Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Redding, CA 06/22
Tampa, FL 06/26
Tampa, FL 10/04

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Mike Fisk

Real Name Mike Fisk   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname killer_roach
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage None given.
Signed On Oct 31, 2002, 20:40
Total Comments 1104 (Pro)
User ID 15013
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ] Older >


News Comments > The Difficult 2nd Bundle Expands
5. Re: The Difficult 2nd Bundle Expands Nov 14, 2011, 00:11 killer_roach
 
MoreLuckThanSkill wrote on Nov 13, 2011, 19:23:
Yeah their FAQ was pretty general, they warn that some games MAY require Steam/Desura at some point in one of the bundles, basically.

Looking at the future bundles, I'm thinking that, in particular, the Alpha Fund Bundle will likely require Desura.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Forum Downtime Follow-up; Steam Also Breached
7. Re: Steam Forum Downtime Follow-up; Steam Also Breached Nov 10, 2011, 17:53 killer_roach
 
Good time for it to have happened - my debit card was in the process of being replaced due to suspicious activity already, so the number they possibly could've gotten is useless to them.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
7. Re: Morning Metaverse Nov 10, 2011, 17:39 killer_roach
 
zirik wrote on Nov 10, 2011, 17:30:
zynga management should have realized it in the beginning and given out stocks proportional to the employee contribution to the company. i agree that the company should be dragged to court and forced to honor their original offer. the google chef is a new term on an old phenomenon for successful companies. when home depot went public they created a lot of millionares. among them were secretaries/front lobby receptionists and one very lucky caricature artist who designed homer.

It's also apparently the reason Facebook isn't going public - Zuckerberg was worried that employee stock options, once the company hit an IPO, would cause much of the company's staff to retire as soon as their shares vested.

Honestly, with this power struggle, Zynga has (whether they admit it or not) created a situation where their likely course of action would be to get bought out and then have the employee shares diluted in the buyout. The question is this, though - who has the scratch to swallow up Zynga apart from Google, Microsoft, or Apple?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Consolidation
5. Re: Evening Consolidation Nov 8, 2011, 01:57 killer_roach
 
Creston wrote on Nov 7, 2011, 23:18:
nin wrote on Nov 7, 2011, 22:09:
Xbox 720 Will Be Cheaper, 'Far Smaller Than 360' And Run On Windows 9 [Rumor].

Wow, let's just totally make shit up! I got it: it has a built in toaster.


If it runs on Windows 9, it'll have a release date of 2016 at the earliest, so yeah, that sounds about right!

I think the 720 will also have really broad bands!

Creston

Windows 9 should likely be out around 2014, which would make a 2014-2015 release seem plausible. That being said, a far smaller system running on Windows 9 makes me wonder if Microsoft is going to go the route of OnLive with their next console.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > More Fallout Online Legal News
7. Re: More Fallout Online Legal News Nov 8, 2011, 00:11 killer_roach
 
Sepharo wrote on Nov 7, 2011, 22:40:
That's great and all but I think I'll wait for the resident lawyer here to tell us what this means.

Would like to know on this as well - have an interest in contract law, but I'm an economist with a BA in Public Law... my knowledge of contract law is, sadly, limited.

All I can really speak to myself is point (4), which seems a bit assertive, but not out of the ordinary. Mistake would be something that you would think Interplay would be putting into their response to the lawsuit to begin with as an affirmative defense while they tried to assemble a more complete defense... adding it in now smacks of desperation (and would likely make Bethesda, once the jury trial starts, attempt to move for summary judgment and squash Interplay's case once and for all).
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Legal Briefs
6. Re: Saturday Legal Briefs Nov 6, 2011, 00:41 killer_roach
 
ChangWizzle wrote on Nov 5, 2011, 22:04:
Pete wrote on Nov 5, 2011, 20:34:
killer_roach wrote on Nov 5, 2011, 18:09:
Ozmodan wrote on Nov 5, 2011, 15:08:
AT&T just does not get it, there is no way anyone is going to let them merge with T-mobile. It basically makes them a semi-monopoly with one competitor, Verizon.

