Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Mike Fisk

Real Name Mike Fisk   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname killer_roach
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage None given.
Signed On Oct 31, 2002, 20:40
Total Comments 1465 (Pro)
User ID 15013
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ] Older >


News Comments > Morning Consolidation
7. Re: Morning Consolidation Jan 10, 2013, 14:28 killer_roach
 
Verno wrote on Jan 10, 2013, 14:20:
ASeven wrote on Jan 10, 2013, 12:10:
If the rumored specs are like those ones them then new Xbox will be expensive as fuck.

I'm not sure anyone can get away with a $350+ console anymore, not when games are $60 and half of the average consumers disposable budget to Apple/phone shit. I guess time will tell.

$60 games still seem to sell on the consoles, though, as the major titles seem to show. It's mostly the mobile space that's been shredded (a lot has been made about the high-profile collapse of the Vita, but even the 3DS is sucking a lot of wind with respect to expectations).

As far as the console price, Microsoft and Sony have still been trying to hold up the $300 line for a premium bundle on aging hardware - to the point where both are likely selling their systems at a profit anymore. $400-500 price points for launch hardware will likely be the norm (and I couldn't rule out $600 premium packages), but what will still drive initial adoption will be the launch lineups. If the games are there, people will jump in. If not, they'll be more than content to play the waiting game, as, with the expansion of the digital distribution market on the two major consoles (and a lesser amount on Nintendo's systems as well), there's a lot of games left to tide over uncommitted gamers.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Consolidation
2. Re: Morning Consolidation Jan 10, 2013, 13:02 killer_roach
 
ASeven wrote on Jan 10, 2013, 12:10:
If the rumored specs are like those ones them then new Xbox will be expensive as fuck.

Well, depends on the specifics. Seeing as there's only a $40 difference between the slowest (3.1 GHz) and fastest (4 GHz) octa-core AMD CPUs on Newegg, however, it's likely that, even in quantity, Microsoft couldn't get one at any clock much less than $100 per. As for the GPU... well, we don't know what 8000-series proc they're using. Considering it's a console, it could very well be something like an 8570, which wouldn't be too expensive at all.

The HDD and RAM... they're both cheap. Not a huge issue.

Regardless, assuming the rumor of the eight-core CPU is correct (and, if they are even attempting to have backwards compatibility, it would have to be), this is probably a $400-500 product at launch, even with Microsoft taking a loss on the hardware.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > THQ Sale Update
11. Re: THQ Sale Update Jan 6, 2013, 19:59 killer_roach
 
nin wrote on Jan 6, 2013, 13:54:
People want to play their games w/o hassle. Is that wrong? Do they need to jump through hoops?

Is it too much to ask that they have an IQ above room temperature?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > THQ Sale Update
4. Re: THQ Sale Update Jan 5, 2013, 20:32 killer_roach
 
The Half Elf wrote on Jan 5, 2013, 19:20:
Unless they are going to take the Saints Engine and make a Batman game out of it I really can't think of any reason I'd want WB to but THQ.

Keep in mind, they bought Midway with no real interest in using their tech or IP for ongoing WB/WBIE projects.

There is, simply put, the idea for a rising publisher to pad their portfolio, and THQ would do just that at a fairly attractive price point.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > THQ Sale Update
1. Re: THQ Sale Update Jan 5, 2013, 19:01 killer_roach
 
WBIE is one of the interested parties?

Did I not call that, oh... a few months ago?

*takes bow*
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Consolidation
16. Re: Sony blocking used game sales Jan 4, 2013, 16:00 killer_roach
 
PHJF wrote on Jan 4, 2013, 15:43:
Seems like some poor design decisions were made under the hood that the XBOX managed to avoid.

360 games are on DVDs

And beyond that, the Forza games (3 and 4) did more or less require large content installs to the hard drive...

Also, the mandatory installs weren't as frequent as Microsoft apologists would like to believe.

(Additionally, a move to even a 4x BD-ROM drive would mean that they'd be able to load content faster than any DVD-ROM drive could ever hope to, making the arguments largely moot. Honestly a bit surprised Sony didn't move to this in later PS3 models, and then have the installs be subject to a version check.)
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Op Ed
12. Re: Op Ed Jan 3, 2013, 23:19 killer_roach
 
jacobvandy wrote on Jan 3, 2013, 23:16:
I think we all know the answer to that.

Of course.

