User comment history
< Newer [ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ] Older >
| News Comments > Quoteworthy |
 |
| 14. |
Re: Quoteworthy |
Jun 20, 2012, 23:35 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Dades wrote on Jun 20, 2012, 22:13: Yep, this is a load of crap. EA is going to charge you for the box, charge you for the DLC and then charge you for stuff in a shop. Well, not necessarily - charging to get in creates a barrier to entry, and makes one more thing that you have to manage the price of. Ultimately, the best way to maximize revenue from any product is to get everybody to pay you as much as they're willing to pay - if that ends up being nothing, so be it. If that's $1, so be it. If it's $1,000 - congratulations, you just made up for the people who paid $1 or less. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Saturday Consolidation |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Saturday Consolidation |
Jun 16, 2012, 18:13 |
killer_roach |
|
|
ASeven wrote on Jun 16, 2012, 16:04: $299.... I can't even think of the hardware used to keep this price so low and not make MS have too steep losses in manufacturing this console.
The 6670 rumor may indeed be true. If so an average PC bought a couple years ago will be far more powerful than this. And 10 years lifespan? Holy shit, someone at MS is insane. It may very well be. If the rumored PS4 specs are correct, the GPU that's on-die on the CPU of it would be as powerful as the GPU in the 360... and then would have another GPU on top of that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Valve's Economist |
 |
| 20. |
Re: Valve's Economist |
Jun 16, 2012, 18:10 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Jun 16, 2012, 13:35:
xXBatmanXx wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 22:15: I have an Econ major! Hire me!!!!! They've had the job posted for, like, 3 years!
But they wanted a phd. Seems like they're flexible on that part of it, but you'd need to have demonstrable proof of considerable quantitative ability. Having a doctorate is just one of the easiest ways to show that.
I do quantitative and theoretical work, but not to the extent or depth that they appear to be looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Valve's Economist |
 |
| 14. |
Re: Valve's Economist |
Jun 16, 2012, 09:59 |
killer_roach |
|
|
LittleMe wrote on Jun 16, 2012, 00:43: So is he a Keynesian or Austrian economist? Most economists would tell you that either label is quite limiting.
Speaking personally, I'm a microfoundations guy as far as macro thought is concerned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm "99% Done" |
 |
| 12. |
Re: StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm |
Jun 15, 2012, 23:45 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Yifes wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 22:32:
Creston wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 22:27: I might be interested, but it depends very heavily on the price. Anything over 20 bucks and they can go fuck themselves.
Creston Blizzard has never priced their expansions at $20. Considering how the pricing has gone on Blizzard expansions in the past, it might get down to $20 in five years. They don't understand the meaning of the word "sale". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Valve's Economist |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Valve's Economist |
Jun 15, 2012, 23:29 |
killer_roach |
|
|
xXBatmanXx wrote on Jun 15, 2012, 22:15: I have an Econ major! Hire me!!!!! Go to Valve Software's jobs page, they'll tell you how to submit your resume/CV to them.
I sent mine in a while back to them, haven't heard back. Don't really expect to, seeing as, unlike Dr. Varoufakis, I'm not published. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > It Came from E3 2012, Part 13 |
 |
| 9. |
Re: It Came from E3 2012, Part 13 |
Jun 14, 2012, 09:00 |
killer_roach |
|
|
CommunistHamster wrote on Jun 14, 2012, 08:20: There isn't a single gawker media site worth reading. This. A thousand times this.
It takes a lot to make The Huffington Post look distinguished and professional in comparison, and Gawker manages to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Neal Stephenson's Sword Fighting Kickstarter |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Neal Stephenson's Sword Fighting Kickstarter |
Jun 10, 2012, 18:35 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Sounds incredibly ambitious, but he seems to have a good idea about how to approach it in an incremental fashion.
Not sure I'd back this idea considering I have questions about the expertise of the people involved, but I'm really, really curious to see what could come of this. If they can get a solid prototype going I'd be quite intrigued. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Vivendi to Discuss Activision Sale? |
 |
| 42. |
Re: Vivendi to Discuss Activision Sale? |
Jun 8, 2012, 19:21 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Agent.X7 wrote on Jun 8, 2012, 17:48:
RollinThundr wrote on Jun 8, 2012, 15:59:
Agent.X7 wrote on Jun 8, 2012, 14:19: Oh God, please let them get away from Vivendi. Better yet, let Blizzard go back to being its own company. Either way it's probably better for my stock. You are aware Blizzard hasn't been their "own company" since before they were Blizzard right? Yeah, what I should have said is "Please let them go back to being an independently run studio owned by a company that lets them do things their way."
