User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ] Older >
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 47. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
May 22, 2013, 14:04 |
1badmf |
|
|
SpectralMeat wrote on May 22, 2013, 14:00:
Verno wrote on May 22, 2013, 13:54:
SpectralMeat wrote on May 22, 2013, 13:26: I think you guys are making way too many conclusions on details that are just pieced together from bits and pieces of info. Bits and pieces of info from the maker of the console itself, this is not idle speculation easily dismissed like the pre-reveal rumors. I disagree entirely that people are making something out of nothing, it's quite the opposite and you are giving them too much leeway in consideration here. Now is the time to voice opposition and condemn this sort of idiocy unless you want to see it on display on the shelves without any changes made.
https://twitter.com/majornelson/status/337258743366574080 Yeah, this is called PR. When people are upset you quiet down and ride it out. The only way these things change is if enough people are pissed off about it. I bet you most people that wanted to buy the new console have no clue what DRM is or how that will affect them. I personally can't get upset about the new xbox or PS4 DRM, won't make any difference for my PC games the used game moneygrab would be a thing that would break through the dull glazed eyes of an average gamer. if that news broke out into the general media, that backlash might be enough for MS to backpedal. but regardless, i think it's time for me to jump ship off the SS Xbox. sad to say cuz i've generally liked the experience of using the two previous, but too much bullshit with these new nextgen bricks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Xbox One Announced |
 |
| 60. |
Re: Xbox One Announced |
May 21, 2013, 17:11 |
1badmf |
|
|
Agent.X7 wrote on May 21, 2013, 17:05:
SirKnight wrote on May 21, 2013, 15:29: That is one bland and ugly looking console.
siapnar wrote on May 21, 2013, 15:00: The new COD (not that I want to play COD) looks practically the same graphics-wise as MW3 and this was supposed to "blow us away".
You seem to be reaching pretty hard there. I'm no CoD fan boy, but you must be blind as hell to not see the huge differences in graphics. Unfortunately for COD, Crysis had better looking faces in 2007 on PC. Oh boy, consoles finally caught up to PC tech from 6 years ago! my thoughts exactly. when i saw the latest screens of watch dogs and everybody was screaming fake! cuzza the textures, i thought you've gotta be joking, it doesn't look any better than crysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 31. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 21, 2013, 12:32 |
1badmf |
|
|
SpectralMeat wrote on May 21, 2013, 12:19:
Creston wrote on May 21, 2013, 11:35: I've been in that closet about a dozen times or so over the years; it's always better to be safe than sorry. So I guess "coming out of the closet" has a slightly different meaning in your case aww man beat me to it =P
as a previous poster said, if we were to try to avoid living in areas prone to natural disasters, we'd all live... i dunno, in montana or something. the east coast has annual hurricanes which do WAY more damage than tornados, the west coast has earthquakes, which also do WAY more damage than tornadoes, and the midwest has tornados, which while very destructive, are very small localized events. i lived in kansas for 5 years and i never saw a one. california now, and i don't get out of bed for anything less than a 5.5. the point is, you can't avoid mother nature. you live on her planet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 12. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 20, 2013, 14:51 |
1badmf |
|
|
| i'll bet trek has better retention in the long run; good films tend to do that. it may not quite catch IM3 in total gross, but i bet it'll be a lot closer than the percent difference in opening weekend sales. i think a part of IM3's success was that it was the first big summer release of the year and people had that blockbuster money burning a hole in their pockets all winter. i know i did. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 20, 2013, 14:24 |
1badmf |
|
|
| wow, i feel bad for having contributed to ironman3's opening now. trek was a way better film. ironman3 was just a completely forgettable film. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 12. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 18, 2013, 20:02 |
1badmf |
|
|
nin wrote on May 18, 2013, 19:18:
Cutter wrote on May 18, 2013, 18:43:
nin wrote on May 18, 2013, 15:59: Just got back from Trek - really enjoyed it. If you liked the last one, I can't see you not liking this one. And conversely those of us hated it will hate this one too?
I would say so as well. They're continuing an alternate timeline, with some similarities and some differences.
you didn't know that harrison was khan? i've known it for months and i wasn't even following development of the movie particularly closely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 18, 2013, 19:09 |
1badmf |
|
|
Cutter wrote on May 18, 2013, 18:43:
nin wrote on May 18, 2013, 15:59: Just got back from Trek - really enjoyed it. If you liked the last one, I can't see you not liking this one. And conversely those of us hated it will hate this one too? i would say so, though i don't know how you can hate it. into darkness is a logical progression of the first with the same flaws and strengths. generally forgettable plot; pays homage to wrath of khan while managing to avoid being derivative; really strong characters and dialogue. as i posted on fb after seeing, the enterprise should be renamed USS Bro, the love is so strong on that ship haha. not gonna lie, i got a little choked up at one of the bro scenes between spock and kirk.
i saw it in liemax 3d and it was a magnificent cinematic experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 39. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 17, 2013, 21:30 |
1badmf |
|
|
Frags4Fun wrote on May 17, 2013, 20:50: I'm glad that you're ok Blue. We don't know each other in real life but you have a large impact on my life and I'm sure the same is true for the rest of the people who visit daily. Your website is like no other and you've enriched our lives by giving us a home here at Bluesnews. Thanks man and while I'm at it, thanks to all the people who help make Bluesnews possible. And no, I haven't been drinking. well, voodooextreme was pretty similar, except the comments were flamier, which i kinda enjoyed. too bad ign decided to pull the plug on them =(
it's a little too... civilized around here for me sometimes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 20. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 17, 2013, 12:22 |
1badmf |
|
|
I take our daughter to McDonalds once in awhile because she loves it but generally speaking I do not eat at fast food places, no. If I'm going to have the calories and salt, I might as well do it at a real restaurant to get quality food and often the meal doesn't take much longer anyway. Fast food is also getting fairly pricey these days for what amounts to deep fried processed crap and junk ingredients.
Nothing food snob about it BTW, it's just sensible eating for your enjoyment and long term well being If fast food was a good value for body/money and tasted good I'd do it all the time.
I also love cooking and appreciate the work that goes into a real meal
i can cook, but i still enjoy fast food. strictly on taste i think a lot of it is really good. best burger is still in-n-out double double, but McD's 1/4 pounder/w cheese is up there for me. and i still haven't come across anyone's fries (healthy or no) that's as good as McD's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 18. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 17, 2013, 12:15 |
1badmf |
|
|
nin wrote on May 17, 2013, 11:41:
1badmf wrote on May 17, 2013, 11:27: food snobs! or maybe i'm just a human trash disposal. i eat it all (and i have a particular fondness for jack in the box). and no i'm not fat either =P not even mildly obese. i'm not the svelt 25 y/o athlete anymore, but i still look good in tight clothes. I admit I sometimes eat stuff I probably shouldn't, but I also have 200-300 calories b-fasts and 250-400 calorie dinners most days, so I'd like to think it evens out.
srsly, 400 calories? that's not even like 1 fry. that's like, the grease you could wring out of said fry. how do you survive on that? i'm pretty sure the FDA recommends 2000-2200 cals/day as healthy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 13. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 17, 2013, 11:27 |
1badmf |
|
|
| food snobs! or maybe i'm just a human trash disposal. i eat it all (and i have a particular fondness for jack in the box). and no i'm not fat either =P not even mildly obese. i'm not the svelt 25 y/o athlete anymore, but i still look good in tight clothes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 16, 2013, 15:13 |
1badmf |
|
|
jdreyer wrote on May 16, 2013, 12:16:
A survey of thousands of peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals has found 97.1% agreed that climate change is caused by human activity. I'm sure that we'll get lots of people who will deny AGW regardless of this research. To paraphrase Upton Sinclair, it is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his lifestyle depends on his not understanding it. i remember reading an article a few years ago about the source of most global warming denial research. turns out most of it had origins in think tanks set up by tobacco companies to deny the link between smoking and lung cancer. when those sources were removed, there was an almost universal scientific consensus on the human origins of global warming. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 5. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 16, 2013, 10:50 |
1badmf |
|
|
| sorry but it's gonna be a King's Cup again. the east plays no defense and the blackcocks are a small fast bunch - just the type the kings like to smash and feast on. oh and jonathan quick is doing his usual May impression of a brick wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > More Watch_Dogs Footage |
 |
| 15. |
Re: More Watch_Dogs Footage |
May 13, 2013, 15:53 |
1badmf |
|
|
| soooo... have AI slider maybe? or have it scale with difficulty level? i always thought that was the proper way to increase difficulty anyway; not the nonsense with the increase enemy health/autoaim/gimp you/whathaveyou. i'd rather face a few quality baddies than a roomful of hackerbots. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 5. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
May 13, 2013, 11:24 |
1badmf |
|
|
| wait i thought generic shield agent guy died in avengers no?!? how can he be on tv all of a sudden? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > On The XCOM Shooter's Evolution |
 |
| 9. |
Re: On The XCOM Shooter's Evolution |
May 12, 2013, 01:26 |
1badmf |
|
|
| what that started out as... how in the hell did they think that was in the least bit xcom??? it looks like they basically scrapped it and started over, which i don't mind, but you can totally tell they saw the success of the Enemy Unknown and tried to shoehorn a bunch of stuff from that game into this one. carter's alien gun, pretty sure i saw a couple mutons, and the sectoids are almost exact copies. i actually liked what i saw, but i get the strong feeling this will play as a derivative xcom meets mass effect type combo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Into the Black |
 |
| 6. |
Re: Into the Black |
May 10, 2013, 20:25 |
1badmf |
|
|
Bill Borre wrote on May 10, 2013, 18:43: Forget about the two astronauts. Do you know how much tenure that represents going up in smoke? meh, depends on who's fault they think it is. gus grissom sank his mercury capsule, but he was still scheduled to be the commander on apollo 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
222 Comments. 12 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ] Older > |
|