Female aliens, duh.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
1. Re: Evening Metaverse Jan 3, 2013, 22:49 killer_roach
 
Twitter isn't even close to an $11 billion company. Considering their business model, I'd have to think any sort of a market cap over $500 million would be purely wishful thinking (and even a half-billion valuation would be assuming, more than likely, that it gets bought out by somebody else).  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Consolidation
5. Re: Sony blocking used game sales Jan 3, 2013, 22:45 killer_roach
 
jdreyer wrote on Jan 3, 2013, 22:05:
nin wrote on Jan 3, 2013, 21:36:
And what happens when your hardware dies?

C'mon, that never happens!

There's some thought that such a system could tie to a PSN ID, which would allow a safety valve (and allow you to take a game to a friend's house). Also, an RFID-based solution should, depending on implementation, be reasonably easy to adapt for rental copies.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
5. Re: Morning Metaverse Jan 3, 2013, 20:07 killer_roach
 
Panickd wrote on Jan 3, 2013, 13:49:
Why the fuck would anyone with any other option use HughesNet? Satellite internet is just awful. I can understand why someone who lives out in the boonies where there isn't anything else offered might think to pay for their piss-poor service but even low rent cable and DSL offerings are way better (and cheaper).

That being said, there are a lot of places that are that far in the boonies. (Seriously, some of these more rural areas in Kentucky neither my girlfriend or I, on Verizon and T-Mobile respectively, can get cell service at all, much less data.)
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Op Ed
12. Re: Op Ed Dec 29, 2012, 22:03 killer_roach
 
Axis wrote on Dec 29, 2012, 20:39:
Game manufacturers already label minimum requirements.

In all seriousness, though, a lot of system requirements are especially confusing to people who aren't familiar with PC hardware.

Case in point:

"The game says it requires a GeForce GTX 260... I have a GeForce 520, how come it runs like garbage?"

To a lot of people, this would be a perfectly acceptable question (even if pretty much everyone here would be laughing quietly, and hysterically, to themselves).
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Metaverse
3. Re: More Big Picture Details Dec 28, 2012, 16:28 killer_roach
 
HorrorScope wrote on Dec 28, 2012, 15:59:
Since we are talking Smart TV, we are talking living room. Remember the big thing... "Winning the living room"? Wow that was a total fizzle for companies like MS and Sony. They thought a game box would win them the living room and make them swim in dollars. Both companies stock go nowhere, one's seemingly hanging on by a thread. You take those two consoles today and break them from their companies, they couldn't stand on their own. Winning the living room was a lie. This isn't the 50's.

Although their stocks have been going nowhere for opposite reasons. For Microsoft, their Xbox team is modestly profitable, but requires huge amounts of revenue for their meager margins (and possibly being a drain on the Windows team due to Microsoft de-emphasizing the PC as a gaming platform). For Sony, their gaming division isn't particularly profitable, but it might be one of the more profitable parts of the company at the moment, seeing as their TV and camera businesses are in the toilet at present with little (if any) hope for recovery, and the film and music businesses being about as much of a money suck as the Xbox is for Microsoft.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Festivus Mobilization
4. Re: Festivus Mobilization Dec 23, 2012, 23:34 killer_roach
 
Creston wrote on Dec 23, 2012, 23:28:
DangerDog wrote on Dec 23, 2012, 17:25:
and there goes Microsoft Surface Pro, straight into the bargain discount bin.

The Windows RT Surface isn't even worth its weight in recyclable materials.

It's astounding that there is nobody at Microsoft that understands basic marketing principles. You do NOT go to market first with your shitty, underpowered version, only to bring out the actual good product two months later. This sours the customer on your product, and they will have no interest in it anymore by the time it becomes worth taking a look at.

And yet MS happily keeps on doing it. "Let's release the Surface Shit first, so everyone can laugh at us and ignore the entire Surface product line before we ever get around to launching something that might actually be a good product and would get us some decent market share."

What a bunch of fucking morons.

Creston


Agreed - launch the flagship product first, get people excited about it, and then go "hey, here's the version you can actually afford!"

Works for the car companies.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > On Sale
17. Re: On Sale Dec 23, 2012, 22:07 killer_roach
 
MoreLuckThanSkill wrote on Dec 23, 2012, 18:40:
Dev wrote on Dec 23, 2012, 18:22:
Its priced appropriately for the niche market they cater to (which isn't PC gamers). And the zombies DLC got enough crossover demographics that they made a special edition of the train simulator with the zombie DLC integrated.
Thats on sale for $9 right now.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/222540/

That's a classic pusher move, giving you the first one free, or cheap in this case.

Several hundred dollars worth of virtual trains later as you kneel in the smoking ruins of your games budget, in classic Platoon pose, arms upraised, yelling at the gods as the viet cong shoot you from the trees, we'll look back on these posts and wonder if this could have all have been avoided.

*EDIT* typo.

There's a few other free DLCs out there, and a lot of them go on sale regularly, but yeah - it's a daunting stack if you're into the "collect everything" mindset.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc.
3. Re: etc. Dec 22, 2012, 14:09 killer_roach
 
Cutter wrote on Dec 22, 2012, 14:05:
Sounds like they wanted to have a fun party. Jesus, I work in an industry where females have it made so if there are some where they don't learn to suck it up buttercup. Gaming is male domain. Don't like it? Go do something else. I would have been motorboating those sluts like it was going out of style!

Keep in mind the article was on Kotaku, which is one of Gawker's properties. They seem to enjoy emasculated men around those parts.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Legal Briefs
4. Re: Saturday Legal Briefs Dec 22, 2012, 13:06 killer_roach
 
PHJF wrote on Dec 22, 2012, 12:43:
How are landline broadband caps such a red flag when the entire cellphone industry is based around data caps? Is wireless data really so much more precious than wired?

On the backhaul end, no.

On the spectrum end, oh yes.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Ubisoft Eyeing THQ?
28. Re: Ubisoft Eyeing THQ? Dec 22, 2012, 10:41 killer_roach
 
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Dec 22, 2012, 05:29:
Hopefully Valve will buy up the whole company, as I think that would be the best outcome. If not then Ubisoft is probably one of the better publishers, as it releases games on Steam and does excellent PC ports - EA would boycott Steam and require Origin; Activision would increase the price of games, make them all yearly series and fleece you on DLC; Bethesda seems to have no quality control;. 2K Games could be another reasonable choice but even though it has a larger revenue than Ubisoft it has a much lower operating income - it's really not being managed well.

UPlay certainly isn't necessary and is a minor annoyance but it's nothing compared to GFWL and it didn't really bother me with Far Cry 3.

Keep in mind that Ubisoft has a market cap of 750 million euro - just under $1 billion. They'd have to leverage themselves to the hilt to acquire THQ in total once they emerge from bankruptcy (as THQ's value was as low as it was due to its outstanding debt). They're just as likely, if not more, to be a "pick out pieces that we want" than even Valve would be (although Valve's actual market value is unknown since it's privately held, my best estimates would put it in the $1-3 billion range). For those wondering about Take-Two, they're almost exactly the same size as Ubisoft. (Just a wild guess, I'd place the value of a restructured THQ in the $500-800 million range, possibly as high as $1 billion.)

I've said before that the most likely players to acquire THQ in its entirety would be either Activision or Time Warner, with a bit of an edge to the latter. EA still is digesting a lot of their recent acquisitions, so I don't think they have much interest apart from possibly trying to pick up some IP on the cheap.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Ubisoft Eyeing THQ?
14. Re: Ubisoft Eyeing THQ? Dec 21, 2012, 23:47 killer_roach
 
nin wrote on Dec 21, 2012, 23:40:
Somebody get Gabe on the phone. If we can twist his arm just right, he might even green light a space shooter from Volition, once he owns them.

(I can dream, dammit.)


That's all it would be - once emerging from Chapter 11, THQ will be considerably more valuable than their stock price indicated. Likely far too rich for Valve's blood (although Valve likely has the money to buy Volition or Relic should they be so inclined, and they don't get into a bidding war with anyone else).

Granted, the practical upshot of Ubi being the first confirmed bidder is that it means the bidding is likely starting off pretty low - they're not exactly swimming in cash.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Ubisoft Eyeing THQ?
9. Re: Ubisoft Eyeing THQ? Dec 21, 2012, 23:12 killer_roach
 
So Ubisoft is eyeing THQ assets. Guess what? Now that they've filed Chapter 11, so are pretty much everybody else (whether they'll publicly admit it or not).

Honestly, I think Ubisoft is more trying to make a play for some of THQ's licenses than anything, which THQ would likely be more than happy to unload - while a few are profitable, on balance they've been the millstone that ground THQ down into oblivion (that being said, at the right price it could be a win-win for both parties - THQ is without those recurring costs, and Ubisoft could acquire them for less than they likely would in the traditional negotiating process, thereby making them potentially profitable for them).
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
2. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Dec 18, 2012, 19:24 killer_roach
 
Porn-O-Matic wrote on Dec 18, 2012, 19:01:
Awwwwww.... poor Apple...

Fucking dicks. Go play schoolyard bully somewhere else.

And that was Judge Koh who turned down the request... she's basically been Apple's pet jurist for the last few years.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
1465 Comments. 74 pages. Viewing page 27.
< Newer [ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo