User comment history
< Newer [ 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 ] Older >
| News Comments > Hotline Miami Sale; Soundtrack Released |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Hotline Miami Sale; Soundtrack Released |
Jan 25, 2013, 09:14 |
Beamer |
|
|
I had a blast with the gameplay, for a short period of time. 4-6 hours, then I'd done enough.
But those hours were definitely a blast.
And, by the end of those hours, I hated the soundtrack. Hated with every fiber of my being. I'm a guy that often listens to similar music (see: Zombi), but man, did this music get grating after a few hours of headphones. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 36. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 24, 2013, 11:03 |
Beamer |
|
|
Blue wrote on Jan 24, 2013, 10:44:
Ant wrote on Jan 24, 2013, 10:20: http://www.develop-online.net/news/43051/Next-Xbox-to-simply-be-named-Xbox is gone! Guess that's proof that they didn't fall for this. Interestingly, that says the X-Surface (fake) could run UE3 at 60fps. The article above (gone) said it was the Xbox (fake) that could do it.
So they got that wrong.
And somehow people still think "can run this engine at these frames" means anything. A 160hp engine can go 140 miles per hour, but not if you put it in a dump truck, so telling someone that an engine can do something is pointless unless you know what that engine is running... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs |
 |
| 42. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Jan 24, 2013, 08:16 |
Beamer |
|
|
yuastnav wrote on Jan 24, 2013, 06:51:
Beamer wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 12:53:
Burrito of Peace wrote on Jan 22, 2013, 21:38:
Whether it's the Internet or 1973, it's ridiculously stupid to have compromising photos taken of yourself for anything other than professional uses. Dating you must be a blast. Why? It sounds to be an incredibly moronic thing to take such type of pictures of yourself and then just send them to whoever. I agree, and said so earlier in the thread. But the argument you are making isn't what he made. He didn't say "send it to whoever," he's saying "anyone." So he's saying it's "ridiculously stupid" for a wife to let her husband take topless photos of her.
I'm saying he's boring. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 33. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 24, 2013, 08:15 |
Beamer |
|
|
LittleMe wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 17:47:
Creston wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 11:28: Next Xbox simply to be named Xbox.
Yeah, that's not going to go well.
Ebay: "For sale! Xbox, hardly used, 10 games, 2 controllers included! $149!"
Oh, you expected it to be the NEW Xbox? Sorry, it was the old one. Exactly this is a terrible name for the new console. Making one word mean two different things just confuses and angers people and will certainly lead to upset consumers buying the wrong games and accessories. Many, dare I say most, console consumers are not technologically savvy.
"Excuse me, where are your Xbox games?" asks customer
"Right over there" says the clerk
"No, I mean Xbox not xbox360" says frustrated customer
"Oh, these are xbox games" says frustrated clerk that usually sends people to the 360 shelf but knows some want new xbox games.
or...
"Is this xbox compatible?" asks customer
"Yes, it is." says clerk.
Customer gets home, opens package, and product doesn't work because it's for the wrong 'xbox' and goes back to store. Store refuses item return for opened package and insists the product was accurately sold as xbox compatible.
Fail Microsoft marketing.
But that's, what, an issue for 18 months before the 360 games are no longer carried anywhere? And it wasn't an issue when we went from Xbox to 360. "Excuse me, where are the Xbox games?" "Right over there." "No, I mean Xbox 360 not Xbox." Or with the PS3. "Excuse me, where are the Playstation games?"
Plus, who ever had to ask such a question? They're always all in the same small area.
This is probably the worst criticism of this here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Ubisoft Confirms THQ Montreal Acquisition |
 |
| 5. |
Re: Ubisoft Confirms THQ Montreal Acquisition |
Jan 24, 2013, 08:13 |
Beamer |
|
|
Armengar wrote on Jan 24, 2013, 02:21: Because ubi only want the ip. Montreal was a brand new studio with no IP attached to it. SP was auctioned off separately.
