Reikon wrote on Oct 26, 2012, 09:51:

Blackhawk wrote on Oct 25, 2012, 22:44:

Stimpack wrote on Oct 25, 2012, 20:47:
*edit* and I meant no kidding as in they need to bring on AC II.

III?

No, there needs to be a 2.

Dev wrote on Oct 25, 2012, 04:42:

wtf_man wrote on Oct 24, 2012, 23:58:
I guess I'm more irked that people think everyone that buys Apple products, runs out and buys every fricken new model as soon as it is available.

The apple fans I know personally are like that.

Jensen wrote on Oct 24, 2012, 21:59:
I'm generally happy with my iPad 3, and most of the complaints I have about it aren't fixed by the iPad 4, anyway.

Flatline wrote on Oct 24, 2012, 23:19:
The Q2 engine was awesome for it's time and was used in a metric assload of games. Probably their biggest success in terms of engine licensing.

Fantaz wrote on Oct 24, 2012, 03:07:

nin wrote on Oct 23, 2012, 21:03:
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apple

Classic, and still relevant...

Apple, without Steve Jobs the company lost their way... no more innovation, their vision lost...

Cutter wrote on Oct 22, 2012, 20:54:
Nice preview on TTH as usual. Sounds like they're taking a page from GW2 in everything. And it sure looks nice. That Dunmer lavafalls shot is impressive. It'll be interesting to see how they do Elsewyr and the Black Marsh in particular. Well, colour me interested.

Beelzebud wrote on Oct 22, 2012, 12:20:
Kickstarter just made Romero its bitch.

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Prez wrote on Oct 22, 2012, 02:09:
A lot of pooh-poohing of this game, but I can't help but still be excited. I really liked the Bioshock games (yes even 2!) - call me crazy.

Beamer wrote on Oct 21, 2012, 11:36:
Reread the sentence you quoted.

Ken will be working on at the Lord of the Rings Online developer, other than word that: "He will be responsible for all aspects of game design from vision to implementation."

Agent.X7 wrote on Oct 18, 2012, 23:26:

Cutter wrote on Oct 18, 2012, 22:16:

Looking back, Brutsch said his actions "were a huge mistake." He claimed he was addicted to Reddit and could not stop himself. The biggest thrill Brutsch said he got "was those meaningless Internet points," earned when "Redditors" voted for his posts.

Addicted? Couldn't stop himself? Ever the cry of those wanting to duck taking responsibility for themselves. It's not always easy to say no to your desires, but sometimes you have to in order to know you're truly free.

Yup. I love the empty apologies too. You're not sorry you did it, you're just sorry you got caught. Have fun finding a job, moron.

Ratty wrote on Oct 18, 2012, 12:22:
I'm playing Bioshock 1 again after quite a while being away from it and I must say I'm enjoying it a lot more than I remember the first time I played it. I find myself appreciating the things that make it the spiritual successor to SS it claims to be. There are so many radically different ways you can solve a problem and within any level it's generally non-linear. I think the first time I played it I was disappointed by the whole console vibe but I guess I'm used to that in modern games now so it doesn't even bother me. I'm tempted to say I like it almost as much as SS2.

nin wrote on Oct 18, 2012, 11:00:
I enjoyed Bio for what it was (judging it on it's own, unconnected to the SS series). 2 was ok...I'd classify it as more of an expansion, and in that regard it was ok.

nin wrote on Oct 18, 2012, 11:00:
Did you try that patch a few weeks ago for SS2? Works great under Win7!

nin wrote on Oct 18, 2012, 10:48:
I'm much more interested in if the game will be any good than a statue...

Beamer wrote on Oct 12, 2012, 10:07:
I'm with you. Netflix would be what, $108 per year?
Not much, sure, but I instead watch any movie I plan to watch On-Demand from my cable company.

Given that I was only turning Netflix on once every 3 months or so, and that it never had any movies I wanted to see, and I no longer have time to sit through entire seasons of TV shows, it was averaging out to about $54 per movie. Maybe $36 or $27, but I was probably watching something "just because," not because I wanted to see it.

On-Demand is $5.99 per movie and I only use it when I want to see the movie.