That Blizzard has long since been scattered to the four winds. What Blizzard is today is not the Blizzard of the 1990s - most of those people have left Blizzard even before Vivendi acquired Activision and tied Blizzard to them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Vivendi to Discuss Activision Sale? |
 |
| 17. |
Re: Vivendi to Discuss Activision Sale? |
Jun 8, 2012, 01:41 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Jerykk wrote on Jun 8, 2012, 00:54:
The other question would be who has pockets deep enough to acquire ActiBlizz without Vivendi basically having to jettison them? They're too rich for the likes of EA or Sony, and they're a poor fit for Microsoft or Apple. Poor fit for MS? How so? MS already bribes Activision for timed CoD DLC exclusivity. If MS bought Activision, they could turn CoD into an Xbox-exclusive and force Blizzard to make Xbox exclusives too. Microsoft has problems integrating most any company into their fold. It's one of the reasons Bungie bought themselves back, and why they basically gutted Rare and Lionhead. Microsoft Games Studios is a pretty dysfunctional entity - they'd rather just pay for exclusivity on a title by title basis rather than have to shoehorn in a large developer/publisher into a practically tribalistic corporate culture where business units fiercely defend their own turf. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Vivendi to Discuss Activision Sale? |
 |
| 13. |
Re: Vivendi to Discuss Activision Sale? |
Jun 7, 2012, 23:16 |
killer_roach |
|
|
The question is whether or not Activision is a worthwhile long-term play for a company to acquire... their current trajectory makes them perilous to hold in the short run.
The other question would be who has pockets deep enough to acquire ActiBlizz without Vivendi basically having to jettison them? They're too rich for the likes of EA or Sony, and they're a poor fit for Microsoft or Apple. If Vivendi decides to try to sell, I'd place the most likely buyer as Time Warner, hoping to make ActiBlizz the centerpiece of a revitalized WB Games. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Dark Souls PC Port Issues |
 |
| 27. |
Re: Dark Souls PC Port Issues |
Jun 7, 2012, 03:03 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Rattlehead wrote on Jun 7, 2012, 01:10:
Honestly, did anyone expect anything better from a Japanese developer? Capcom has been making some of the best PC ports for years from their console games. Devil May Cry 4 is really really good on PC. RE4 and Onimusha 3 were disastrous ports to PC, but they've gotten better recently. They've been one of the better Japanese developers in terms of developing for the PC, but until recently it was pretty slapdash work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Op Ed |
 |
| 13. |
Re: Op Ed |
Jun 5, 2012, 19:31 |
killer_roach |
|
|
RailWizard wrote on Jun 5, 2012, 18:29: 90% of games are shit now. You're assuming that in years past that percentage was lower. Either you have a terrible grasp on history, are too young to remember, or are playing fast and loose with the facts, but regardless.
It's always been that way, if not worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Op Ed |
 |
| 7. |
Re: Op Ed |
Jun 5, 2012, 14:36 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Fion wrote on Jun 5, 2012, 11:38: What do people expect? This is E3 we are talking about here. A half dozen years ago it was the pinnacle of gaming conventions. Today shows like Gamescom, GDC, PAX and even G-Star have made E3 their bitch. Anymore TGS and Gamescom are the big shows. E3 has been hollowed out by an Eastern and a Western flank. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Epic Assisting Big Huge Games |
 |
| 30. |
Re: Epic Assisting Big Huge Games |
Jun 4, 2012, 18:18 |
killer_roach |
|
|
alvador wrote on Jun 4, 2012, 12:41: I've been lurking on Blue's for a decade or more but practically never say anything- not entirely sure why I feel the need to say this here and now, but the amount of misinformation that has been put out on the whole situation is infuriating.
*snip* Agreed. People can say what they want about whether or not the subsidies are a good thing, but when you're expecting them and they don't show up, that not only throws a wrench into the whole operations, but also calls into question about whether government can be considered a reliable partner in business operations (personal bias: it probably isn't). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Op Ed |
 |
| 20. |
Re: Op Ed |
Jun 4, 2012, 02:06 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Dev wrote on Jun 4, 2012, 00:23:
killer_roach wrote on Jun 3, 2012, 23:56: As I see it, there's quite a few gems in the indie gaming scene - but the overwhelming majority of it is flotsam. Isn't it that way in the big publisher scene too? It's probably an order of magnitude worse in the indie scene. Then again, the cost of a bad idea is much lower in indie gaming, so there's invariably going to be more of an attitude of "throw some ideas at the wall and see what sticks". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Op Ed |
 |
| 16. |
Re: Op Ed |
Jun 3, 2012, 23:56 |
killer_roach |
|
|
ASeven wrote on Jun 3, 2012, 22:28: All a matter of taste, I guess. This year I've played far more indies than mainstream games. Far easier to obtain indies than mainstream titles, to say the least.
As I see it, there's quite a few gems in the indie gaming scene - but the overwhelming majority of it is flotsam. Just as reliance on the mainstream gaming entities would result in a collapse due to the inevitable cost spiral, a reliance on indies would result in a similar collapse due to the pitiful quality/crap ratio (and the typically ephemeral lifespan of an indie developer).
Going forward, we see the mainstream pushing the indies to be more ambitious, and we have the indies pushing the mainstream to be more creative. And we're all better off for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Humble Indie Bundle V |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Humble Indie Bundle V |
Jun 1, 2012, 20:24 |
killer_roach |
|
|
mongrol wrote on Jun 1, 2012, 05:35: LIMBO for linux runs it in wine from a bash script. Linux users should avoid this out of protest. This bundle is deceptively not cross platform. As opposed to it not running at all, which is preferable? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1086 Comments. 55 pages. Viewing page 19.
< Newer [ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ] Older > |
|