So no, they got no IP in that purchase and it's not why they bought it. They bought it because it's right next to them and a fully stocked, fully staffed 500 person studio. Will it stay 500 people? Who knows? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > THQ Sale Results? |
 |
| 47. |
Re: THQ Sale Results? |
Jan 24, 2013, 08:10 |
Beamer |
|
|
1AngryGamer wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 17:56: Gross...who on Earth would want to buy Homefront As just mentioned, the company that long ago announced that they'd purchased the Time Killers team to make Homefront 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > THQ Sale Results? |
 |
| 10. |
Re: THQ Sale Results? |
Jan 23, 2013, 16:30 |
Beamer |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 16:27:
The Half Elf wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 16:19: 22 mill for Volitionm, does that include their IP's?
Anyone wondering Kock Media is Deep Silver. REALLY wish Take 2 would have bought Volition, would have loved a Saints Row game with Rockstar Tech. Yeah I thought it would have been natch for them to want to get their hands on Saints Row. Dunno how well it bodes with Koch getting it. I suppose only time will tell.
Take 2 would have killed SR if they bought it. Why buy your biggest competitor and keep producing it? But SR barely eats into GTAs sales, so why bother at all?
And, personally, I dislike the GTA tech. The graphics are great but the controls feel off to me. Running feels weird, driving feels terrible, and combat is crap relative to SR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > THQ Sale Results? |
 |
| 9. |
Re: THQ Sale Results? |
Jan 23, 2013, 16:28 |
Beamer |
|
|
Redmask wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 16:21: If the worst result of this sale is that I have to click launch twice in Steam and uPlay to get into the South Park RPG then I can live with that. The Koch Media purchase is an odd one, I think they're the parent company behind the Dead Island guys. The companies and IP are often two separate things, it would be good to know which companies are being purchased with their respective IP intact or not. I'd assume the IPs went with the companies, but it's tough to tell, given that some are spelled out as IP and some as company. If anyone bought Volition but not SR I'd be quite surprised. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > THQ Sale Results? |
 |
| 3. |
Re: THQ Sale Results? |
Jan 23, 2013, 16:20 |
Beamer |
|
|
See ya, Volition. It's been fun.
Also, I enjoy "Ubisoft agreed to purchase Montreal and South Park." Out of context... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 24. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 23, 2013, 13:23 |
Beamer |
|
|
PropheT wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 13:11:
Beamer wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 09:51: "Loathe" is pretty much right, too.
Thinking back of Microsoft products people don't loathe: 1) Windows, for about 5-10 years 2) DOS. No one loathed it, but no one really liked it 3) Paint! 4) Hotmail, until Gmail 5) Office, but arguably Excel is the only product that, uh, excels (sorry, had to) 6) Windows Phone. Like DOS, no one loathes it, but it isn't exactly widely appreciated. Still, if you're looking for a list of Microsoft brands that aren't loathed, you take what you can get rather than look for successes To be fair, 1,2, and 5 are are only on the list because there aren't or weren't any real competitors to take their place for the average person and 4 didn't even start as a Microsoft product, they bought out the company. You could also argue that 3 is only there because it's pretty much ignored, the only time anyone uses it is if they don't have anything better on that system.
I'm not saying it's an impressive list, just things that don't, or at least didn't, make the common person puke.
That's a very low bar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs |
 |
| 38. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Jan 23, 2013, 12:53 |
Beamer |
|
|
Burrito of Peace wrote on Jan 22, 2013, 21:38:
Whether it's the Internet or 1973, it's ridiculously stupid to have compromising photos taken of yourself for anything other than professional uses. Dating you must be a blast. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 22. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 23, 2013, 12:52 |
Beamer |
|
|
Creston wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 11:33: Also : The source claimed that they had “witnessed Unreal Engine 3 demos running at a solid 60fps” on the device 60 fps for an Unreal 3 game? PFWOAR!!!
Consoles have entered the year 2008! News at 11!
