Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Wakka Wakka!

Real Name Wakka Wakka!   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname mag
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Oct 24, 2002, 15:22
Total Comments 2291 (Senior)
User ID 14905
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ] Older >


News Comments > Out of the Blue
15. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 12, 2013, 19:25 mag
 
Creston wrote on Nov 12, 2013, 12:15:
7-7 on my picks. FUCK YOU TAMPA BAY AND JACKSONVILLE. FUCK YOU BOTH IN THE ASS WITH A FUCKING PITCHFORK. Both of you pick this week to stop being a walking shitshow and win a game? FUCK YOU.

Anyway, for the second time this year, I've got the honor of being the Biggest Drop! WOOT! ... Sigh

Again, I'd feel bad if I spent more than 10 seconds picking these things.

Chiefs vs Broncos this weekend. You'd expect a good game, but I think it's going to be a terrible grindfest to watch.


I'm kinda anticipating that Peyton's not going to finish the game. His ankles are bad, and the Chefs lead in sacks. I'm wanting the Broncos to go all the way this year, so I hope I'm wrong, but...
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
10. Re: Leaked Climate Change Report Predicts Violent, Poorer, Sicker Future. Nov 4, 2013, 23:36 mag
 
RollinThundr wrote on Nov 4, 2013, 20:40:
mag wrote on Nov 4, 2013, 13:19:
RollinThundr wrote on Nov 4, 2013, 11:34:
Quick get those carbon taxes written into law! Man made my ass, let's ignore the history of naturally occurring warming and cooling cycles all throughout what we know of Earth's history. Must be man made! And we can fight it if you pay more taxes!

Why do you believe that scientists would be ignorant of historical cycles or would not be accounting for them in their models?

Look, there's no doubt us humans contribute to it, but not on the scale they want you to believe.

Okay. But on what relative scale, then? Do you have a reference? Who are they, and how do they benefit by being disingenuous?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
3. Re: Leaked Climate Change Report Predicts Violent, Poorer, Sicker Future. Nov 4, 2013, 13:19 mag
 
RollinThundr wrote on Nov 4, 2013, 11:34:
Quick get those carbon taxes written into law! Man made my ass, let's ignore the history of naturally occurring warming and cooling cycles all throughout what we know of Earth's history. Must be man made! And we can fight it if you pay more taxes!

Why do you believe that scientists would be ignorant of historical cycles or would not be accounting for them in their models?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Tech Bits
22. Re: Morning Tech Bits Nov 1, 2013, 14:27 mag
 
Kitkoan wrote on Nov 1, 2013, 11:31:
Verno wrote on Nov 1, 2013, 09:40:
In the end people only want TVs as thin and as cheap as possible

Its not always for those reasons.

My friends and I wouldn't buy a plasma tv because of issues with screen burn. Two of my friends both bought these big, beautiful plasma tv's and were told that the old problems of screen burn had been fixed. And after playing some racing game for an hour... you could still see the speedometer. Screen burn was still a huge issue. Though now it has a "remove screen burn" function that would work... if you left it running for an hour+ on that function. Harder on the electric bill.

In the end, they both returned their tvs and demanded LCD. A lot of us had been waiting a plasma tv because they looked gorgeous but those screen burning issues just killed any desire.

I have a big beautiful plasma screen from Panasonic and I might have a minute of image retention after gaming for a couple hours. Goes away almost immediately when I start doing something else. Or for really bad cases, just a few minutes of the white scrolling bar.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Consolidation
9. Re: Evening Consolidation Nov 1, 2013, 02:02 mag
 
Creston wrote on Nov 1, 2013, 01:37:
Oh, okay. At least that's better. That Kinect tank thing would be similar to microsoft just coming over and shitting on your porch.

The tank game was the... baffling sequel to Steel Battalion.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 Trailer
5. Re: Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 Trailer Nov 1, 2013, 00:33 mag
 
Taskeen wrote on Oct 31, 2013, 21:45:
Hmm, the first one is on sale on Steam.

Don't do it! It's awful!

Edit:

I should qualify my statement. It's a terrible Castlevania (in that it has absolutely nothing in common except the name) game. It is maybe an okay DmC clone, if that's your sort of thing.

