Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Rob Seace

Real Name Rob Seace   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Agrajag
Email Concealed by request - Send Mail
ICQ None given.
Description Ugh...
Homepage http://www.magrathea.com/~ras/
Signed On Jan 12, 2000, 11:57
Total Comments 165 (Novice)
User ID 1965
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Older >


News Comments > Evening Safety Dance
17. Re: Evening Safety Dance Dec 18, 2014, 06:23 Agrajag
 
InBlack wrote on Dec 18, 2014, 02:25:
They should have released the movie, the free publicity alone from all this 'controversy' would have netted them HUGE profits and N. Korea would invent something for their state media anyway.

Don't worry, I'm sure the DVD/Blu-Ray sales will be huge enough to make them a profit still... The only losers are the theater owners (who were the real pussies here, since Sony only caved because they all did first)...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Legal Briefs
11. Re: Op Ed Nov 19, 2014, 06:27 Agrajag
 
Prez wrote on Nov 19, 2014, 02:35:
So only 48 Senators are even aware that the 4th Amendment exists. Wonderful.

58... And, that's what I don't get: why did they need 60 votes to pass?? Is this another one of those threatened Republican filibusters they need a supermajority to overcome? I say call their fucking bluff: make them do a real, old-style, stand up and read from random books for days on end non-stop type filibuster! Make them piss and shit their goddamned pants at the podium if they want to filibuster! Screw this caving to threats crap...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
16. Re: Morning Metaverse Nov 14, 2014, 06:37 Agrajag
 
Seventyfive wrote on Nov 13, 2014, 15:20:
In other news for these people... "Jonathan Gruber".

Didn't Bruce Willis throw him off a building in Die Hard? Or was he the brother with all the riddles and puzzles?
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
11. Re: Evening Metaverse Nov 13, 2014, 06:12 Agrajag
 
How are things going in the Mirror universe, shihonage? Are goatees still in style?  
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Legal Briefs
4. Re: Evening Legal Briefs Oct 7, 2014, 06:14 Agrajag
 
Everyone knows, Chinese people become more skilled and aggressive when drunk...  
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Mobilization
11. Re: Evening Mobilization Sep 12, 2014, 06:50 Agrajag
 
Cutter wrote on Sep 11, 2014, 19:47:
Lol at MS stupidity. Simply boggles the mind. If they hadn't lucked out with Windows this company would not exist today.

DOS was their lucky break, not Windows... Specifically, Gary Kildall dropping the ball and failing to license CP/M to IBM for the PC, and MS managing to find and buy a crappy clone hastily renamed to DOS that they could license to IBM... After that, it was all coasting for them!
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
5. Re: Evening Metaverse Sep 11, 2014, 06:34 Agrajag
 
Jesus, I wish people would hyphenate "shadow-banned"... Trying to parse that headline nearly gave me a headache... I thought "Piranha shadow" was some username that everyone was expected to recognize, and I was just out of the loop...  
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Tech Bits
4. Re: Evening Tech Bits Jul 11, 2014, 06:31 Agrajag
 
Creston wrote on Jul 10, 2014, 23:40:
It's also something that happened months ago, but trust Ars to be right on the ball.

Are you sure you're not thinking about his original plea? Or Musk's vague promise to help at the time? This appears to be a brand new update on the situation saying that Musk is giving a million bucks (and a supercharger station for the parking lot)... From what I can tell by the Oatmeal's blog post on the subject (dammit, people, put dates on your posts!), it was posted yesterday... He mentions it being Tesla's birthday, which was July 10th...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
8. Re: Evening Metaverse Jul 3, 2014, 06:17 Agrajag
 
HorrorScope wrote on Jul 2, 2014, 21:11:
Google, there are several conspiracy stories of Goldman's part in 911, cover up financial issues, warning letters to emps to stay away Monday 9/11, etc.

That must be why so many died: 9/11/2001 was a Tuesday!
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > DOOM Teaser Trailer
6. Re: DOOM Teaser Trailer Jun 10, 2014, 14:32 Agrajag
 
Does that Cyberdemon have the Union Aerospace logo stamped on its metalic parts? WTF?? Are the fucking monsters going to be some lame-ass man-created thing again, rather than demons from hell like they're supposed to be?! Goddammitsomuch!!  
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
15. Re: Evening Metaverse May 16, 2014, 13:38 Agrajag
 
eRe4s3r wrote on May 16, 2014, 11:28:
How you think they will ID the device used? Wouldn't that require the browser giving unique ID information to a plugin/website? Maybe I am misunderstanding how this would work, but to me there seems no actual way to give a device a unique trackable ID without the browser being a defacto trojan horse.... this means the browser and website have to talk to each other, share a trackable unique hash, and then generate a watermark for that content and device.

That screams privacy violation in every way, imo. (I would never use a browser that supported this)

Um, read it again... It doesn't say anything at all about device IDs or anything else you're making up in your head!

In fact, it explicitly mentions that watermarking would DO AWAY with any per-device restrictions! The whole point was to decry the evils of per-device restrictions... Watermarking means no such restrictions... Instead, it's per-user, NOT per-device... That was the whole point of what he said!
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
13. Re: Evening Metaverse May 16, 2014, 09:35 Agrajag
 
eRe4s3r wrote on May 15, 2014, 20:07:
I have nothing against watermarking of media content as such, but Mozilla talked about supporting it on the browser side... which means via plugin that any website can poll and talk to.

Where in hell are you seeing THAT?! They say nothing of the sort that I can find...

Here are the words of the CTO in the blog post all the news articles are about: "Instead of DRM schemes that limit how users can access content they purchased across devices we have long advocated for more modern approaches to managing content distribution such as watermarking. Watermarking works by tagging the media stream with the userís identity. This discourages copyright infringement without interfering with lawful sharing of content, for example between different devices of the same user."

Nothing about the browser having anything to do with the process... No idea where you got that from!
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
11. Re: Evening Metaverse May 15, 2014, 16:24 Agrajag
 
eRe4s3r wrote on May 15, 2014, 15:06:
What happens when the W3C puts tracking functions or NSA backdoors in as standard? Will Firefox also add this then?

I doubt the W3C would ever do such a thing... Plus the concept of a backdoor being documented in open standards seems kind of impossible... If everyone knows about it, it can hardly be called a backdoor anymore!

Let it sink in what per user watermarking implies.... that is their less evil alternative? ... wow ~.~

What's so evil about watermarking? The idiot media companies refuse to trust their customers, so they're clearly going to keep demanding SOME method that placates them that they're doing something to stop piracy... Shitty DRM gives users a bunch of hoops to jump through (download this plug-in, and if you're lucky and we support your platform of choice, you might be able to watch what you just paid us for!), but watermarking is an alternative that doesn't really require any hoops to jump through on the user's end... If done right, it won't be visible in any way; just something totally hidden in the data to uniquely ID the user, so that on the off chance that the user really IS a pirate and uploads it somewhere for other pirates to copy, they can track down who is responsible for releasing it... I'm not sure why that's a problem... I don't have much sympathy for the actual pirates... I have far more for legit users who are inconvenienced by bullshit DRM schemes...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
9. Re: Evening Metaverse May 15, 2014, 11:27 Agrajag
 
eRe4s3r wrote on May 15, 2014, 10:25:
Yeah, but I remember a talk from Mozilla about how they stand up for a free and open internet. Adding support for something is akin to supporting it in every way. DOesn't seem to be possible to coexist with Mozilla's pseudo principles.

Having ideals are great, but it's not always possible to stay true to them and still survive... I suppose if they were serious enough, they could refuse to support it and then wither away and die when they lose all their users because Firefox no longer works for watching whatever crappy videos they want to watch... But, I think they feel it's better in the long run for them to continue existing and being somewhat influential, even if they have to make the occassional compromise in their ideals... They've done it before by allowing support for H.264 video, after long railing against it in favor of VP8/9 or Theora... It's generally better to be practical about the reality of things than to be a pure idealist... There's a place for pure idealism, but it's generally not a good way to make a popular and widely used product...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
5. Re: Evening Metaverse May 15, 2014, 06:27 Agrajag
 
eRe4s3r wrote on May 14, 2014, 21:55:
Uh, so we are supposed to install an Adobe backdoor that's not security tested, not talking encrypted, and not verifying identity of servers on our systems to watch certain kinds of media now?

Or how about.. no? Geez, what could possibly go wrong! Apparently Firefox devs never heard of the Sony trojan

So, don't install it then... Firefox is just adding support for it (reluctantly), so you could install it if you wanted, and have it work... If users have no need to watch the crap crippled with the DRM in question, then they have no need to worry about it... Plus, it's a given that every other browser out there will be supporting this crap, so if Firefox doesn't and everything starts requiring such support to watch, then Firefox refusing to support it will be the death of it...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
18. Re: Morning Metaverse May 13, 2014, 06:26 Agrajag
 
Julio wrote on May 12, 2014, 18:07:
ISP provider

Is this a thing now? Like ATM machine and PIN number?

Or is there some entity out there who provides ISPs to people?
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > ZeniMax vs. Oculus and Carmack on VR Tech
50. Re: ZeniMax vs. Oculus and Carmack on VR Tech May 2, 2014, 06:31 Agrajag
 
Well, there goes any enthusiasm I had for playing the newest Wolfenstein or Doom (if/when it ever shows up)... DIAF rotting corpse of id!  
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
6. Re: Evening Metaverse Mar 25, 2014, 06:09 Agrajag
 
eRe4s3r wrote on Mar 25, 2014, 00:09:
Because it definitely does not take skill to be a mom, everyone can do it.

I'm pretty sure I lack the proper parts to be a mom...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
12. Re: Evening Metaverse Mar 21, 2014, 06:56 Agrajag
 
Creston wrote on Mar 20, 2014, 21:44:
A few weeks ago, we agreed to pay Comcast and our members are now getting a good experience again."

REALLY? So Comcast's claim that it was just 'normal network congestion' can't be right then, because if it had been normal network congestion, more money wouldn't have simply fixed it.

So, like everyone knows, and like everyone said, Comcast was blatantly throttling your traffic, in blatant violation of net neutrality, the rules they swore to uphold until 2017 even if they were stricken down by court order.

Well, I hate to defend evil ISPs, but I was under the impression that the "fix" involved Comcast directly peering with Netflix (in exchange for some unknown amount of money)... So, it's not so much that they were deliberately throttling the traffic before, but they just let it get routed through Timbuktu on its way to them, so it was just naturally much slower... Now, the traffic goes directly from Netflix right onto Comcast's network with nothing in between, hence the speed gain...
 
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
1. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Mar 18, 2014, 06:49 Agrajag
 
We need to require Congresscritters to wear patches of all their sponsors, like fucking NASCAR drivers... Then, we'd at least know who owns them all...  
Avatar 1965
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
165 Comments. 9 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo