User comment history
< Newer [ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ] Older >
| News Comments > BioShock Infinite Delayed |
 |
| 38. |
Re: BioShock Infinite Delayed |
Dec 9, 2012, 03:51 |
mag |
|
|
| The first non-gameplay trailer had me excited. The first gameplay made me pretty much actively want to not play it. I don't think there was a single free moment of actual gameplay. It was 100% auto-aim and press-x-to-advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Dec 6, 2012, 12:48 |
mag |
|
|
| Also: Broncos, Ravens, Bengals, Bills, Bucs, Falcon punches, Browns, Steelers, Colts, uh... jets?, bears, 49ers (pull it together!), Seahawks, Giants, Packers, Pats. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 8. |
Re: NASA animation |
Dec 6, 2012, 12:36 |
mag |
|
|
Creston wrote on Dec 6, 2012, 10:57: Something seems off there. Most of the UK is dark, and trust me that there is a fuckload of light in the London metro. Everything west of New York all the way to like Indiana seems to be dark as well. Barely any lights on Hawaii? No lights on New Zealand?
As for TRON3, I'm happy to see another TRON, but please make the story better and fix these gaping retarded plotholes. I can come up with a better script in approximately five minutes than it took these assholes two years to write.
Creston I think you're misreading the map (or I'm misunderstanding what you're saying). That's just midland NY state and Pennsylvania and Appalachia and Maine and so on that's dark, toward the East. Then there are lots of lights all the way out past Illinois, then I think they get less dense around Missouri, then it's pretty dark out to Cali.
You can pick out (what I'm guessing are) Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati, Louisville, Lexington, Detroit, Indianapolis, Chicago. And then I'm thinking St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and then it gets dark.
This comment was edited on Dec 6, 2012, 12:41. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 18. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Dec 5, 2012, 16:36 |
mag |
|
|
PHJF wrote on Dec 5, 2012, 15:22: And dumping money into NASA isn't going to magically solve all our problems, either. What's your point? NASA should be funded, sure. Within reason. And stuff like education, healthcare and alternative energy are a hell of a lot more immediate and necessary than a mission to Mars. Without something besides fossil fuels, we aren't doing shit in space. Without education, nobody is going to have any idea what to do in space. Without healthcare, some kid is going to die of cancer instead of going to work at NASA.
You seem to forget NASA depends on people. That's its resource. When you get a generation of well-educated, healthy individuals who don't spend half their lives wondering how they'll ever pay off their student loans, maybe then more people will show more support for space exploration. Or maybe we can pass the buck to one of the dozens of countries ahead of us in math and science education. My point: NASA (and other basic science research, for that matter, for similar reasons) is important, that it is underfunded relative to other expenditures, GDP, and the total budget, and that you would likely get a better return on investment by spending another $17B on it (doubling its budget) than by putting the same amount of money into the issues people usually cite as reasons we shouldn't be bothering with space.
Healthcare, education, and alternative energy are all important, and we're throwing huge amounts of money at the first two. The latter's probably underfunded, but it's not for lack of money--it's political.
You could shave 5% of the defense budget and double NASA's budget, and throw an equivalent amount of money at two of those other problems. But that amount of money won't make a difference to health care or education.
And we already spend more money per student for education and more money per citizen for health care, than any other country.
US spending (Fed, State, Local): Health Care: $1T Education: $908B Defense: $902B NASA: $17B
Edit: Actually, you could throw $17B specifically at higher education and, I dunno, let 10% of college students go to school for free if you assume average yearly tuition's around $10k. That might have an effect.
This comment was edited on Dec 5, 2012, 16:43. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 12. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Dec 5, 2012, 13:45 |
mag |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Dec 5, 2012, 12:17:
dj LiTh wrote on Dec 5, 2012, 10:42:
PHJF wrote on Dec 5, 2012, 10:34: You know, it is possible to see both sides of the issue. Obviously mankind's future will eventually be among the stars, but there are very real domestic issues which need dealing with. And they won't wait. If Neil deGrasse and Sagan can accept this, so should you. There's just such a long list of 'real domestic issues' that nasa has helped/solved, here's some: [url=]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off_technologies[/url] If NASA holds all those patents should they be able to fund them self? And that's no argument that private enterprise wouldn't come up with those things regardless. Space should be handled privately with government oversight. Otherwise it'll just be the masses paying for what the privileged enjoy as per usual. When most people are struggling just to keep a roof over their heads and feed themselves you have to prioritize - and space ain't a priority.
Besides Vger will return in a few centuries to wipe out the carbon unit infestation anyway. Domestic issues will wait, and they will remain. You can't solve them with NASA's budget. You can't solve them with money. People aren't poor because the US spends money on space. People aren't hungry because the US spends money on space. People don't kill one another because the US spends money on space. People don't lack health care because the US spends money on space.
Cultural issues lie at the heart of all of those--you can't fix them by dumping a few billion dollars into them, or they'd be long-solved. It's culture and philosophy
PHJF wants to say Neil deGrasse Tyson thinks we should solve Earth-problems first, but maybe he should read this.
You write that space exploration is a "necessity." Why do you think others don't agree?