I'm not a fan of being locked in a tiny arena, with an uncontrollable camera that can only point one direction, killing the same four guys over and over again for fifteen minutes (filled with QTEs!) before being shunted off to the next tiny arena to repeat the process. Over and over and over.

Even the music is entirely forgettable, which is awful for a series known for having fantastic soundtracks. Generic, uninspired, orchestral blugh.

This comment was edited on Nov 1, 2013, 01:48.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 Trailer
1. Re: Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 Trailer Oct 31, 2013, 20:18 mag
 
Lords of Shadow was so disappointing that I have to voice my displeasure in every related thread.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Tech Bits
5. Re: Evening Tech Bits Oct 29, 2013, 00:14 mag
 
Rabble rabble. Nevermind.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sunday Consolidation
20. Re: Sunday Consolidation Oct 27, 2013, 23:20 mag
 
xXBatmanXx wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 22:44:
Fantaz wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 13:55:
Grumpy Sod wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 13:52:
... 'we cannot, no matter how hard we try, get anything to run at 1080p. we've been told we have to, with the current memory holding it back, but it's just not going to happen, it's pretty miserable'. ...

if PS4 does 4K but Xbox One can't even do 1080p then I don't think the Xbone will last a full console cycle...

So it will display worse than xbox 360? Although it is upscaling, it is going to be a step backward!? Good job *slow clap*

BUT BUT BUT THIS IS THE NEXT GENERATION! It will be better than everything (except a pc built 4 years ago)

Not sure what you're saying. Neither the 360 nor PS3 can do 1080p either, except in very few, very limited cases. Halo 3 and the CoD games are 540p on the 360, aren't they?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sunday Metaverse
6. Re: Sunday Metaverse Oct 27, 2013, 19:04 mag
 
PHJF wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 17:38:
You forgot the part about it including 20-25mbps internet service, numbskull.

And on-demand, and broadcast TV.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Into the Black
2. Re: Into the Black Oct 26, 2013, 03:19 mag
 
Sepharo wrote on Oct 26, 2013, 01:01:
Hilarious...

If I want to use HD on Amazon Prime Instant Video I have to leave my TV on because my desktop display is not HDCP compliant but my secondary display the TV I hardly use is. Weirdly enough I prefer watching movies and TV at my desk. If I turn the TV off the Amazon player will detect and immediately switch back to SD only.

I try to go legit with my media and all they want to do is figure out ways to fuck me over and make piracy still the better product.

edit: Hahah and if I try to watch it on my TV display I need to leave my non-HDCP desktop display on or else it reverts... Basically both have to be on for me to have HD content. That is against their own idiotic rules, a pop-up came up saying all displays need to be HDCP, except my only working configuration is one HDCP and one non-HDCP.

edit2: Okay I figured it all out... Apparently both my displays are HDCP compliant but if I have them both hooked up they need both be powered on. If I physically unhook one or the other Prime will let me play HD on either.

Desktop and TV cabled and both powered = HDCP
Desktop and TV cabled only one powered = No HDCP
Only Desktop cabled and powered = HDCP
Only TV cabled and powered = HDCP

Huh. What a bunch of crap. That must be brand new--I'd never had that problem before trying today. My PC monitor isn't HDCP compliant.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
13. Re: Evening Metaverse Oct 24, 2013, 22:26 mag
 
Beamer wrote on Oct 24, 2013, 13:13:
mag wrote on Oct 23, 2013, 23:16:
Axis wrote on Oct 23, 2013, 00:06:
Prime recently changed to need $25 bucks worth, but its a change that made good sense I'm actually glad they did it.

Hm? Prime still gives me free 2-day shipping on everything.

It isn't "everything." It's everything Amazon would normally carry.
There are add-on items, like a $1.99 box of pencils, that Amazon wouldn't sell otherwise. They created the entire "add-on" program for that reason. Just little things that are entirely uneconomical to sell online.

Want pencils? Either buy a carton, or buy something else and throw a smaller box in.

Everything with a Prime logo next to it. Which is exactly the same as it's been for years.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc., etc.
2. Re: etc., etc. Oct 24, 2013, 22:25 mag
 
I loved BF1942, and I loved BF2--except that punkbuster kicks me every time I load it.

I found BF3 kind of unplayable, though. I'm not colorblind, but I found it essentially impossible to distinguish characters from background. Depth of field, motion blur, the blue/green/yellow filter they apply to everything. Whatever it was, I couldn't see shit.

Kinda killed any desire to play BF4, which is a damn shame.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
10. Re: Evening Metaverse Oct 23, 2013, 23:16 mag
 
Axis wrote on Oct 23, 2013, 00:06:
Prime recently changed to need $25 bucks worth, but its a change that made good sense I'm actually glad they did it.

Hm? Prime still gives me free 2-day shipping on everything.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
29. Re: Out of the Blue Oct 21, 2013, 02:27 mag
 
dj LiTh wrote on Oct 21, 2013, 01:32:
mag wrote on Oct 21, 2013, 01:06:
dj LiTh wrote on Oct 21, 2013, 00:38:
Oh man! What a Colts game! I called that one on beattheinsiders but went 8-6 overall. Its a scary thing to be rooting against Peyton with 2m to go even with the lead.

I picked the Broncos, but this one felt like it had Upset written all over it. I expected it to be a case of just being out-played--the Broncos were looking kinda tired.

Colts didn't win this one, though. The Broncos players were either acting like middle schoolers, or the refs just really had it in for them. SO MANY penalties. And the pass interference calls were silly when the Colts were draping themselves all over the Broncos for the whole game.

...also there was what's-his-name dropping the ball every time he touched it...

There were some questionable calls, but thats true for every nfl football game. As for Colts not winning, i'm going to have to respectfully disagree. Anyways, i'm just glad it was a good game.

You're right, that was too strong. Luck had a great game, and they crushed the Broncos running game except for like one play. I just couldn't believe how many opportunities they threw away on dumb-dumb-dumb-ultra-dumb penalties.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
27. Re: Out of the Blue Oct 21, 2013, 01:06 mag
 
dj LiTh wrote on Oct 21, 2013, 00:38:
Oh man! What a Colts game! I called that one on beattheinsiders but went 8-6 overall. Its a scary thing to be rooting against Peyton with 2m to go even with the lead.

I picked the Broncos, but this one felt like it had Upset written all over it. I expected it to be a case of just being out-played--the Broncos were looking kinda tired.

Colts didn't win this one, though. The Broncos players were either acting like middle schoolers, or the refs just really had it in for them. SO MANY penalties. And the pass interference calls were silly when the Colts were draping themselves all over the Broncos for the whole game.

...also there was what's-his-name dropping the ball every time he touched it...
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
3. Re: Out of the Blue Oct 20, 2013, 16:32 mag
 
I picked the Pats, but hahahahaha, hilarious. Pouty Brady face. >:|  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Into the Black
6. Re: Into the Black Oct 19, 2013, 02:19 mag
 
Cutter wrote on Oct 19, 2013, 00:04:
I too picked the Giants because they can't go 0-7 can they? Cereal? I mean the law of freakin averages says they're past due for a win at this point. Then again I picked the Cards because I though they were close to the Seahawks and homefield advantage would nudge them by. So maybe the Giants can go winless this season!


Yeah, I really don't know. I mean, Eli's been a champ this year. He goes out there and sucks as hard as he can every week, and he's doing a damn fine job of it. But if we look at the last few years, occasionally he fails to suck in a pretty spectacular way, and I'm worried that he's just not going to be able to suck as bad as the Vikes this week.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Terra Ex Kickstarter
13. Re: Terra Ex Kickstarter Oct 17, 2013, 18:13 mag
 
Christ you people are hypercritical pedants.

This is for everyone in this thread.

http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=3146#comic
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Mobilization
9. Re: Evening Mobilization Oct 17, 2013, 04:01 mag
 
nin wrote on Oct 16, 2013, 20:58:
Tom wrote on Oct 16, 2013, 20:57:
...except it's not even cheap...

They're $50.


They are $500.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
2291 Comments. 115 pages. Viewing page 11.
< Newer [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ] Older >


footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo