Dmitri_M wrote on May 6, 2012, 14:43:
somebody sell me on Warlock

Quinn wrote on May 5, 2012, 21:14:
You're not even remotely trying not to sound like the stereotype online-community asshole, are you?

My "retarded statements" were an hypothesis. I don't even want to use that term but you make me. I do not claim it "is this" or "will be that". You're obviously too dumb to wrap your head around it so I'm done arguing with you, Krovven.

Quinn wrote on May 4, 2012, 05:46:

Krovven wrote on May 3, 2012, 19:29:

Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 17:13:
There will be thousands of players who are not at all interested in multiplayer. It takes "only a few" (relatively speaking) to collapse the (RM)AH economy entirely.

So people that won't be touching MP or the Auction Houses will collapse the game economy? /facepalm

You didn't read my earlier posts so stop trying to be a condescending smartass, Krovven. I hate it with a goddamn passion that I have to waste my time repeating myself because of people like you.

Multiplayer is integrated in singleplayer in such a way that singleplayer gamers can use the AH without the normally tedious steps of first getting into a multiplayer section of the game. In this way they'll use the AH as just that: a singleplayer AH. This is the first game with such an integration which is why my hypothesis is what it is.

Dev wrote on May 3, 2012, 21:13:
FAQ says $250 max bid per item. Plus a blizzard credit limit of $250. So on uber items, it will be who can snipe a $250 amount first, gets the item.

Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 17:13:
There will be thousands of players who are not at all interested in multiplayer. It takes "only a few" (relatively speaking) to collapse the (RM)AH economy entirely.

Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 17:13:
This even happened on rare occassions in WoW AH's, where apathetic people dropped stuff you could sell for 30gold on the AH for 2gold.

Flatline wrote on May 2, 2012, 19:22:
Err... I can think of multiple ways to get around that, relatively cheaply if not free (many illegal methods, some legal). And while it might filter out the amateurs, I doubt it'll filter out the pros, otherwise they would have implemented it long ago and gold farmers wouldn't show up everywhere.

Mashiki Amiketo wrote on May 1, 2012, 23:46:

RollinThundr wrote on May 1, 2012, 21:15:

The way he defends Blizzard like they're the greatest thing since sliced bread, one could pose a good argument for it.

I'll keep that in mind for the next time you're going on about something great. After all, being a fan of something = automatic shill in your book...sooo...

MisterBenn wrote on May 1, 2012, 19:43:
I also wonder whether the larger studios will try to get in on the act in some way.

Cutter wrote on May 1, 2012, 21:25:
15 points for doing nothing? Fucking wow. Yet just one more reason to stop supporting Actiblizz.

Cram wrote on May 1, 2012, 17:35:
I just want to point out what I think a number of us do already know, the runewords change the effect of the skill and sometimes the look. Ray of Frost does have a few variants, vid here.

Alamar wrote on Apr 30, 2012, 17:34:
My point is that, to many, WoW is the epitome of 'generic quests', but still has a crazy amount of variety...

WarpCrow wrote on Apr 29, 2012, 16:04:

Krovven wrote on Apr 29, 2012, 15:47:
You aren't getting the point. You are wishing for the very thing that took these types of games away in the first place.

Okay. An ideal RPG, for me, is a deep, detailed world with plenty of opportunity for exploration, an interesting setting packed with lore, and a character I can grow and advance in whatever role I see fit, within reason and the rules laid down by the setting. Everything else is incidental to that. I'm not into this whole genre dogma thing. I backed Shadowrun Returns because I want to see more of Shadowrun outside of the PnP setting. You're acting like I have to subscribe to a certain set of beliefs in order to do that.

WarpCrow wrote on Apr 29, 2012, 15:06:
In my dreams, this game will be a huge commercial success and inspire a publisher like Bethesda to invest in a big budget open world RPG. Complete freedom of character development, combined with a party system, set in the Shadowrun universe with two or three diverse cities/regions to explore...

Fion wrote on Apr 25, 2012, 16:51:
I'm used to MMOGs charging $20 to transfer a single character to a server that I often only have the barest idea of how good or bad it is (based on friends recommendations, etc).

The idea of being able to visit other servers when ever I want to play with friends and then pay a small fee (or even free if I buy gems in game) to transfer ALL characters there, that's a hell of an improvement.