Creston Considering they've been doing this forever, my guess is that they mean UE4. But who knows, it isn't even like that means anything. I can make a game with UDK that no current Intel/Nvidia setup can run at more than 10 fps. Or I can make one they can run at hundreds. It tells you nothing of the hardware. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 16. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 23, 2013, 11:05 |
Beamer |
|
|
Verno wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 11:04:
sauron wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 10:52:
I was looking at a Surface tablet the other day and found myself thinking it was pretty good. I actually had to pause to think that this might be a Microsoft product I didn't hate. It was really surprising. The feeling goes away after continued use of bumping into the artificial ARM platform limitations. I ended up returning mine. What do you mean "artificial?"
I didn't budge on the RT for the same reason my only tablet is a $99 TouchPad - they're just not good for most of what I use any device for. Definitely ARM limitations. Just not sure what you mean by artificial. Seems inherent to ARM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 10. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 23, 2013, 10:31 |
Beamer |
|
|
Kajetan wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 10:26:
nin wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 09:30:
Report: Next Xbox to simply be named 'Xbox'. I see MS Marketing hasn't lost it's touch... Its consistent incompetence at work. MS branding policy is one of the worst i've ever seen. They throw away well established brand names for some shit they throw away a few years later, only to be replaced by some other mumbojumbo no one cares about. And now they just name the third console like the first, because ... well, because they can.
I suspected the next name would be XBOX 8, but MS proved me wrong The issue with Xbox 8 is that they hope to have it last through Windows/WP 8,9, probably 10 and maybe 11.
But otherwise yeah, it'd make perfect sense for what they're doing with their entire branding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Amazon Adds Microtransactions |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Amazon Adds Microtransactions |
Jan 23, 2013, 10:23 |
Beamer |
|
|
Optional Nickname! wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 10:00: Even better, many States and Municipalities in the USA are trying to get Amazon to begin paying local taxes, on the flimsiest of foundations.
One of the arguments against and by no means the least compelling, is the difficulty of accounting all of those different States and municipalities rules on what taxes and how much to pay.
Now imagine paying Tax on your +5 Sword of Imagination. Have fun explaining that deduction! Even better, Amazon actually fights for state taxes!
In the past state taxes would be a burden for Amazon, and take away a big reason why you shop there over, say, Circuit City. But now most of those local alternatives are dead and can't really match Amazon's pre-tax price, anyway, so Amazon's biggest competitors are other online retailers. But while Amazon is huge and can absorb the cost of figuring out how to collect state taxes other retailers can't. It would cost them about as much to begin to do so, and since they're a fraction the size of Amazon that cost would be proportionately fatal.
So, if online retailers have to start collecting taxes, Amazon, who has already dealt a fatal blow to local retailers, would be able to kill any online usurpers before they gain traction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 6. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Jan 23, 2013, 10:17 |
Beamer |
|
|
HorrorScope wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 10:06:
Beamer wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 09:35: It makes some sense, though. I'm convinced Microsoft is trying to take Xbox everywhere. So rather than something being an "xbox 360" game, and playable on an xbox 360, it will just be an "Xbox game," and playable on anything Xbox compatible.
If they really wanted to do it well they'd do tiers, as others have mentioned here somewhere. Games are released for certain tiers, so for now something that runs RT or WP8 is Tier 1. The Xbox is Tier 2. A powerful PC today is Tier 3. A powerful PC tomorrow is Tier 4. When you look at a game you look at the tier. If it's equal to or lower than the tier of your device it can play that game. So will Xbox games play on Xbox 360's? When I say Xbox, I mean the next gen, this is going to be fun I see. In your words Xbox games play on anything Xbox compatible, so I would assume the 360 is compatible, amiright? And the whole Xbox and Pc Xbox, I'll believe it when I see it working between both, as is. No, 360 will be tier 0. Tier N/A. I think it will be left out.
You do have some XBLA games playable on Windows 8 right now, though. By and large they're crap, I think, but it's a sign of what's coming. How far Microsoft pushes is debatable, but if they're smart (arguable) they see the writing on the wall - dedicated consoles have one more generation left, and it may be a short one. May as well move the whole Xbox brand multiplatform while it still thrives. By detaching it from a specific box and making it just a brand name for games then Microsoft can reattach it to anything.
I've been saying for a long while that Windows 8 was designed specifically to let us start using a Game/App on our phone, move to our tablet, switch to the Xbox and finish on our desktop. That's still the plan. Just a question of whether this means real games or if it means Minesweeper. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 23, 2013, 09:51 |
Beamer |
|
|
Verno wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 09:47:
nin wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 09:30:
Report: Next Xbox to simply be named 'Xbox'. I see MS Marketing hasn't lost it's touch...
It's literally the only successful consumer brand they've launched in 15 years, can you really blame them? People can list dozens of failed Microsoft products and branding efforts, the Xbox is the only consumer related entry that people don't loathe. "Loathe" is pretty much right, too.
Thinking back of Microsoft products people don't loathe: 1) Windows, for about 5-10 years 2) DOS. No one loathed it, but no one really liked it 3) Paint! 4) Hotmail, until Gmail 5) Office, but arguably Excel is the only product that, uh, excels (sorry, had to) 6) Windows Phone. Like DOS, no one loathes it, but it isn't exactly widely appreciated. Still, if you're looking for a list of Microsoft brands that aren't loathed, you take what you can get rather than look for successes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > SimCity EULA to be Fixed |
 |
| 3. |
Re: SimCity EULA to be Fixed |
Jan 23, 2013, 09:41 |
Beamer |
|
|
No. People on this board get worked up incredibly over EULAs. Sometimes with reason. Sometimes not. When they mention restricting access usually not. Here is how EULAs usually go: Attorney, probably outside counsel, writes it. Attorney, inside counsel, stamps it. Developer gets a copy, says "yeah, whatever," ignores it. It goes out.
Outside counsel is trying to make sure it can't get sued for something that happens, so it includes everything. It wants to make sure that no one that gets banned for exploiting a bug (something that's valid to ban for in a competitive multiplayer game), so they write it in a way that makes it very difficult for someone to argue.
There's never any intent to abuse this, but it's someone covering their ass. And it's fine that people push back to make sure it can never be abused, but the odds of this being EA trying to be abusive is pretty much nil. It's just attorneys being attorneys, and the reason they act that way is to prevent from being sued themselves.
It's like the whole Instagram EULA thing. Again, Nilay Patel on The Verge, probably the only person I trust in analyzing EULAs, says that the one the internet set fire to Instagram for was actually a better EULA than the original. It had MORE rights for users and fewer for Instagram. It also spelled things out in plain English. But the original EULA was more obtuse, and it was there in the first place rather than a change that people looked to compare, so it wasn't something anyone complained about. People complained about the new, easier to read, more user friendly one, so Instagram went back to the old one. The one that gives them more control over your pictures and allows them to pass that extra control on to advertisers.
Again, it was probably just overzealous attorneys, not Instagram being evil. And again, it's ok to make people fight their attorneys rather than rubber stamp. I just want to point out it's probably no one being evil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Morning Consolidation |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Morning Consolidation |
Jan 23, 2013, 09:35 |
Beamer |
|
|
nin wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 09:30:
Report: Next Xbox to simply be named 'Xbox'. I see MS Marketing hasn't lost it's touch...
It makes some sense, though. I'm convinced Microsoft is trying to take Xbox everywhere. So rather than something being an "xbox 360" game, and playable on an xbox 360, it will just be an "Xbox game," and playable on anything Xbox compatible.
If they really wanted to do it well they'd do tiers, as others have mentioned here somewhere. Games are released for certain tiers, so for now something that runs RT or WP8 is Tier 1. The Xbox is Tier 2. A powerful PC today is Tier 3. A powerful PC tomorrow is Tier 4. When you look at a game you look at the tier. If it's equal to or lower than the tier of your device it can play that game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
10554 Comments. 528 pages. Viewing page 50.
< Newer [ 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 ] Older > |
|