 15:56 |
Teddy |
|
|
Playing as Rainbow, players will face critical scenarios that will require them to make tough ethical decisions in order to stop this new breed of terrorists. So the question is, do we actually get to MAKE the 'tough ethical decisions', or is there a set story that we have to follow and if we make the 'wrong' decision, then it's game over?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > BF3 on Steam Hints |
 |
| 24. |
Re: BF3 on Steam Hints |
Oct 31, 2011, 19:20 |
Teddy |
|
|
Prez wrote on Oct 31, 2011, 16:19: I think you are right. The files were probably just put in before the big Steam/EA tiff.
They weren't. That's why the speculation exists at the moment. They were added in a recent punkbuster update.
The battlefield 3 steam code thing was probably a mix-up, but according to several BF news sites, the files are brand new. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > BF3 on Steam Hints |
 |
| 23. |
Re: BF3 on Steam Hints |
Oct 31, 2011, 19:15 |
Teddy |
|
|
Bludd wrote on Oct 31, 2011, 19:14:
bhcompy wrote on Oct 31, 2011, 16:03: God Origin is an abortion. Getting it installed off the DVD was a nightmare because it didn't pick up the DVD and tried to download it from EA's awful Origin servers. Had to copy all ~14gigs to the HDD, replace the Origin installer files with the new installer, and run setup from there to get it to pick up. Then it required me to disable uPnP on my firewall and setup port forwarding to even log in(which no other game has ever required). Actually, it just says "downloading" but it installs from the DVDs. After a while you get prompted to insert DVD2. I was caught out by this too, but when I realised it was "downloading" at 8 MB/s which is 5 MB/s more than my line can handle, I realised it was just Origin being dumb and actually not downloading. Not the case for everyone. Some people actually did have it download instead. It is a bit wacky sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Origin Adds Publishers |
 |
| 29. |
Re: Origin Adds Publishers |
Oct 28, 2011, 12:16 |
Teddy |
|
|
Now where are all the people who were saying "They're not doing this to compete with Steam, they're just using it for their own products."?
Short-sighted tools, every one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Batman: Arkham City Nightwing Trailer |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Batman: Arkham City Nightwing Trailer |
Oct 27, 2011, 17:10 |
Teddy |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 15:51: Oh hells yeah! I wish they would have gone with Nightwing instead of Catslut in the first place. I simply cannot get into playing a chick even in a fictional sense. I hopes this means you can play through the entire game as Nightwing and not just the challenge maps. Negative. Assuming it's anything like the Catwoman "first purchase club" bit, it's a sub-plot that goes along side the main, periodically swapping you over to play one or the other. Or you can select the specific story sections and play them individually (or just wander off with that particular character and screw around ignoring the story. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
 |
| 55. |
Re: Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
Oct 25, 2011, 15:39 |
Teddy |
|
|
Mac wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 15:30: EA must be racist ... what other reason is there to delay the launch until Friday in the UK? Congratulations. You won the most retarded post of the day award. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
 |
| 54. |
Re: Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
Oct 25, 2011, 15:39 |
Teddy |
|
|
Dmitri_M wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 15:31: What's up with Origin still saying "pre-order now"? I'm thinking of getting it but only if I can play it right now.
Although that's only because it'd be nice to have a brand spanking new highend PC game (Rage didn't quite deliver) rather than any real desire to play it.. If you're in NA you should be fine. EU and UK orders don't unlock until the 27th or 28th, one of the two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
 |
| 43. |
Re: Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
Oct 25, 2011, 14:32 |
Teddy |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 14:21:
Teddy wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 12:02: The campaign is no worse than any CoD campaign, or MoH's from last year. It's no better either, but certainly no worse. It looked worse to me, even more scripted and controlled, but that could be because it was the opening. Granted the train sequence is pretty bad, but it's also the worst part of the game (barring aforementioned bat-shit crazy bit near the end). The remainder plays out pretty much identical to a CoD game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 PC Checklist |
 |
| 20. |
Re: Battlefield 3 PC Checklist |
Oct 25, 2011, 13:54 |
Teddy |
|
|
Surf wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 09:39: BF3 is friggin MIND BLOWING and very infantry heavy. The helicopters and particularly jets seem totally worthless and will have to be tweaked as they do jack shit in the game apparently and are very easy to blast away.
The jets really require some of their unlocks for survivability and to deal reasonable damage to ground targets. Give the players some time to get them and learn to stay high unless directly engaging and you'll start to see some real involvement from them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 PC Checklist |
 |
| 19. |
Re: Battlefield 3 PC Checklist |
Oct 25, 2011, 13:49 |
Teddy |
|
|
Surf wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 09:43: PS - Got mine on Amazon for $50, digi download.
Can't remember the map names, some are really good, others not so much, but I blame myself because with previous BF's the hardest thing was getting used to the maps.
Karkand, which I have, was not unlocked all day yesterday, so wasn't able to play. Over time we will see which maps shine.
OH AND THERE IS A COMPASS IN THE LOWER LEFT! YEEEHAW! Karkand and the maps from that (despite showing up on the battlelog server list filters) are not available at launch. They'll be out in about a month. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
 |
| 21. |
Re: Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 3 |
Oct 25, 2011, 12:02 |
Teddy |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Oct 25, 2011, 11:48: Giantbomb quicklook makes the campaign look flat-out embarrassing. The campaign is no worse than any CoD campaign, or MoH's from last year. It's no better either, but certainly no worse.
Yes there are occasional QTE's and whoever came up with the idea to include them needs to have the stupid smacked out of them, but the rest is pretty much par for the course for linear aka "Cinematic" SP style shooters.
The only real qualm I have with the plot is that it runs along well enough through almost the entire thing, then goes bat-shit crazy in the last mission (or just before it). Not going to utter any spoilers, but there's a very clear moment that NO ONE in their right mind is going to be able to consider logical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 Reviews |
 |
| 83. |
Re: Battlefield 3 Reviews |
Oct 24, 2011, 22:44 |
Teddy |
|
|
jacobvandy wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 20:52: Again, my gripe with the mission was that it was on rails, period. Call of Duty does aircraft on rails, but Battlefield is known for letting players fly them, so why stoop to that level? I can only guess they figured it'd be too complex for the average console player. That the entire campaign seemed to have been designed with that mindset is the reason I probably won't ever be replaying it, same as Bad Company 2's. Bring on the multiplayer! Because in flying a strike aircraft (generally 2 seater) which is what was used in that mission, the pilot ONLY flies. If they'd done that, you'd be complaining that all you get to do is fly around and not shoot anything.
They could have had a flight mission in a fighter where it's pure air to air and then you'd be able to do both, but they decided to show closer to what actually happens. If you're the WSO, and you're on a mission... LIFE is on rails for you. You go where the pilot flies you and do your own job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Medal of Honor Sequel Hinted? |
 |
| 23. |
Re: Medal of Honor Sequel Hinted? |
Oct 24, 2011, 20:07 |
Teddy |
|
|
Hump wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 16:36: ugh, just put a nail in the coffin of this IP. EA has butchered it with every attempt since the guys who formed Infinity Ward left. Agreed. They have Battlefield as their major modern shooter title. We REALLY don't need MoH as well. Where battlefield at least has vehicles to distinguish itself against CoD, MoH had almost nothing. I enjoyed the SP campaign more so than any CoD game I've played save perhaps the original Modern Warfare itself, but even that didn't make it worth the cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 Reviews |
 |
| 74. |
Re: Battlefield 3 Reviews |
Oct 24, 2011, 20:03 |
Teddy |
|
|
jacobvandy wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 19:49:
Teddy wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 19:31:
jacobvandy wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 14:26: The jet level sucks because you aren't flying. You assume the role of the pilot, but it just floats along on a rail with you popping flares or firing guns and missiles as needed. It's so boring because more than half the time is just waiting for the the enemies to decide to fly in front of you rather than behind.
No, you do not assume the role of the pilot in that mission. Apparently you simply failed to understand it. The other guy is the pilot, YOU are the weapons officer responsible for handling... you guessed it, the weapons. Well then they confused me by directly referring to her in the preceding cutscene as the F-18 pilot that flew an air strike. That distinction doesn't suddenly make the mission any less of a disappointment, however. WSO's (weapons systems officers) are also trained and qualified pilots. To my knowledge, they generally don't swap about from single pilot fighters to strike aircraft, but it's not beyond the realm of possibility.
*shrugs* If you don't appreciate a closer approximation of actual encounters, that's on you. I'd personally rather they try to remain authentic and make things interesting that way instead of "Here's a bajillion things to blow up! GO GO GO!" Your single jet is not going to get swarmed by 50 enemy aircraft and hundreds of ground targets. That sort of thing simply DOES NOT happen. Forgetting even the pilots' lives, the Navy would not send in a $50+ million dollar aircraft to guaranteed destruction against innumerable odds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 Reviews |
 |
| 73. |
Re: Battlefield 3 Reviews |
Oct 24, 2011, 19:51 |
Teddy |
|
|
Tumbler wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 19:49:
Teddy wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 19:31:
No, you do not assume the role of the pilot in that mission. Apparently you simply failed to understand it. The other guy is the pilot, YOU are the weapons officer responsible for handling... you guessed it, the weapons. Does anyone know if this back seat position is available in MP? To my knowledge, it's not, though I didn't get to try any A10's or the russian equivalent in testing. There is, however a co-op mission where you are pilot and co-pilot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 Reviews |
 |
| 70. |
Re: Battlefield 3 Reviews |
Oct 24, 2011, 19:31 |
Teddy |
|
|
jacobvandy wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 14:26: The jet level sucks because you aren't flying. You assume the role of the pilot, but it just floats along on a rail with you popping flares or firing guns and missiles as needed. It's so boring because more than half the time is just waiting for the the enemies to decide to fly in front of you rather than behind.
No, you do not assume the role of the pilot in that mission. Apparently you simply failed to understand it. The other guy is the pilot, YOU are the weapons officer responsible for handling... you guessed it, the weapons.
This comment was edited on Oct 24, 2011, 19:38. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Battlefield 3 Reviews |
 |
| 69. |
Re: Battlefield 3 Reviews |
Oct 24, 2011, 19:28 |
Teddy |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Oct 24, 2011, 13:43: And while I agree the CoD story is incoherent garbage, it at least has a pressing urgency. That's really the only thing it communicates well.
But the two or three reviews I skimmed didn't drool over CoD, just said this tries very hard to be CoD and fails miserably by having the same flaws and new ones.
No big surprise. MW does set pieces and urgency well. It does infinite spawning and story cohesion poorly. Like hell is had a pressing urgency. All they did with that was have the guys yell at you when you didn't move. In the first mission in black ops I was in a house that was supposedly falling down around us. They kept shouting, "Come on, WE HAVE TO GET OUT NOW!" Just for fun I left my character sitting in a corner doing absolutely nothing, walked away from my computer. The AI fought with itself for almost an hour with the friendlies screaming about how the building was coming down and we had to get out NOW.
I was bored out of my skull in Black Ops precisely because these people don't understand how to pace a story. Constant explosions and gunfire is not exciting. It's repetitive and if it ever impressed you at the beginning, you just don't care by the time the 70th explosion in the last five minutes goes off.
Same reason I despise Michael Bay movies. He is one of the worst film makers of our generation, and even though he doesn't understand how to make a movie without having to scream EPIC EPIC EPIC every second of the film, he still gets millions to make his drivel. He sells movies well, he makes them horribly.
This comment was edited on Oct 24, 2011, 19:39. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1059 Comments. 53 pages. Viewing page 14.
< Newer [ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ] Older > |
|