NdGT: I don't think they've thought it through. Most people who don't agree say, "We have problems here on Earth. Let's focus on them." Well, we are focusing on them. The budget of social programs in the federal tax base is 50 times greater for social programs than it is for NASA. We're already focused in ways that many people who are NASA naysayers would rather it become. NASA is getting half a penny on a dollar -- I'm saying let's double it. A penny on a dollar would be enough to have a real Mars mission in the near future. I'll confess that it's hard to make the case for manned space in a sense of guaranteed returns--that's why it's government research and not corporations. The work done for the last fifty years is what is now letting private enterprises get into the game, though. It's that kind of research-for-its-own-sake that corporations won't/can't afford do anymore and that drives technological advances.
Basic science-wise: You can do things with manned missions that you can't with unmanned missions. A couple of people on Mars could do in a day what'll take Curiosity ten years.
Spin-off technology: Necessity is the mother of invention. This is an unknown, but like any other never-attempted science mega-project manned exploration always requires refining tools and techniques, developing new technologies, etc, like linked above.
Resources: We're not yet where it would be cost-effective to mine asteroids, in that it's currently expensive to fetch them and stuff on Earth is cheap. Both of these will change. The latter will happen on its own, and the former is what continuing to explore will fix, as we figure out better ways to do it.
Inspiration: NASA was once and could be again the US's (and science's) halo car. NdGt likes to make this point. The Apollo program inspired a generation of engineers and scientists.
Survival: The lack of a space program will kill the species eventually, if nothing else gets their first. It could be tomorrow, or it could be in a million years, but it'll happen. I'd put money on an extinction-level asteroid impact happening faster than a solution to poverty and unhappiness. And it's not necessarily the all-the-eggs-in-one-basket argument. Detection/deflection/destruction/WHATEVER all depend on us being good at space shit.
And on and on and on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Dec 2, 2012, 21:31 |
mag |
|
|
Mr. Tact wrote on Dec 2, 2012, 21:09: I have the same schedule now. I'm usually at work between 6:15 and 6:45, I usually lunch at 11, leave work between 3 and 4, and eat supper at 5. Got used to eating lunch at 11, when I was in the military, just easier to be first in line at the mess hall. That was reinforced when I got out and worked on/near the University campus of the town I still live in. Then you wanted to be in the food establishment before the students got out of their 10-11 class. Otherwise it was often a long wait... Behold! The idea behind late suppers! You don't have to get to work at 6am. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 17. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Nov 15, 2012, 17:56 |
mag |
|
|
Jivaro wrote on Nov 15, 2012, 15:15: My picks: Miami, Atl, Tamba Bay, Dallas, Green Bay, Houston, Cincy, St Louis, New Orleans, Denver, New England, Baltimore, SF.
Upset of the week: Philly over Washington. Washington is terrible at home so far, and Philly is having that kind of season where a rookie quarterback that has no business even taking snaps is going to win a ball game he shouldn't win (mainly because the Skins defense is so injured) and create a quarterback controversy right when Vick and Reid need that not to happen. Not saying they don't want to win...but everyone knows what the fans and the press in that town are going to be screaming for if that rookie wins while Vick is out. They are going to want Vick to stay out... I'm inclined to agree with you. I think this is going to be the week for the Eagles and the Jets, but I'm not ballsy enough to actually pick them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 7. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Nov 15, 2012, 11:39 |
mag |
|
|
I feel like the Bills have a shot tonight, but I'm going to go along with everyone else and say the Dolphins.
So. Dolphins, Packers, Falcons, Bucs, Cowboys, Redskins, Rams, Bengals, Texans, Saints, Broncos, Colts, Ravens, 49ers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Sunday Tech Bits |
 |
| 12. |
Re: Sunday Tech Bits |
Nov 12, 2012, 00:21 |
mag |
|
|
Narf2029 wrote on Nov 11, 2012, 23:28: I decided Win 8 was a failure once I started seeing the upgrade packs at a lower price than student editions of Win 7. I think the local Micro Center is selling Win 8 upgrade packs for like $40. If they get any cheaper they might as well give them away. That was the launch price, not a price cut due to poor sales. Preemptively priced, expecting poor sales, maybe. But, not indicative of actual sales. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 18. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Nov 11, 2012, 23:59 |
mag |
|
|
xXBatmanXx wrote on Nov 11, 2012, 23:01: You know what you, me, and Obama all have in common? None of us were born in Hawaii.... Whoooooa. Really? REALLY? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| News Comments > Out of the Blue |
 |
| 8. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Nov 11, 2012, 19:55 |
mag |
|
|
xXBatmanXx wrote on Nov 11, 2012, 19:31: Anyone else confused as to why a CIA director would step down for infidelity but a past president did not? I smell bs from this newly re-elected scam. Our unfaithful CIA director has at least enough integrity to admit it and step down rather than drag his family into more shit? OBAMA YOU MONSTER! >:|
Edit: My first thought was that he delayed his resignation until after the election to avoid impacting it, though.
This comment was edited on Nov 11, 2012, 20:47. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1923 Comments. 97 pages. Viewing page 15.
< Newer [ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ] Older > |
|