Any politician that lets that happen will be crucified.

This is why you're not an economist. The odds that the merger doesn't go through are minimal at best.

Leave antitrust talk to those of us who have actually studied it.

Was Ozmodan wrong with his statement?

More importantly, HOW was Ozmodan wrong with his statement? (

Simple - to create a situation where the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division or the Federal Trade Commission can block a merger under the Sherman or Clayton Antitrust Acts, they have to demonstrate that the merged company would have the power to unilaterally set prices in the market and/or discourage new entry into the market. For those looking for a spoiler -- that situation appears to be absent from this market.

Here's the part of it that people seem to be not picking up on - pretty much no matter what, in the next year or two T-Mobile will cease to exist in the US market. They are bleeding money and the parent company, Deutsche Telekom, wants to get rid of them. Either somebody buys them out or they fold up shop, the latter of which would likely be more detrimental to consumers than a buyout.

The question then would be whether or not AT&T would be able to set prices or discourage competition entering into the wireless business - something that doesn't seem particularly likely, especially with the rise of regional to quasi-national carriers like Cricket and MetroPCS seemingly able to continue operating with low plan costs irrespective of what the major carriers are doing. Far from treading water, both aforementioned "budget" carriers are looking to add services like LTE in the coming years, something that would make the "monopoly" argument specious at best. Beyond that, the market share of a combined AT&T and T-Mobile, while being the largest of any cell phone carrier, would still not even constitute a majority of cell phone customers in the US, much less an amount that would give them the ability to control prices (keep in mind that, additionally, many of these customers are on pay as you go plans, especially on T-Mobile - increases in rates could easily send these people elsewhere).

That being said, there will be some regulatory oversight that may need to be taken with respect to the merger, in particular with how to manage the contracts of existing T-Mobile customers as well as how to alleviate redundancies in spectrum (a government property that the FCC licenses out to private entities), more than likely by selling it to other carriers (MetroPCS, for instance, has already expressed interest in buying some of this wireless spectrum for the purposes of rolling out their own LTE network). The wireless communications industry is a concentrated field relative to many other industries, but this is also to be expected due to economies of scale (the cell phone carriers are about as close to a classic "natural monopoly" situation as you can get outside of utility companies).

As far as where Ozmodan is wrong with his statement, he forgets the number of regional carriers, quasi-national carriers, budget carriers, and, above all, the loudest objector to the merger, Sprint (who seems to oppose the merger because it would increase competition in high-speed data by allowing AT&T to roll out its LTE network faster while Sprint is stuck with a flagging WiMax network that has problems competing in speed terms with HSPA+, let alone LTE). AT&T has little means by which to fix prices for the reasons I mentioned earlier, and the natural untangling of spectrum issues will likely put MetroPCS into a stronger position as a #4 carrier than T-Mobile ever had.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Legal Briefs
2. Re: Saturday Legal Briefs Nov 5, 2011, 18:09 killer_roach
 
Ozmodan wrote on Nov 5, 2011, 15:08:
AT&T just does not get it, there is no way anyone is going to let them merge with T-mobile. It basically makes them a semi-monopoly with one competitor, Verizon.

Any politician that lets that happen will be crucified.

This is why you're not an economist. The odds that the merger doesn't go through are minimal at best.

Leave antitrust talk to those of us who have actually studied it.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Gone Gold - Skyrim
22. Re: Gone Gold - Skyrim Nov 4, 2011, 17:02 killer_roach
 
Kythlyn wrote on Nov 4, 2011, 16:57:
Isn't it a bit odd that this announcement comes only one week before the launch of the game? I thought gold announcements go out as soon as the final discs start getting stamped. The copies of Skyrim are already printed and sitting in warehouses ready to ship.

