Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for m00t

Real Name m00t   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname None given.
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description m00t
Homepage http://
Signed On Mar 4, 2003, 23:52
Total Comments 398 (Amateur)
User ID 16358
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] Older >


News Comments > Quote of the Day
27. Re: Quote of the Day Mar 2, 2011, 23:50 m00t
 
It seems like a lot of people are missing the point he's trying to make. Yes, it is ridiculous to compare piracy to a bad review. That IS the point he's trying to make. Companies make such a massive deal about how 1 pirated copy is directly equal to lost money (actually, each pirated copy is worth about 150 times more than a copy costs judging by the numbers thrown out). Yet bad reviews also cost publishers sales, so if The Lost Sale is the big deal to them, why aren't they going after bad reviews with similar zeal? Because the concept of a Lost Sale is ridiculous. At least in the context of how DRM peddlers use it.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Gaikai Live
39. Re: Gaikai Live Feb 28, 2011, 16:39 m00t
 
Verno wrote on Feb 28, 2011, 15:36:
People often believe that they should get the savings passed onto them because often times thats how the industry persuades them to adopt these services. I've heard everyone from Valve to EA claim that digital sales would lower prices and that hasn't happened.

At least as far as Valve is concerned, I'd say you're wrong. I've never seen a brick and mortar store do the kinds of sales that Steam has. Lots of stuff (even new games and pre-orders) goes on sale pretty frequently and for significant discounts. If that's not a lower price, what is? Of my 152 games, probably 90% were at or below 75% of retail price.

As for EA, well, it's EA, what do you expect?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Magicka #1 on Steam, Bug Hunt Continues
14. Re: Magicka #1 on Steam, Bug Hunt Continues Jan 26, 2011, 13:26 m00t
 
I changed the port I was hosting on and then I had to use the 'invite to game' feature on my Steam friend list for people to get in (even on LAN). Lots of work to be done for this one, but the gameplay is pretty fun and for $10 it's a decent deal. I do hope they release and endless type mode similar to Torchlight. And a PvP mode with a large map (so it's not just a spawn-camp fest).  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Magicka #1 on Steam, Bug Hunt Continues
9. Re: Magicka #1 on Steam, Bug Hunt Continues Jan 26, 2011, 12:12 m00t
 
I had a few issues getting a multiplayer game started and the perf wasn't great. But once I opened a port (yeah, I know.) in the router I was able to play through 6 chapters with my wife and a friend. It's a lot of fun once you get in, so I assume once they sort out the general issues it'll be really popular.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Minecraft Sales Milestone, Interview
2. Re: Minecraft Sales Milestone, Interview Dec 5, 2010, 15:11 m00t
 
Classic mode is a bit different from Survival (the paid version). In survival the blocks don't disappear instantly and there is a day/night cycle. You start with an empty inventory and have to work your way up to better tools. It's a bit more engaging than the Classic mode.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > StarCraft II Bans
9. Re: StarCraft II Bans Nov 30, 2010, 23:34 m00t
 
Icewind wrote on Nov 30, 2010, 22:41:
gilly775 wrote on Nov 30, 2010, 21:19:
StingingVelvet wrote on Nov 30, 2010, 21:12:
Yay for banning idiots from multiplayer.

Boo for that meaning they lose all access to the game after 30 days.

I don't think it's just MP. They were banning people for cheating in SP too.

That's just pathetic. You can't even run a few cheats in singleplayer? I had heard about that last time they banned people but couldn't believe it.

It's like ID banning you for using "idkfa".

Blizzard sure has changed since Activision dug their claws into them.


No, they're banning people who used hacks in single-player to circumvent the fact that using cheats would not grant them achievements. Honestly, I think they should just be stripped of their achievements and not be allowed to play online or exist on battle.net at all. If they want to hack in single player, I don't care, but Blizzard is entirely within their rights to prevent the outcome of those hacks from appearing on their service.

If you use the built-in cheats it prevents you from gaining achievements during the game you used them but you won't be banned.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sid Meier's Civilization V Patched
8. Re: Sid Meier's Civilization V Patched Oct 22, 2010, 23:03 m00t
 
Sigh, still crashes just the exact same way.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sid Meier's Civilization V Patched
3. Re: Sid Meier's Civilization V Patched Oct 22, 2010, 13:49 m00t
 
Nooooo I'm so close to the end. It crashes at the start of the same turn every time. Hopefully it'll last until I finish. We'll see though.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sid Meier's Civilization V Patched
1. Re: Sid Meier's Civilization V Patched Oct 22, 2010, 13:24 m00t
 
FINALLY I CAN FINISH MY GAME (I hope!)  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Plants vs Zombies Steam Patch
3. Re: Plants vs Zombies Steam Patch Sep 12, 2010, 00:33 m00t
 
I have the steam version and I have a Zombie Creator in my game. Zombatar, to be specific. I don't think the zombie shows up in game, it just saves a picture of it that you can use as an avatar on message boards.


Also, I had no problem using the steam cloud storage. My save came through just fine.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Blizzard's PC Stance
36. Re: Blizzard's PC Stance Aug 11, 2010, 14:32 m00t
 
I agree with what you're saying, m00t. But it's not what I meant exactly.

GPUs should indeed still have different features and all, and be different from eachother as a whole, but wouldn't it be a good thing if they all had this same... well, let's say basic technology. PC game developers can then build their games on that basis. In this way, I think (but my logic may be flawed since I'm no expert) games shouldn't have to crash anymore on one GPU and work fine on another. Same with CPUs.

Well, you would think. But even within a single company this isn't the case. nVidia, AMD, Intel, and other chip mfgs revise their core technologies from time to time. Even Intel chips only implement the x86 interface in microcode and run a somewhat more RISC like architecture at it's core. OpenGL and DirectX are an attempt to insulate developers from the differences in hardware implementation, but even then some hardware bugs creep through. Drivers are filled with per-game / per-card combinations of fixes for one problem or another.

Also I think the technology is still evolving too fast to settle down. Backwards compatibility, while useful, is also a huge bottle-neck in terms of growing the capabilities of a design. Look at Windows. Many of the backwards compatibility features are really just preserving the behavior of bugs that people started to rely on. This adds complexity and leaves potential vulnerabilities.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Blizzard's PC Stance
4. Re: Blizzard's PC Stance Aug 10, 2010, 21:07 m00t
 
No. It would harm computing significantly and would likely incur anti-trust lawsuits from the government. The competition (what there is of it) is good and, theoretically, helps keep the prices lower.

Also, a lot of the compatibility issues often stem from board makers like Asus (not saying Asus is a culprit, just an example of a separate board maker) and not necessarily from the graphics chip itself.

That said, it's not like consoles are immune to hardware issues. The original XBox had problems with it's DVD drive, and the 360, well, let's just say we invented a new phrase to encompass the scope of fail.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Natural Selection 2 Alpha Tonight
14. Re: Natural Selection 2 Alpha Tonight Jul 27, 2010, 13:18 m00t
 
Sepharo wrote on Jul 27, 2010, 01:40:
I fail to see any wisdom in releasing an alpha quality client to paying customers. 1% will recognize what an alpha is, and the rest will just be upset that the game isn't running good at all.

Anyone that would be aware of NS2, pre-orders the special edition, and is interested in playing an alpha, knows what an alpha is.

Stardock releases its game like this too. Let's the fans be a part of polishing and balancing the game to something great. They plan on doing nearly weekly updates from here on out.


Sadly I've already seen a handful of people complaining "how dare they release the game in this state. We're paying customers!!!!!11" and demanding refunds. It's almost like they think that devs finish the game months/years ahead of time for some reason.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Time of Defiance Ending
1. Re: Time of Deviance Ending Jul 21, 2010, 13:12 m00t
 
Blue, it's "Time of Defiance" according to their web page.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Blizzard Relents on Real ID
8. Re: Blizzard Relents on Real ID Jul 9, 2010, 20:55 m00t
 
My bet is that Activision (Er, not the Blizzard unit) saw things this way:
1) Real names are needed to "Social Media" integration
2) They were spending a fair amount of time(=$$) on forum moderation.

And the best plan they could come up with is to force people to use real names on the forums in the hopes that no one would troll under their real name (hint: they will, but regular users likely won't post at all because anyone could attack them outside the forums with near impunity).

Most Blizzard unit folks immediately said "no, this is a bad idea". If you read their responses, they're not exactly glowing with praise for the new system. But since they're part of Activision they had to do it because they didn't have enough leverage they were willing to put on the table to block it out right, so they announced the plan on the forums hoping there would be enough user backlash to show Activision what a terrible idea it was without having to burn bridges internally.

Or I can hope anyway. If Blizzard unit folks were genuinely in favor of this then it's only a matter of time before it comes to pass in spite of the current rage against it. For me, the original spirit and integrity of Blizzard will be finally dead at that point.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Dawn of War II Patch Plans
2. Re: Dawn of War II Patch Plans Jun 9, 2010, 20:49 m00t
 
I'm fond of Base building in general (or SimCity as some call it), but the fact that it's not a factor in DOW2 makes it easy to play with my wife as we can just focus our attention on our units and not have to jump around the map a lot.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Blizzard on DRM
4. Re: Blizzard on DRM May 26, 2010, 22:20 m00t
 
It's almost never been a question of whether we WANT to be connected, but one of what happens when we simply CAN'T be but still want to LAN or even play single player.

That said, I'd at least like the option of not showing up online when I play.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Warner Sued for Antipiracy Piracy
10. Re: Warner Sued for Antipiracy Piracy May 26, 2010, 16:48 m00t
 
Seriously? Someone has a patent on that? It's so obvious it hurts, nevermind the fact that schemes like this have been used for CENTURIES.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Battle.net Real ID Details
10. Re: Battle.net Real ID Details May 7, 2010, 13:30 m00t
 
Do all of your friends have authenticators? Do you trust everyone that they give their password to?  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Battle.net Real ID Details
4. Re: Battle.net Real ID Details May 6, 2010, 16:35 m00t
 
I think it's funny because it basically does away with any sort of privacy on battle.net

Sometimes you just want to play in peace and not be bothered by people.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
398 Comments. 20 pages. Viewing page 4.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] Older >


footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo