Rattlehead wrote on Jun 7, 2012, 01:10:

Honestly, did anyone expect anything better from a Japanese developer?

Capcom has been making some of the best PC ports for years from their console games. Devil May Cry 4 is really really good on PC.

Tom46 wrote on Jun 6, 2012, 23:55:
This almost sounds like a veiled request for help. Why don't they farm this port out to someone who knows (and likes) what they're doing? It's obvious that the game will make money if properly done and WITHOUT GFWL.

PHJF wrote on Jun 6, 2012, 22:38:

A rushed, console port with no PC advantages...who would want that?

Well in this case it's the only chance somebody without a PS3 is going to have to play the game. Have you never used an emulator to play a game for a system you don't own? I've experienced plenty of games that way.

MattyC wrote on Jun 6, 2012, 21:55:
A VR setup could be interesting, but it would have to be very interesting for me to prefer it to a monitor. The rest of the VR just wouldn't be there.

coldcut wrote on Jun 6, 2012, 08:29:
It's called Dredmore, not Dremore, Blue

InBlack wrote on Jun 4, 2012, 04:38:
Ultima 8 is fucking awesome. Its definitely a weird game, more like an adventure than an RPG. In fact as an RPG its abysmal, But when you get used to it the atmosphere and story is fantastic.

Its also hard & frustrating as fuck. I have no idea why I liked that game so much as a kid. Something about the weird atmosphere. Idduno.

Verno wrote on Jun 5, 2012, 12:26:

Orogogus wrote on Jun 5, 2012, 12:10:
Clicking on the equivalent 360 link shows that the 360 exclusive list is larger, 239 to 196. Some of those are junk, but a quick glance suggests that the same is true on both platforms.

Quantity != quality. If Sony crapped out 1000 exclusives it wouldn't mean anything if they were of poor quality. Sony's output has been more consistent, especially in the past few years where Microsoft has seemingly given up and just buys DLC exclusivity rights instead.

Verno wrote on Jun 5, 2012, 09:52:
Uncharted, Heavy Rain, Ratchet and Clank, Metal Gear, God of War, etc etc. Unlike Microsoft, Sony didn't forget it was a gaming company this generation. One can make the argument that its tertiary features are nowhere as good as the 360 but their exclusive library was far stronger and much more diverse.

Jerykk wrote on Jun 4, 2012, 12:37:
Neither of those websites list their sources either.

mag wrote on Jun 4, 2012, 00:07:
He spends a lot more time complaining about all of the things that are wrong with the game than he does good things. "The loot sucks, the game is boring, it's far too easy, the story is awful, the online-only thing has done nothing good for me, I don't like the leveling system, but... but... it's pretty. And I like clicking on things. And I'm sure it'll get better!"

That's a verbatim quote. You should read before you post.

Tusker wrote on Jun 1, 2012, 22:20:

Stormsinger wrote on Jun 1, 2012, 20:56:
Yeah, I'm going to take my security advice from a guy who thinks someone is replacing his coffee and toothpaste to make him insane. Totally invalidates the rest of his article, as I don't accept guidance from psychotics.

Exactly what I thought - the poster is suffering from paranoid delusions; home security is the least of his worries. I love the fact that conspiracy theorists think they are so important that the government will spend so much time and money to keep them quiet or "intimidate" them.

Eirikrautha wrote on Jun 1, 2012, 19:51:
The "other" properties (i.e. the classic games like Monkey Island, Grim Fandango, et al.) were definitely the product of the creative minds at early LucasArts, and not Lucas himself. Ever since then, LucasArts has been almost solely focused on Star Wars properties... in other words, Lucas' stuff (I wonder if the studio got "purged" the same way Lucas canned the employee who told him that Jar Jar Binks was going to be a flop). And since the focus on Star Wars, the only good games have been (generally) related to or in the same style as the original trilogy (X-Wing, Lego, KOTOR, etc.). I stand by my point...

UnderDown wrote on Jun 1, 2012, 11:25:
I would bet that the majority of Diablo 3 players really only want to play single player & LAN/friend style co-op

Darks wrote on Jun 1, 2012, 11:20:
The problem with this game is that it’s going to be on the Xbox, so it will be pg13. They won’t be allowed to make it as dark as we would like for it to be. So it will ultimately end up being an epic fail.