I'm thinking they're defining "gold" as "every launch configuration has reached gold master status".
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sanctum DLC Plans; Sale; Free Weekend
6. Re: Sanctum DLC Plans; Sale; Free Weekend Nov 4, 2011, 00:37 killer_roach
 
Prez wrote on Nov 4, 2011, 00:19:
I'm thinking they started a bit too early with the DLC. The 4 weapons and 4 maps made for a bit of a scarce intial offering, though then again it's hard to be too pissed considering the original $10 price tag. I'm going to get my game fully patched with all the DLC and get gaming.

The game was $15 at launch... I remember because I bought it during the Steam summer sale for 75% off, paying $3.75 to do so.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > THQ's Losses; More Space Marine DLC Announced
6. Re: THQ's Losses; More Space Marine DLC Announced Nov 3, 2011, 15:56 killer_roach
 
Hudson wrote on Nov 3, 2011, 09:58:
Is Space Marine really a "RPG" at all? Or more like Gears of War with Warhammer 40k skins?

It's more like Gears, from what I've heard.

Overall, though, THQ seems to be likely acquisition bait before too long - they've been bleeding cash and have a handful of high-profile licensing deals (which may likely be cheaper for a rival to acquire by buying the company outright). Also, THQ's market cap is bite-sized compared to most of the other major publishers - THQI has a cap of $136.7 million, compared to Electronic Arts' (ERTS) $7.55 billion and Activision's (ATVI) $15.1 billion.

In other words, THQ's quarterly loss was about 70% of their total market cap. OUCH.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Play Skyrim Three Hours Early?
9. Re: Play Skyrim Three Hours Early? Nov 3, 2011, 01:47 killer_roach
 
Whether it's midnight Eastern time or 9PM Pacific Time, it's the same damn time... nobody's getting the game earlier. (That being said, for PC gamers, gone are the days of physical releases where midnight meant midnight local time, and the people in the East got the game three hours sooner than the people on the West Coast...)  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > The Humble Voxatron Debut
10. Re: The Humble Voxatron Debut Nov 1, 2011, 15:56 killer_roach
 
Dev wrote on Nov 1, 2011, 14:58:
Bundle now includes a couple more titles.

Pretty good titles to add, I'd say... even if I already own The Binding of Isaac (which is worth the price of the bundle alone).
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Op Ed
7. Re: Op Ed Nov 1, 2011, 14:54 killer_roach
 
Yaogun wrote on Nov 1, 2011, 13:54:
Ozmodan wrote on Nov 1, 2011, 11:07:
The publishers are losing a lot of purchases with always on DRM. No matter how good the game I will not purchase one and there are a lot of people like me.

I'm the same way. I didn't buy HoMM VI even though I love the series, and I won't buy Diablo III. Like you say, there are enough good games that I can skip the DRM'd ones and still have plenty of fun stuff to play.

I do buy a lot of games on Steam, though, but offline mode is the key there.

I'll still buy always-on games, but the difference now is that they've hurt themselves in terms of what I'm willing to pay to get their games as a result. (i.e. a game that I might've gotten for $40 I'd wait until it was $15-20 now.)
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Blizzard's BlizzCon Apology
28. Re: Blizzard's BlizzCon Apology Oct 28, 2011, 13:44 killer_roach
 
Bodolza wrote on Oct 28, 2011, 13:42:
CommunistHamster wrote on Oct 28, 2011, 13:15:
Oh boy, time for another 200 posts of social conservatives vs social liberals on the topic of homosexuals!

I don't see this as a conservative/liberal division. It's much more libertarian/authoritarian, and there are plenty of each in both major parties.

I'm neither socially conservative or liberal... I'm socially "don't care". What I don't like, in the libertarian tradition, is either side trying to use government force to advance acceptance of their viewpoint, which seems to happen quite a bit from both sides.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Blizzard's BlizzCon Apology
19. Re: Blizzard's BlizzCon Apology Oct 28, 2011, 13:17 killer_roach
 
Metasparks wrote on Oct 28, 2011, 11:24:
Sincerity at its finest.

Translation: Please don't sue us, please don't picket our offices, please don't start an Internet-wide smear campaign against us...

Amazing is the power of reputational blackmail.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized
64. Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized Oct 27, 2011, 14:49 killer_roach
 
Beamer wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 14:33:
So that guy just said black face is ok.



And the conversation is still including him...?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment

Learn it. Understand it. Love it.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized
32. Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized Oct 27, 2011, 12:50 killer_roach
 
Xombie wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 12:00:
GLADD is a great organization, but they're not above criticism for manufactured outrage.

Manufactured outrage is GLAAD's bread and butter. Personally, I don't really care much about the issue one way or the other, but I find it ironic that, by going off on these bents, GLAAD is reinforcing a lot of negative stereotypes about the gay community. Any quicker to write a press release to express outrage and they'd have to conclude it with "well, I never...!", snap their fingers, and walk off in a huff.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Bethesda's Fallout MMO Injunction Appeal Denied
10. Re: Bethesda's Fallout MMO Injunction Appeal Denied Oct 27, 2011, 03:13 killer_roach
 
Dev wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 03:03:
Cutter wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 01:23:
Exactly my point. Bethsoft wanted it all but dind't want to pay what Herve was asking, and here were are 4 years later back at square one. You can't blame Interplay for trying to milk it for all it's worth. Bethsoft dropped the ball here thinking they could do an easy end-run. Now they're F'd in the A.

It would have been crazy to pay that much more for what it was at the time.

Not to mention all that money would've done would be to delay Interplay's ultimate liquidation just that much longer. They're basically an empty shell of a company anymore.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Bethesda's Fallout MMO Injunction Appeal Denied
3. Re: Bethesda's Fallout MMO Injunction Appeal Denied Oct 26, 2011, 23:57 killer_roach
 
What everybody seems to be forgetting is that this is simply a preliminary injunction. It's very rare these things go through without some extremely negative things going on. All it really means is that the judge is going "Zenimax, you're not really being hurt by letting the legal process take its normal course."

That being said, it doesn't say much one way or the other as to whether or not Interplay is living up to the terms of their agreement, either. It's just not a situation where the judge feels like they have to step in right away.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Op Ed
26. Re: Op Ed Oct 26, 2011, 21:57 killer_roach
 
Domgrief wrote on Oct 26, 2011, 20:25:
Dear Media, please stop referring to Valve as some sort of hold-out against the evil DRM overlords. They pretty much wrote the book on modern DRM. Love, Domgrief.

  • Until Half-Life, you could rent online games

  • Until Steam, it was considered normal to be able to loan, give or sell games to your friends

  • Early versions of Steam behaved so poorly offline that it was effectively an almost-always-on DRM scheme

  • You can't buy, install and play an off-the-shelf Steam game without connecting to the internet and attaching it to your Steam account

  • They might speak out about some piracy-encouraging behaviours like localising late, but as a publisher they still support piracy-encouraging behaviours like it-costs-twice-as-much-in-Australia

  • Clearly, Australia is its own planet.

    1) Never really had online game rentals in the US, ever. Also, before Half-Life? Dial-up worked that well?

    2) I think that changed even before Steam. Those windows started closing in the US and Europe around 1999-2001, well before Steam's launch.

    3) Very true. I remember that. No longer the case, though (although GFWL tries to bring that back...).

    4) So?

    5) The Australian market is a rounding error to publishers, no offense.

    Yes, Steam is DRM, and a fairly all-encompassing one at that, but it does something that UbiDRM and other always-on schemes haven't really done: Provide value-added to the end user.
     
    Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
     
    1104 Comments. 56 pages. Viewing page 34.
    < Newer [ 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ] Older >


    footer

    .. ..

    Blue's News logo