Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Rob Seace

Real Name Rob Seace   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Agrajag
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description Ugh...
Homepage http://www.magrathea.com/~ras/
Signed On Jan 12, 2000, 11:57
Total Comments 185 (Novice)
User ID 1965
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] Older >


News Comments > etc.
11. Re: etc. May 6, 2015, 06:42 Agrajag
 
The worst possible thing I can wish on these self-proclaimed "Christians" is that their religion is true... Because, Christ sure as hell isn't going to be very happy with the shitty things they've been doing in his name down here... His ass-kicking of the money changers would be nothing compared to what he would do to these assholes...  
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Legal Briefs
11. Re: Evening Legal Briefs Apr 22, 2015, 06:18 Agrajag
 
Rigs wrote on Apr 22, 2015, 03:34:
(Seriously, Google, 'whatchamacallits' doesn't get flagged for a spelling error?! Did I miss something?! That's considered an actual word now?)

Yep...

It is...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc.
9. Re: Radcliffe to play "Grand Theft Auto" Creator Apr 10, 2015, 06:25 Agrajag
 
"Harry Potter" actor Daniel Radcliffe is in negotiations to star in BBC Films' "Grand Theft Auto," a film about the true story fight between the creator of "Grand Theft Auto" and a Miami lawyer who aimed to ban video game violence.

Oh, man, they're going to have a Jack Thompson character in this? It just got 1000% cooler sounding! I can't wait to see the part about him sending gay porn to a judge...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
19. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Apr 1, 2015, 06:45 Agrajag
 
Julio wrote on Apr 1, 2015, 06:18:
Or the baker is forced to go against their own religious beliefs.

How so? I don't recall anything anywhere in the Bible saying, "Thou shalt not bake cakes for the homos!"... He's only forced to go against his inate bigotry, which has absolutely zero to do with his religious beliefs...

Interesting dilemma. There are specific businesses I choose not to go to, because they racially discriminate against white people. There's no chance I could sue them and actually win.

LOLWUT? Racially discrimate against white people? Are you in bizarro world or the mirror universe or something?

But, you know, the Civil Rights Act made it pretty clear that public businesses are not allowed to racially disciminate at all... So, if such businesses exist anywhere outside of your fevered imagination, they are breaking the law...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
2. Re: Evening Metaverse Mar 18, 2015, 06:13 Agrajag
 
Cutter wrote on Mar 17, 2015, 20:25:
"We are quite clear that when you are using city computers, it is supposed to be for city business. This was not authorized business," Mayor Bill de Blasio said Monday

Oh come on Bill! They literally get away with murder! You think they're even in the least bit concerned about this?

I heard they all turned their backs on him while updating his Wikipedia entry to call him a big doodiehead...

When did the cops start hiring spoiled children?
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Legal Briefs
12. Re: Evening Legal Briefs Mar 11, 2015, 06:45 Agrajag
 
InBlack wrote on Mar 11, 2015, 03:27:
xXBatmanXx wrote on Mar 10, 2015, 20:57:
We are fighting a war on the street.

I know its a figure of speech but this is disturbing. If policemen feel they are in danger 24/7 they are much more likely to use excessive force.

Yeah, quotes like that don't exactly help with the public image of police as overly militarized bullies who see all non-cops as enemy combatants... You're not in Iraq, guys! Those people you're dealing with aren't enemy soldiers; they're citizens whose rights you're supposed to be protecting... Yes, even the "bad guys"...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Machines in November
27. Re: Steam Machines in November Mar 6, 2015, 06:25 Agrajag
 
Wallshadows wrote on Mar 5, 2015, 18:46:
What's the point? What market are they trying to capitalize on?

I don't know, maybe people like me... My real PC is an ancient workstation running CentOS, which I use for programming for work... It's too old (and CentOS5 is too old a system) to run anything newer than Quake3... Plus, it's for work not play... I have no interest in ever owning a Windows PC again, so buying one of those is right out... I play most of my games these day in front of my TV via my Xbox360... I'm not yet sold on either Xbone or PS4 this generation, but am really intrigued by the Steam Machine idea... Being a Linux fan, I like the SteamOS concept and that they're porting all their games and convincing others to do the same... Sure, I could buy/build my own PC and install SteamOS on it, I suppose, but I'm getting too old for that shit! I'd just as soon spend the money on a ready-to-go solution... So, when these things finally come out, I might just pick one up...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
12. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Feb 28, 2015, 09:05 Agrajag
 
NegaDeath wrote on Feb 27, 2015, 17:34:
shihonage wrote on Feb 27, 2015, 17:06:
Spoken like a true proletariat stooge. Lenin used low-information voters like you to create a revolution in my home country. Now Obama's using people like you for a soft coup. Some things never change.

It was only a matter of time until someone invoked Godwin's l....wait did you say Lenin? Well that's different.

I have to wonder if that's sarcasm... No real right-winger could be so self-unaware as to call the left-wing "low-information voters" with a straight face, could they? I mean, that just has to be a joke! The party of willful ignorance, anti-science, and anti-intellectualism telling the other side that they're the know-nothings? Just WAY too out there to buy as serious...

But, maybe it's Poe's Law in action...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > DOOM Mythbusters
30. Re: DOOM Mythbusters Jan 27, 2015, 12:59 Agrajag
 
Orogogus wrote on Jan 27, 2015, 12:39:
I don't think that's it. If that was all there was to it, games wouldn't track ammo, either.

Well, there's a line you have to walk between fun and challenging... You don't really want to give everyone god mode and unlimited ammo by default... That may be fun to just run around and go nuts once in a while, but for the game to have any real playability, there needs to be SOME level of challenge... But, if you make things TOO challenging and put in too many rules and restrictions, things start to get less and less fun, too...

And how much does the old school hate regenerating health? A lot. And usually because "it's not realistic," because health packs and turkey platters are much, much more immersive.

Heh. I hate it too, and not because it's not realistic... As you point out, it's MORE realistic than old-school health packs and such... (People really DO heal on their own over time! Just not usually as fast as depicted in games...) I hate it because it forces you to abandon the action and do nothing for a while to keep from dying... Eg: I'm finally playing Assassin's Creed IV (I know, I'm way behind the times!), and I absolutely hate that they've switched to that regen health crap now... In AC2 and 3, I'd just carry plenty of medicine with me, and then in tough fights when running low on health, I could just instantly power back up and continue the fight... Now, I have to run away like a pussy and hide until I'm better! It's annoying as hell... I also dislike that they seem to have done away with armor entirely, as far as I can tell... (Aside from hull armor for your ship...)

Nor is every game DOOM, an over-the-top shootarama. When a game like Half Life 2 does it while pretending to be all immersive, it's just weird. It really feels like something that's there just because Wolfenstein happened to do it that way, and now that's what gamers expect.

Sure, games are different, and for some I'm sure the ultra-realism makes sense... I just tend to not want to play those type of games...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > DOOM Mythbusters
27. Re: DOOM Mythbusters Jan 27, 2015, 07:01 Agrajag
 
Orogogus wrote on Jan 26, 2015, 15:04:
SimplyMonk wrote on Jan 26, 2015, 14:04:
But really? Their tag line is "Can someone carry a lot of heavy shit?" It's a bad sign when common sense answers your myth easily.

I dunno, I think I had that discussion briefly on this board. A certain class of FPS player really hates games that limit you to two guns at a time, and trash it as console crap. But, I mean, it seems kind of realistic, yes? And I think the heavy realism games like Red Orchestra and ARMA hold you to one rifle and one sidearm. I thought it was a weird case of "this is what I'm grew up on and is therefore objectively the best."

I think it's more a case of "real life limitations aren't very fun in a game"... When I'm playing a game, I don't want it to be realistic; I want it to be fun... If I want realism, I can go outside... The biggest appeal of video games is they let you do all kinds of unrealistic shit you'd never be able to do in real life... Don't throw zombies and demons at me, then try to toss in some nod to "realism" by limiting how many fucking guns I can carry! We've already agreed to throw real life out the window, so don't half-ass it! You're not making the game more realistic, you're just making it less fun...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Legal Briefs
4. Re: Evening Legal Briefs Jan 10, 2015, 08:55 Agrajag
 
Cutter wrote on Jan 9, 2015, 18:46:
Oh, how interesting. I didn't realize that mobile data was a completely different kind of data. All these corporations are such cockbags. You make billions in profits and it's still never enough. You just have to keep trying to stick it in and break it off sans lube. Why aren't the terrorists killing those assholes? They're the real problem, not Joe Sixpack on the street.

What's hilarious (in a sad, frustrating, insanity-inducing way) is just yesterday we had a story where the same AT&T were arguing that they WERE common carriers, so the FTC has no jurisdiction to tell them to stop throttling unlimited data plans! They're like Schrodinger's common carrier!
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
51. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 15:24 Agrajag
 
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 14:56:
Why should I go into detail and point out that 8 out of the 11 stances she took on just that ONE link I posted is textbook liberal?

And, are therefore wrong? Is it your claim that if a decision is one that liberals applaud it's always wrong, no matter what? If so, then wow, I have nothing more to say... But, if not, then what makes you think she reached all those decisions due solely to bias rather than by just reaching the correct decision based on the Constitution, which then just happened to match what liberals wanted?

Also, I assume you also think as little of Alito, Scalia, and Thomas? Because, most of their decisions seem to line up pretty damn closely with conservative agendas, too... So, they must be just as biased, right? Or, is it ok, because they're biased the "right way"?
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
50. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 15:14 Agrajag
 
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 14:22:
Roberts has proven to be fairly neutral, much to the disappointment of the hard right.

Let me guess what one of you peas in the pod will say next... you'd like me to give you specific examples in regards to Robert's neutrality? See Ag, there are mind readers here on Blues...

Actually, I know the perfect example case you could cite to backup that claim: Obamacare! He was the only conservative to join the liberals in finding it Constitutional (though via his tax theory rather than via the way they wanted it upheld)... Even Kennedy, the traditional swing vote, didn't side with them!
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
49. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 15:06 Agrajag
 
Beamer wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 14:25:
We're floundering like lost children?

And is this the same guy a few posts ago complaining about insults?

Horrible insults like asking if one is a native English speaker! I never knew being from a foreign country was such an insulting thing to be... And, here I thought I was being nice by giving him the benefit of the doubt that that was his problem...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
43. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 13:18 Agrajag
 
Beamer wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 12:34:
Just one case she clearly botched so horribly she could be considered one of the worst of all time.

Just one. Not even a preponderance of the evidence that she's the absolute worst of all time, just one case that demonstrates that, if all cases were exactly like that, she'd be in even the bottom 10%.

What's most amusing is that this entire thread is about a story about a case which clearly demonstrates that she didn't allow her personal feelings and opinions to bias her judgement... So, we already have at least one counter-example against his claim, and he can't even provide a single supporting example for it!

/I think she was on the wrong side in Aereo, but so was Roberts, and I wouldn't say he had a big liberal bias...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
40. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 12:24 Agrajag
 
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 12:00:
I know that when someone starts a "debate" with insults like "Meh Meh Is English not your native language or something?? Meh Meh", they aren't to be taken seriously.

How in the hell is that an insult? Are you unaware of the existence of other countries where English is not the native language or that they have access to the Internet? It was a genuine question, because you honestly appeared to not understand what Verno was asking you, and kept replying with something completely unrelated and unhelpful while insisting that you had provided him with the "proof" he asked for... I simply assumed you might be foreign and struggling with the language... I guess I should've just jumped to the obvious conclusion that you were being deliberately obtuse and trolly...

And when that same someone follows up with a "Meh Meh fuck you very much as well", I know I was correct in my thinking.

Just responding in kind to you! Telling me I'm unworthy of your time because I don't care about debate or facts is just a nice way of saying "Fuck you!"... I just tend to be a bit more blunt when I insult someone...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
38. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 11:50 Agrajag
 
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 11:42:
I won't waste time with those who are known to have no interest in debate or facts. I'm including you on the list.

Oh... Well, then, fuck you very much as well!

Seriously, I don't even post enough regularly around here for you to be likely to recognize me, nor have the faintest clue what my politics are nor my debating skills nor interest in facts... But, from your posts here, I've seen all I need to know to understand about you now... Have fun continuing to project all of your own faults onto others!
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
36. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 11:16 Agrajag
 
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 10:42:
I stated TWICE already Verno that I humored you and linked your "proof" of her voting record. Your problem is you cannot comprehend or don't bother to read.

Is English not your native language or something?

No one asked for proof of her voting record... Everyone already knows how she ruled on every case, or can very easily find out themselves...

What was asked for is which decisions, specifically, do you have a problem with and feel reflect a liberal bias? You can't expect anyone else to possibly find those, since it would require them knowing what you think constitutes liberal bias... I know Blue's has some cool people, but I don't think any of them are qualified mind-readers...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
30. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 10:40 Agrajag
 
Axis wrote on Jan 7, 2015, 10:09:
you'll find ones like (just one example):

NYT 2014

So... In which of those decisions are you saying she was on the wrong side??

Looking at them, the only one I can spot is the Aereo one... That was clearly fucked up... But, I'm not sure it's because she was being liberally biased...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
24. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 7, 2015, 07:25 Agrajag
 
Axis wrote on Jan 6, 2015, 14:46:
Kagan has been the wrong person for the job -- she is hardcore in her liberal ideology which takes precedence to her interpretation of the law.

In which cases, specifically? Because, the case that this story is about would seem to dispute that, given that it's all about how she followed Constitutional law instead of her personal feelings...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
185 Comments. 10 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo